Understanding the Complexity of Urban Road Congestion Ed Manley Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering Supervisors: Dr Tao Cheng (UCL)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Smarter Choices – changing travel behaviour through soft policies Dr Sally Cairns Senior Research Fellow TRL and UCL ECOMM 2005:
Advertisements

International Telecommunication Union No 1 The Executive Round Tables High-level perspectives and strategies regarding the present and future use of ICT.
NAME Of Transportation Supervisor DATE The Business of Transportation.
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY Driving is not a contest. Try to stay calm and forget about winning. Everyday driving is not about winning.
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY Behind the Wheel ? Keep your cool! Who is in control? You or Your frustration?
Page 1 Capability Business Benefit Business Risk KEYBA Capabilities: Benefits V Risks Facilitation of Decision making Getting the right people together.
KS 2 Being responsible for driving safety What responsibility do other road users have towards me? What responsibilities do I have towards other road.
WCTRS seminar on Green Urban Transport in China, Shanghai, September 11th to 13th 2010 Policies to reduce car use – lessons from Britain Roger Mackett.
Towards an integrated South African Green Economy Model (SAGEM)
London Streets...The Way Ahead Garrett Emmerson Chief Operating Officer: London Streets.
#13362 Data from a statewide survey of 500 registered voters in Arizona, conducted October 3, 6-7, A survey commissioned by the Conducted by:
Introduction to VISSIM
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY DO SOMEONE ELSE A GOOD TURN HOW GOOD DRIVERS DEAL WITH INTERSECTIONS.
The SMARTFREIGHT project Hans Westerheim SINTEF ICT.
TRANSPORT MODELLING Lecture 4 TRANSPORT MODELLING Lecture 4 26-Sep-08 Transport Modelling Microsimulation Software.
Modelling individual vehicle and driver behaviours Stephen Cragg Associate – SIAS Limited.
The Innovation- Decision Process. A Model  Five Stages: Knowledge: exposure and some understanding Persuasion: form a favorable or unfavorable attitude.
Computer-Aided Drawing (CAD)
1.2 The Driving Task.
Mobile Ghent Mobile positioning data and transport: a theoretical, methodological and empirical discussion 24 October 2013 Bert van Wee Delft University.
CHAPTER 5 SOCIAL EQUITY AND GUIDELINES FOR MOBILITY GUIDELINES FOR PASSENGER TRANSPORT IN SOUTH AFRICA A MULTI MODAL ANALYSIS.
TRANSPORT INNOVATION FUND Stephen McFarlane Regional & Local Transport Delivery - DfT.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Integration of Transportation System Analyses in Cube Wade L. White, AICP Citilabs Inc.
The Fully Networked Car Geneva, 4-5 March Ubiquitous connectivity to improve urban mobility Hermann Meyer ERTICO.
Vincenzo Artale ENEA Energy and Environment Modeling, ENEA Technical Unit (UTMEA, CR Casaccia, Rome (Italy)
Analysis of GPS traces of police vehicles Leto Peel Department of Computer Science, UCL.
1 Introduction to Transportation Systems. 2 PARTIII: TRAVELER TRANSPORTATION.
Road pricing. Why ? What is it ? How might it be introduced ? Where and when ? How might it work? Why ? What is it ? How might it be introduced ? Where.
Network effects from improved traffic signals Kristina Schmidt Transek AB.
Siemens Traffic Controls Ltd ITSE99/Standards 1 Traffic Management and Control Workshop on Research and Technological Development for Information Society.
ARTIFICIAL CITY A TRAFFIC SIMULATION. INSPIRATION SimCity 4 CitiesXL
Simulation of Non-Recurrent Road Congestion CASA Seminar Ed Manley EngD Candidate University College London Supervisors Dr Tao Cheng (UCL) Prof Alan Penn.
Dr. Essam almasri Traffic Management and Control (ENGC 6340) 9. Microscopic Traffic Modeling 9. Microscopic Traffic Modeling.
PARKING STRATEGY POLICY DEVELOPMENT Transportation & Asset Management Environment & Regeneration Scrutiny Committee 28 February 2007.
1 Individual and contextual factors contributing in geographical variations in risk-behaviour among young adults in Norway. Sveinung Eiksund Research fellow,
ABSTRACT Currently, drivers must utilize a third-party, such as a radio or broadband device, to learn about local traffic conditions. However, this information.
1 Copyright Orange Business Services HOW ITS TECHNOLOGIES CAN HELP CITIES TO REDUCE THEIR CO 2 EMISSIONS François RICHARD.
