EPA Field Activities Relating to Nanoscale Materials Bradley R. Grams, Environmental Scientist Chemicals Management Branch Land and Chemicals Division,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction of the new Canada Consumer Product Safety Act Technical Briefing January 29, 2009.
Advertisements

Jim Jones Acting Assistant Administrator Office of Chemical Safety & Pollution Prevention 1.
Objectives Terminal Objective
PBT – P2 Preventing Pollution: A Tool to Reduce and Eliminate Persistent Toxic Substances in the Great Lakes Basin.
DEQ Mission By the end of the decade, Virginians will enjoy cleaner water available for all uses, improved air quality that supports communities and ecosystems,
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Authorizes EPA to identify hazardous wastes and regulate their generation, transportation, treatment, storage and.
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
Interagency Refinery Task Force Gina M. Solomon, M.D., M.P.H. Deputy Secretary for Science and Health California Environmental Protection Agency
CE/Geol/ChE 174 Hazardous Materials The Federal - State Relationship Christopher Vais
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
Controlling Toxic Chemicals: Production, Use, and Disposal Chapter 19 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
PBT Initiative and PCBs Spokane River Regional Toxics Task Force Holly Davies, Ph.D. April 24 th, 2013.
Minnesota Laboratory System for Public Health (MLS-PH) Purpose and Description 1.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS- SANITATION INPUTS ON NATIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 29 MAY 2012 By Mandisa Mangqalaza.
The Path Forward: Green Chemistry and Chemicals Policy Reform Ken Zarker, Manager Pollution Prevention & Regulatory Assistance Section
Disposal/Recycling of Nanomaterials: Advancing the Eco-Responsible Design and Disposal of Engineered Nanomaterials An International Workshop March 9-10,
Regulating Plant- Incorporated Protectants (PIPs) A State and National Perspective Western Region Pesticide Meeting May 12-14, 2004 Spokane, Washington.
Chemicals Policy – A View from the United States Joel Tickner, ScD, Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts.
Environmental Legislation & Regulations Professor Bernie Engel ASM 336 September 13, 2004.
Nanotechnology: an integrated product policy approach Rosalind Malcolm Professor of Law School of Law University of Surrey UK.
Green Engineering  Profit = Ø ?. It depends!!!!
Introduction to the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse
PSM Covered Chemical Facilities National Emphasis Program.
EPA Office of Water Source Water Protection Initiative Elizabeth Corr, Associate Director Drinking Water Protection Div. Office of Ground Water and Drinking.
“Study on Other States’ Regulatory Oversight of Waste and Material Handling Activities Relative to Recycling Centers, Transfer Stations, and Green Material.
Environmental Compliance Assistance Workshop for Colleges and Universities September 13-14, 2005 Chapel Hill, NC.
EPA’s Work Related to P2 and the Great Lakes Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Round Table Summer Conference August 2005.
Import Safety Cathy Sauceda Director Import Safety Branch and Interagency Requirements Division Office of International Trade January 2010.
Regulatory Controls PBT Strategy Team Great Lakes Regional Collaboration February 22, 2005.
Oregon Toxics Reduction Strategy: Tools and Initiatives June 25, NW NAHMMA Conference Kevin Masterson, Oregon DEQ Agency Toxics Coordinator
Oregon Toxics Reduction & Green Chemistry PPRC Roundtable – October 24, 2012 Kevin Masterson, Oregon DEQ Agency Toxics Coordinator
Sustainability Issues
Environmental Protection in the United States Christopher Green U.S. Embassy July 13, 2006.
Barbara Cunningham Office of Pollution Prevention & Toxics 1.
Source Control Planning for Municipal Wastewater System Permit Compliance Environmental Trade Fair & Conference Austin, TX. May 6, 2015 David James Santiago.
A Culture of Sustainability NDIA 30 th Environmental & Energy Symposium Hank Habicht Chief Executive Officer Global Environment & Technology Foundation.
IDEM Compliance/Enforcement Priorities Felicia Robinson Deputy Commissioner of Legal Affairs Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
1 EPA Regulatory Authority and PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
From Strategy to Results Case Study on Integrated Planning from Ontario Ministry of the Environment Operations Division National Environmental Partnership.
1 NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) Carmen Dwyer Director Gas Implementation.
Regulatory Processes for Pesticides Mark Hartman Antimicrobials Division (AD) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances United States Environmental.
Brownfields: Real Property, the expansion or redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of contamination.
Environmental Legislation & Regulations Ecology and the Environment Mr. Corsini - NWHS.
September 22, 2011 Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics1.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
1 Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program Environmental Summit May 20, 2008 Jim Alwood Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Presentation to Association Municipalities of Ontario Implementation of Management of Excess Soil - A Guide for Best Management Practices Ministry of the.
New Framework for EPA’s Chemical Management Program Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Wendy Cleland-Hamnett, Director.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF ORDER Larry Stirling
BasicsBenefitsData Wild Card Compliance.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
DRAFT USEPA Office of Compliance Update: 90 CWA Action Plan, State Review Framework, & OECA National Priority Selection Presentation to NACAA Chris Knopes.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and 1989 (RCRA) Alex Chenault Period 4.
Voluntary Standards and Government: Working Together A Positive Collaboration Benefits Both the Public and Private Sectors Presentation by Mary C. McKiel,
Nanosafety ISO TC 229 Nanotechnologies Standardization in the field of nanotechnologies that includes either or both of the following:  1. Understanding.
The Wilderness Act Permanently protects some lands from development.
Sustainability in the Supply Chain 5 © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. SUPPLEMENT.
Pharmaceuticals in the Great Lakes: prevention priorities Great Lakes Pharmaceutical Stewardship Summit Chicago, IL June 7-8, 2012 Olga Lyandres Research.
Leon Wirschem, REHS/HMS County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Division
Long-Term Stewardship: Ensuring the Safe Use of Contaminated Sites Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
Environmental Protection Agency
Hazardous Waste Operations
The Ohio Clean Marinas Program Expansion
What we all need to know about the powers that be!
RETAP Retired Engineer Technical Assistance Program
CCMI 9 September 2015 Public Hearing: Nanotechnology for a competitive chemical industry Social aspects: education, health and safety.
Environmental Protection Agency
PFAS Background and Action Plan
Laws, Agencies and Treaties
Presentation transcript:

