The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ Red List Criteria: Criteria C, D and E.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?
Advertisements

Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
  Refresher 5(2x - 3) Solving Equations 2x + 5 = x + 10 x + 5 = 10
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
Red List Criteria: Criterion A
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Red List Case Studies.
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species IUCN Red List Categories.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. OPTIMIZING LOT SIZE AND HARVEST SIZE 3.5.
5.9 + = 10 a)3.6 b)4.1 c)5.3 Question 1: Good Answer!! Well Done!! = 10 Question 1:
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ Red List Criteria: Criterion B.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
1 Modeling and Simulation: Exploring Dynamic System Behaviour Chapter9 Optimization.
Introduction Situations in the real world often determine the types of values we would expect as answers to equations and inequalities. When an inequality.
$1 Million $500,000 $250,000 $125,000 $64,000 $32,000 $16,000 $8,000 $4,000 $2,000 $1,000 $500 $300 $200 $100 Welcome.
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 One- and Two-Sample Tests of Hypotheses.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
We are working on a contract with National Grid to undertake a first year of survey for wild blue lupines and Karner blue butterflies/Frosted Elfins under.
Biodiversity of and changes related to harvestable fish resources Invited talk, Arctic Frontiers 2010 Part III Biodiversity under change Harald Gjøsæter.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Introduction to the IUCN Red Listing Process.
The IUCN Red List categories Dr. Esko Hyvärinen Senior Environmental Adviser Ministry of the Environment, Finland Syktyvkar, Republic of Komi, Russia,
Section 3 Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria at Regional Levels.
458 Estimating Extinction Risk (the IUCN criteria) Fish 458; Lecture 24.
KAREN E10-1 Endangered Species. Summary An endangered species is a population of organisms which is facing a high risk of becoming extinct because it.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Introduction to the IUCN Red Listing Process.
Monika Böhm Indicators & Assessments Unit The importance of Regional Red Lists for conservation: from assessments.
Review of the KBA process in Indo-Burma First iteration of KBAs identified by BirdLife International in collaboration with the Bird Society of Thailand,
Factors of Extinction Why are some species more or less prone to extinction?
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ Using the IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels.
Salmon in the Russian Far East: Distribution, abundance and status Salmonid Specialist Group.
The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List Criteria are used to determine extinction risk and set numerical thresholds for qualification for three globally.
Conservation of Migratory Birds s amateur birders noticed decline in migratory songbirds, not as many seen in favorite birding spots over many years.
Red List Assessment of CWRs in Spain. Implications for genetic reserve conservation. José M. Iriondo and Lori J. De Hond Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Examples. THE IUCN CATEGORIES  A. Declining Population  B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation  C.
Identifying Species Targets at the Landscape/ Seascape Scale.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Definitions of terms used in the IUCN Categories & Criteria Location.
Prioritization. 128 KBAs were divided into four (4) priority levels/tiers Data used: (no population data available for most species)  extent of occurrence/area.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) risk of extinction The IUCN Red List assessment estimates risk of extinction What is the likelihood.
Endangered Animals of Sri Lanka
Key terms and concepts in the IUCN criteria
CRITERION B: RESTRICTED GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION THEORY AND EXAMPLES
CASE STUDIES – RED LIST OF ECOSYSTEMS
University of Southern Denmark & Max Planck Society
International Conservation Efforts
Biodiversity at Risk.
Pilbara leaf-nosed bat
TOTAL RED LISTS 31 lists/books from 19 countries/regions
The shark panel: An InDel multiplex for shark species identification
The State of Nature in the EU
Fig. 1 Estimated population declines and threat status of Amazonian tree species under historical deforestation and two projected deforestation scenarios.
Percent of species threatened with extinction in each primate family
Presentation transcript:

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ Red List Criteria: Criteria C, D and E

Criterion C Small population size and continuing decline Extinct

Criteria C, D and E Based on small population size AND either C1: Continuing decline in number of mature individuals at a specified rate OR C2: Continuing decline in population size at any rate AND either C2a - very small subpopulations or most mature individuals in one subpopulation; or x% decline over y years Population size Time Criterion C

