Financial and Procurement Shared Services Comptrollers Conference November 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Funding Alternatives and Outreach
Advertisements

Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
NIMS ICS All-Hazard Position Specific Training – A Way Forward A Special Presentation for the All Hazards IMT Conference Houston, Texas November 4.
Planning an Onsite Training Seminar Presenter Name #/#/200# Note: this project plan was exported from Project KickStart directly to PowerPoint. Project.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 of 19 Organization and Management New Structures and Alliances IMARK Investing in Information for Development Organization and Management New Structures.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
Membership & Roster Maintenance Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Kevin Shanahan 1.
Orientation Session on International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) September 1, 2009.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
FY 2006 Lincoln Trail Libraries System Budget & Work Plan May 24, 2005.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
European Union Cohesion Policy
WHO Good Distribution Practices for Pharmaceutical Products
NexSAT NexSAT Steering Group Meeting - 8 June 2004 © 2004 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) 1 Welcome to the 4th meeting.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Threshold System Presented by Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Fall Title I Directors Conference October 23-25,
Training for Teachers and Specialists
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
ZMQS ZMQS
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
1 Implementing Internet Web Sites in Counseling and Career Development James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University Copyright 2003 by James P. Sampson,
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS Technical Assistance MICS Survey Design Workshop.
1 School District Merger Study Alfred-Almond, Arkport and Canaseraga Central Schools January 30, 2014 Castallo and Silky Education Consultants Alan Pole.
1 Dr. Ashraf El-Farghly SECC. 2 Level 3 focus on the organization - Best practices are gathered across the organization. - Processes are tailored depending.
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
Program design overview Pre-contract to post-program year Office on Volunteerism and Community Service.
- 1- Just enough. Just in time. Just for you March 24, 2011 Building a solid foundation: A new approach to ERP acquisition March 24, 2011 Mike Reyna Project.
1 Division of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) Knowledge Management and Transfer Project 7/30/12.
Abstract To provide efficient and effective access to enterprise information that meets stakeholder needs and supports mission success, NASA is implementing.
UC BERKELEY CAMPUS SHARED SERVICES RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION: A Central Office Perspective 1.
Financial System Replacement Project
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
1 INAC First Nation Education Policy Framework Regional Dialogues Coordinated by AFN and INAC Education Policy Framework - Joint Steering Committee (EPF-JSC)
UR Financials Project Demo Days April UR Financials Demo Days – April 2014 Agenda Project Update and Delay Details Impact to Project Deliverables.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting your organization’s logo –“View”
Global Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
Copyright 2007 Thomson South-Western Chapter 4 Financial Decisions and Planning.
Making a Financial Case: The Loughborough Context ILM Level 5
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
1 Eligibility Business Process Re-engineering & Conversion to a Task-Based Model (Lessons Learned - Successes Achieved) Presented by: Kim Forrester Health.
Table of contents 1 Manual of Operational Procedures (MOP) 2
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
1 Mobility Management 17 th Annual Transportation Training and Technology Conference Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged August 18.
1. 2 The San Jacinto Unified School District presents: Strategic Plan For
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
© Prentice Hall CHAPTER 15 Managing the IS Function.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
1 Service Providers Capacity Assessment Framework Presentation to the Service Delivery Advisory Group August 28, 2008.
Project Kick-off Meeting > > Presented By: > >
African Aviation Training Organization
CBISA ™ User Permission Levels Use “enter” on your keyboard, or click your left mouse button to move through the screens 1 For any CBISA TM questions,
Oregon State Library Transformation Project Launch
1 IT Governance Presentation to DCO’s Forum 8 June 2005.
PwC Project Management Steve P. Russell IBM Manager Infrastructure Projects Depaul University November 6, 2002.
PEOPLE FIRST Department of Management Services State of Florida Orientation Session & Briefing October 7, 2002.
Project Kick-off Meeting Presented By: > > > > Office of the Chief Information Officer.
PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) FRAMEWORK AND GUIDELINES Syed M. Ali Zaidi, P.Eng. PM(Stanford), Ph.D. Director, Strategic Partnerships Alberta Infrastructure.
What is a Service Level Agreement? Service level agreements are part of a quality approach to help teams identify and agree what ‘good quality’ looks like.
Incorporating Privacy Into Systems Development Methodology Phil Moleski Director Corporate Information Technology Branch Saskatchewan Health
BRIEFING THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE OF WATER AND SANITATION
Presentation transcript:

Financial and Procurement Shared Services Comptrollers Conference November 2010

Agenda What you heard last year Project background and benefits refresher Lessons Learned Where are we now… ◦ Governance ◦ Service Partnership Agreements ◦ Functional Design Key Milestones Client Expectations Breakout activities 2

What you heard last year… Originally planned to proceed with the SAM project, however the project was deferred Financial Shared Services Centre (FSSC) implementation was approved for implementation in 2011 A Procurement Shared Services Centre (PSSC) be coordinated with the FSSC planning Information on the purpose, benefits, scope, timeline and planned activities as originally planned in November 2009 Service centres in place April 1,