CS 521 Computational Science1 Street Traffic Simulation Charles Erwin.
CREATING OUR STRATEGIC DIRECTION FOR 2015 Innovating our way to a successful and sustainable future:
Chapter 10 Response Time and Display Rate February 3, 2004.
SAFENET The OSU SAFENET Project The Ohio State University Center for Automotive Research & Center for Intelligent Transportation Research.
ALGEBRA Concepts Welcome back, students!. Standards  Algebra is one of the five content strands of Principles and Standards and is increasingly appearing.
Neural Networks and Machine Learning Applications CSC 563 Prof. Mohamed Batouche Computer Science Department CCIS – King Saud University Riyadh, Saudi.
Introduction of Intelligent Agents
The development of a HOV driver behavior model under Paramics Will Recker, UC Irvine Shin-Ting Jeng, UC Irvine Lianyu Chu, CCIT-UC Berkeley.
Decision Making Under Uncertainty - Bayesian Techniques.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
Safe roads, Reliable journeys, Informed travellers Highways Agency’s Journey Time Reliability Target With Thanks to Paresh Tailor Business Planning & Performance.
Risk Attitude Reversals in Drivers’ Route Choice When Range of Travel Time Information Is Provided Megan Englert Tim Leser.
Simulating Traffic Congestion on Route 1 Jimmy O'Hara Computer Systems Lab
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
Review homework on sustainable policy research In pairs can you think of 3 sustainable strategies to reduce the number of cars on the road? Sustainable.
Harry Beck Brian Russell. Exam expectations Issues associated with designers are regularly tested in the written paper. You should be able to describe.
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
Charisma Choudhury Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology A Simulation Framework for Evaluating Sustainable Transport Options in Developing.
URBAN ISSUES IN M.E.D.C’s: TRAFFIC & SHOPPING IN THE CBD.
Weighting Waiting: Evaluating the Perception of In- Vehicle Travel Time Under Moving and Stopped Conditions David Levinson Kathleen Harder John Bloomfield.
1st November, 2016 Transport Modelling – Developing a better understanding of Short Lived Events Marcel Pooke – Operational Modelling & Visualisation Manager.
The Business of Transportation
2.7: Simulation.
Modeling of Traffic Patterns on Highways
EXTERNALITIES AND MARKET INEFFICIENCY
Motion Planning for Multiple Autonomous Vehicles
The Driving Task DRIVER EDUCATION.
The Business of Transportation
Abstract During rush hours traffic on Route 1 is at an almost standstill, the road is not capable of holding the amount of traffic that travels on it during.
The Tragedy of the Commons in Traffic Routing and Congestion
D R I V E R S E D G E USA Curriculum Use mouse to advance slides.
Prepared by: Riyaaz Ebrahim
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the Complexity of Urban Road Congestion Ed Manley Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering Supervisors: Dr Tao Cheng (UCL) and Mr Andy Emmonds (TfL) The problem is well known. Urban road congestion is the bane of many commuters lives. It’s almost certain that anyone reading this text has spent far too much of their time sitting in traffic. It’s one of those urban phenomena that people accept as ‘inevitable’ or as ‘one of those things you have to put up with if you want to live in the city’. While this is somewhat true – too many people trying to drive along the same road is bound to cause some slow down in traffic – the way in which we manage congestion can undoubtedly be improved. What is needed is a more in-depth understanding of the drivers of congestion: people. How do human interactions exacerbate congestion? What do people do when they reach congested roads? Do they alter their route? Or keep on going? This project, working in conjunction with Transport for London (TfL), seeks to better understand and model the complex behaviours taking place on the roads, particularly those that contribute to congestion. In doing so, we can understand how to manage people on the roads, in normal and abnormal situations. This poster provides an idea of the approaches being taken, as part of this project, towards tackling this important problem. Technical Approach Agent-based modelling is a relatively new approach in computing, one that seeks to simulate the behaviour of an individual in a given environment. Through the interactions of well-modelled individuals one is able to replicate the conditions that lead to macroscopic phenomena. The approach has been used in a wide number of disciplines, although the best known example is probably the replication of bird flocking behaviour by Craig Reynolds in Prior to his simulation, flocking was widely believed to be driven by one ‘lead bird’. Agent-based modelling has not been widely used in transport. Instead, there has been focus on flow-based aggregate models, and disaggregate models that only replicate the physical behaviours of a vehicle. While these models effectively demonstrate the behaviours of drivers in a normal conditions, they fail when it comes to predicting how one reacts to congestion and how it might spread throughout the road network. Behavioural Model Any attempt to model the interactions of individuals must be based on a strong behavioural model. The model must encompass both the local and higher-level decisions an individual makes. In this case, although