Beyond the Red and Green “The Rest of the Story!”

Building Environments Where Students Feel Connected, Supported, and Challenged ” “Building Environments Where Students Feel Connected, Supported, and Challenged ”

138,000

“ALL educators committed to ensuring the learning of ALL students” 100% Proficient by 2014

Valid Complaints/ Legitimate Concerns

“The Rest of the Story”

Would you feel good about your child receiving their education from any teacher at your school? Would a child with all the risk factors for dropping out stand a chance for success at your school?

3

True performance over time

1

Blank 4 Year Longitudinal Templates

“There is Still More to the Story”

SchoolSI StatusProficiency – 3 year Junior HighNot in SI High SchoolNot in SI40 – High SchoolSI Yr 148 – Special SchoolSI Yr 532 – Middle HighNot in SI50 – Special SchoolSI Yr 266 – High SchoolNot in SI52 – High SchoolNot in SI52 – 64 – 55 High SchoolNot in SI60 – 55 – 64 High SchoolNot in SI65 – High SchoolNot in SI56 – High SchoolNot in SI62 – Special SchoolNot in SI53 – High SchoolNot in SI64 – 62 – 62 High SchoolSI Yr 368 –

100% Mastery of the Minimum

Grad Exam ReadingMath 50 – 55/84 (approx.) 48 – 53/100 (approx.)

2

Looking Good! “I mean no one is doing well in the Special Ed subgroup”

Alabama High School Graduation Exam Dallas County - (024) Keith Middle-High School - (0080) Grade: 11 Reading: GroupPercent Tested (1) Percent of Students in Each Achievement Level (2) Percent in Group (3) Level I & IILevel IIILevel IV All Students ( ) All Students ( ) Sp Ed Students ( ) * * * 9.80 Sp Ed Students ( ) * * * 7.69 Gen Ed Students ( ) Gen Ed Students ( ) Male ( ) Male ( ) Female ( ) Female ( ) Black ( ) Black ( ) Non-Migrant ( ) Non-Migrant ( ) Non-Limit Eng Prof ( ) Non-Limit Eng Prof ( ) Free Lunch ( ) Free Lunch ( ) Reduced Lunch ( ) * * * 3.92 Reduced Lunch ( ) * * * 1.92 Non Poverty ( ) * * * 3.92 Non Poverty ( ) * * * 9.62 Poverty ( ) Poverty ( )

GradeProficientAMO 8 th Grade56%67% 7 th Grade61%79% 6 th Grade72%85% 5 th Grade75%85% 4 th Grade75%82% 3 rd Grade79%85%

Why the difference between the two reports?

Grade Where we are… (2009 results) Where we need to be! (2010 AMO) % of difference Grade Level Reading Goal 385% To increase the percent of students scoring proficient (Levels III and IV) by ___% in reading on the ARMT to 85%. 482% To increase the percent of students scoring proficient (Levels III and IV) by ___% in reading on the ARMT to 82%. 585% To increase the percent of students scoring proficient (Levels III and IV) by ___% in reading on the ARMT to 85%. 685% To increase the percent of students scoring proficient (Levels III and IV) by ___% in reading on the ARMT to 85%. 779% To increase the percent of students scoring proficient (Levels III and IV) by ___% in reading on the ARMT to 79%. 867% To increase the percent of students scoring proficient (Levels III and IV) by ___% in reading on the ARMT to 67%. 1189% To increase the percent of students scoring proficient (Levels III and IV) by ___% in reading on the AHSGE to 89%. “Where We Are and Where We Need to Be!” Setting Grade Level Reading Goals for 09-10

Grade Where we are… (2009 results) Where we need to be! (2010 AMO) 8 Sp Ed30% 67% Gen Ed60% Male57% Female56% Black56% Non Migr57% EL56% Free51% Poverty51% “Where We Are and Where We Need to Be!” Setting Grade Level Reading Goals for 09-10

Blank - Where You Are, Where You Need to Be templates Disaggregated Reports are located on the SDE website – click on the Accountability Reporting tab

3

Proficiency Worksheets

1AYP Over Time 2Disaggregated Reports 3DRC

“When people become resigned to their fate, nothing ever changes.” Rosabeth Moss Kanter