EPA Field Activities Relating to Nanoscale Materials Bradley R. Grams, Environmental Scientist Chemicals Management Branch Land and Chemicals Division, EPA Region 5

Regional Roles EPA Regions are “implementers of program” Implement EPA programs through research, programs, outreach and/or enforcement Program Development (e.g., Pollution Prevention, Stewardship, etc.) Compliance Assistance, Compliance Monitoring & Enforcement Chemical Monitoring & Surveillance Work with State and local governments to address their specific needs State & local government assistance, support and outreach Government Access assistance (e.g., finding the right resource) Community engagement (through Environmental Justice, CARE, etc.) Facility oversight (e.g., addressing non-compliance)

General Approach Nanoscale Materials are still covered under many Federal statutes and regulations EPA regional efforts have focused on using current authorities (e.g., FIFRA, CWA, RCRA, etc.) at the Federal level to address nanoscale material concerns as they arise Where applicable or possible, State or local authorities are utilized to supplement Federal actions (e.g., to go beyond federal requirements, address a specific local issue, etc.)

General Activities Region 5 has scientists, engineers and analysts who work with all EPA Headquarters Offices on nanotechnology Cover nanotechnology in different ways (through voluntary, stewardship or regulatory mechanisms): Discharges & Water Treatment (CWA & SDWA) Nano-pesticides (FIFRA), particularly nano-silver (nAg) Lifecycle and Waste Management (RCRA) Industrial Nanomaterials (TSCA) Field Monitoring, Surveillance & Research

Nanotechnology Definitions Generally, EPA (Offices and Regions) utilizes the NNI three-part definition in defining nanotechnology or its nanoscale materials, considering: Size: Approximately 1 – 100 nm in any one dimension Properties: The intermediate size generates unique phenomena and novel properties Control: Ability to understand, control, and/or manipulate matter at this scale Nanoscale material activities at the regional level are most times determined by local, State and Regional needs (e.g., State concerns, community concerns, site issues, etc.) Definitions of nanotechnology can be unclear at times Clarity is essential in determining where action is required At times it can be easier to treat nanotechnology more generally due to material/product/waste ambiguity