a driver is a very complex being, the decision- making process can be divided into two key scales: local interactions and route-choice decisions. Local interactions: This part of the model will seek to replicate the variation in driving style and trip purpose that there is on the road. Is the driver cooperative? Or aggressive? Is the vehicle a bus? Or a lorry? Or just a car? The massive range of interactions occurring here must be well modelled to ensure a complete understanding of the situation. Route-choice: Here we will attempt to model the higher-level decision making powers of the individual. What do drivers do when there is a problem on the network? Do they risk taking another route? Do they know the network? Or are they constrained in their actions? The work will not only model people’s behaviour in busy situations, but also how they respond to congestion and react to others. The result is a two-tier scaled model of behaviour (below), and a complex network of driver interactions (right). Low experience of network High perception of congestion Low cooperation High frustration Willing to take risks Experienced taxi driver Low perception of Congestion High cooperation No frustration Waiting to turn High frustration Restricted choices High-level planning Perception and knowledge of network Origin and Destination Current conditions and perception Local behaviours Behaviour of those around them Driver psychology Function of vehicle Implementing the two-tiered behavioural model described above, within an agent-based model, the emergence of road congestion from the interactions of intelligent agents will be demonstrated. This simulation will help reveal how congestion forms, how it spreads and the measures that might be taken to tackle it. For more information please Network of driver interactions Two-tiered model of driver behaviour

Understanding the Complexity of Urban Road Congestion Ed Manley Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering Supervisors: Dr Tao Cheng (UCL) and Mr Andy Emmonds (TfL) The problem is well known. Urban road congestion is the bane of many commuters lives. It’s almost certain that anyone reading this text has spent far too much of their time sitting in traffic. It’s one of those urban phenomena that people accept as ‘inevitable’ or as ‘one of those things you have to put up with if you want to live in the city’. While this is somewhat true – too many people trying to drive along the same road is bound to cause some slow down in traffic – the way in which we manage congestion can undoubtedly be improved. What is needed is a more in-depth understanding of the drivers of congestion: people. How do human interactions exacerbate congestion? What do people do when they reach congested roads? Do they alter their route? Or keep on going? This project, working in conjunction with Transport for London (TfL), seeks to better understand and model the complex behaviours taking place on the roads, particularly those that contribute to congestion. In doing so, we can understand how to manage people on the roads, in normal and abnormal situations. This poster provides an idea of the approaches being taken, as part of this project, towards tackling this important problem. For more information please CONGESTED NETWORK Route Plan Feedback on network situation Network conditions Driving behaviour Experience Time Driver Personality Vehicle function THINKING LAYER ACTION LAYER INTERACTION LAYER Condense network Local interactions have big impact Network Origin- Destination DRIVER STRATEGY Real-time Route Selection NETWORK Interactions of Drivers Perception of Congestion DRIVER ACTIONS Local driving behaviour

Understanding the Complexity of Urban Road Congestion Ed Manley Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering Supervisors: Dr Tao Cheng (UCL) and Mr Andy Emmonds (TfL) The problem is well known. Urban road congestion is the bane of many commuters lives. It’s almost certain that anyone reading this text has spent far too much of their time sitting in traffic. It’s one of those urban phenomena that people accept as ‘inevitable’ or as ‘one of those things you have to put up with if you want to live in the city’. While this is somewhat true – too many people trying to drive along the same road is bound to cause some slow down in traffic – the way in which we manage congestion can undoubtedly be improved. What is needed is a more in-depth understanding of the drivers of congestion: people. How do human interactions exacerbate congestion? What do people do when they reach congested roads? Do they alter their route? Or keep on going? This project, working in conjunction with Transport for London (TfL), seeks to better understand and model the complex behaviours taking place on the roads, particularly those that contribute to congestion. In doing so, we can understand how to manage people on the roads, in normal and abnormal situations. This poster provides an idea of the approaches being taken, as part of this project, towards tackling this important problem. For more information please Route Plan Feedback on network situation Network conditions Driving behaviour Experience Time Driver Personality Vehicle function THINKING LAYER ACTION LAYER Origin- Destination NETWORK Interactions of Drivers Perception of Congestion DRIVER BEHAVIOUR DRIVER ACTIONS Local driving behaviour DRIVER STRATEGY Real-time Route Selection