Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Target/Beam Interaction M. Apollonio, A. Dobbs - IC 27/11/20081MICE Target Workshop - IC.

Published by Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Target/Beam Interaction M. Apollonio, A. Dobbs - IC 27/11/20081MICE Target Workshop - IC."— Presentation transcript:

1 Target/Beam Interaction M. Apollonio, A. Dobbs - IC 27/11/20081MICE Target Workshop - IC

2 Motivations: optimise secondary production minimising dangerous losses in ISIS assess better orientation/shape of the shaft for secondary production a work at “four hands”: A. Dobbs, ORBIT simulation of ISIS ring / interaction with target / comparison with data taken from MICE shifts, MA, G4Beamline simulation of secondary production with a set of shafts 27/11/20082MICE Target Workshop - IC

3 ORBIT Results 27/11/20083MICE Target Workshop - IC A. Dobbs

4 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs4 - overview of results obtained from simulating beam loss in ISIS synchrotron - using code ORBIT - emphasis to loss caused by MICE target - results for 3 target orientations: long-thin short-fat tilted or parallel to the MICE beamline - 2 target sizes are used: 10mm x 1mm and 1mm x 1mm - dip depths ranging from 27mm to 24mm above beam axis are shown. 27/11/20084MICE Target Workshop - IC

5 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs5 Target Orientations (variable depths) “Short-Fat” – 1mm along z – axis, 10mm along x - axis “Long-Thin” – 10mm along z – axis, 1mm along x – axis (true orientation) “Reduced” – 1mm along z – axis, 1mm along x - axis 27/11/20085MICE Target Workshop - IC x y s

6 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs6 Model The MICE target is modelled as a block of iron inserted into the ISIS beam 2ms before extraction, sitting at a position of ~115m around the synchrotron ring. The target is also currently modelled as being static. Work is being done about the possibility of improving the model to make the target titanium and dynamic. 27/11/20086MICE Target Workshop - IC NB: ORBIT phys.models elastic/inelastic/nuclear

7 27/11/2008MICE Target Workshop - IC7 TGT

8 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs8 Results 2D histograms showing number of particles lost from the beam as a function of time in an ISIS spill and the position in the synchrotron in which they were lost. Further a table is also presented for each target configuration, showing the number of “hits” (intersections of the volume) in the MICE target, for the last 2ms of the ISIS spill The tables also give the number of particles “absorbed” by the target i.e. turned into lost particles by their interaction with the target. 27/11/20088MICE Target Workshop - IC

9 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs9 Injection losses MICE target losses Short-Fat: 27mm above axis, -1 to 10ms 27/11/20089MICE Target Workshop - IC zoom last 2 ms

10 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs10 Short-Fat: 27mm above axis, 8 to 10ms 27/11/200810MICE Target Workshop - IC

11 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs11 NameIndexPosition [m]# Hits# AbsorbedEfficiency Mice111100115.2251986140.00704935 Mice211110115.226000 Mice311120115.227000 Mice411130115.228000 Mice511140115.229000 Mice611150115.23000 Mice711160115.231000 Mice811170115.232000 Mice911180115.233000 Mice1011190115.234000 27/11/200811MICE Target Workshop - IC

12 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs12 Long-Thin: 27mm above axis, -1 to 10ms (NB: present config) 27/11/200812MICE Target Workshop - IC

13 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs13 Long-Thin: 27mm above axis, 8 to 10ms 27/11/200813MICE Target Workshop - IC

14 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs14 NameIndexPosition [m]# Hits# AbsorbedEfficiency Mice111100115.22561330.00489396 Mice211110115.22661500 Mice311120115.22761700 Mice411130115.22861700 Mice511140115.22961410.00162866 Mice611150115.2360900 Mice711160115.23160100 Mice811170115.23259210.00168919 Mice911180115.23358100 Mice1011190115.23456800 27/11/200814MICE Target Workshop - IC

15 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs15 Long-Thin: 26mm above axis, -1 to 10ms 27/11/200815MICE Target Workshop - IC

16 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs16 Long-Thin: 26mm above axis, 8 to 10ms 27/11/200816MICE Target Workshop - IC

17 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs17 NameIndexPosition [m]# Hits# AbsorbedEfficiency Mice111100115.225104560.00574163 Mice211110115.226104320.00191755 Mice311120115.227105100 Mice411130115.228104200 Mice511140115.229103800 Mice611150115.23102000 Mice711160115.231100300 Mice811170115.23299500 Mice911180115.23399000 Mice1011190115.23496610.0010352 27/11/200817MICE Target Workshop - IC

18 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs18 Long-Thin: 27mm above axis, 25 0 rotation, -1 to 10ms 27/11/200818MICE Target Workshop - IC

19 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs19 Long-Thin: 27mm above axis, 25 0 rotation, 8 to 10ms NB At present there remains an ambiguity in the direction of the rotation, clockwise or anti-clockwise. If / when this is resolved it will be published in an updated version of this document. 27/11/200819MICE Target Workshop - IC

