IFW Final RuleJune 30, 20031 Image File Wrapper Final Rule Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, Director (703) 308-5107,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 TC1600 Restriction Practice Action Plan and Unity of Invention Study Bruce Kisliuk Group Director, TC1600 United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Advertisements

WS Choreography v.0-1 Overview This is work-in-progress David Burdett, Commerce One 18 June 2003.
The Puzzle of WTO Safeguards and RTAs Joost Pauwelyn Duke University, Law School WTO Seminar on RTAs and the WTO Geneva, 14 November 2003.
TRACES TRAde Control and Expert System
WIPO Recentdv03-1 Changes to the PCT Regulations which came into effect on 1 January 2004.
Key Decision Points in the PCT System
August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
PCT REFORM: Why It Is Needed and What Lies Ahead Charles A. Pearson Director Office of PCT Legal Administration.
Patents e-Filing Update Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership November 15, 2001.
Colorado Secretary of State e-FILING COLORADO ADMINISTRATIVE RULES CODE OF COLORADO REGULATIONS ONLINE PORTAL FOR e-FILING AND RULE ACCESS Colorado Secretary.
28 July Doors Creating Time Zones. 28 July What is a Time Zone? A designated period of time in which access can be granted to a secure area.
The Procedure for Amending the Application under § Presented by Margaret W. Stevens, Head Supervisory Legal Instruments Examiner ;
Image File Wrapper (IFW) – Final Rule
SCORE The Supplemental Complex Repository for Examiners Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Partnership June 2006.
Final Rule: Power of Attorney Practice and Assignment Rules Clarification of Power of Attorney Practice, and Revisions to Assignment Rules, 69 Fed. Reg.
1 Information Disclosure Statements Julie Burke TC1600 Quality Assurance Specialist
First Action Interview Pilot Program Overview. Pilot Program Objectives Promote personal interviews prior to issuance of a first Office action on the.
February 19, Benefit Claims to Prior Applications under 35 U.S.C. §§ 119(e), 120, 121, and 365(c) Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration.
SWCAP Budgeting July 30, 2003.
July 30, Pro Rata Budgeting. July 30, Pro Rata Budgeting Pro Rata Detail by Funds reports are available on the Internet no later than October.
By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.
Incorporation by Reference
Revision of WIPO Standard ST.14 Committee on WIPO Standards, third session Geneva 15 – 19 April 2013 Anna Graschenkova Standards Section.
Michael Neas Supervisor Office of PCT Legal Administration
© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.
Accelerating Patent Prosecution Thursday, October 18, 2012.
Update on USPTO Activities November 18, 2014 Drew Hirshfeld Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy 1.
THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
September 25, Recent Patent-Related Rule Making and Changes in USPTO Practice Philadelphia IPLA 9/25/03 Bob Spar Director Office of Patent Legal.
1 Info on Publications of Patent Applications and Impact of Revisions made by AIPA of 1999 to 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(e) and 135(b) Bob Spar Director Office of.
Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting October 8, 2002 William F. Smith Administrative Patent Judge Board of Patent Appeals.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Filing Compliant Reexam Requests Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit June, 2010.
Community Patent Robert Clarke – Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
Preissuance Submissions Under the America Invents Act Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator Direct dial:
1 Implementation of the American Inventors Protection Act of 1999 (Public Law ) and the Patent Business Goals Hiram H. Bernstein Senior Legal Advisor.
July 8, Enhanced Examination Timing Control Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
February 3, Recent Significant Rule Makings and Changes in USPTO Practice February 3, 2004 Robert Clarke Senior Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal.
USPTO Implementation of the America Invents Act Teresa Stanek Rea Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the.
Appeal Practice Refresher Office of Patent Training.
1 Electronic Filing System United States Patent and Trademark Office.
1 35 U.S.C. § 102(e): The Legislative Fix (S.320) and Serial Abandonment of Provisional Applications Stephen G. Kunin Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination.
July 18, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818/P.L ) Topic: Patent Fees Office of Patent Legal.
1 United States Patent and Trademark Office Revised PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination Guidelines Biotech/ChemPharm Customer Partnership.
September 14, Final Rule Making on Practice Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) Robert Spar Director of the Office of Patent.
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
February 19, Recent Changes and Developments in USPTO Practice Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, DirectorJoni.
Recent Patent-Related Rule Making and Changes in USPTO Practice
Tuesday, Februray 3, Patent E-commerce at the United States Patent and Trademark Office Presented by: Edmund Crump, Mary Small and Bill Stryjewski.
Remy Yucel Director, CRU (571) Central Reexamination Unit and the AIA.
Preparing a Provisional Patent Application Hay Yeung Cheung, Ph.D. Myers Wolin, LLC March 16, 2013 Trenton Computer Festival 1.
1 LAW DIVISION PATENT DIVISION TRADEMARK & DESIGN DIVISION ACCOUNTING & AUDITING DIVISION YUASA AND HARA LAW, PATENT, TRADEMARK & DESIGN and ACCOUNTING.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
Pilot Concerning Public Submission of Peer Reviewed Prior Art Jack Harvey Director, TC 2100 United States Patent and Trademark Office
1 Rules of Practice Before the BPAI in Ex Parte Appeals 73 Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008) Effective December 10, Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008)
Summary of Rulemaking in California for the Forensic Alcohol Laboratories Regulation Review Committee Cathy L. Ruebusch, RN, MSN Office of Regulations.
Claims and Continuations Final Rule Overview Briefing for Examiners 1.
PatentScope - Electronic Publication World Intellectual Property Organization.
3 rd Party Participation Bennett Celsa TC 1600 QAS.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
USPTOUSPTO 1 Image File Wrapper (IFW) Processing Paula Hutzell Practice Specialist, TC 1600 (571)
1 Benefit Claims to Prior Applications under 35 U.S.C. §§ 119(e), 120, 121, and 365(c) Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert.
Text2PTO: Modernizing Patent Application Filing A Proposal for Submitting Text Applications to the USPTO.
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
Patents e-Commerce Update: Public and Private PAIR
Third Party Pre-Issuance Submissions Under AIA
Patents e-Commerce Update: Public and Private PAIR
Presentation transcript:

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Image File Wrapper Final Rule Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, Director (703) ,

IFW Final RuleJune 30, The Office is implementing the Image File Wrapper (IFW) system which is an image technology system for storage and maintenance of records associated with patent applications. The IFW system will replace the standard paper applications in paper file wrappers. Paper components of the application file contents (including the specification, oath or declaration, drawings, information disclosure statements, amendments, Office actions, and file jacket notations) of pending applications will be scanned into the IFW system as electronic image files. Image File Wrapper– Final Rule IFW Implementation

IFW Final RuleJune 30, The electronic image files in the IFW system will be the official records of the applications (the transition will begin on 6/30/03). See Notification of United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Application Records being Stored and Processed in Electronic Form, 1271 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 100 (June 17, 2003). All processing and examination will be performed with the electronic image files, instead of paper source documents, by all Office personnel. The IFW system is consistent with the data processing system used by the European Patent Office (EPO). Office plans to increase information exchange by leveraging common storage architecture. Image File Wrapper– Final Rule IFW Implementation

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Applicants may continue to file applications and correspondence in paper form. Alternatively, applicants may use the Office electronic filing system (EFS) for new application filings and certain information disclosure statement (IDS) submissions. Copies of U.S. patents and U.S. patent application publications are not required under §1.98 if the references are being submitted in an e-IDS. Image File Wrapper– Final Rule IFW Implementation

IFW Final RuleJune 30, The Office will supply copies of U.S. patents and U.S. patent application publications to applicants for applications in IFW until the Office implements a system to permit applicants via PAIR to access these documents electronically. Foreign patent documents and non-patent literature will still be provided. U.S. patents and application publications are currently available on the USPTO website at Image File Wrapper– Final Rule IFW Implementation

