Overlay Journal Infrastructure for Meteorological Science (OJIMS) Sam Pepler RIOJA, Monday July 7th, 2008 University of Cambridge, UK.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Engaging repository policy with preservation Steve Hitchcock and Neil Jefferies* Preserv 2 Project School of Electronics and Computer Science (ECS), Southampton.

Advertisements

Engaging repository policy with preservation Steve Hitchcock and Neil Jefferies* Preserv 2 Project School of Electronics and Computer Science (ECS), Southampton.

DRIVER Long Term Preservation for Enhanced Publications in the DRIVER Infrastructure 1 WePreserve Workshop, October 2008 Dale Peters, Scientific Technical.

Institutional Repositories and Self-Archiving Crisis? What Crisis? Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Repositories, Learned Societies and Research Funders Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.

Creating Institutional Repositories Stephen Pinfield.

Building Repositories of eprints in UK Research Universities Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Philip LordDigital Archiving Consultancy Alison Macdonald Digital Archiving Consultancy Liz LyonDigital Curation Centre David GiarettaDigital Curation.

A centre of expertise in data curation and preservation DCC/NeSC eScience Workshop, June 2008 Working in partnership with the eScience community This work.

28 March 2003e-MapScholar: content management system The e-MapScholar Content Management System (CMS) David Medyckyj-Scott Project Director.

Metadata workshop, June The Workshop Workshop Timetable introduction to the Go-Geo! project metadata overview Go-Geo! portal hands on session.

CLADDIER project fundamentals Citation, Location and Deposition in Discipline and Institutional Repositories Sam Pepler Project Manager BADC CLADDIER workshop,

Publishing Data Catherine Jones Library Systems Development Manager, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory CLADDIER workshop, Chilworth, Southampton, UK.

Data and Publication Discovery Brian Matthews, Information Management Group, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory CLADDIER workshop, Chilworth, Southampton,

The PREMIS Data Dictionary Michael Day Digital Curation Centre UKOLN, University of Bath JORUM, JISC and DCC.

UKOLN is supported by: Digital Repositories Roadmap: looking forward The JISC/CNI Meeting, July 2006 Rachel Heery Assistant Director R&D, UKOLN

UKOLN is supported by: Put functionality Augmenting interoperability across scholarly repositories 20/21 April 2006 Rachel Heery, UKOLN, University of.

UKOLN is supported by: JISC Information Environment update Repositories and Preservation Programme meeting, October 24-25, 2006 Rachel Heery UKOLN

DIGITAL POLICY MANAGEMENT IN THE DOM PROGRAMME Richard Masters Programme Manager Digital Object Management Programme Digital Policy Management Workshop.

OAI and Publishers metadata Using the static repositories approach to disclose small journals.

Digital Repositories: interoperability & common services Closing Remarks Dr Liz Lyon, UKOLN, University of Bath, UK

The Discovery Landscape in Crystallography UKOLN is supported by: Monica Duke UKOLN, University of Bath, UK – eBank UK project A centre.

A centre of expertise in data curation and preservation DigCCur2007 Symposium, Chapel Hill, N.C., April 18-20, 2007 Co-operation for digital preservation.

A centre of expertise in data curation and preservation DCC Workshop: Curating sApril 24 – 25, 2006 Funded by: This work is licensed under the Creative.

Managing your research data

Open access policies in Norway Frode Bakken Birzeit 26th of May 2009.

An Introduction to Repositories Thornton Staples Director of Community Strategy and Alliances Director of the Fedora Project.

Information Professionals and Learning Object Repositories … more than just metadata quality … Sarah Currier Stòr Cùram Project Librarian JISC X4L Repository.

Good practice in Research Data Management Module 5: Deposit and long-term preservation.

Role of librarians in the development of Institutional Repositories Susan Ashworth University of Glasgow.

Versioning Requirements and Proposed Solutions CM Jones, JE Brace, PL Cave & DR Puplett OR nd April

1 Archiving Workflow between a Local Repository and the National Library Archive Experiences from the DiVA Project Eva Müller, Peter Hansson, Uwe Klosa,

UKOLN is supported by: OAI-ORE a perspective on compound information objects ( Defining Image Access.

UKOLN is supported by: A non-technical introduction to: OAI-ORE ( Defining Image Access project meeting.

Depositing and Disseminating Digital Resources Alan Morrison Collections Manager AHDS Subject Centre for Literature, Linguistics and Languages.

1 Sharing Learning Objects in Health Care - 24 th March 2009www.jorum.ac.uk Repositories and communities: how Jorum can enhance sharing Nicola Siminson.

Institutional Repositories Tools for scholarship Mary Westell University of Calgary AMTEC Conference May 26, 2005.