Criteria C, D and E Based on small population size AND either C1: Continuing decline in population size at a specified rate OR C2: Continuing decline in population size at any rate AND either C2a - very small subpopulations or most mature individuals in one subpopulation; or C2b - extreme fluctuations in population size. Criterion C

Criteria C, D and E Small population size C1: estimated decline in a specific time period C2: general continuing decline C2a(i): Small # mature individuals in each subpopulation C2a(ii): Most (90%+) individuals in 1 subpopulation C2b: Extreme fluctuations in # mature individuals Criterion C

Criteria C, D and E

Near Threatened (NT) examples: Population size = 13,250 mature individualsClose to VU Population is declining, but rate unknownMeets C2 All individuals found in 1 subpopulationMeets C2a(ii) NT C2a(ii) Population size = 13,250 mature individualsClose to VU Population is declining, but rate unknownMeets C2 All individuals found in 1 subpopulationMeets C2a(ii) NT C2a(ii) Population size < 2,500 mature individualsMeets EN Population is declining, but rate unknown Meets C2 Largest subpop = 1,180 mature individualsClose to C2a(i) NT C2a(i) Population size = 15,000 mature individualsClose to VU Estimated 10% decline over last 3 generations and population continues to declineMeets C1 NT C1 Population size = 15,000 mature individualsClose to VU Estimated 10% decline over last 3 generations and population continues to declineMeets C1 NT C1

Criteria C, D and E Criterion C points to remember: To use criterion C, an estimate of the population size is needed To use criterion C1, an estimate of the generation length is needed 1, 2 or 3 generations? or 3, 5 or 10 years?

Criteria C, D and E Criterion C points to remember: For C1, you need some population data to be able to estimate the reduction rate. For C2, population decline can be at an unknown rate, but population structure or fluctuations must follow the rules in C2a or C2b.

Criteria C, D and E Very small or restricted population Criterion D

Criteria C, D and E Based on D and D1: VERY small population size OR D2: VERY restricted AOO or few locations (VU only) Criterion D

Criteria C, D and E CR EN DVUD1/D2

Criteria C, D and E Near Threatened (NT) examples: Best population size estimate = 2,000 mature individuals Estimate very uncertain; population may be as low as 1,000 NT (nearly meets VU D1) Best population size estimate = 2,000 mature individuals Estimate very uncertain; population may be as low as 1,000 NT (nearly meets VU D1) Population size = 1,500 mature individuals Nearly meets VU D1 NT (nearly meets VU D1) Population size = 1,500 mature individuals Nearly meets VU D1 NT (nearly meets VU D1) AOO = 12 km² and 3 locations Population being harvested but not currently declining Harvest may increase (= plausible threat) but species only likely to become VU or EN (not EX or CR) within 1-2 generations NT (Nearly meets VU D2)

Criteria C, D and E More examples: Taxon lives in one lake. AOO = 22 km² Population currently stable. No current threats, but introduction of invasive predatory fish has occurred in other nearby lakes. If fish are introduced, population will surely plummet and could become Extinct. VU D2 Taxon lives in one lake. AOO = 22 km² Population currently stable. No current threats, but introduction of invasive predatory fish has occurred in other nearby lakes. If fish are introduced, population will surely plummet and could become Extinct. VU D2 AOO = 17 km² Population is not declining No current threats, no plausible future threats; population likely to remain stable. LEAST CONCERN

Criteria C, D and E Criterion D points to remember: To use criteria D or D1, an estimate of the population size is needed D1 & D2 Vulnerable category only

Criteria C, D and E For D2, the thresholds noted in the criteria are examples only. Criterion D points to remember: For D2, there must be a serious plausible threat to the population and this must be stated in the assessment. D2. typically: AOO <20 km² or number of locations ≤ 5

Criteria C, D and E Quantitative analysis Criterion E

Criteria C, D and E Based on a quantitative analysis showing a probability of extinction in the wild is at least: Within 10 years or 3 generations Within 20 years or 5 generations Within 100 years 50% Critically Endangered 10% Vulnerable 20% Endangered Up to a maximum of 100 years in the future Criterion E

Criteria C, D and E