1April, 22 2009UKNF09 - Lancaster1 MICE Beamline m. apollonio.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
F451 Discussions for Section II The Sieve and the Sand.
Advertisements

MA10209 – Week 8 Tutorial B3/B4, Andrew Kennedy. people.bath.ac.uk/aik22/ma10209 Top Tips (response to sheet 7) Be careful with calculations, this is.
MA10210: ALGEBRA 1B
ICANN MEETING NO. 38 | JUNE 2010 ALSes Survey Analysis Prelimenary results ALSes Survey June 2010.
1Copyright © 2011, Printer Working Group. All rights reserved. MPSA/PWG Power Management Survey Results for WIMS WG Session Printer Working Group Face-to-Face.
CS4026 Formal Models of Computation Part II The Logic Model Lecture 8 – Search and conclusions.
Computability Dr. Colin Campbell Course Element 2 (EMAT20531)
Turing Machines Part 1:. 2 Church-Turing Thesis Part 1 An effective procedure is defined as: a procedure which can be broken down into simple.
Recap 4. In antiseptic 3. In the oven 2. Glass bead steriliser 1. Under the hot water tap Q1. How should tweezers be sterilised before using on a client.
Algorithms for Geometric Covering and Piercing Problems Robert Fraser PhD defence Nov. 23, 2012.
Survey for Providers Received: 8- Cable companies 21- Telephone companies 37- Telecommunication companies 2- CLEC 14- Do not provide service in MI.
Survey of North West Charities BY IOFNW – JUNE 2014.
RM Quick Reminder Test. Q1: What is it called when ppts take part in either the experimental condition, or the control condition, but not both? A:
Design of Questionnaire for teachers FocusNo. of Qs (A) General Feedback 3Q12 Q8 Q13 (B) Teaching & Learning Style 2Q11 Q10 (C) Language Development 4141.
Concepts and Vocabulary
Quiz on weight and mass This quiz has 10 multiple choice questions Click on the answer box you think is correct BEWARE ! One mistake and you have to start.
AP Calculus BC Review for Quiz -Determining convergence of geometric series -Creating a power series -Finding a Taylor Series sum expression.
Geometry validation plots Stefania, April 2014 Stefania1.
Machine Physics at ISIS Proton Meeting 24 th March 11 Dean Adams (On behalf of ISIS Accelerator Groups)
Want to be a xxxxx? Welcome to College Name Click here to start.
Probability Models The Bernoulli Family. Bernoulli Trials Geometric Geom(p) Mean stdev How long till first success Binomial Bion(n, p) Mean Stdev r successes.
Antisocial Behaviour Customer Satisfaction Survey Results North Community Safety Team COMMUNITY SAFETY.
Setting Next Year’s Standard Cost David Jones. ` Budget Year N Std Cost Year N -ve variance vs.Std cost +ve variance vs.Std cost €10 €8 Budget Year N+1.
Cumulative Frequency (BCD). A B C D Q1. Find the median of the following set of numbers: 5, 3, 6, 9, 1, 5, 2, 3,
Item 3 Formula Review. Formula Review Consultation Simplification Mainstreaming grants Balance of SEN/AEN/Deprivation and impact of Pupil Premium.
Unit Test Practice Expressions & Equations Part 1 Unit Part 1 Unit.
Conversion Unit Q1: Write the fraction as a percent. 16/20 a) c) b)d) 64% 8% 80% 20%
The Within-Strip Discrete Unit Disk Cover Problem Bob Fraser (joint work with Alex López-Ortiz) University of Waterloo CCCG Aug. 8, 2012.
Greater Washington Board of Trade Sustainability Survey Released April 21, 2010.
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.
124/3/2010CM26 - Riverside1 m. apollonio ( ,P) matrix.
M.apollonioMICE Funding Agency Committee Meeting - RAL 18/4/ M. Apollonio – MICE Operations Manager University of Oxford MICE beam line commissioning.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 14 September, 2009.
Simulated real beam into simulated MICE1 Mark Rayner CM26.
M.apollonioImperial College - London1 M. Apollonio University of Oxford the MICE diffuser: issues and operation MICE beamline review Nov. 16 th 2007 Imperial.
Target/Beam Interaction M. Apollonio, A. Dobbs - IC 27/11/20081MICE Target Workshop - IC.
TJR 7/30/031 Geant4 Simulations of the MICE Beamline Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 7/30/03.
MICE Experiments Introduction Introduction Disclaimers Disclaimers Assumptions Assumptions Baseline programme Baseline programme Full programme Full programme.
1June 1 st 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 MICE Beamline m. apollonio.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
The MICE beam line status a)Muon BL: P=208 MeV/c, emi_N= 7 mm rad “... the mother of all the beamlines “ b)Proton BL: derived from (a) by rescaling magnet.
The MICE beam line status a)Muon BL: P=208 MeV/c, emi_N= 7 mm rad “... the mother of all the beamlines “ b)Proton BL: derived from (a) by rescaling magnet.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
(+) session, PAC09 Vancouver – TH6PFP056 Introduction The Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment (MICE, fig. 1c) at RAL[1]
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
M. apollonio MICE Beamline summary. - Beamline parallel session (June 1 st ): - envisaged goals (Alain) - assess readiness of the line magnet status (Ken)
Alain Blondel MICE VC 12 March 2009 Brief MICE news 1. Decay solenoid: operations will restart in early July. Criteria for acceptance have been specified.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
KEK beam test in May 2005 Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE Frascati June 27 th, 2005.
MICE Run Plan Sept/Oct 2009 m. apollonio – IC MACHINE PHYSICS USERs RUN NO SHIFT A B C D E.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
14/01/2008MICE CM23 - Beam Line Parallel Session1 Simulations: tools and status Marco Apollonio, Imperial College - London.
Target/Beam Interaction M. Apollonio, A. Dobbs - IC 27/11/20081MICE Target Workshop - IC.
1June 2 nd 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 m. apollonio Beamline+( ,P) matrix.
1 Updated Run Plans. K.Tilley, MICO, 07/02/08 - pre-commissioning - Target, - beamline functionality - detectors, particle production - decay solenoid.
1June 1 st 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 Beamline Optics m. apollonio.
(one of the) Request from MPB
M.apollonioNuFact??1 ABSTRACT In the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) at RAL, muons are pro­duced and transported in a dedicated beam line connecting.
Marco apollonioAnalysis Meeting (9/12/2006)1 transmission vs amplitude with a finite size diffuser M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Beam-Line Analysis m. apollonio 7/7/2010 CM27 - RAL 1.
MICE Beamline Status m. apollonio 17 December 2009 MICE VC
MICE Operations Scenario Run 1
A BeamLine update m. apollonio 7/7/2010 CM27 - RAL 1.
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Presentation transcript:

1April, UKNF09 - Lancaster1 MICE Beamline m. apollonio

2 BeamLines Availability April, UKNF09 - Lancaster Reference Beam Line – muon (e,P=207 MeV/c) Beamlines for initial/calibration studies: from (a) with local momentum rescaling of the magnets [ with / without solenoid ] (infact we used the one with no DKsol for the aformetntioned reasons) electron MeV/c)  used for TOF calibration pions 300 MeV/c)  1st muons seen protons MeV/c)  1st estimate of primary intensity

3 Target Studies April, UKNF09 - Lancaster 25 deg Q1 acceptance ORBIT simulation: Beam Loss in ISIS A. Dobbs  production in the first q-pole (G4Beamline)

4 TOF Analysis to determine Beam Parameters: -  x /  y -  mittance -  x /  y,  x /  y  see Mark’s Talk BeamLines Analysis April, UKNF09 - Lancaster

5 search for Q4-5-6 & Q7-8-9 currents to match optics at the u.s. face of the diffuser for every chosen  [3,6,10] mm rad (norm.) at every defined P = [140,200,240] (MeV/c) BeamLine Completion: tuning for all ( ,P) April, UKNF09 - Lancaster

6April, UKNF09 - Lancaster D1 D2 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9

7 OUTPUT u.s. of the diffuser INPUT: beamline u.s. Section Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q1 Q2 Q3 Sol Dipole1 Dipole2 alpha  0 alpha  a0 beta  b0 GA+Turtle Optimiser

8

9 TR ~ 3% BETA=0.78 m ALPHA=0.2

10 recalculated e=6mm rad, P=207 new tuning e=10 mm rad, P=207 investigate case e=3 mm rad P=207 (does not converge) PLAN: fix P=140/240 and cover the remaining empty elements ???

11 - so far beamline used for initial studies & calibrations - no solenoid  reduced amount of secondaries - studies to complete the (e,P) matrix (BL tuning for all possible configurations of MICE) -waiting for DKsol (1) and check predictions vs measurements (1) & tgt Summary

12