ATLAS PESA Meeting 20/11/02 1 To do: di-muon & full-scan triggers 1) Di-muon trigger at L=2x10 ^33, introducing full scan at lower luminosity To do: Update.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Martin zur Nedden, HU Berlin 1 WS 2007/08: Physik am LHC Kap 4: Heavy Quarks Physics Introduction and overview Measurement of heavy quarks Production of.
Advertisements

ATLAS, CMS B-Physics Reach UK HEP FORUM The Cosener's House, Abingdon, 24th-25th April 2004 'From the Tevatron to the LHC' M.Smizanska, Lancaster University,
ATLAS ATLAS PESA Meeting 25/04/02 B-Trigger Working Group Status Report This talk:
ATLAS ATLAS Week: 25/Feb to 1/Mar 2002 Data Manager Design Status Report DM.pdf.
ATLAS PESA Meeting 20/11/02 1 B-Physics Trigger in the TDR Demonstrate viable & affordable B-physics trigger based on the evaluation of two strategies:
ATLAS ATLAS PESA Meeting 25/04/02 B-Trigger Working Group Work-plan This talk:
TDAQ week Lisbon, October B-Physics Trigger Status Contents: Introduction: Di-muon triggers Hadronic Final States Muon-electron Final States Program.
ATLAS ATLAS PESA Meeting 20/11/02 B-Trigger Working Group Work-plan This talk:
Sander Klous on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Real-Time May /5/20101.
Jet Slice Status Report Ricardo Gonçalo (LIP) and David Miller (Chicago) For the Jet Trigger Group Trigger General Meeting – 9 July 2014.
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
0 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK LHC preparations for precise measurements of muonic very rare B-decays 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska,
TDAQ week Lisbon, October HLT Algorithms Planning Discussion Discussion: (suggested timing) Aims for this meeting (2 mins) Milestones (1 min) Review.
B triggering Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa Consorzio CMS Italia Firenze 7 Sept
Aras Papadelis, Lund University 8 th Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Nov , Lund 1 The ATLAS B-trigger - exploring a new strategy for J/  (ee) ●
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
Prospects for Studying Heavy Quarkonia with ATLAS at the LHC Prospects for Studying Heavy Quarkonia with ATLAS at the LHC Armin NAIRZ CERN on behalf of.
Stefania.Spagnolo, Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce CERN, Nov. 2006, ATLAS Trigger and Physics week Muon Event Filter Stefania Spagnolo Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce.
HiT – Higgs and Top (Thursday, June 22, 2000) 1.News - Boaz/Meenakshi 2.Trigger Simulator Status – who?? 3.Proposal for a HiT workshop – Meenakshi/Boaz.
Report of the Oscillation Working Group and status of Charm study 1 F. Juget – D. Duchesneau Ankara, April 1rst 2009.
Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
6 th International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons July 2, 2004 Rare B Decays at LHC Sébastien VIRET Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
BEAUTY 2006, 28/09/06Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS & CMS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory On behalf of ATLAS and CMS.
Top Trigger Strategy in ATLASWorkshop on Top Physics, 18 Oct Patrick Ryan, MSU Top Trigger Strategy in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics Grenoble.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
High Level Trigger of Muon Spectrometer Indranil Das Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Update FTK Meeting 05/02/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
Time Meeting PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
ATLAS ATLAS Week: 25/Feb to 1/Mar 2002 B-Physics Trigger Working Group Status Report
High pT jet analysis for the study of BSM jet event TadaAki Isobe, Shoji Asai, Koji Terashi, and Michiru Kaneda ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo August 25th, 2008.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
1 “Steering the ATLAS High Level Trigger” COMUNE, G. (Michigan State University ) GEORGE, S. (Royal Holloway, University of London) HALLER, J. (CERN) MORETTINI,
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
Higgs to WW Analysis in CDF and ATLAS R StDenis. Higgs to WW CDF and ATLAS Reproduction of Previous Results:Identifying, datasets, Rows and columns Data.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.
ATLAS B-Physics Reach M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
M. Gilchriese Basic Trigger Rates December 3, 2004.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
HLT Kalman Filter Implementation of a Kalman Filter in the ALICE High Level Trigger. Thomas Vik, UiO.
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
G Watts/UW Seattle2 SM Hidden Sector Phenomenology as complex as you wish Decay back to SM particles Scalar.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Alain Romeyer - Sept Light Higgs search in SUSY cascades Introduction (Previous studies) Plans for this analysis Simulation chain Reconstruction.
University of Iowa Study of qq->qqH  qq ZZ Alexi Mestvirishvili November 2004, CMS PRS Workshop at FNAL.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
Search for supersymmetric neutral Higgs bosons in the decay channel A/H->m+m- in the ATLAS detector George Dedes , Sandra Horvat Max-Planck-Institut.
Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Samples and MC Selection
M.Biglietti (Univ. Naples and INFN Naples)
K/p fakes rejection VERY Preliminary Full offline environment
Presentation transcript:

ATLAS PESA Meeting 20/11/02 1 To do: di-muon & full-scan triggers 1) Di-muon trigger at L=2x10 ^33, introducing full scan at lower luminosity To do: Update di-muon trigger rates based on full simulation of signal and background (in conjunction with muon trigger group) – what can we do for TDR? Move LVL2 and EF algorithms to new selection framework – in progress Update LVL2 full-scan studies using DC1 data – first with IDscan + B(  or D s (  Re-do EF studies using DC1 data – done as part of offline work? Measure time-saving for RoI-based reconstruction in EF – use seeded xKalman Update resource estimates based on test-bed measurements using new selection framework and including conversion from byte-stream – extrapolate from e-gamma slice for TDR? Measure trigger rates and trigger selection efficiencies for J/  (  ) and B - >  triggers using fully simulated events and appropriate LVL2 and EF algorithms – post TDR Devise strategy for selecting rare decay channels, B - >  X, at EF – status?

ATLAS PESA Meeting 20/11/02 2 RoI guided B-trigger 2) RoI guided B-trigger, possibly with addition of full-scan at lower luminosity Current Status: Preliminary studies using fast simulation Rough c.p.u. resource estimates (ATL-COM-DAQ ) In RoI guided scheme, the main factors driving resource requirements are: muon trigger rate & muon algorithm time Jet RoI multiplicity, Jet RoI Size, time for ID reconstruction in Jet RoI (LVL1 & EF) => Important to confirm RoI multiplicities with full simulation => Need full simulation to determine trigger efficiency for signal channels

ATLAS PESA Meeting 20/11/02 3 RoI guided B-trigger To do: Measure multiplicities for low E T LVL1 Jet RoI using full simulation (in conjunction with LVL1 group) - essential for TDR Measure multiplicities for low E T LVL1 e/gamma RoI using full simulation(in conjunction with LVL1 group) - essential for TDR Measure efficiencies for low p T e + e - from J/  in conjunction with e/gamma trigger group) – start using fake RoI? or can we already use the LVL1 RoI? Measure trigger rates and efficiencies for B(  ) and B(D s  (KK)  ) signal channels– start using fake RoI? or can we already use the LVL1 RoI? Measure EF execution times for RoI-based reconstruction (see previous page) Update resource estimates – algorithm execution times from running algorithms offline, overheads from e-gamma slice on Test-bed