Nanotechnology Concerns in the Field When people think of nanotechnology regulation, the EPA TSCA program likely comes to mind However, nanoscale materials are also addressed through many other EPA and non-EPA activities: EPA Examples: Pesticides, Devices, Releases, Wastes, Industrial Production, Research Non-EPA Examples: Foods/Food Products, Personal Care Products (PCPs), Worker Safety (OSHA), certain consumer products

Field Work & Activity Examples - Water Nanoscale Materials in Water Treatment Evaluating claims of water treatment efficacy for homeland security purposes (e.g., temporary hospital utilization) Evaluation of chemical-specific water treatment methods and effects including nanoscale materials Nanoscale Materials in Water Discharge Chemical Monitoring & Surveillance of Great Lakes through the Great Lakes National Program Office Consolidation and coordination of POTW/WWTP data on nanoscale material monitoring & surveillance Assisting WWTPs and POTWs in source identification

Field Work & Activity Examples- Land Nanoscale Materials in Pesticides Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement for Unregistered nano-pesticides and/or devices Nano-pesticides with inappropriate labeling/pesticidal claims Both activities with the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection under the FIFRA program Nanoscale Materials in Site Remediation The Superfund program has implemented limited site remediation with nanoscale materials (nZVI) for in situ chemical treatment Nanoscale materials have been gaining traction as an in situ treatment alternative, particularly for halogenated solvent contamination

Field Work & Activity Examples - Land (continued) Nanoscale Material Lifecycle Assessment Using an integrated approach, evaluating nanoscale materials’ life cycle, for material and waste management Through the Pollution Prevention (P2), RCRA and TSCA programs, promoting enhanced risk management of materials, particularly at end-of-life Assisting companies in waste and materials management These activities have been completed with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources under the RCRA program, through e-Waste and other materials stewardship programs.

Field Work & Activity Examples- Land (continued) Nanoscale Material Manufacturer/Industrial Production Chemical Reporting Providing Compliance Assistance to entities in reporting Nanoscale Materials under TSCA Pre-Manufacture Notices Health & Safety Information Testing Assisting entities in acquiring/providing chemical information Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement under TSCA

Research Support In addition to field and program activities, the Region 5 Laboratory also provides research and laboratory support: Support for Research and Development Supplemental Research Capacity Building Field Operation Support (Sampling and Collection) Data collection and interpretation Method Development

Findings Nanoscale materials and nanotechnology issues have required significant monitoring & surveillance Many information and research gaps still exist Overall material definitions are unclear Large-scale sources tend to be very discrete and place- based (e.g., difficult for frameworks) Lifecycle concerns have not matured to the point at which full analyses may be provided More chemical information is needed

Findings (continued) As a result of these issues and gaps, emphases have focused on: Enhanced research and laboratory capacity, Increased chemical monitoring and surveillance Using current authorities to address nanoscale material concerns where necessary Increasing interagency collaboration

Future Direction EPA Region 5 will continue to provide assistance to State and local Partners as nanoscale material concerns arise Emphasis on State and local government assistance and coordination Sector-based, Place-based or community-based initiatives Improving access to chemical information

Within Region 5 The State of Minnesota is currently implementing the “Toxic Free Kids Act” (Minn. Stat – )Minn. Stat – Through the Minnesota Department of Health and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency This legislation requires the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) to create two lists of chemicals: one list called “Chemicals of High Concern” and one called “Priority Chemicals.” In addition, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) is required to make recommendations about mechanisms to reduce and phase out the use of priority chemicals in children’s products and to promote the use of safer alternatives. Considers chemical risk in the context of children While this legislation is not nanotechnology/nanoscale material specific, the program could be utilized as a framework for nanoscale materials

Nationally California EPA’s (Cal/EPA’s) Department of Toxics Control (DTSC) chemical programs: Cal/EPA DTSC Data Call-in for Carbon Nanotubes Data Collection for Carbon Nanotubes Information/Responses publicly available Green Chemistry Program Alternatives Analyses/Assessment Cal/EPA Library Acquiring Chemical Information The States of Maine, Michigan, Oregon and Washington, have also begun implementing various types of chemical legislation or executive orders that could regulate or lead to regulation of nanoscale material use/management through other mechanisms

Contact Bradley R. Grams, Environmental Scientist Chemicals Management Branch Land and Chemicals Division, EPA Region 5 (312) phone (312) fax