Word Grammar in Theory Dick Hudson Cardiff, May 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kees van Deemter Matthew Stone Formal Issues in Natural Language Generation Lecture 4 Shieber 1993; van Deemter 2002.
Advertisements

Idioms and exceptionality Nik Gisborne and Dick Hudson LAGB Leeds September 2010.
1 Why education needs linguistics, and linguistics needs education Richard Hudson Budapest March 2012.
1 Cognitive sociolinguistics Richard Hudson Budapest March 2012.
Grammar: Meaning and Contexts * From Presentation at NCTE annual conference in Pittsburgh, 2005.
PM—Propositional Model A Computational Psycholinguistic Model of Language Comprehension Based on a Relational Analysis of Written English Jerry T. Ball,
Why study grammar? Knowledge of grammar facilitates language learning
1 Dependency structure and cognition Richard Hudson Depling2013, Prague.
Knowledge Representation
WORKING BACKWARDS FROM MODERN LANGUAGE TO PROTO-GRAMMAR Sverker Johansson School of Education & Communication University of Jönköping, Sweden.
Chapter 7 Knowledge Terms: concept, categorization, prototype, typicality effect, object concepts, rule-governed, exemplars, hierarchical organization,
Chapter 20: Natural Language Generation Presented by: Anastasia Gorbunova LING538: Computational Linguistics, Fall 2006 Speech and Language Processing.
Knowing Semantic memory.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 5 – Meaning-Based Knowledge Representation July 24, 2003.
EngL 3601: Analysis of the English Language and Culture.
Topic: Theoretical Bases for Cognitive Method Objectives Trainees will be able to give reasons for the design and procedures of the Cognitive Method.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Some basic linguistic theory part3.
 2003 CSLI Publications Ling 566 Oct 16, 2007 How the Grammar Works.
Fundamentals: Linguistic principles
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 5 – Meaning-Based Knowledge Representation.
Transformational Grammar p.33 - p.43 Jack October 30 th, 2012.
Lecture 1 Introduction: Linguistic Theory and Theories
1. Introduction Which rules to describe Form and Function Type versus Token 2 Discourse Grammar Appreciation.
Generative Grammar(Part ii)
Word Grammar at Work Dick Hudson Cardiff, May 2013.
Main Branches of Linguistics
Syntax: The Sentence Patterns of Language
Linguistics, Pragmatics & Natural Grammar
1 Computational Linguistics Ling 200 Spring 2006.
What is linguistics  It is the science of language.  Linguistics is the systematic study of language.  The field of linguistics is concerned with the.
Lecture 2 What Is Linguistics.
THE BIG PICTURE Basic Assumptions Linguistics is the empirical science that studies language (or linguistic behavior) Linguistics proposes theories (models)
Psycholinguistic Theory
Linguistics The first week. Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Linguistics.
Phrases and Clauses L/O: to revise/learn how to analyse larger units of language – phrases and clauses to revise/learn how to analyse larger units of language.
LOGIC AND ONTOLOGY Both logic and ontology are important areas of philosophy covering large, diverse, and active research projects. These two areas overlap.
A network model of processing in morphology Dick Hudson UCL
LECTURE 2: SEMANTICS IN LINGUISTICS
Discourse Analysis ENGL4339
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 11 – Language Structure June 2, 2003.
Lecture 1 Lec. Maha Alwasidi. Branches of Linguistics There are two main branches: Theoretical linguistics and applied linguistics Theoretical linguistics.
Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 5 – Meaning-Based Knowledge Representation.
Knowledge Representation
Syntax and cognition Dick Hudson Freie Universität Berlin, October
Linguistics as a Model for the Cognitive Approaches in Biblical Studies Tamás Biró SBL, London, 4 July 2011.
1 Introduction to WG syntax Richard Hudson Joensuu November 2010 Word-word relations are concepts.
Word Grammar in Cardiff Dick Hudson Cardiff, May 2013.
1 French clitics and cognition Dick Hudson Oxford, November 2012.
1 The logic of default inheritance in Word Grammar Richard Hudson Lexington, May 2012.
1 (Introduction to Word Grammar) Richard Hudson Joensuu November 2010 Words are concepts.
What is Linguistics? «… window to understanding the brain» Pinker. S.( 2012)  Linguistics studies the language(s) – The way how language works language.
From NARS to a Thinking Machine Pei Wang Temple University.
Usage-Based Phonology Anna Nordenskjöld Bergman. Usage-Based Phonology overall approach What is the overall approach taken by this theory? summarize How.
Text Linguistics. Definition of linguistics Linguistics can be defined as the scientific or systematic study of language. It is a science in the sense.
E303 Part II The Context of Language Research
An Introduction to Linguistics
Linguistics Linguistics can be defined as the scientific or systematic study of language. It is a science in the sense that it scientifically studies the.
Language, Logic, and Meaning
The toolbox for language description Kuiper and Allan 1.2
Cognitive Language Comprehension in Rosie
Dependency structure and cognition
Word order and phrases in a network
Between dependency structure and phrase structure
Extraction: dependency and word order
Cognitive Processes PSY 334
Competence and performance
Introduction to Semantics
Traditional Grammar VS. Generative Grammar
Defaults without faults
Presentation transcript:

Word Grammar in Theory Dick Hudson Cardiff, May 2013

History 1963: PhD on Beja grammar at SOAS Halliday or Chomsky? –Halliday was more convincing : worked with Halliday –64-67 with Huddleston on a corpus study –66-67 met Terry Winograd (AI) –read about Lamb's network theory –wrote first generative Systemic Grammar book

Systemic Grammar

Dependency theory 1976: why no word- word dependencies? Systemic + Dependency = Daughter-Dependency Grammar

Psychological reality AI (e.g. Winograd, Schank, Anderson) Mental networks (Lamb, Halliday) Linguists (Bresnan, Chomsky) Sociolinguistics (e.g. Labov, Gumperz)

Word Grammar 1984 Why recognise phrases? Daughter-Dependency Grammar + psychological reality – phrases = WG

What am I? a lapsed systemicist a dependency grammarian a cognitive linguist a sociolinguist a descriptive linguist a theoretical linguist an educational linguist

What do I believe? Theory matters and can be improved Truth matters and can be aimed at. Minds matter and can be modelled Texts matter and can be explained Education matters and needs linguistics Neighbouring disciplines matter, and can be learned from.

A nice quote Wray 2009 One has to ask … whether a particular claim or assumption in one domain can really be true, given what we know about another domain.

What don't I believe in? macrofunctions in structure system networks the rank scale constructions as signs

Macrofunctions in structure Many artefacts have multiple functions But the functions are all 'realized' by the same structure. –e.g. chair: comfortable for sitting strong, durable good-looking affordable

For instance Hearer is part of the meaning of 'question', but not otherwise. Why 'interpersonal'? What does 'theme' mean?

System networks Why is this the first choice? How might we organise knowledge so tidily? And why?

The rank scale sentence clause group word Hurry! hurry unary branching Headedness Classification of mother is always predictable from its head daughter objections

Constructions CxG: a language consists of nothing but constructions. A construction is a form-meaning pair. –So: every 'form' has a meaning But some forms have no meaning, e.g. –extraposition –(arguably) all of morphology, e.g. {z}, {ing}

What does WG actually claim? Language is just ordinary knowledge applied to words. So: Language is a mental network. The network nodes (concepts) are atoms. Concepts are defined solely by their links to other concepts. Concepts are organised in 'isa' hierarchies.

For instance … around … messing around … looked around … all around were … … the soil around the base of the plant … roundagroundon {on} {a}{round} around 1 around 2 labels are NOT part of the analysis isa hierarchy

Tokens and types Tokens are created ad hoc, types are stored. The type-token ratio = types/tokens –e.g. for The cat sat on the mat TTR = 5/6 Tokens have distinct properties, so they must be distinct concepts. Each token isa at least one type. –e.g. He wandered around Tokens show modifying effects of context. isa around 1

An utterance as part of the grammar The cat sat on the mat. THE CAT SIT past ONMAT noun verbpreposition word SIT, past

Tokens and syntax Each word token is distinct from its type: It shows the effects of its syntactic context. –the/1 means 'the cat' –on means 'on the mat' –sat means 'sat on the mat' –but also 'the cat sat on the mat' So phrases aren't needed.

Tokens of tokens … The 1 cat sat on the 2 mat. 'mat' 'the mat' 'on the mat' 'sat on the mat' 'the cat sat on the mat' 'cat' 'the cat' sat 1 on 1 the 21 the 11 sat 2

Usage The network is 'usage based' –built out of episodic memories It contains 'ex-tokens': words plus context –so formulae –and socially constrained So any properties may be generalised –'linguistic' – relations to other words –'non-linguistic' – relations to social constructs

Processing Node creation: one node per token Default inheritance to enrich token nodes Binding tokens to existing nodes Spreading activation –activation guides inheritance and binding –super-active tokens become permanent types

An utterance as part of the grammar THE CAT SIT past ONMAT noun verbpreposition word SIT, past ? The cat sat on the mat

Summary Mentalist – just cognitive structures Just a network of atoms –Declarative network –Organised round an isa hierarchy Procedures: –node creation –node enrichment (inheritance, binding) –spreading activation