Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

Interpreting & Applying the Standards October 4, 2006 Dr. Luis J. Pedraja, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
The Board’s Role in Accreditation Michael F. Middaugh Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness University of Delaware Celine R. Paquette Trustee,
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
What is Middle States, Anyway? Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated by Joe Marchetti, Gene.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
The Middle States Accreditation and Review Process & the ESC Self-Study Center for Distance Learning Craig Lamb – Director of Academic Support Val Chukhlomin.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
University-wide Accreditation Academic Leadership Program February 18, 2010.
MSCHE Expectations for Governance Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education Annual Conference December 12, 2011.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
- Documenting the Self-Study (I) Preparation for Georgian Accreditation (with internationally acceptable standards) Amy Kirle Lezberg GEDA Staff NEA Staff.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
CCC: Where Teaching and Learning Transform Lives, Putting Together the Self- Study Puzzle Corning Community College August 24, 2012.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
PRESIDENT’S Campus forum November 9, Dr. Shirley Wagner and Dr. Paul Weizer NEASC Self Study Co-Chairs Key Elements of the Self Study Process Demystifying.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
IUP Middle States Accreditation and Self Study Process
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Self-Study 2010: Review, Reflect, and Renew. The Accrediting Process  A means of self-regulation  Intended to strengthen and sustain the quality higher.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Principles of Good Governance
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Why is My College on warning? Understanding the Accreditation Process.
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Curriculum and Accreditation
Curriculum and Accreditation
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
University Community Briefing
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
NEASC Self –Study Appraisal.
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016 Overview of the Self Study Process

What is Self Study? A process through which the institution carefully considers Its educational programs and services with particular attention given to student learning and achievement; and How well programs and services accomplish institutional goals, fulfill the mission, and meet the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) (our accrediting body) standards

Why should we do Self Study? Are we achieving what we want to achieve? What should we do to improve our effectiveness in achieving our fundamental aims? Answers are achieved by planning and assessment – the MSCHE 14 standards are key, but most important are Standards 2 (Planning and Resource Allocation ), 7 (Institutional Assessment), and 14 (Student Learning Assessment).

What is the primary purpose of Self Study? Advance institutional self understanding and self-improvement Demonstrate to external audiences that the institution meets the MSCHE standards for accreditation

What are MSCHE’s expectations? The institution conducts a thorough review of assessment information to either confirm current activities or make appropriate modifications of programs and services to meet changing needs. The institution has an institutional plan and documented, sustained and organized assessment processes. The institution conducts ongoing planning and assessment and systematically uses data to continually inform institutional and unit decisions regarding programs, services, initiatives, and resource allocation

Self-Study Model Comprehensive Report Reordering Standards to Reflect an Institution 8 sections Standards appraised – focus is on telling our story about our culture

Who is involved in the Self Study process? Self study involves everyone in the university, but there two key groups that organize and shepherd the process: Steering Committee – (appointed by Institution) organizes the self study process, produces a draft report, and disseminates the final report Working groups/subcommittees – (faculty, staff and student volunteers) collect and examine existing data and prepare analytical reports for their assigned topics

What is my role in this Self Study process? Know the 14 standards Join a subcommittee Respond promptly to all requests for documents or assessment data Attend all training sessions Follow the Self Study website and Blackboard site for updates, activities, and documents Ask questions Help us speak with one voice

14 Standards of Excellence (1-7) Institutional Context Standard 1: Mission and Goals Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, and Institutional Renewal Standard 3: Institutional Resources Standard 4: Leadership and Governance Standard 5: Administration Standard 6: Integrity Standard 7: Institutional Assessment

14 Standards of Excellence (8-14) Educational Effectiveness Standard 8: Student Admissions and Retention Standard 9: Student Support Services Standard 10: Faculty Standard 11: Educational Offerings Standard 12: General Education Standard 13: Related Education Activities Standard 14: Assessment of Student Learning

What are the Self Study Subcommittees? Subcommittee 1: Standards 1 and 6 - Mission, Goals, and Integrity Subcommittee 2: Standards 2 and 3 – Planning, Resources, and Institutional Renewal Subcommittee 3: Standards 4 and 5 – Leadership, Governance, and Administration Subcommittee 4: Standards 8 and 9 – Student Admissions and Support Services Subcommittee 5: Standard 10 – Faculty Subcommittee 6: Standard 11 – Educational Offerings Subcommittee 7: Standards 12 and 13 – General Education and Related Educational Activities Subcommittee 8: Standards 7 and 14: Institutional Assessment and Student Learning Assessment

Mission, Goals (1) and Integrity (6) Mission and Goals Clearly defined statement of its mission and goals Goals consistent with mission and appropriately focused. Mission and goals are the result of collaboration Integrity Widely publicized, fair and impartial processes and practices Healthy academic climate Truth and honesty are essential Accuracy and availability of factual information about the institution

Planning, Resources, and Institutional Renewal (2 and 3) Mainstay of how we function Closely tied to assessment and institution’s mission and values and unit level goals Balanced university goals with external expectations and demands Proper use of resources Deciding how to allocate resources Sound financial planning and resource allocation

Leadership, Governance (4) and Administration (5) Shared collegial governance Governance structure provides for a governing body with sufficient independence and expertise Organized administration - clearly defined roles and responsibilities Qualified administrators - effective leadership and efficient management Administrative staff working effectively as a team and cooperatively with other constituencies 14

Student Admissions (8) and Support Services (9) Students as primary beneficiaries Admission and retention practices supporting student success Well organized services required Responsiveness to full spectrum of diversities Flexible services Recreational and intramural and intercollegiate athletics supporting the mission

Faculty(10) Faculty characteristics Role in curriculum development and strategic planning Faculty incentives Extent of reliance on adjunct faculty

Educational Offerings (11) Assesses the alignment of the university’s program Continuous assessment and revision of programs Positive feedback in 2005 There were several recommendations: regular schedule for revisions better coherence between levels of education and timely graduation and advancement for students. systematic collection and analysis of data more comprehensive advisement structure

General Education (12) and Related Educational activities (13) Appropriateness of the general education program to the institution's mission Adequacy in cultivating basic skills and engaging questions of ethics and values Adequacy of assessment process - assuring students’ development and improving the program Related activities encompass additional services offered in support of its mission Major areas of focus are: distance education or distributed learning, alternative instructional sites or branch campuses, non-credit and certificate program offerings, basic skills provided for under prepared students, and experiential learning. 

Institutional Assessment (7) and Student Learning Assessment (14) The brain of the institution’s operations Institutional assessment - student learning and institutional effectiveness Ongoing institutional activity University assessment - third element of a four-step planning-assessment cycle MSCHE’s expectation for assessment Data needs to be meaningful, useful, and used.

How can I participate in the process? Join a subcommittee: Contact Co-chairs Lena Walton (lwalton@udc.edu) or Marilyn Hamilton (mhamilton@udc.edu) or one of the subcommittee chairs. Self- enroll in the “Middle States 2016 Self Study” organization on Blackboard and participate in the Discussion Board

Click on the Organization tab at the top of the screen How do I enroll in the “Middle States 2016 Self Study” organization on Blackboard? Login to Blackboard Click on the Organization tab at the top of the screen Type “Middle States 2016 Self Study” in the search box Wave the mouse next to the name until you see the drop down arrow. Click “Enroll”

Where can I find more information about self study process? Go to the Middle States Commission on Higher Education website: https://www.msche.org/