20 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs20 NameIndexPosition [m]# Hits# AbsorbedEfficiency Mice111100115.22520500 Mice211110115.22620200 Mice311120115.22718110.00552486 Mice411130115.22819100 Mice511140115.22919710.00507614 Mice611150115.2321520.00930233 Mice711160115.23122710.00440529 Mice811170115.23221400 Mice911180115.23320300 Mice1011190115.234000 27/11/200820MICE Target Workshop - IC

21 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs21 Reduced: 27mm above axis, -1 to 10ms 27/11/200821MICE Target Workshop - IC

22 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs22 Reduced (1mm^2): 27mm above axis, 8 to 10ms 27/11/200822MICE Target Workshop - IC

23 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs23 NameIndexPosition [m]# Hits# AbsorbedEfficiency Mice111100115.225104460.00574713 Mice211110115.226000 Mice311120115.227000 Mice411130115.228000 Mice511140115.229000 Mice611150115.23000 Mice711160115.231000 Mice811170115.232000 Mice911180115.233000 Mice1011190115.234000 27/11/200823MICE Target Workshop - IC

24 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs24 Reduced: 26mm above axis, 8 to 10ms 27/11/200824MICE Target Workshop - IC

25 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs25 NameIndexPosition [m]# Hits# AbsorbedEfficiency Mice111100115.225162090.00555556 Mice211110115.226000 Mice311120115.227000 Mice411130115.228000 Mice511140115.229000 Mice611150115.23000 Mice711160115.231000 Mice811170115.232000 Mice911180115.233000 Mice1011190115.234000 27/11/200825MICE Target Workshop - IC

26 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs26 Reduced: 25mm above axis, 8 to 10ms 27/11/200826MICE Target Workshop - IC

27 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs27 NameIndexPosition [m]# Hits# AbsorbedEfficiency Mice111100115.2253286220.00669507 Mice211110115.226000 Mice311120115.227000 Mice411130115.228000 Mice511140115.229000 Mice611150115.23000 Mice711160115.231000 Mice811170115.232000 Mice911180115.233000 Mice1011190115.234000 27/11/200827MICE Target Workshop - IC

28 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs28 Reduced: 24mm above axis, 8 to 10ms 27/11/200828MICE Target Workshop - IC

29 25/11/08ORBIT Results, Adam Dobbs29 NameIndexPosition [m]# Hits#AbsorbedEfficiency Mice111100115.2256039380.00629243 Mice211110115.226000 Mice311120115.227000 Mice411130115.228000 Mice511140115.229000 Mice611150115.23000 Mice711160115.231000 Mice811170115.232000 Mice911180115.233000 Mice1011190115.234000 27/11/200829MICE Target Workshop - IC

30 Circular-solid 6mm radius: 27mm above axis, 8 to 10ms 27/11/200830MICE Target Workshop - IC

31 NameIndex Position [m] # Hits # Absorbe d Efficie ncy Mice111100115.2367150.01 Mice211110115.2382000 Mice311120115.2395310 Mice411130115.23101900 Mice511140115.23105820 Mice611150115.23106200 Mice711160115.23103600 Mice811170115.2398200 Mice911180115.2386300 Mice1011190115.2370600 27/11/200831MICE Target Workshop - IC

32 27/11/2008MICE Target Workshop - IC32 SUMMARY of the SUMMARIES ORBIT Results Summary TargetRunDepth above axis (mm)LP end of spillMICE Collimator HitsMICE Collimator Absorber% Efficiency Short Fat6.1274541986140.70493454 Long Thin6.227636602750.08296001 Reduced6.527211104460.57471264 Rotated 25deg7.127483183550.27247956 Circular 6mm rad8.1271047917080.087241 Long Thin6.42610831019390.08829589 Reduced6.626352162090.55555556 Reduced6.7257003286220.669507 Reduced6.82413476039380.62924325 - in a sh.fat config. losses happen far from the tgt point -the long-thin (or cylindrical) config. suggest most of losses happen in S7-8, closer to the TGT prod point - more controllable with collimators/scrapers?

33 G4Beamline Studies 27/11/200833MICE Target Workshop - IC M. Apollonio

34 27/11/200834MICE Target Workshop - IC - is there a better shape for the target or orientation? - how many secondaries (pi) do we get at the Q1 bore (per impinging proton?) - what about materials? ISIS p trajectory Q1-2-3 25 o MICE TGT

35 10 mm X Z 25 deg Q1-TGT axis 25 deg lost to Q1 secondaries production 20<theta<30 propagation to plane A acos(Pz/Ptot)>20 && acos(Pz/Ptot)<30 rotation & propagation to plane B A A B C shift & align with Q1-TGT axis LONG SLIM 35

36 25 deg FAT SHORT TILTED TGT 10 o / 25 o 27/11/200836MICE Target Workshop - IC

37 25 deg Cylinder: OD=6mm/ID=4.7 mm Materials: Ti Be Al 27/11/200837MICE Target Workshop - IC