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Electronic Maintenance of Application Records Increases the integrity of the Office records; Reduces the potential for loss of records and misfiling; Allows parallel processing of the application by various parts of the Office; and Facilitates intra-Office access to an application file and to other authorized parties. Applicants may electronically access their applications in the IFW system via private side of Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. The contents of published applications that are in the IFW system will be viewable by the public through the public side of PAIR in FY04. Image File Wrapper– Final Rule Advantages of IFW

IFW Final RuleJune 30, All new applications are being scanned, and indexed, into the IFW system. The backfile of existing applications will be scanned, and indexed, into the IFW system. A schedule for capturing the backfile of existing applications linked to art units has been established. When a paper for an existing application in a designated art unit is recognized, the paper and the application will be scanned into the IFW system. Image File Wrapper– Final Rule IFW Implementation

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Prototype Electronic Image File Wrapper Program See USPTO ANNOUNCES PROTOTYPE OF IMAGE PROCESSING, 1265 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 87 (Dec. 17, 2002). By December of 2003, 1,700 examiners (from TCs 1600, 1700 and 2800) are expected to be working in IFW environment with all their applications scanned into the IFW system. Examiners will be trained to use IFW desktop tools, messaging system, and desktop application navigator to bring up examiner’s docket and any application on their docket. Examiners may print out a working paper file consisting of selected parts of the application (e.g., the specification, drawings, or most recent claim set.) Image File Wrapper– Final Rule IFW Implementation

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Proposed Rule See Changes to Implement Electronic Maintenance of Official Patent Application Records, 68 FR (Mar. 25, 2003), 1269 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 166 (Apr. 22, 2003). Major changes proposed involved: Amendment Practice - §1.121 Application format requirements - §§1.71, 1.72, 1.75, and E-IDS - §§ 1.97 and 1.98 Access and status information - §1.14 Image File Wrapper– Final Rule IFW Rule Making

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Final Rule – Effective date: July 30, 2003 See Changes to Implement Electronic Maintenance of Official Patent Application Records, 68 FR (June 30, 2003), xxxx Off. Gaz. Pat. Office xxx (July xx, 2003)(final rule). The Office received 20 written comments from intellectual property organizations, law firms, and patent practitioners in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. The comments are posted at ex.html Image File Wrapper– Final Rule IFW Rule Making

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Elimination of Return of Non-entered Papers The rules have been revised to eliminate Office’s return of certain papers because of the costs for locating, and the limited availability of, post-scanned papers. Where permitted by statute, the final rule has adopted the public comments to provide notification of non-entry of papers under §1.3, “Business to be conducted with decorum and courtesy”, and §1.59, “Expungement of information or copy of papers in application file”, (but not for §1.99, “Third-party submission in published application”). The non-entered papers may be returned if the contents of the application have not been captured as image files. Image File Wrapper– Final Rule 37 CFR 1.3, 1.59, and 1.99

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Section 1.9, “Definitions”, has been amended to clarify that the word “paper” and “papers” refer to a document or documents, which may be electronic records or physical paper sheet(s). Section 1.14, “Patent applications preserved in confidence”, has been revised to provide clarity and expand the rule to provide for electronic files. Image File Wrapper– Final Rule 37 CFR 1.9 and 1.14

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Separate paragraphs in §1.14(a) were established to state what access or information is available in specific situations: Patented applications and statutory invention registrations (SIR). (§1.14(a)(1)(i)) Published abandoned applications. (§1.14(a)(1)(ii)) Published pending applications. (§1.14(a)(1)(iii)) Unpublished abandoned applications (including provisional applications) that are identified or relied upon. (§1.14(a)(1)(iv)) Unpublished pending applications (including provisional applications) whose benefit is claimed. (§1.14(a)(1)(v)) Unpublished pending applications (including provisional applications) that are incorporated by reference, or otherwise identified. (§1.14(a)(1)(vi)) Image File Wrapper– Final Rule 37 CFR 1.14(a)

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Request for Access under 37 CFR 1.14(a)(1)(iv) Applicants are encouraged to use Form PTO/SB/68 which has been revised to include explanatory notes concerning when access is available.

