Page 1 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents Safety and ASAS Applications Progress and Contents Ken.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Compliance Related to Human Subjects Research Review Joseph Sherwin, Ph.D. Office of Regulatory Affairs University of Pennsylvania Fourth Annual.
Advertisements

1 Documentation Legal Framework Air Navigation Orders Guidelines ATS Manual Airport Manual Safety Management Manual ICAO Annexes Licenses / Certificates.
Integra Consult A/S Safety Assessment. Integra Consult A/S SAFETY ASSESSMENT Objective Objective –Demonstrate that an acceptable level of safety will.
SAFETY MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
© Integra A/S SAFETY MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP Karachi - January 2006 PRESENTERS: PETER THORSEN STEFAN REIB.
1 Regulation. 2 Organisational separation 3 Functional Separation.
WECC TEPPC – March 25, 2010 Proposed Revisions to PCC Regional Planning Document 1 Proposed Revisions to Overview of Policies and Procedures for Regional.
EASA and the EU Regulatory Framework
Unmanned Aircraft Systems EUROCONTROL ATM Integration
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Overview of the interoperability Regulation
1 centre dÉtudes de la navigation aérienne COMMON METRICS FRAMEWORK FOR ATM PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING Almira Williams, CSSI Inc.
1 CARE-ASAS Action Plan Francis Casaux CARE-ASAS Action Manager on behalf of EUROCONTROL.
Introduction ATMCP and Performance Dominique Colin de Verdière (CENA) Bernard Miaillier (Eurocontrol) TIM9 - ATMCP-RTSP May 2002.
NexSAT NexSAT Steering Group Meeting - 8 June 2004 © 2004 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) 1 Welcome to the 4th meeting.
Whole Airspace ATM System Safety Case - Preliminary Study
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
FAA/Eurocontrol Technical Interchange Meeting on Performance Metrics
The EMERALD RTD Plan and the ASAS Validation Framework R P (Bill) Booth 10 October 2002.
One Sky for Europe EUROCONTROL © 2002 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) Page 1 FAA/Eurocontrol Technical Interchange.
Federal Aviation Administration SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR AIRPORT OPERATORS.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 8, 2012 SOCM-2 Seminar Data Link Operations.
ENAV S.p.A. ASAS TN I Workshop, April 20031/13 Airborne Spacing and Safety Alberto Pasquini - Deep Blue (ENAV)
Airborne Separation Assistance System Thematic Network An Overview Bill Booth, EUROCONTROL.
C ENTRE D'ETUDES DE LA NAVIGATION AERIENNE ASAS-TN, 2nd workshop - Malmö 6 ~ 8 october 2003page 1 Electronic separation Clearance Enabling the Crossing.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-80/PIA-1 Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM SIP/ASBU/2012.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-86/PIA-3 Improved Access to Optimum Flight Levels through Climb/Descent.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-101/PIA-3 ACAS Improvements Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12.
Ken Jacobs Airport Planning & Environmental Division March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration 33.
1 Development of Electronic Reporting Tools for IPPC Directive and WI Directive Workshop – Objective and next steps Tuesday 3 rd March 2009 Meeting room.
1 United States Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration Robert M. Friend Administrator Metal and Nonmetal Mine Safety and Health.
By: Nurhan Tan, NAS Planning & Integration Date: Sept. 16, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration ACA Association of California Airports Conference S. Lake.
Oregon State Library Transformation Project Launch
E-OCVM (Version 2) Explained Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Alistair Jackson EUROCONTROL Episode 3 Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
System Safety Concepts Dave Balderston Office of System Safety March 26, 2003.
Implementing SMS in Civil Aviation: the Canadian Perspective.
‘One Sky for Europe’ EUROCONTROL © 2002 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) Page 1 VALIDATION DATA REPOSITORY Overview.
ASSTAR User Forum #1 Rome 4th April 2006 ASAS-TN2 Second Workshop ASSTAR Safety Approach and Preliminary Issues Dr Giuseppe GRANIERO, SICTA
1 EUROCAE EUROCAE Dedicated to Aviation Standardisation ASAS Standards: “From concept to equipment” David Bowen (Technical Secretary) April 24 th 2007.
3rd ASAS TN Workshop 19 April – 21 April rd ASAS TN Workshop Session 4: Strategy and Implementation Package I Requirements Focus Group (“Rapid.
Development of Methodologies for Independent Verification and Validation of Neural Networks NAG OSMA-F001-UNCLASS Methods and Procedures.
ASAS TN2 Final Seminar Paris, April 2008 Recommendations by the ASAS Thematic Network Ken Carpenter.
Federal Aviation Administration AP23 briefing on D3: ASAS Concept of operations ASAS-GN Seminar 13 Nov 08, Rome By Ken Carpenter, QinetiQ.
ESARR 5 and language proficiency for ATCOs European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation ICAO – EUROCONTROL EUROPEAN SEMINAR ON LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY.
Certification Considerations for the Implementation of ASAS Applications on Aircraft Kevin Hallworth: UK CAA ASAS-TN Seminar – October 2004.
NDIA PMCS May Rosslyn, VA Earned Value Management System Acceptance Working Group Buddy Everage Working Group Lead.
Objective ITY-FMTP - Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) ESSIP Plan 2015 Oscar ALFARO DPS/PEPR
© EUROCONTROL 2010 ICAO – Regional Workshop on Language Proficiency Requirements Implementation Rome, March 3 rd to 5 th 2010 ICAO Circular 318 Adrian.
Presented to: Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather at NBAA 2005 By: Les Smith, Manager AFS-410 Flight Operations Date:11 Nov Federal Aviation.
A Technology Partnership for the New Millennium Anne Harlan, Director William J. Hughes Technical Center 68th NASAO Annual Convention September 20, 1999.
Alberto Pasquini – Deep Blue Safety Assessment in MFF ASAS TN2 3-5 April 2006, Rome MENU: COVER | SUMMARY | OVERVIEW | TASKS | ALLOCATIONSCOVER SUMMARY.
Accident Investigation SGRP CD Slide # Meeting 1 Northern Ontario Safety Group.
Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision TECHNICAL & OPERATIONAL COMPETENCE ATS.
Chapter 10 Understanding and Planning Reports and Proposals 10-1.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
International Cooperation
Chris Shaw, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Session – 4: Existing ICAO Standards relating to Air Traffic Control
Purpose and Structure of the Workshop
AIM Global Strategy Air Navigation Procedures for AIM Seminar
Adrian Enright EUROCONTROL
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
ICAO AFIS MANUAL UPDATE
Presentation transcript:

page 1 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents Safety and ASAS Applications Progress and Contents Ken Carpenter on behalf of the AP1 team

page 2 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents SAF-ASAS  It is a paper, and it’s in draft  Drafting group is the AP1 team reporting to the FAA/EUROCONTROL R&D Committee  This talk will cover purpose of SAF-ASAS progress that has been made the contents of the paper (8 slides) who to complain to  Completed version should be available in November

page 3 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents Purpose  To provide guidance on how to develop safe applications how to demonstrate that applications are safe  Discusses the problems for each category does not discuss specific applications does not try to show that ASAS is safe  Provides a review of the available methods  Discusses the use of the methods for ASAS applications  Discusses what it means for an ASAS application to be safe

page 4 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents Progress  Jan 2002 work started  Dec 2002 draft version (D1) distributed for comment chapter 4 ( ‘Guidelines for safe ASAS applications’ ) not present comments have been received and accommodated  Aug 2003 second draft (D2) distributed for comment chapter 4 complete - no chapter 5 (‘Conclusions’) comments have been received, are being considered  Nov 2003 document complete  Feb 2004 Presentation to FAA/EUROCONTROL R&D Committee

page 5 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents Contents  Chapter 2 the provision of safety safety issues in ASAS applications (by category)  Chapter 3 safety standards design and assessment methodologies  Chapter 4 development of safe ASAS applications safety assessment of ASAS applications

page 6 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents The provision of safety  Same requirements for ASAS applications as any other ATM operation  ASAS assists the provision of separation by controllers or by flight crew  ASAS applications have to meet the TLS for separation provision proof of safety by comparison has to be justified TLS for separation provision ~ 10  8 collisions/flight hour?  ASAS has to support safe applications Equipment certification requirement - 10  9 collisions/flight hour

page 7 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents Safety issues in ASAS applications  Gives all the specific issues we thought of  General considerations in addition to those listed below human performance ACAS  For each category the role of ASAS in separation provision safety issues related to roles and procedures safety issues related to systems safety issues related to implementation

page 8 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents Safety standards  Review of existing standards that apply to ASAS SAE ARP 926A, 4754, 4761; FAR & JAR AMJ these are for systems DO-264/ED78A  end to end  Air Traffic Services supported by communications FAA NAS Modernization Safety Management Program EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements ESARR 4 & EATMP ANS Safety Assessment Methodology  OSA methodology central to most work on ASAS needs expansion to comply with ESARR 4

page 9 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents Assessment methodologies  Design and human factors analysis analytical empirical  Risk analysis hazard analysis human error assessment  ICAO - collision risk assessment and separation comparison with TLS comparison with a reference system  Use made to date for ASAS applications

page 10 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents Development of safe ASAS applications  Recommends iterative development concept early specification full specification pre-deployment operations  Favour hybrid/spiral model for development process iterative loops through objectives, evaluation of alternatives, development, validation and assessment  Guidelines on addressing safety and human performance during development

page 11 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents Safety assessment of ASAS applications  Everything affects safety the operational procedures the decision support tools the controllers and pilots the communications  Guidelines offered on operational safety analysis technical safety analysis spacing values and separation minima  Guidelines on each of the application categories

page 12 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents Activities versus development phase

page 13 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents Points of contact  Rose Ashford (NASA PoC)  Gene Wong (FAA PoC):  Francis Casaux (EUROCONTROL PoC)