Maryland’s Grid Modernization Experience

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Confidential A PHI Company 1 NJ Off-Shore Wind – Recommended Compliance Structure Stakeholder Meeting January 13, 2009.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
National Town Meeting on Demand Response Focus on Pepcos Washington, DC Residential Smart Meter Pilot Program Presented By Steve Sunderhauf July 14, 2009.
DISPUTES & INVESTIGATIONS ECONOMICS FINANCIAL ADVISORY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING Early Lessons Learned from DOE-EPRI Framework Experience Melissa Chan MA DPU.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
The Power to Make a Difference PPL Electric Utilities April 2010.
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
1 11 Public Service Commission Update on Utility Issues: Reliability and Infrastructure Upgrades, Advanced Metering Issues, and Related Matters Briefing.
University of Pittsburgh School of Law 2013 Energy Law and Policy Institute Eric Matheson Energy Advisor to PAPUC Commissioner James H. Cawley August 2,
Regulatory View of DSM/EE David Drooz Public Staff – N.C. Utilities Commission April 2015.
SMART REGULATORY APPROACH FOR SMART GRID INVESTMENTS Barbara R. Alexander Consumer Affairs Consultant 83 Wedgewood Dr. Winthrop, ME (207)
The Efficiency of Energy Efficiency Program Tom Van Paris Vice President-Member Services & Communications October 18, 2012.
Power Utilities in the Telecom Business in the USA: Past Failures and Future Trends Mike Oldak Vice President & General Counsel Utilities Telecom Council.
HOME ENERGY USAGE REPORTS: DOES INCREASED FEEDBACK LEAD TO SIGNIFICANT ENERGY REDUCTIONS AND REDUCED COSTS? NASUCA MID YEAR MEETING JUNE 25, 2012 Ricky.
Battling Load Growth in NYC Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
Energate: Leaders in Consumer Demand Response ENERGATE: AN ONTARIO CASE STUDY A fully integrated 2.0 Smart Grid… with Ontario Consumers.
MEC: Customer Profitability Models Topic DSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability Jesse Langston, OG&E Oct 20 th 2013.
NASHVILLE ELECTRIC SERVICE | Association for Financial Professionals March 2012.
APS and Its Smart Grid Initiatives September 26, 2012 Tony J. Tewelis Director, Technology Innovation.
OUC’s EV Roadmap Near Term Planning Activities Develop a flexible framework and visionary roadmap Collect actionable information Business models Charging.
1  The IPM model projects increases in electricity prices as a result of the RGGI policy scenarios which, by themselves, would increase the household.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop March 3, Update on the CPUC’s Demand Response and Advanced Metering Proceedings Bruce Kaneshiro Energy Division.
EmPower MD Act overview and Demand Response Training EmPower Maryland.
PPL Electric Utilities Act 129 Phase 3 Non-Residential Programs April 20, 2016.
1 Hearing to Discuss the Potential Interplay and Effect of the Money Available to States’ Low- Income Weatherization Programs under the American Recovery.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
1 Detailed EM&V Approach for each of BGE’s Proposed Conservation Programs January 10, 2008.
1 Overview of Maryland Pepco and Delmarva Power Spring 2007 Blueprint for the Future Filings Tom Graham, President Pepco Region Maryland Commission Hearing.
1 BGE Smart Energy Pricing Program: Update to Maryland Public Service Commission April 23, 2008 Wayne Harbaugh VP – Pricing & Regulatory Services.
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
1 Proposed Performance Tracker for PSC Working Group 1 of 3 CategoryMetricResults Project Costs Cost to Deploy: Capital vs total Capital deployment cost.
EE5900 Cyber-Physical Systems Smart Home CPS
BLACK HILLS ENERGY 2016 Energy Efficiency Portfolio Annual Results Overview December 8, :00am – 12:00pm MST Mark James – Energy Efficiency Program.
Commercial Customer Demand Response Program Pilot
SMECO Demand Response filing
MEPAV 2010 CONFERENCE. AMI MANASSAS Gregg S. Paulson, P. E
Pepco and Delmarva Power
Introducing Smart Energy Pricing Cheryl Hindes
Energy Efficiency and Conservation
Technical Advisory Group Meeting on BGE’s Conservation Program
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
Market Operations Engagement Group EVSE Working Group – Principles
AMI/Smart Energy Pricing (SEP) Update
Mass Market Demand Solutions in PJM
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
Arun Vedhathiri, Director, Project Delivery, National Grid
SMART REGULATORY APPROACH FOR SMART GRID INVESTMENTS
Draft 2013 Energy-Efficiency Forecast
Restructuring Roundtable April 11, 2008 Richard Cowart
Grid Modernization in Massachusetts
2500 R Midtown Sacramento Municipal Utility District
State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
Transforming Maryland's Electric Distribution Systems
Mike Mumper & Brian Kick Good afternoon
Photovoltaic Systems Engineering Application to PV Systems
Commissioner Anne C. George
Wednesday, April 17, 2019 El Golfo 8739 Flower Ave
PG&E EV Fleet Program.
PG&E EV Fleet Program.
Presentation transcript:

Maryland’s Grid Modernization Experience Presentation for the New England Electricity Restructuring Roundtable Kelly Speakes-Backman Boston, MA September 20, 2013 1

EmPOWER Maryland Energy Efficiency Act Enacted: April 2008 (PUA § 7-211) 15% by 2015: per capita energy consumption reduction by 2015 2117 MW 5,475,000 MWh Multi-faceted : Cost-effective programs for energy efficiency (EE), demand response (DR), distributed generation, CVR, and AMI/Smart Grid Verifiable: §7-211(g)(1) requires projected & verifiable electricity savings Three year plans: 2009-2011, 2012-2014 plans developed as Work Group recommendation of PSC Staff, OPC, MEA, Utilities and other stakeholders Reporting: Quarterly data to Staff, semi-annual reports to the Commission

Scope of EmPOWER Maryland Includes Energy Efficiency (EE), Demand Response (DR) & Smart Grid (SG) 2012 – 2014 program portfolios $695m in EE/DR Programs 2009 – 2015 projected to exceed $1b (not including SG) Customer-Facing Lighting & Appliance rebates HVAC HPwES (existing homes, whole-house) Residential New Construction C&I prescriptive measures (lighting, HVAC, motors, VSD, custom retrofits, CHP) Low-income Multi-family housing (e.g., common-area EE measures) Direct Load Control Grid-Facing AMI (BGE, Pepco, DPL, SMECO) Conservation Voltage Reduction (Pepco, DPL, PE)

EmPOWER Maryland Progress 4 4 4

Cost Recovery Mechanisms Customer-Facing Portfolios: monthly surcharges 2012 Residential Avg Monthly Impacts 2012 C&I Consumption Charge (per kWh) Grid-Facing Programs: regulatory asset Smart grid utilities will use AMI reg asset Non-smart meter utilities will recover in rate base (PE)

Maryland Smart Grid Context Introduced in the context of EmPOWER No legislative mandate or specific guidelines set forth BGE and Pepco each received up to $200m ARRA Smart Grid Investment grants All Maryland AMI proposals were preceded by pilot projects, including: Technology pilots Multi-year peak pricing pilots Operational benefits pilot

Maryland Smart Grid Business Cases BGE, Pepco, DPL proposals estimated strong cost-effectiveness Roughly half the benefit from operational savings and half from peak load reductions (mostly capacity benefits) Dynamic pricing using peak time credit approach to achieve usage reductions during critical peaks SMECO cost effectiveness positive Includes operational benefits only Did not include peak load reduction savings Possible time of use rates in the future

Maryland Commission Decisions Cost recovery contingent upon demonstrated cost-effectiveness Smart grid expenditures may be requested in first rate case following full deployment and cost-effectiveness analysis Plans and Metrics 55 total metrics Metrics monitor deployment progress, costs/benefits, customer engagement Customer education plans Cyber-Security plans