Release 4 of the COUNTER Code of Practice for e- Resources and new usage- based measures of impact Peter Shepherd COUNTER May 2014.

Management, marketing and population of repositories Morag Greig, University of Glasgow.

Chinese-European Workshop on Digital Preservation, Beijing July 14 – Network of Expertise in Digital Preservation 1 Trusted Digital Repositories,

5-7 November 2014 DR Workflow Practical Digital Content Management from Digital Libraries & Archives Perspective.

Catherine C. Marshall Akshay Kulkarni.  Explores practices associated with ◦ Collaborative Authoring ◦ Reference Use ◦ Informal Creation of Personal.

ECHO DEPository Project: Highlight on tools & emerging issues The ECHO DEPository Project is a 3-year digital preservation research and development project.

Software Sustainability Institute Dealing with software: the research data issues 26 August.

VO Sandpit, November 2009 Environmental Data Archival: Practices and Benefits crib sheet Graham Parton With many thanks to Dr.

Sarah Callaghan 1, Fiona Hewer 2, Sam Pepler 1, Paul Hardaker 3 and Alan Gadian 4 1 NCAS-BADC; 2 Fiona’s Red Kite; 3 Royal Meteorological Society; 4 NCAS-Weather.

UCL LIBRARY SERVICES Repository Interface for Overlaid Journal Archives (RIOJA) : an overview of work in progress Panayiota Polydoratou Martin Moyle

DAEDALUS Project: Building Institutional Repositories for Glasgow William J Nixon Service Development Morag Mackie Advocacy.

Scientific Data and Electronic Publishing Renze Brandsma, Head, Digital Production Centre University of Amsterdam Maarten Hoogerwerf, Project Manager,

Emerging Uses for the OpenURL Framework Ann Apps and Ross MacIntyre MIMAS, The University of Manchester.

Software Sustainability Institute Software Attribution can we improve the reusability and sustainability of scientific software?

Data Management in Scholarly Journals and possible Roles for Libraries – Some Insights from EDaWaX Sven Vlaeminck | Leibniz-Information Centre for Economics.

1 Metadata –Information about information – Different objects, different forms – e.g. Library catalogue record Property:Value: Author Ian Beardwell Publisher.

Cross-linking and Referencing Data and Publications in CLADDIER Brian Matthews, E-Science Centre, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.

Selection Strategies for Digital Institutional Repositories Kent Woynowski 30 September 2004.

Open Archive Initiative – Protocol for metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) Surinder Kumar Technical Director NIC, New Delhi

Warwick Cathro Assistant Director-General Resource Sharing and Innovation National Library of Australia Trove – a service built on collaboration OCLC Asia.

A centre of expertise in digital information management Content Packaging for Complex Objects Technical Workshop: Introduction.

Sarah Callaghan 1, Gerry Devine 2, Eric Guilyardi 3, Bryan Lawrence 1, Charlotte Pascoe 1, Lois Steenman-Clark 2 and the Metafor Project Team 1 NCAS-BADC;

Collection Description considerations in the nof-digitise programme Sarah Mitchell Programme Manager New Opportunities Fund.

Metadata & Repositories Jackie Knowles RSP Support Officer.

Discover ScholarSphere A repository service collaboration between the University Libraries and ITS.

EPSRC research data expectations and research software management

Moving on : Repository Services after the RAE

Building A Repository for Digital Objects

Linking persistent identifiers at the British Library

VI-SEEM Data Repository

Data Management: Documentation & Metadata

Institutional Repositories

Data + Research Elements What Publishers Can Do (and Are Doing) to Facilitate Data Integration and Attribution David Parsons – Lawrence, KS, 13th February.

Presentation transcript:

Overlay Journal Infrastructure for Meteorological Science (OJIMS) Sam Pepler RIOJA, Monday July 7th, 2008 University of Cambridge, UK

Outline The OJIMS project, Aims and Who’s involved Data Journal MetRep – A subject based repository for Meteorological science. Proposed overlay mechanisms

Outline The OJIMS project, Aims and Who’s involved Data Journal MetRep – A subject based repository for Meteorological science. Proposed overlay mechanisms

The OJIMS project Overlay Journal Infrastructure for Meteorological Science JISC and NERC funded. The project has three main aims:  Creation of overlay journal mechanics.  Construction and evaluate business models for potential overlay journals.  Creation of an open access subject based repository for Meteorology and atmospheric sciences.

