An efficient solution to toll choices involving multiple toll booths and / or multiple tolling strategies Current approaches to toll road demand forecasting:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Advertisements

Using Cube for Public Transport Planning
Chapter 23 Minimum Spanning Tree
GIS and Transportation Planning
October 2014 Implementing the Sydney Strategic Transport Model (STM) in Emme 4 Dr Peter Hidas Bureau of Transport Statistics, Transport for NSW.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
Analyzing the Effects of Tolls and Operating Costs on Statewide Travel Patterns Vishal Gossain Thomas A. Williams Joseph P. Savage Jr. Christopher E. Mwalwanda.
SATURN and DIADEM Practical Experience Toni Dichev 31 st Oct 2008.
Subarea Model Development – Integration of Travel Demand across Geographical, Temporal and Modeling Frameworks Naveen Juvva AECOM.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
Enhanced analytical decision support tools The Scheme level Final workshop of the DISTILLATE programme Great Minster House, London Tuesday 22 nd January.
Junction Modelling in a Strategic Transport Model Wee Liang Lim Henry Le Land Transport Authority, Singapore.
Tirgul 9 Amortized analysis Graph representation.
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
CAPS RoutePro Routing Environment. Solution Methods. Backhauls. Dispatcher Interface. Demonstration.
TransCAD Network Settings 2017/4/17.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Improving the Treatment of Priced Roadways in Mode Choice.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT.
Network Simplex Method Fatme Elmoukaddem Jignesh Patel Martin Porcelli.
Distance Indexing on Road Networks A summary Andrew Chiang CS 4440.
Joint Program in Transportation University of Toronto Generalized Time Transit Assignment in a Multi- Modal/Service Transit Network Eric J. Miller, Ph.D.
May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Clustering Unsupervised learning Generating “classes”
Challenge 2: Spatial Aggregation Level Multi-tier Modeling in Ohio Attempts to Balance Run Time and Forecast Granularity Gregory Giaimo, PE The Ohio Department.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
TPB Models Development Status Report Presentation to the Travel Forecasting Subcommittee Ron Milone National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
Assigning User Class Link and Route Flows Uniquely to Urban Road Networks ______________________________________________________________________________.
Analysis of Algorithms
07/14/2010 DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion Only 11 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study CSC Meeting – Houston.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
Digital Electronics. Introduction to Number Systems & Codes Digital & Analog systems, Numerical representation, Digital number systems, Binary to Decimal.
Modelling of Trips using Strategic Park-and-Ride Site at Longbridge Railway Station Seattle, USA, Oct th International EMME/2 Users Conference.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
Bangkok September, Economic Integration 2 Bangkok September, 2012.
Generic Approaches to Model Validation Presented at Growth Model User’s Group August 10, 2005 David K. Walters.
Agenda Introduction Overview of White-box testing Basis path testing
EMME Users’ Group Meeting NSW Modelling Guidelines - Highway Assignment 27 May 2011.
NETWORK COMPONENTS Assignment #3. Hub A hub is used in a wired network to connect Ethernet cables from a number of devices together. The hub allows each.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 1: Process Greg Erhardt Dan Tischler Neema Nassir.
1 Introduction to Transportation Systems. 2 PARTIII: TRAVELER TRANSPORTATION.
S. Erdogan 1, K. Patnam 2, X. Zhou 3, F.D. Ducca 4, S. Mahapatra 5, Z. Deng 6, J. Liu 7 1, 4, 6 University of Maryland, National Center for Smart Growth.
© Janice Regan, CMPT 300, May CMPT 300 Introduction to Operating Systems Memory: Relocation.
EMME/2 Conference Gautrain Rapid Rail Link: Forecasting Diversion from Car to Rail 8 September 2004 Presented by Johan De Bruyn.
EMME Users’ Group Meeting Recent toll patronage forecasting using EMME 27 May 2011.
Dynamic Tolling Assignment Model for Managed Lanes presented to Advanced Traffic Assignment Sub-Committee presented by Jim Hicks, Parsons Brinckerhoff.
SHRP2 C10A Final Conclusions & Insights TRB Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013 Columbus, OH Stephen Lawe, Joe Castiglione & John Gliebe Resource.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
Digital Logic Design (CSNB163)
TRB Planning Applications May 2009, Houston,TX Changing assignment algorithms: the price of better convergence Michael Florian and Shuguang He INRO.
May 2009TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference 1 PATHBUILDER TESTS USING 2007 DALLAS ON-BOARD SURVEY Hua Yang, Arash Mirzaei, Kathleen.
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Network Assignment of Highway Truck Traffic in FAF3 Maks Alam, PE Research Leader Battelle.
Matrix Algebra Section 7.2. Review of order of matrices 2 rows, 3 columns Order is determined by: (# of rows) x (# of columns)
Dynamic Programming1. 2 Outline and Reading Matrix Chain-Product (§5.3.1) The General Technique (§5.3.2) 0-1 Knapsack Problem (§5.3.3)
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
Application of Accelerated User Equilibrium Traffic Assignments Howard Slavin Jonathan Brandon Andres Rabinowicz Srinivasan Sundaram Caliper Corporation.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
CMPSC 16 Problem Solving with Computers I Spring 2014 Instructor: Tevfik Bultan Lecture 4: Introduction to C: Control Flow.
D. AriflerCMPE 548 Fall CMPE 548 Routing and Congestion Control.
Karen Tsang Bureau of Transport Statistics Department of Transport
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
TransCAD Vehicle Routing 2018/11/29.
Multi-modal Bi-criterion Highway Assignment for Toll Roads Jian Zhang Andres Rabinowicz Jonathan Brandon Caliper Corporation /9/2018.
Transportation Engineering Route Choice 3 February 2, 2011
Jim Lam, Caliper Corporation Guoxiong Huang, SCAG Mark Bradley, BB&C
Math review - scalars, vectors, and matrices
TransCAD User’s Guide 2019/8/19.
Presentation transcript:

An efficient solution to toll choices involving multiple toll booths and / or multiple tolling strategies Current approaches to toll road demand forecasting: - Toll Delay Penalty (TDP) models - Behavioural Route Choice (BRC or logit) models

BEHAVIOURAL ROUTE CHOICE (BRC OR LOGIT) MODELS The payment of a toll is treated as a purchase of a range of road travel benefits The willingness of potential toll road users to pay a toll is driven by a range of relative utilities, with the value of time being only one component of choice. Pluses? Can be calibrated to observed toll road user behaviour (RPSP surveys) Minuses? Arbitrary definitions of potential toll users Complexity with multiple toll booths and/or multiple tolling strategies General convergence and run-time issues

UTILITIES Utility UN= a1+ a2. Time_UN Utility A= a1 + a2. Time_A + a3. Toll_A Utility B= a1 + a2. Time_B + a3. Toll_B Utility AB= a1 + a2. Time_AB + a3. Toll_AB Utility BA= a1 + a2. Time_BA + a3. Toll_BA Calculating the tolls (A, B, AB, BA) is relatively easy Calculating the times (A, B, AB, BA) is messy and time-consuming (OD matrices) - network techniques such as toll link flags or switches, select links etc Hard enough with 4 toll segments – what about 300+ (Sydney since Westlink M7)

THE SYDNEY TOLL ROAD NETWORK - CURRENT TRENDS More toll booths Pre-M719 Post-M777 More valid toll segments Pre-M735 Post-M7300+ (about half are M7 ramp-to-ramp) More valid toll segments in the toll choice for each OD pair Pre-M72.0 (cutoff = 0 min) Post-M75.0 (cutoff = 0 min)

A NEW BRC APPROACH Potential toll segments For n toll booths and up to three toll booths in a single trip, there are n + n2 + n3 toll segments eg for 10 toll booths, there are 1110 potential toll segments Valid toll segments Logic test to remove obvious (eg AA, ABA, AAA, BAA) Input a list of valid toll segments User-defined toll connectivity matrix

A NEW BRC APPROACH A dummy zone represents each toll booth Allows each OD variable (eg Travel time, StopStart time, Variability time, Reliability time) to be derived from a single matrix, for each valid toll segment, on the fly or in memory The size of this single matrix is the number of centroids PLUS the number of toll booths Removes the need for toll flags or toll switches Uses standard matrix algebra for adding vectors and scalars The dummy zone network construction (ie nodes and links) are easily integrated into a users existing transport software (eg EMME2, Voyager, TransCad etc).

A NEW BRC APPROACH A dummy zone represents each toll booth

A NEW BRC APPROACH Untolled OD times Tolled OD times(Toll segments A, B, AB, BA) Define toll catchments by comparing untolled and tolled times eg For toll segment A, accept an OD if Tolled time_A – Cutoff – Untolled time < 0 etc Toll segments are SPARSE – why process tolled ODs that fail? [Public transport matrices are also generally sparse eg Bus-Rail] Dont need to build toll segments using toll flags or switches Matrix-based rather than network-based Depending on the Cutoff Catchment ODs increase or decrease Toll segment BA may fail for the example OD

A NEW BRC APPROACH Toll segments are SPARSE The Sydney demand matrix has 1,000,000 (1000 zones) or 8M The largest of the 300+ toll segments is only 12% Remaining toll segments from 1-12% The new BRC model uses sophisticated matrix indexing to ensure that only the valid OD pairs of each valid toll segment are processed, whilst retaining full matrix functionality. The process is undertaken wholly in memory and is limited only by available computer memory (1.5G), easily sufficient for 300+ toll segments and two toll classes (say car and truck)

A NEW BRC APPROACH eg Toll segment A

A NEW BRC APPROACH Trip threshold The use of a trip threshold after the first model iteration can significantly reduce the number of toll segments to be considered in later iterations, by skipping those toll segments where the total tolled trips (summed across all toll classes) are less than the specified trip threshold. Number of toll segments versus model run-time

A NEW BRC APPROACH Preparing a single demand matrix for assignment Disaggregate the tolled trips into component legs Sum across all toll segments Add the untolled demands Sum across all toll classes Ensures that a computationally efficient single-class equilibrium assignment can be performed (all link tolls banned). The model converges readily because ALL the tolled trips must travel through their designated toll booths (or at least through the adjacent dummy zone) For reporting and/or analysis purposes, multi-class assignments can still be undertaken eg untolled/tolled

A NEW BRC APPROACH ( FASTOLL ) Preparing a single demand matrix for assignment

A NEW BRC APPROACH ( FASTOLL ) Summary of key features: BRC models – convergence, runtimes, arbitrary definitions Valid toll segments (logic, list and/or toll connectivity matrix) Each toll booth is represented by a dummy zone. For each toll segment, travel times can be extracted from a single matrix on the fly An acceptance condition (ie cutoff) defines, for each valid toll segment, the valid OD pairs (the cutoff equals amount of negative time savings) – toll segment ODs are SPARSE Sophisticated matrix indexing is used to ensure only valid ODs are processed in memory, whilst retaining full matrix functionality Trip threshold to skip minor toll segments – saves runtime Disaggregating tolled trips into component legs, summing across all toll segments and adding untolled trips, ensures that a computationally efficient single class equilibrium assignment can be performed.

FASTOLL- a new BRC approach Toll demand forecasting module Integrates seamlessly with users existing software (EMME2, Voyager, TransCad). Existing software used for equilibrium assignment only Spreadsheet-based inputs Implemented as an Application Program in MaxMan (MAtriX MANager) Demonstration available