Maryland Smart Grid Progress BGE 1.2 million electric & 660,000 gas meters Roughly 33% of installations completed, complete in 2014 Pepco-MD (PHI Affiliated) 550,000 electric meters in Maryland (largest jurisdictional PHI utility) Preceded (one year) by full implementation in Pepco-DC 98% complete by June 2013 DPL-MD (PHI Affiliated) 210,000 electric meters in Maryland DPL-DE completed full implementation (electric and gas) in 2012 Installations underway, complete late 2013/early 2014 SMECO 160,000 electric meters Approved Summer 2013

Maryland Smart Grid: AMI AMI overall benefits Reliability (duration) Demand reduction Energy use information transparency New technology advances and applications Forecasted Smart Grid demand reductions through 2017 (MW)

Leveraging EmPOWER and AMI Dynamic Pricing Direct load control Peak time rebates Time of use pricing Real-time pricing Conservation Voltage Reduction (“CVR”) Behavior-based EE programs Electric Vehicles and the Grid

Maryland Smart Grid: Dynamic Pricing Dynamic pricing includes DLC, PTR, TOU, real time pricing Peak event days Includes PJM DR days, high LMP days, and could include distribution problem days In most cases, declared for the following day Generally declared June – Sept. Maximum hours are 12pm – 8pm, usually actual is less Multiple customer communication streams in advance

Maryland Smart Grid: Direct Load Control DLC program reductions approximately 700 MW BGE “Smart Energy Rewards” Voluntary “Opt-in” for residential 100%, 75%, 50% option PHI “Peak Energy Savings Credit” “Opt-in” for residential, small commercial $1.25/kWh during peak period Reductions monetized in PJM capacity and energy markets True-up in annual distribution surcharge/credit

Maryland Smart Grid: Peak Time Rebates $1.25/kWh credit for reduction from customer-specific baseline Calculates usage difference from a comparable degree-day Cash flow similar to DLC programs Peak load reductions monetized in PJM capacity and energy markets PJM payments fund customer credits True-up in annual distribution surcharge/credit Can augment DLC programs If monthly reduction exceeds DLC commitment, customer receives end-of-season credit for the difference No penalty for non-participation Retail supply neutral – except for customers whose supplier provides their own PJM based load reduction program

Maryland Smart Grid: CVR PE received approval to implement CVR program under its EmPOWER portfolio Recovery of program costs will be sought in rate base after full implementation Commission Order No. 84569 directed other utilities to investigate feasibility of implementing CVR in respective service territories (Dec. 22, 2011) Directed recovery of program costs to be sought through rates

Maryland Smart Grid: Behavior-based EE Behavior-based programs encourage direct customer engagement April 2012: Commission authorized EmPOWER utilities to implement energy usage programs

Maryland Smart Grid: Electric Vehicles Maryland Senate Bill 179 (2011) Establish “a Pilot Program for electric customers to recharge electric vehicles during off-peak hours.” Pilot Program in place June 30, 2013 Report findings to General Assembly by February 1, 2015 Increase efficiency and reliability of electric distribution system Encourage lower electricity use at times of high demand BGE Pilot Program: voluntary, residential, TOU rate Based on whole-house TOU with lower off-peak pricing (400) Pepco Pilot Program: voluntary, residential options Existing customers with EVSE: whole-house TOU or PIV rate (200) Existing customers without EVSE: PIV rate and bill, Level II charging station, second meter (50) New customers without EVSE: whole-house TOU (1000)

Maryland Smart Grid: Opt-out? Jan. 7, 2013: Order No. 85294 Commission concluded (3-2) that the public interest requires provision of additional option related to installation of smart meter Additional proceedings held August 20, 2013 Whether to allow option to retain existing meter, RF-free or “near RF-free” meter Associated costs, allocation and procedures for exercising option Treatment of “non-responsive” customers What percentage opt-out scenario to consider Low-income opt-out scenarios

Maryland Smart Grid: Cyber Security Plans Company-specific AMI cyber security plans Plans apply to AMI, not utility-wide operations Work Group consensus support Commission oversight plan applicable to BGE, Pepco, DPL Key feature is independent 3rd party consultant answerable to PSC to review all details of utility AMI cyber security activities and incidents Approved by Commission June 21, 2013

For more information… www.psc.state.md.us 20

SMECO Operational Pilot Results