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Electronic access to an application Where a copy of the application papers or access to the application is available pursuant to §§ 1.14(a)(1)(i) through 1.14(a)(1)(vi), the Office may at its discretion provide access only to an electronic copy of the file contents of the application. Image File Wrapper– Final Rule 37 CFR 1.14(b)

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Papers may not be permanently bound Papers must be readily separable for scanned entry into the image system. The use of binder clips or standard office staples will generally be acceptable. Image File Wrapper– Final Rule 37 CFR 1.52

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Each section of a patent application is required to start on a separate sheet and include no other portions of the application or other material. The application will be electronically scanned and each section of the application (e.g., text of the specification, abstract, claims) will be indexed separately in IFW. Presentation of other material on the same page makes the electronic indexing of the application more difficult. Image File Wrapper– Final Rule 37 CFR 1.71, 1.72, 1.75, and 1.823

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Elimination of the prohibition on using the abstract to interpret the claims §1.72(b) has been amended to delete the last sentence in the rule (“The abstract will not be used for interpreting the scope of the claims.”) to be consistent with Hill Rom Co. v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., 209 F.3d 1337, 1341 n.*, 54 USPQ2d 1437, 1440 n.1 (Fed. Cir. 2000). Image File Wrapper– Final Rule 37 CFR 1.72

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Electronic Information Disclosure Statement (eIDS) Section 1.98 has been amended to provide that the requirement for a copy of U.S. patents and application publications does not apply to any IDS submitted electronically in compliance with the Office’s EFS. Also see 1262 OG 94 (9/17/02). Only U.S. patents and application publications may be submitted with eIDS. eIDS may be submitted with original application or later. eIDS may be submitted even where application was not submitted by EFS. eIDS automatically loads patent citations for examiner with EAST & WEST search tools Image File Wrapper– Final Rule 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98

IFW Final RuleJune 30, For the present time, the Office did not adopt: The proposed changes to §1.14(e) and §1.19(b) concerning electronic document exchange; and The Office will consider further rule changes pending negotiation and implementation of appropriate agreements. The proposed changes to §1.14(f) concerning any action of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) or decisions by the Director These changes are not necessary for the IFW implementation. The Office may reconsider the changes in future rule making. Note: the former §1.14(g) has been redesignated as §1.14(e). Image File Wrapper– Final Rule

IFW Final RuleJune 30, The Office also did not adopt: The proposed changes to §1.97(c) to reduce the time period in §1.97(c) by one day. The Office will consider posting any outgoing correspondence in PAIR on the next business day after the mailing date of the correspondence. Image File Wrapper– Final Rule

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Office of Patent Legal Administration – (703) or to Patent IFW – Final Rule – Jay Lucas (703) , Robert Clarke (703) , or Robert Spar (703) Amendment Practice – Elizabeth Dougherty (703) , Eugenia Jones (703) , or Joe Narcavage (703) Access under 37 CFR Karin Ferriter (703) , or Michael Lewis (703) Reexamination- Jerry Dost (703) or Ken Schor (703) Reissue- Joe Narcavage (703) Electronic Filing, CDs – Michael Lewis (703) or Jay Lucas (703) Information Contacts

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Image File Wrapper - Recent Patent-Related Notices (published in O.G., F.R., etc.)- Questions of a General Nature - Inventors Assistance Center- 800-PTO(786)-9199 Electronic Business Center – Customer Numbers, PAIR, EFS - or (703) The American Inventors Protection Act of 1999 in general- Further Information Contacts

IFW Final RuleJune 30, Thank you