What you heard last year…. Original work had been completed in 2007 (pre-SAM) which will be used as a starting point ◦ Which we will leverage later this afternoon Recognize that we operate differently now post SAM ◦ All detailed work was done in the FIS world and while much should still be relevant we need to vet that and identify new and changed activities. 4

Background- Benefits Retention and development of a skilled staff with consistent experience and training  Team of experts  Clear progression path  Involved in continuous improvement of daily activities  Backup support 5

Background- Benefits Improving the quality of internal service delivery to managers and employees  Enable departments to focus on delivering programs and services  Service focus  Leverage specialist skills 6

Background- Benefits Improve Government-wide information and reporting Improved technology leverage Standardize practices and processes Leverage best practices 7

Background – A Shared Service Model 8

The focus of shared service centres: ◦ Customer Service ◦ Employee development and retention ◦ Partnership  Joint Accountability and Responsibilities ◦ Performance Measurement ◦ Continuous Improvement 9

Background – Scope * No decisions have been made on the Scope as the function design has yet to be finalized or discussed Financial Shared Services could…  Provide common financial processing functions  Include Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Expenses, and some aspects of revenue and collections, asset management, general ledger and project costing support Financial Shared Services probably won’t provide…  Departmental budgeting  Program financial analysis and variance reporting  AP and AR for program specific applications 10

Background – Scope * No decisions have been made on the Scope as the function design has yet to be finalized or discussed Procurement Shared Services could…  Be responsible for procurement of goods and services  Responsible for developing/maintaining procurement policy and purchasing directive  Contract administration for goods purchasing Procurement Shared Services probably won’t provide…  Development of technical requirements 11

Lessons Learned Previous GNWT Initiatives ◦ Technology Service Centre ◦ Human Resources Departments will be left with residual resources ◦ Residual resources will remain with departments for responsibilities not moved to service centres 12

Where we are now… Project Management Teams ◦ Financial Shared ServicesProcurement Shared Services ◦ Warren St. Germaine – Executive Project LeadMike Burns – Executive Project Lead ◦ Jamie Koe – Project ManagerJohn Vandenberg – Project Manager ◦ Louise Lavoie – Assistant Comptroller General Advisory Committees ◦ Joint Senior Management Steering Committee 13

Where we are now… Advisory Committees ◦ Financial Business Advisory Committee  Jamie Koe (Chair)Finance  Nancy MagrumITI/ENR  Jim MartinDOT  Kim SchofieldJustice  Sheldon GraystonNWTHC  Blair ChapmanHR  Anne MouldJustice  Sheila WhiteFinance – Regional Rep 14

Where are we now… Advisory Committees ◦ Procurement Business Advisory Committee  John Vandenberg (Chair)PWS  Daniel AugeDOT  Colin GordonJustice  David JarvisITI/ENR  Martina SimonsDOT  Joe TkachukH&SS  Art DurkeePWS  Steve LewisPWS  Michelle BeardHR 15

Where are we now… Communications Plan (ongoing) ◦ Bear Facts announcement on August 20 th, 2010 ◦ SharePoint site activated on August 20 th ◦ Standing agenda item on RMC’s and DFA meetings SharePoint Site Address ( services/default.aspx) services/default.aspx 16

Where we are now… Governance Structure ◦ Discussion paper provided to all Departments and the NWTHC ◦ Governance options presented  Executive Governance Committee  Advisory Committees  User Committees ◦ Milestone is to finalize the Governance Structure in December

Where are we now… Service Partnership Agreements ◦ Discussion paper provided to all Departments and the NWTHC ◦ Presented a potential template for Shared Services Service Partnership Agreements  Goals  Principles  Proposed Template  Detailed Services to be incorporated into template once agreed to ◦ Focus group consultations held in Yellowknife November 8-10 ◦ Finalize Service Partnership Agreement template in December

Key Milestones *No final decisions have been made on timeframes. Project team staffing April 2010Complete Communications PlanJune 2010Ongoing Change Management PlanJune 2010Ongoing Define FSSC governance modelDec Service Level Agreements - DraftDec Finalize FSSC scope/Departmental ScopeMarch 2011 Develop organizational & staffing requirementsMay 2011 Determine infrastructure requirementsMay 2011 Determine staff impacts May 2011 Finalize Service Level AgreementsJune 2011 Staffing activitiesMay-June 2011Phased? ImplementationJuly 2011Phased? 19

Next Steps Finalize governance structure Finalize Service Partnership Agreement template Develop and consult on functional design ◦ No decisions have been made on final services to be provided ◦ Will be developed in consultation with departments Design service centres ◦ No decisions have been made on organizational design ◦ No office planning decisions have been made ◦ No decisions have been made on staffing impacts 20

Questions? 21

Client Expectations Discussion ◦ Imagine that you are the client of a Financial or Procurement Shared Service Centre ◦ Ask yourself the following questions:  What will I expect from shared services?  How will these expectations change over the next few years? 22

Activity Breakout Group Activity ◦ Functional Design  Group 1 - Functional Design for Financial Shared Services  Directors of Finance, Controllers, Finance Managers  Group 2 - Functional Design for Procurement Shared Services  Procurement Focused Employees ◦ Time Collection Trial  Groups of 6-8 people 23