TINKER v. DES MOINES By: Abby, Noemi, Megan, Kaitlin, Kenley, Kalista, Daisy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freedom of Speech.
Advertisements

Al A The tinker case was a very neat case because b the ob the ob the of the of D d Al A The tinker case was a very neat case because b the ob the ob the.
Student Speech Symbolic Speech 1969 Turbulent Times Country was embroiled in conflict regarding the Vietnam War. This conflict was not approved by Congress.
Marbury vs. Madison (1803) Essential Skill:
The First Amendment By Michael Flax. The First Amendment Five Parts.
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Summary of Case: Pennsylvania's schools were giving public school money to private schools in the surrounding area. Most of which.
FREEDOM of the student press. CHAPTER 14
Cases that impact student journalists
Amendment #1 The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion,
Landmark Cases.
Famous court cases #4 Emmitt and Jordan.
Constitution A body of fundamental principles or established examples according to which a state or other organization is acknowledged to be governed.
(Information courtesy of the First Amendment Center)
ADM 507 Dr. Vicki (Morris) French W. Marshall May 19, 2014
Constitution Day The Bill of Rights: Freedom of Speech.
Tinker Sample Law and Ethics.
Student Rights: What rights do students have once inside the schoolhouse door? Tinker v. Des Moines and New Jersey v. T.L.O.
The Bill of Rights and Teens 5 Landmark Cases from the U.S. Supreme Court.
Amendment 1 The Bill of Rights.
The Courts and the Constitution The Silent Protest Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District Copyright 2010 The Florida Law Related Education.
INTERPRETING THE BILL OF RIGHTS BY SEAN KIGIN INTERPRETING THE BILL OF RIGHTS BY SEAN KIGIN.
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier Brad Palmer. Censorship  What is Censorship?  When is Censorship appropriate?  Where have you seen censorship?
Interpreting the Bill of Rights.  Judges - interpret meaning of citizens’ rights 1. local judges 2. states judges 3. Supreme Court *Decisions of the.
Rachel Pleasants  In December 1965, a group of students met to discuss plans of wearing armbands to school throughout the holiday season and fasting.
How the Constitution applies to you. Constitution When someone feels that their constitutional rights have been violated, they will usually go to court.
Legal Latin  Certiorari: SIR-shee-uh-RARE-ee  Stare decisis: STAIR-ee dee-SIGH-sis  Amicus curiae: uh-MEE-kuss CURE-ee-EYE  Ratio decidendi: RAY-shee-oh.
Tinker v. Des Moines Overview
Freedom of Speech Tinker v. Des Moines 1969 Information obtained from:
Tinker v. Des Moines Unit 4 Lesson 9.
Should there be boundaries to what students should be able to say to a teacher or other students at school? If so, what are the limits? If not, why not?
Look over all the cases in the powerpoint and select only one of the cases. Open the Supreme Court Cases Reading file on Edmodo and read about the case.
SS.7.C.3.6. In this lesson, students will understand how the U.S. Constitution limits and safeguards individual rights. Essential Question  How does.
1 st Amendment Rights. History of the Bill of Rights Constitution was ratified without the Bill of Rights (1789) Amendments were added These amendments.
Texas vs. Johnson and Tinker vs. Des Moines By Emily Franklin.
Student and Teacher rights. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging.
In 1969, in Des Moines, Iowa, students (John F. Tinker, Christopher Eckhardt and Mary- Beth Tinker) wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam.
QUESTION: “Does a prohibition against the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of symbolic protest, violate the free speech clause of the First.
The First Amendment at School. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging.
Freedom of Speech: First Amendment “The test of democracy is freedom of criticism.” ~David Ben-Gurion.
Analogizing and Distinguishing Fact Patterns. Distinguishing Hazelwood from Tinker Tinker Facts: At a public school in Des Moines, Iowa, students organized.
Civil Rights Court Cases Go to Create a chart of the court cases – summarizing the facts & conclusion Court CaseDate Decided FactsQuestionConclusion.
Aim: What are the landmark First Amendment cases of the 20 th Century? Do Now: What does the First Amendment protect?
Haley Jurbala Derek Hegna Ashley Hitchcock Andrew Howard COURT CASES- GROUP 2.
First Amendment in Schools
First Amendment in Schools
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) 393 U.S. 503
Texas v. Johnson(1989)Flag Burning, Freedom of Speech
1st Amendment.
T-Shirts & Free Speech Drake University EDL 276.
By: Lexi Henry, Rachel Sivie & Kiersten Walther
Students’ Rights Cases
1st Amendment & School (8 cases = 7 revolving around school and 1 NOT)
Freedom of Speech.
Freedom of Speech.
First amendment Charles & Emmanuel.
Where do yours end and mine begin?
1st Amendment By Haley & Briana.
Tinker vs. Des Moines Independant School District
First Amendment in Schools
By Ben Reimer and Connor Mundy
Where do yours end and mine begin?
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
Tinker v. Des Moines Public Schools, 1969
Tinker v. Des Moines Student Speech At School
Freedom of Speech.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Where do yours end and mine begin?
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District
1st Amendment Rights Student Journalists.
Happy Monday! Have your notes out
Presentation transcript:

TINKER v. DES MOINES By: Abby, Noemi, Megan, Kaitlin, Kenley, Kalista, Daisy

What’s the dispute? Students were wearing black armbands to voice "silently" against the war in Vietnam. The school administration was against this, so it was taken to court. Students were silent protesting at a public school in Des Moines, Iowa. They were doing this to ‘voice’ their opinion against the war occuring in Vietnam. They wore black armbands, but the principal found out and threatened to suspend students if they did not stop wearing them. Even when warned, they continued to wear the armbands. The principcal started suspending, and the parents of the students sued the school for violating their childrends first amendement rights. ( desmoines.aspx) desmoines.aspx

Final Vote The final vote was 7:2 and the final vote went to the Des Moines. According to the US Supreme Court, the students were protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution because “Students don’t shed their rights at the schoolhouse gates.”

Concurring Opinion Mr. Justice White While I join the Court's opinion, I deem it appropriate to note, first, that the Court continues to recognize a distinction between communicating by words and communicating by acts or conduct which sufficiently impinges on some valid state interest; and, second, that I do not subscribe to everything the Court of Appeals said about free speech in its opinion in Burnside v. Byars, 363 F.2d 744, 748 (C.A. 5th Cir.1966), a case relied upon by the Court in the matter now before us.

Dissenting Opinion Justice Hugo L. Black: "First, the Court concludes that the wearing of armbands is "symbolic speech" which is "akin to 'pure speech'" and therefore protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Secondly, the Court decides that the public schools are an appropriate place to exercise "symbolic speech" as long as normal school functions are not "unreasonably" disrupted." "It is a myth to say that any person has a constitutional right to say what he pleases, where he pleases, and when he pleases“