Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Radio Maria World. 2 Postazioni Transmitter locations.
Advertisements

EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
Números.
1 A B C
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
SKELETAL QUIZ 3.
PDAs Accept Context-Free Languages
/ /17 32/ / /
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
Reflection nurulquran.com.
1
EuroCondens SGB E.
Worksheets.
Slide 1Fig 26-CO, p.795. Slide 2Fig 26-1, p.796 Slide 3Fig 26-2, p.797.
Slide 1Fig 25-CO, p.762. Slide 2Fig 25-1, p.765 Slide 3Fig 25-2, p.765.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Addition and Subtraction Equations
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
Create an Application Title 1Y - Youth Chapter 5.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
CHAPTER 18 The Ankle and Lower Leg
The 5S numbers game..
突破信息检索壁垒 -SciFinder Scholar 介绍
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Numerical Analysis 1 EE, NCKU Tien-Hao Chang (Darby Chang)
Media-Monitoring Final Report April - May 2010 News.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Regression with Panel Data
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Dynamic Access Control the file server, reimagined Presented by Mark on twitter 1 contents copyright 2013 Mark Minasi.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
Biology 2 Plant Kingdom Identification Test Review.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Facebook Pages 101: Your Organization’s Foothold on the Social Web A Volunteer Leader Webinar Sponsored by CACO December 1, 2010 Andrew Gossen, Senior.
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
Midterm Review Part II Midterm Review Part II 40.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Subtraction: Adding UP
Numeracy Resources for KS2
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
1 hi at no doifpi me be go we of at be do go hi if me no of pi we Inorder Traversal Inorder traversal. n Visit the left subtree. n Visit the node. n Visit.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Converting a Fraction to %
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Lial/Hungerford/Holcomb/Mullins: Mathematics with Applications 11e Finite Mathematics with Applications 11e Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Select a time to count down from the clock above
1.step PMIT start + initial project data input Concept Concept.
A Data Warehouse Mining Tool Stephen Turner Chris Frala
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Introduction Embedded Universal Tools and Online Features 2.
úkol = A 77 B 72 C 67 D = A 77 B 72 C 67 D 79.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Presentation transcript:

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples

AGVISE Laboratories % Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2012

AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory % Grid or Zone Samples Tested Compared To Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples Tested

Fall 2012 samples Average Soil Nitrate following Wheat in 2012 (lb/a 0-24 samples) 35 43

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following WHEAT in Montana

Average Soil Nitrate following Wheat in 2012 Fall 2012 Samples (lb/a 0-24 samples) MB ND SD MN

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields Following Fallow in Montana

% Soil Samples with Phosphorus less than 10 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6) 66% 55% 35% 40% 43% (Olsen P test) 22%

56% 55% 66% 47% 68% 57% 78% 77% 69% 72% 34% 14% 20% 58% 50% 27% 60% % Soil Samples with Phosphorus less than 10 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 38% (Olsen P test) 35% 67% 32% 36% 50% 46% 60% 57%47% 71% 36%

% Soil Samples with Potassium less than 150 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6) 6% 18% 2% 1% 8% 6%

21% 14% 3% 6% 7% 2% 48% 36% 17% 30% 32% 38% 11% 6% % Soil Samples with Potassium less than 150 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 32% 11% 48% 21% 5% 35% 41% 31% 23% 4%1% 78% 77% 19%

% Soil Samples with Zinc less than 1.0 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6) 79% 56% 81% 91% 62% 46%

65% 56% 72% 54% 77% 86% 83% 65% 78% 35% 24% 35% 32% 59% 53% 49% 66% % Soil Samples with Zinc less than 1.0 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 34% 35% 26% 59% 20% 36% 50% 49% 74% 91% 22% 44% 65%

% Soil Samples with Sulfur less than 15 lb/a Fall 2012 samples (0-6) 55% 22% 42% 52% 19% 34%

8% 14% 18% 49% 40% 54% 22% 21% 9% 12% 10% 5% 9% 7% 11% 15% 12% % Soil Samples with Sulfur less than 15 lb/a Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 10% 46% 49% 69% 27% 38% 32% 44% 29% 19% 20% 59% 67%

% Soil Samples with Copper less than 0.5 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6) 4% 1% 0% 1%

12% 17% 7% 13% 10% 2% 1% 4% 20% 29% 26% 5% 0% 2% 5% 16% 14% 26% 24% 10% 12% % Soil Samples with Copper less than 0.5 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 15% 7% 10% 5% 14% 45% 41% 4%

% Soil Samples with Boron less than 0.4 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6) 9% 2% 6% 19% 4%

3% 7% 5% 2% 15% 2% 39% 5% 1% 13% 4% 1% 8% 2% % Soil Samples with Boron less than 0.4 ppm Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 1% 9% 47% 75% 17% 9%8% 12% 9% 35% 27% 4% 0%

% Soil Samples with Chloride less than 40 lb/a Fall 2012 samples (0-6) 76% 62% 78% 77% 52% 62%

48% 38% 56% 59% 87% 85% 89% 65% 84% 41% 20% 77% 70% 57% 44% 30% 47% 13% 78% 55% 42% 59% % Soil Samples with Chloride less than 40 lb/a Fall 2012 Samples (0-24 samples) MB ND SD MN 51% 78% 85% 34% 57% 63%

% Soil Samples with Carbonate greater than 5.0% Fall 2012 samples (0-6) 16% 10% 21% 3% 44% 3%

12% 26% 10% 6% 7% 10% 29% 23% 44% 4% 9% 2% 17% 40% 22% 14% 10% % Soil Samples with Carbonate greater than 5.0% Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 36% 1% 10% 24% 55% 13% 3% 1% 3% 9% 6%

% Soil Samples with Salts greater than 1.0 mmhos/cm Fall 2012 samples (0-6) 4% 8% 4% 8% 4%

27% 37% 15% 10% 1% 4% 2% 8% 1% 4% 19% 3% 11% 2% 21% 17% 12% 23% 17% 8% 10% % Soil Samples with Salts greater than 1.0 Fall 2012 Samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 11% 12% 7% 6% 2% 0% 6% 17% 21%

% Soil Samples with soil pH greater than 7.3 Fall 2012 samples (0-6) 78% 81% 72% 56% 86% 63%

65% 76% 70% 38% 35% 39% 62% 51% 25% 54% 79% 96% 43% 36% 22% 23% 75% 72% 74% 82% 42% 71% % Soil Samples with Soil pH greater than 7.3 Fall 2012 samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 65% 27% 34% 23% 15% 6% 67% 92% 84%

% Soil Samples with %OM less than 3.0% Fall 2012 samples (0-6) 86% 85% 76% 96% 90% 47%

26% 22% 33% 25% 38% 60% 71% 43% 28% 21% 25% 17% 33% 8% 20% 29% % Soil Samples with %OM less than 3.0% Fall 2012 Samples (0-6 samples) MB ND SD MN 9% 3% 9% 75% 26% 17% 9% 28% 26% 55% 12% 26% 13%

Zip codes for Montana