2012-2013 School Year. State of South Dakota New Accountability System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
Advertisements

Un percorso realizzato da Mario Malizia
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Fill in missing numbers or operations
Warm Up Problem of the Day Lesson Presentation Lesson Quizzes.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
AYP Changes for 2007 K-20 Videoconference June 11, 2007 Presented by: JoLynn Berge OSPI Federal Policy Coordinator.
Program Goals, Objectives and Performance Indicators A guide for grant and program development 3/2/2014 | Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Science Action Research Team Kennedy High School.
1 1  1 =.
27  9 =.
1  1 =.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
The 5S numbers game..
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
* Princeton Public Schools State School Performance Report Interpretive Guide *Based upon data.
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS) High Growth, High Achieving Schools: Is It Possible? Fall, 2011 PVAAS Webinar.
Algebra & Fcts. Trace Items Algebra & Fcts. Trace Items Fall 2007 ISTEP+ Grades Bob Trammel Math Consultant (260)
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
Measuring Personal Growth Attributed to Multicultural Education Constructs Personal Growth Positive psychological changes during time period of interest.
ASSESSMENT UPDATE Rhonda Sims, Director Division of Support and Research Office Of Assessment And Accountability
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Evelyn CP School Foundation Stage Results (Specific Learning Goals – Reading, Writing and Number) 2013 Reading (Expected) 77% Writing (Expected) 43% Number.
Adding Up In Chunks.
Least Common Multiples and Greatest Common Factors
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Title I Parent Orientation Greenland Central School
Moving Forward!. Let’s C.H.A.T. (Children, High Expectations, Academic Achievement, Teacher Growth) Missouri School Boards’ Association Annual Conference.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Converting a Fraction to %
Previous Year 3 Overview Grant Budget Resources This presentation allows you to:  Review the overall expectations for Focus Schools, as outlined in Wisconsin’s.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
Using Lowest Common Denominator to add and subtract fractions
Select a time to count down from the clock above
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Focus Schools Conference Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. September 17-18, 2012.
SMART GOALS APS TEACHER EVALUATION. AGENDA Purpose Balancing Realism and Rigor Progress Based Goals Three Types of Goals Avoiding Averages Goal.
Teacher Evaluation System LSKD Site Administrator Training August 6, 2014.
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education June 17, 2013 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator Leslie Titler, Title One Teacher.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 2 (REVISED FEBRUARY 2012)
Multiplication Facts Practice
Graeme Henchel Multiples Graeme Henchel
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
Bennett County School District
District Accountability Report
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report
Presentation transcript:

School Year

State of South Dakota New Accountability System

1) Student Achievement 2) Academic Growth 3) Attendance 4) Effective Teachers and Principals 5) School Climate

Student Achievement Academic Growth AttendanceEffective Teachers and Principals School Climate Overall Score Possible Points 80*20**100 Points Earned 54.40NA19.15NA This indicator begins in the School year Detail by Indicator: Achievement (80 Points Possible): # of students tested % of all students tested Possible Points (% student X Points) % of students Scoring Proficient or Advanced SPI Points (Possible Points X % PA) Math (40 Points) GAP Group % %12.80 Non-GAP Group % %16.00 Reading (40 Points) GAP Group % %6.40 Non-GAP Group % %19.20

Student Achievement Academic Growth AttendanceEffective Teachers and Principals School Climate Overall Score Possible Points 80*20**100 Points Earned 62.87NA19.01NA This indicator begins in the School year Detail by Indicator: Achievement (80 Points Possible): # of students tested % of all students tested Possible Points (% student X Points) % of students Scoring Proficient or Advanced SPI Points (Possible Points X % PA) Math (40 Points) GAP Group % %10.29 Non-GAP Group % %18.29 Reading (40 Points) GAP Group % %12.57 Non-GAP Group % %21.72

Focus Schools: Focus Schools are Title I schools that are contributing to the achievement gap. The calculation to determine Focus Schools looks specifically at Student Achievement and Attendance of the Gap Group for elementary and middle schools; and Student Achievement and four- year cohort Graduation Rate of the Gap Group at the high school level. Using this combination of factors, schools whose rank is among the lowest 10 percent of Title I schools across the state will be identified as Focus Schools. Any school that is already a Priority School would not be included on this list. In addition, any Title I high school with a graduation rate below 60 percent for the last two years will be considered a Focus School, if it has not already been identified as a Priority School.

 Indistar  School Focus Team  RTI Coach  Progress Coach

 Indistar  Is a web-based tool that guides improvement teams through a continuous cycle of…… Assessment Planning Implementation Progress Tracking of research-based indicators 119 research-based indicators.

 COACHES  RTI Coach Ruth Fodness  Progress Coach Terri Cordrey

 School Focus Team  Mr. Gagner  Mrs. Strei  Ms. Haggerty  Mrs. Brandt  Ms. Rousch

 Accountability Model  SD Department of Education Secretary: Melody Schopp  Big Stone City School Focus Team  Meet with Coaches in December  Follow Indistar Program

 Researched Based Model  We have a lot of indicators in place  Dept. of Education is great to work with  $$ from 1003 B grant  10% Title One money  What about next year???  How long will the state support it  Time/Classroom Time/Other Projects