PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN UPDATE PROPOSALS COMMITTEE UPDATE MAY 2008

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Entry to Student Outcomes (ESO). Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Orientation to EVALUATION PROCEDURES August, 2006.
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Performance Appraisal Systems
Evaluation Orientation Meeting Teacher Evaluation System
February 29,  Name  Regional Rep & Location or Planning Committee  Organization.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
World’s Largest Educational Community
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Peninsula School District
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
Today’s website:
PAS…. The Second Observation Cycle Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the remaining two Observation Cycles for.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Teacher Evaluation Patrick Burk, Ph.D. Graduate School of Education Educational Leadership.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
LOGO Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Conferencing and Feedback.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Professional Performance Process OPD 864 – Writing the Mid-Year and Summative Evaluation Report Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
TEM 4.0 For School Librarians Laurie Butler, Library Services Advisor 2014.
Texas Educator Evaluation & Support System Systems US Department of Education NCLB Waiver-Fall 2013 Condition of Waiver to develop new Texas evaluation.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
 Nuts & Bolts 2015/16 PAS…. Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the First Observation Cycle Review and Approve.
Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Professional Growth Plan Committee Information Session January, 2008 Expectations for Classroom Observations by School Leaders.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Collaborative Action Research Option: Staff Development.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
KPBSD Effective Instruction Evaluation Committee LaDawn Druce Marina Bosick Daniel Olson Margaret Griffen Troy Minogue Juliana DeBoard Megan.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
APS Teacher Evaluation System Preparing for Implementation May 2012.
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
By: Alice Tackett and Jill Maynard
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Teacher Evaluation Process
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Teacher Evaluation Training
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
State Board of Education Progress Update
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Using data for instructional decision-making
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN UPDATE PROPOSALS COMMITTEE UPDATE MAY

UPDATE ON THE PQR Alignment to the Mission, Beliefs, and Division Plan Alignment to the Instructional Framework 21st Century Skills Diversity Rigor/ High Expectations Assessment

Classroom Observations Reaffirmed the use of the Santa Cruz model of encouraging reflective practice Reaffirm the concept of a “modified clinical cycle” model for classroom observations. Reaffirmed the importance of walk-through observations as supplement to and not replacement of the observation cycle.

Proposed Classroom Observations Cycle Probationary teachers will be observed three times each year. The observations must be done in a modified clinical cycle with pre- conferences focused on the PQR. Observations must be complete by February 15.

Classroom Observation Cycle Continued….. Continuing Contract Teachers will be observed every two years. The observations will be done in a modified clinical cycle with pre-conference focused on the PQR. There will be at least two observations in the cycle. A principal may place a continuing contract teacher on cycle anytime there is a need.

Additional Observations Peer Observations will be offered for those wishing to have additional feedback Training will be offered for peer teams in how to conduct a peer clinical cycle.

The Professional Growth Plan Document Discussion Points: It has lost its meaning The CSIP has taken on a larger role Teachers can only be expected to do so much Professional development has shifted from individual growth to collaborative team growth.

Options for the PGP 1.The PGP document focuses only on the school improvement plan 2.The PGP has a school goal, a technology goal, and a personal goal. 3. The PGP is strictly for personal goal.

Transition Discussion…. Why do we have to have the PGP at all? Can’t we build other process and forms built around the PQR and the clinical cycle that can serve in it’s place?

PROPOSAL 1. Teachers receive, review, sign PQR every year. 2. Teachers on observation cycle will have a planning conference with their supervisor and complete a planning conference form targeting areas of focus for the year. 3. Observation post-conference summary reports will serve as documentation of growth and performance based on pre- conference form.

Committee Recommendations Meets Policy 1. Code requires that all teachers be evaluated every year. Create an all purpose and simple evaluation form based on the PQR. 2. The all purpose form can be used to commend teachers for specific performance on the PQR at any time 3. The all purpose form can be used to notify a teachers when they have not met the expectation of a specific PQR 4. All teachers will receive a form at the mid-year and end of year.

Classroom Observation: Evaluation or Professional Growth? Developing a Community of Reflective Practitioners

Probationary Teachers Classroom Observation as Formative Evaluation: Consistent use of PQR to guide the focus of classroom observations Multiple observers to provide perspective and support. Implementation of “next steps” closely tied to mid-year and end of year evaluation.

Continuing Contract Teachers Classroom Observation as Professional Growth: Teacher identifies area of focus of the PQR One observer for the year to provide continual feedback on growth Observation reports and next steps not specifically tied to evaluation. Exception to this norm: Teachers who are NOT meeting the PQR.

Policy, Practice and Probationary Teachers 1. Probationary teachers will have two observations before December 15 with the second observation serving as a mid-year evaluation report submitted to HR along with the all purpose evaluation form. 2. Probationary teachers will have their third cycle observation between December 15 and February 15 with their observation report completed and submitted to HR. 3. The all purpose evaluation form will be submitted for probationary teachers at the end of the year documenting performance.

Policy, Practice and Continuing Contract Teachers 1. Continuing contract teachers “on observation cycle” will conference with supervisors to focus their professional growth- not as part of the evaluation document unless specifically stipulated by the supervisor. 2. All continuing contract teachers will receive the all purpose evaluation form at the mid-year and end of year documenting performance. 3. Any teacher not meeting or exceeding the PQR will have a conference with the supervisor in order to clearly understand of the expectation for improved performance.