Who’s involved The University of Leeds, who will development a dataset review policy with RMetS on behalf of the NCAS universities. Leeds is the NCAS lead university. The British Atmospheric Data Centre, who will setup and maintain a document repository. BADC is part of NCAS. The Royal Meteorological Society who will examine sustainable delivery models

Outline The OJIMS project, Aims and Who’s involved Data Journal MetRep – A subject based repository for Meteorological science. Proposed overlay mechanisms

CLADDIER: Published means available and some form of independent review.

What are the benefits of a data journal? Extend the value of peer-review from papers to data, to provide assurance that data documentation meets the necessary scientific standards.  Metadata standards  Independently understandable  Re-useable Provide an overview of the quality and applications of data, enabling it to be used more easily and appropriately in research and applications.  Adding independent quality statements about usefulness. Provide recognition for the work of collecting and describing data.  High quality, reusable data is not presently a citable resource  The writers of papers are not necessarily the data creators Raise awareness of the meteorological datasets available to UK and international community.  Discovery of data via citation

Why make an overlay journal? Because the data are already in a repository – The data is already available, it just needs some independent review. Because data is bulky, compound and complex – not easy to copy.

Outline The OJIMS project, Aims and Who’s involved Data Journal MetRep – A subject based repository for Meteorological science. Proposed overlay mechanisms

MetRep Filling a gap in the market. There is no store for some of the items we would like in the data journal. Gray document repository What's the selection policy:  Most types for item  Items must be relevant to Meteorological Science  Any author (not an institutional repository)

Examples of MetRep items  A paper from Weather  A set of pictures illustrating cloud forms  A report documenting a file format for climate models  Weather balloon data  A recording of a interview with ministers about climate change  The IPCC reports  The logo for a research programme

Could we use existing repositories?  A paper from Weather – NORA, IR?  A set of pictures illustrating cloud forms – JORUM  A report documenting a file format for climate models – BADC, RoRRI?  Weather balloon data – BADC  A recording of a interview with ministers about climate change – RMetS website  The IPCC reports – Website, IR?  The logo for a research programme – programme website.

Existing repositories – Could we use them? Institutional repositories  NORA  university IR Object type repositories  Arxiv  NORA  BADC Subject repositories  Arxiv  BADC

MetRep as an overlay repository Shouldn't data be in the BADC and MetRep? Shouldn’t a paper be in NORA and MetRep? What we mean by being in the repository is that the item has been submitted, been found to be in scope and will be stored. If we separate the submission and content review from the storage function then we have an overlay repository.

Outline The OJIMS project, Aims and Who’s involved Data Journal MetRep – A subject based repository for Meteorological science. Proposed overlay mechanisms

Overlay documents Document, dataset or other item. Reference- able via a resolvable id in a trusted repository. Overlay document Metadata about the overlay document Reference to document Discovery metadata for the referenced document Review process information

Version of document in review cycle  Submitted by author  Sent for review  Published Public comments Description of review process Digital signatures?

Metadata about the overlay document Author (of overlay not the referenced document) Other Dublin core fields

Discovery metadata for the referenced document and Reference to document Dublin Core metadata harvested from document Resolvable reference to document Other identifiers for document

Data repositoryDocument repository Repository Overlay repository Overlay document

Advantages of this approach Its clear that this is a document about another document. The two items are distinct self contained. Authorship for the referenced and referencing document are allowed to be different. Others can submit a document for review. The Overlay document has the same meaning as a stand alone item. You can take the out of the its repository context and its still meaningful. Review mechanisms and repositories do not need adapting to deal with these items. You can review a private document/data set. Answers the “is thing worth buying?” question.

Disadvantages of this approach Authentication issues. What if the author does not wish for document to be reviewed

Implementation Atom XML representation Already a popular format with many tools. Need a tool to create the records Need a web rendering method

Atom Example Feed A subtitle. <link href=" T18:30:02Z John Doe urn:uuid:60a76c80-d399-11d9-b91C e0af T19:32:42Z Atom-Powered Robots Run Amok urn:uuid:1225c695-cfb8-4ebb-aaaa-80da344efa6a T18:30:02Z Some text. Overlay document Metadata about the overlay document Reference to document Discovery metadata for the referenced document Review process information

Trusting repositories More than resolvable identifiers. Need to believe the object is preserved. Need to know preservation means for complex objects. Repositories need to have sound footing (but there are not absolute guarantees).

Summary The OJIMS project is about widening review processes beyond papers. This means storing a wider range of objects – MetRep. Data is a good example of valued stuff which is not recognised in a formal manner – Hence, the data journal. Because lots of repositories are already storing the things we think are valuable, we are going to implement MetRep as an overlay repository. To reuse existing tools for repositories and journals we are going to use overlay documents. These will be based on atom documents. Need to trust repositories to make any overlay work.