OGISD Board of Trustees September 19, 2011 Orange Grove Elementary 2010-11 Accountability Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AYP Changes for 2007 K-20 Videoconference June 11, 2007 Presented by: JoLynn Berge OSPI Federal Policy Coordinator.
Advertisements

Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
1 TETN Accountability Update Session April 23, 2009.
1 TETN Accountability Update Session State Accountability Update February 18, 2010.
Special Education Assessments TETN January 5, 2011 State and Federal Accountability Systems Update Shannon Housson Ester Regalado TEA Performance Reporting.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Special Education TETN January 6, 2010 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
Legislative Requirements for State Accountability – 2013 and Beyond Accountability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC) and Accountability Technical Advisory.
TETN Accountability Update Session June 18, 2009.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
State Accountability System Update Special Education TETN January 6, 2010 Shannon Housson TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2013 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.
Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Miami ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
History of State Accountability Accountability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC) and Accountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC)| March.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Accountability 101. State Accountability Federal Accountability # Students Met Standard # Students Tested If the Standard is not met: Apply Required.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Region 7 September 16, Region 7 State TEKS PD June 1 to August 31, 2010 Copyright 2009 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Accountability State and Federal Ratings August 11, 2009 Board Presentation 1.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
RECOGNIZED 2009 Accountability Rating. Basic Indicators EXEMPLARY: for every subject, at least 90% of the tested students pass the test RECOGNIZED**:
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
AYP vs. AEIS Talking Carroll Elementary October 5, 2010.
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Public Hearing & Presentation of MISD Annual Accountability Report 2009 MILLSAP ISD Prepared by Lois Johnson in compliance with Texas Education Code
Sample ISD District Overview Name Position. What makes Sample ISD unique? Mission Statement Vision Statement Unique Programs.
10/19/2015 Academic Excellence Indicator System Woden ISD.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
Understanding the Texas Accountability System. – 1979 Texas Assessment of Basic Skills (TABS) – 1985 Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills (TEAMS)
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
Draft...proposals may change1 Proposed Changes to the Texas Accountability System Adapted from “Accountability System for 2006 and Beyond- Standard Procedures”
– 2008 Analysis of TAKS Results Data by Student Groups.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
2012 Adequate Yearly Progress Preliminary Answers & other Important Information…
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
State Accountability Update
Changes Ahead: Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Texas State Accountability
MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?.
Presentation transcript:

OGISD Board of Trustees September 19, 2011 Orange Grove Elementary Accountability Report

State Accountability System Subjects Measured by TAKS test Reading, Math Student Groups Measured All Students, Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantaged Also Measures Commended Performance Rates, and English Language Learner (ELL) Progress Measure

State Accountability System Exemplary 90% Passing Rate for Each Student Group 25% or Higher Commended Performance Rate Recognized 80% Passing Rate for Each Student Group 15% or Higher Commended Performance Rate Academically Acceptable 70% Passing Rate for Each Student Group in Reading, Writing, Social Studies 65% Passing Rate in Math for Each Student Group 60% Passing Rate in Science for Each Student Group Unacceptable: any score below Acceptable cutoff

Major Changes To The State Accountability System The State of Texas Accountability System had major changes for the school year Discontinued the use of the Texas Projection Measure (TPM) Added a standard for Commended Performance 15% or higher for Recognized 25% or higher for Exemplary Included the scores of all special education students including students who took the TAKS Modified and the TAKS Alternate Assessments Added a standard for English Language Learners (ELLs) 60% or higher of ELLs must either progress one level on their Texas English Language Proficiency System (TELPAS) rating Pass the reading/ELA TAKS test Meet the standard on the TELPAS reading section The state has been in the process of increasing the rigor of the TAKS tests over the past few years

Definition of Terms Commended Performance Rate of students who score at the commended performance level for each subject area and in the All Students and Economically Disadvantaged student groups 15% or higher for Recognized 25% or higher for Exemplary English Language Learner Progress Measure Combines results from TAKS reading/ELA and Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS) Met the passing standard on TAKS reading/ELA test, or Met their proficiency level on TELPAS reading test, or Showed progress on TELPAS reading from the prior year 60% or higher must meet standard These two indicators are new for the school year

Campus TAKS Reading/ELA CampusAreaGroup Elementary Reading/ELAAll Students 94% 95%93%94% Elementary Reading/ELAHispanic 92% 90%92% Elementary Reading/ELAWhite 93%96%98%97% Elementary Reading/ELAEcon. Disadvantaged 90%86%87%90%93%

TAKS Math Data CampusAreaGroup Elementary MathAll Students 92%85%87%91%87% Elementary MathHispanic 91%84%82%88%80% Elementary MathWhite 93%88%94%95%97% Elementary MathEcon. Disadvantaged 90%85% 80%84%

State Accountability: Campus Summary Using Absolute Standards Exemplary:Reading Recognized:Math Exemplary: Commended Performance Rate Reading Recognized: Commended Performance Rate Math Recognized Campus Rating:Recognized

Federal Accountability System: AYP Adequate Yearly Progress AYP measures Reading and Math, using TAKS scores All Students, African American, Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantaged, and Special Education Two Ratings Met AYP: 80% each group Reading; 75% each group Math Missed AYP: any score by any group below 80% or 75% Elementary Rating: Met AYP Reading—93%(Special Education – 64%) Math—87%(Special Education – 36%)

Now What? The Campus Improvement Plan will address State Accountability: Math Special Education Change to the STAAR assessment Federal Accountability: Special Education in Reading & Math Access to the Regular Curriculum through Inclusion Reducing the number of students who take STAAR Modified

Campus Goals The District and each Campus will attain and maintain Exemplar rating As a Campus, we did not maintain Exemplary status. We are at Exemplary levels with our scores in the area of Reading. We are at Recognized levels with our scores in the area of Math and special education performance The accountability system changed from last year to this year Texas Projection Measure (TPM) was discontinued All special education students scores (including the TAKS Modified and TAKS Alternate) were included Commended Performance standards English Language Learner (ELL) Progress standards Our commitment is to continue to increase our percent passing and our advanced academic performance percentages as we move into the era of STAAR assessments