38 Tgt_long_slim_rot0: y:x Nprimaries=100M 27/11/200838MICE Target Workshop - IC A

39 Tgt_long_slim: y:x rotation 25 deg + shift 4.226 27/11/200839MICE Target Workshop - IC B

40 27/11/200840MICE Target Workshop - IC at Q1 plane in Q1 bore C

41 Tgt_tilt25_rot0: y:x Nprimaries=100M 27/11/200841MICE Target Workshop - IC A

42 At Q1 plane Q1 bore 27/11/200842MICE Target Workshop - IC C

43 Tgt_short_fat_rot0: y:x 27/11/200843MICE Target Workshop - IC

44 Tgt_cyl_rot0: y:x 27/11/200844MICE Target Workshop - IC

45 27/11/200845MICE Target Workshop - IC

46 27/11/200846MICE Target Workshop - IC

47 27/11/2008MICE Target Workshop - IC

48 27/11/200848MICE Target Workshop - IC CONCLUSIONS - neither the shape nor the orientation of a target seem to alter significantly the production of secondaries to Q1 - the overall material volume intercepted by the beam is the main parameter (reasonable) - material other than Ti (lower A/rho) generate less secondaries (in particular pions) -a good balance should be found between weight / mechanical stiffness / and pion production -a hollow cylinder is a good solution, certainly does not worsen the performances of the present configuration

Download ppt "Target/Beam Interaction M. Apollonio, A. Dobbs - IC 27/11/20081MICE Target Workshop - IC."

Similar presentations

1April, 22 2009UKNF09 - Lancaster1 MICE Beamline m. apollonio.

1April, UKNF09 - Lancaster1 MICE Beamline m. apollonio.
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.

1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
EXAMPLE DATA: Beam: K - ; E = 4,2 GeV ; m K =m p /2 Target: Hydrogen atoms; R nucleus =10 -5 R atom me = mp/2000.

EXAMPLE DATA: Beam: K - ; E = 4,2 GeV ; m K =m p /2 Target: Hydrogen atoms; R nucleus =10 -5 R atom me = mp/2000.
Summary of MICE 4/4/2008 shift during the ISIS machine-physics period Goals for 04 Apr08 MICE shift: 1. Radiation survey in MICE Hall with target operating,

Summary of MICE 4/4/2008 shift during the ISIS machine-physics period Goals for 04 Apr08 MICE shift: 1. Radiation survey in MICE Hall with target operating,
The MICE Target Lara Howlett University of Sheffield.

The MICE Target Lara Howlett University of Sheffield.
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, R. Nicholson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England.

MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, R. Nicholson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England.
ENGR-36_Lec-26_Mass_Moment_of_Inertia.pptx 1 Bruce Mayer, PE Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE Licensed.

ENGR-36_Lec-26_Mass_Moment_of_Inertia.pptx 1 Bruce Mayer, PE Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE Licensed.
ISIS Related Issues for MICE Adam Dobbs Proton Accelerator Development Meeting, RAL 24 th March 2011 24/03/20111A. Dobbs.

ISIS Related Issues for MICE Adam Dobbs Proton Accelerator Development Meeting, RAL 24 th March /03/20111A. Dobbs.
TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.

TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.
MICE Beam Loss vs Particle Rate Adam Dobbs, ISIS Meeting, 18 th December 2009.

MICE Beam Loss vs Particle Rate Adam Dobbs, ISIS Meeting, 18 th December 2009.
MICE Particle Rate and ISIS Beam Loss Adam Dobbs, Target – ISIS Meeting, 17 th September 2010.

MICE Particle Rate and ISIS Beam Loss Adam Dobbs, Target – ISIS Meeting, 17 th September 2010.
Target Shaft Simulation with G4Beamline M. Apollonio, IC.

Target Shaft Simulation with G4Beamline M. Apollonio, IC.
On MICE Coordinate System Yury Ivanyushenkov RAL.

On MICE Coordinate System Yury Ivanyushenkov RAL.
Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Characteristics of Cherenkov light at low momenta (180 < p < 280 MeV/c) 2. Layout and characterization of the neutron beam.

Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Characteristics of Cherenkov light at low momenta (180 < p < 280 MeV/c) 2. Layout and characterization of the neutron beam.
March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Target Source Calculations Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004.

March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Target Source Calculations Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004.
MICE analysis meeting - (6/4/2006) 1 Update on MICE – step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

MICE analysis meeting - (6/4/2006) 1 Update on MICE – step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting 26 24 March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.

Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
M.apollonioMICE Funding Agency Committee Meeting - RAL 18/4/2008 1 M. Apollonio – MICE Operations Manager University of Oxford MICE beam line commissioning.

M.apollonioMICE Funding Agency Committee Meeting - RAL 18/4/ M. Apollonio – MICE Operations Manager University of Oxford MICE beam line commissioning.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/2006 1 Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.

K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google