1. DoDAF Version 2.03 Update
05 Jan 2012
DoDAF Team 1 1

2. Outline CM Plan (CMP) Changes for 2.03 Formal coordination review plan
Why DoDAF is under CM
CMP Organizational Roles
CMP Processes
CMP Business Rules
Changes for 2.03
Formal coordination review plan

3. DoDAF CM Improvements, error correction, emerging requirements
Stability for governance developers, users, vendors
2.0
2.01
2.02
2.03
5/2009
2/2010
8/2010
8/2012

4. CMP Organizational Roles

5. CMP Processes

6. CMP Business Rules

7. DoDAF-DM2 WG Status: Change Request Status

8. Packaging for Formal CM
CM Requiring Formal Coordination
Associated DoDAF Conformance Level*
Vol. I
DM2 Conceptual Model
Level 1
DoDAF Viewpoints & Models
Vol. II
DM2 Logical DM
Level 2
DoDAF Model Specs
DoDAF Glossary
Vol. III
DM2 Physical DM: PES
Level 3
SparxEA .EAP DM2
Level 4
SparxEA .EAP IDEAS Foundation
Moved to DoDAF Journal
historical material
tutorials
architecture methods
modeling methods
presentation methods
DoDAF best practices
DoDAF examples
DM2 applications
DoD guidance
DoD component guidance
FAC guidance
DoDAF procedures
DoDAF DM2 procedures
DoDAF DM2 WG procedures
BORO materials
IDEAS materials
ontology methods
DB schemas
OWL file
* See next slide

9. Changes for v2.03 TECHEDITS
Normative parts separated from informative parts
Normative parts subject to formal coordination with DoD Components
Informative parts moved to DoDAF Journal
Document + Webpages
DM2
Description of Rules and Desired Effect
Information resource flow
Capability made a subtype of Property

10. Marine Corps - Led TECHEDIT Team
SPAWAR noted many undefined and inconsistent terms in the DoDAF model
Marine Corps commented on many incorrect, ambiguous, and inconsistent statements
After working on for several meetings, the WG requested a re-write rather than line-by-line fixes
A long-standing CR asked for DM2 diagram per DoDAF model as had been done in DoDAF 1.x

11. TECHEDIT Team Rules Must follow DoDAF-DM2 WG rules (p/o CM Plan)
Structure of each model specification:
Name. The twenty-four revised names accomplished by the WG under CR # 579 shall be used.
One Sentence Description. The twenty-four revised “one-liners” accomplished by the WG under CR # 579 shall be used.
Detailed Narrative Description (one page maximum). DoDAF Data Dictionary terms (in DM2 or aliases) shall be used as per DoDAF-DM2 CM Business Rule # 8.
Meta Model diagram (one-half to one page).
Other Names for this artifact (one-quarter page).

12. TECHEDIT Example Name: One-Liner: Narrative: Diagram: Other names:
Notes:

13. Criteria for an Architectural Description to be Conformant with DoDAF-DM2*
Level 1 -- Conceptually conformant
Level 2 -- Logically conformant
Level 3 -- Physically conformant
Level 4 -- Semantically conformant
* Info brief at FAC Nov 2010 13

14. Criteria for an Architectural Description to be Conformant with DoDAF-DM2*
Level 1 -- Conceptually conformant
Uses DoDAF terms and aliases (from DM2 CDM) to categorize its concepts
DoDAF views (AV-1 thru DIV-3) have correct information according to “monster matrix”).  For example:
An OV-2 with radios would be non-conformant
An OV-4 with Tank parts would be non-conformant
Fit-For-Purpose (FFP) would have to be conformant with whatever the FFP model creator(s) specified, e.g., a “xV-1" view for which the creator(s) specified the model as Services mapping to Capabilities should have Services and Capabilities and the relationship but shouldn't have unrelated info 14

15. Criteria for an Architectural Description to be Conformant with DoDAF-DM2*
Level 2 -- Logically conformant
Level 1 + adheres to terms and relationships from DM2 LDM and aliases
Level 3 -- Physically conformant
Level 2 + expressed as DoDAF – DM2 PES that can be consumed by others
Level 4 -- Semantically conformant
Level 3 + IDEAS semantics are correct
* Info brief at FAC Nov 2010 15

16. DoDAF v2.03 Release Plan

17. Questions?