DoDAF Development Team

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction NAME 24 Sep 2009 Mr. Michael Wayson
Advertisements

Architecture Ignore at your own risk (DODAF 2
Work Breakdown Structures
V-1 Part V: Collaborative Signal Processing Akbar Sayeed.
Representations and Models: SysML and Beyond David Long Vitech Corporation SEDC
1 CIS224 Software Projects: Software Engineering and Research Methods Lecture 11 Brief introduction to the UML Specification (Based on UML Superstructure.
DoDAF V2.0 Community Update Overview
An Introductory Tutorial. Background and Purpose.
® DODAF CADM/AP233 Interoperability Project David Price OSJTF March 2006.
Software Defined Radio Testbed Team may11-18 Members: Alex Dolan, Mohammad Khan, Ahmet Unsal Adviser: Dr. Aditya Ramamoorthy.
IEC Substation Configuration Language and Its Impact on the Engineering of Distribution Substation Systems Notes Dr. Alexander Apostolov.
General Block Diagram of a Communication System. Definition of Communication Communication is the transmission of information from a source to a user.
SDP 11 PDR Team Goeckel Group: Adebayo Adeyemi, Joseph Hayward, Mark Kohls, Simon McAuliffe Advisor: Dennis Goeckel MDR Keeping The Secret.
SDP 11 CDR Team Goeckel Group: Adebayo Adeyemi, Joseph Hayward, Mark Kohls, Simon McAuliffe Advisor: Dennis Goeckel CDR Keeping The Secret.
SDP 11 FPR Team Goeckel Group: Adebayo Adeyemi, Joseph Hayward, Mark Kohls, Simon McAuliffe Advisor: Dennis Goeckel FPR Keeping The Secret.
Security Extensions to the DOD Architecture Framework Kevin Richardson Information Assurance Lab Auburn University Computer Science and Software Engineering.
0-1 Team # Status Report (1 of 4) Client Contact –Point 1 –Point 2 Team Meetings –Point 1 –Point 2 Team Organization –Point 1 –Point 2 Team #: Team Name.
0-1 Team # Status Report (1 of 4) Client Contact –Status Point 1 –Status Point 2 Team Meetings –Status Point 1 –Status Point 2 Team Organization –Description.
1 REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING and SYSTEMS ANALYSIS Elements and Definitions.
DoDAF DoD Architectural Framework across multiple levels (Zachman And MoDAF are similar) UPDM Unified Modeling Language (UML) Profile for DoDAF and ModAF.
DoD Architecture Tools 5 January 2012 DoDAF Team.
A Combat Support Agency Defense Information Systems Agency Model Based Systems Engineering and Systems Modeling Language Chris Gedo Chief, Architecture.
® Eurostep.ESUKPC v0.1©Copyright Eurostep Limited DoDAF CADM ISO AP233 OMG UML Converter Interim Report David Price November 2004 INCOSE/OMG Meetings.
DoDAF 2.0 Exemplars UPDM 1.0 X DoDAF 2.0 X DM2 PES XML Examples
DoDAF Maintenance Update (v2.03) 5 Jan 2012 DoDAF Team.
OMG UML Profile for the DoD and MoD Architecture Frameworks (UPDM) Dwayne Hardy American Systems Jan 30, 2007.
Technical Integrity Assurance For Product Development W. Henson Graves Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Russ Campbell.
DoDAF v2.0 – Where are we Now? What are we doing with this version?
Reconfigurable Communication System Design
Lecture 2.3: The Systems Engineering Plan (SEP)
Using Systems Engineering Data Standards with DoDAF
1 Fit For Purpose Example Capability AoA 11 May 2010 Architecture, Standards & Interoperability Directorate Office of the DoD Deputy Chief Information.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e UPDM Review Session Col. Jack Jibilian Enterprise Architecting & Warfighting Decision Support SAF/XCPA.
The european ITM Task Force data structure F. Imbeaux.
Example Template for Project Presentation
1 ECCF Training 2.0 Introduction ECCF Training Working Group January 2011.
Technology Layer. Technology Layer Metamodel Technology Layer Concepts.
OSLC PLM Reference model April Summary of the OSLC PLM Reference Model V0.4 April 4th 2011 Gray Bachelor Mike Loeffler OSLC PLM Workgroup.
1 Department of Defense Enterprise Architecture Conference DoDAF V2.0 Update 11 May 2010 Michael L. Wayson Architecture, Standards, and Interoperability.
Trajectory Predictions Data Formats Draft White Book CCSDS CSSM Technical Meetings Pasadena, CA, USA 23 – 27 March 2015 Jessica Reinert NASA/GRC.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
® IBM Software Group © 2009 IBM Corporation Viewpoints and Views in SysML Dr Graham Bleakley
OMG Technical Meeting - March 2013 Presentation to UPDM Group Security View.
OSLC PLM Reference model February Summary of the OSLC PLM Reference Model V0.2 February 22 nd 2011 Gray Bachelor Mike Loeffler OSLC PLM Workgroup.
Discussion Topics for Exploring OMG UPDM Way-ahead
An Introduction to the Unified Architecture Framework (UAF)
DoD Architecture Framework Version 2.0
DoD Architecture Framework Application
DoDAF and Joint HSI WG (Human View) Dialog Kick-Off
Unified Architecture Framework NATO Architecture CaT Introduction
Official Current Version of DoDAF
DoD CIO Architecture and Interoperability Directorate December 2014
IDEAS Data Exchange Format (RDFS)
DoDAF Version 2.03 Update 05 Jan 2012 DoDAF Team 1 1.
Physical Data Model – step-by-step instructions and template
DoD Architecture Framework Application
Architecture Tool Vendor’s Day
DnDAF security views.
Agenda All-Monday 15 Sep 0800 Welcome - Opening remarks
Understanding and Utilizing the ISP Analysis Process
CV-1: Vision The overall vision for transformational endeavors, which provides a strategic context for the capabilities described and a high-level scope.
Hw week 5 1. Let the message signal m(t) = 4 + 2cos(2  103t), carrier wave xc(t) = 8cos(2  106t) (a) For DSB-SC systems, draw the frequency domain.
AWG 27 April 2012 Candidate Topics
Version 3 April 21, 2006 Takahiro Yamada (JAXA/ISAS)
DoD Architecture Framework Overview
International Defence Enterprise Architecture Specification (IDEAS)
Systems Architecture & Design Lecture 3 Architecture Frameworks
CORE Name: CORE® Description:
International Defense Enterprise Architecture Specification (IDEAS)
SWR Use Case Modeling Francis Bordeleau (Mercury Computer Systems/Carleton University) Francois-Xavier Lebas (Thales)
Presentation transcript:

DoDAF Development Team Exemplar Series # 1 Interpretation of UPDM 1.0 SAR Diagrams in DoDAF 2.0 / DM2 Concepts Extracts for DoD EA Conference May 2010 DoDAF Development Team 1 1

Briefing Structure The OMG UPDM Team developed examples of the views as part of UPDM 1.0. It is called “Sample Problem” and is Annex C in the UPDM 1.0 Spec. The UPDM Team is working on a refinement of the Sample Problem for UPDM 2.0. The DoDAF 2 development team went through the examples and interpreted in DoDAF 2 / DM2 terms. DM2 PES XML documents corresponding to each marked-up diagram are being posted on the DM2 collaboration site (www.silverbulletinc.com/dm2) Briefing format A UPDM diagram will be shown first, in it’s native form from UPDM 1.0 Annex C. Blue background. Then DM2 annotated version of the same diagram will be shown. White background. The UPDM Team has been reviewing the material as it develops.

UPDM SAR OV-2 Really s/b Search Node (SN)

OV-2 with DM2 Markups

Fit-for-Purpose OV-2 with SV-1 Composite

UPDM SAR OV-5

FFP OV-5b/6c Hybrid NOTE 1: Do not have to be modeled

UPDM SAR OV-6b

OV-6b with DM2 Markups

UPDM SAR DIV-2

DIV-2 with DM2 Markups

UPDM SAR SV-1

SV-1 with DM2 Markups

Performance Requirement UPDM SAR SV-7 Parameter ID System/Element Performance Requirement Metric Measure Hardware H 1.1 Voice Radio Transmitter Transmission rate 2 GB H 2.1 Voice Radio Receiver Gain 60 dB H 2.2 Signal to Noise Ratio 20 H 3.1 Signal Processor Comms Channel Bandwidth Support Software S 1.2 Status Alerting Min. status change alert accuracy 500 meters S 1.3 Min. alert response time 30 seconds

SV-7 with DM2 Markups Legend: Measure Types Measure Type units System – Measure association Measure – Measure Type association System – Measure Type – Measure association Name3 System Measure Type Measure Measure Type units Hardware1 H 1.1 Voice Radio Transmitter Transmission rate 2 GB H 2.1 Voice Radio Receiver Gain 60 dB H 2.2 Signal to Noise Ratio 20 H 3.1 Signal Processor Comms Channel Bandwidth Support Software1 S 1.2 Status Alerting (component) Min. status change alert accuracy 500 meters S 1.3 Min. alert response time 30 seconds Legend: Header means Systems below principally consist of this Materiel type Measure Types Measure Type units Measures Systems Materiel (type)1 NOTE 1: Not generally shown in SV-7 NOTE 2: Often it is necessary to relate the Activity (aka System Function) to which the metric applies within the System. Many, often most, System metrics relate to some Activity performed by the System. NOTE 3: Not necessary.

UPDM SAR CV-1

Partial1 CV-1 with DM2 Markups

UPDM SAR CV-2

Partial1 CV-2 with DM2 Markups

UPDM SAR CV-4

Partial1 CV-2 with DM2 Markups

UPDM SAR CV-4

Partial1 CV-4 with DM2 Markups

UPDM SAR CV-5

Partial1 CV-5 with DM2 Markups

UPDM SAR SvcV-3

CV-7 with DM2 Markups

UPDM SAR SvcV-2

SvcV-2 with DM2 Markups

UPDM SAR SvcV-3

SvcV-3b Services-Services Matrix with DM2 Markups Legend: Services

UPDM SAR SvcV-5

SvcV-4 Services Functionality Description with DM2 Markups

SvcV-5 with DM2 Markups NOTE 1: Indentation means whole-part

UPDM SAR SvcV-4a

SvcV-10a Services Rules Model with DM2 Markups

UPDM SAR PV-1

PV-2 with DM2 Markups PV-2: Project Timelines A timeline perspective on programs or projects, with the key milestones and interdependencies SAR Project Partial Interpretation as GANNT Rescue Unit Config 1 IOC? Rescue Unit Config 1 Rescue Unit Config 2

UPDM SAR PV-1

PV-1 with DM2 Markups

UPDM SAR PV-1

FFP PV-2 Fusion with Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) with DM2 Markups PV-2: Project Timelines A timeline perspective on programs or projects, with the key milestones and interdependencies