A. Uryson Lebedev Physical Institute RAS, Moscow

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Many different acceleration mechanisms: Fermi 1, Fermi 2, shear,... (Fermi acceleration at shock: most standard, nice powerlaw, few free parameters) main.
Advertisements

The National Science FoundationThe Kavli Foundation APS April 2008 Meeting - St. Louis, Missouri Results from Cosmic-Ray Experiments Vasiliki Pavlidou.
Fermi LAT Observations of Galactic and Extragalactic Diffuse Emission Jean-Marc Casandjian, on behalf of the Fermi LAT collaboration 7 questions addressed.
Status of Top-Down Models for the Origin of Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays I. Observation of ultra-high energy cosmic rays before the Pierre Auger Observatory.
Hang Bae Kim (HanYang University) High KIAS-NCTS Joint Workshop
High Energy Neutrinos from Astrophysical Sources Dmitry Semikoz UCLA, Los Angeles & INR, Moscow.
Upper Limit on the Cosmological  - Ray Background Yoshiyuki Inoue (Stanford) Kunihito Ioka (KEK) 1.
Nuclei As Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays Oleg Kalashev* UCLA, INR RAS GZK 40: The 3rd International Workshop on THE HIGHEST ENERGY COSMIC RAYS AND THEIR.
An update on the High Energy End of the Cosmic Ray spectra M. Ave.
ANITA Meeting UC Irvine 23 November 2002 EHE Cosmic Rays, EHE Neutrinos and GeV- TeV Gamma rays David Kieda University of Utah Department of Physics.
What is cosmic radiation and where does it come from? Frederik Rühr, Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Universität Heidelberg IRTG Seminar, 26. Oktober 2007.
07/05/2003 Valencia1 The Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays Introduction Data Acceleration and propagation Numerical Simulations (Results) Conclusions Isola.
The National Science FoundationThe Kavli Foundation Mapping the Ultra-high--energy Cosmic-ray Sky with the Pierre Auger Observatory Vasiliki Pavlidou for.
High-energy emission from the tidal disruption of stars by massive black holes Xiang-Yu Wang Nanjing University, China Collaborators: K. S. Cheng(HKU),
Quintessino model and neutralino annihilation to diffuse gamma rays X.J. Bi (IHEP)
Ultra high energy cosmic rays Donna Kubik Spring, 2005.
Accelerators in the KEK, Tsukuba Mar. 14, Towards unravelling the structural distribution of ultra-high-energy cosmic ray sources Hajime.
Nebular Astrophysics.
Petten 29/10/99 ANTARES an underwater neutrino observatory Contents: – Introduction – Neutrino Astronomy and Physics the cosmic ray spectrum sources of.
Physical conditions in potential UHECR accelerators Sergey Gureev Astronomy Dept., Moscow State University Ksenia Ptitsyna Physics Dept., Moscow State.
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays: Strangers Shrouded In Mystery Scott Fleming High Energy Series 24 Feb
Astrophysics of high energy cosmic-rays Eli Waxman Weizmann Institute, ISRAEL “New Physics”: talk by M. Drees Bhattacharjee & Sigl 2000.
Propagation of Ultra-high Energy Cosmic Rays in Local Magnetic Fields Hajime Takami (Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborator: Katsuhiko Sato (Univ. of Tokyo, RESCEU)
Telescope Array Experiment: Status and Prospects Pierre Sokolsky University of Utah.
Paul Sommers Fermilab PAC Nov 12, 2009 Auger Science South and North.
A Catalog of Candidate High-redshift Blazars for GLAST
A.Z. Gazizov LNGS, Italy Based on works with V. Berezinsky and R. Aloisio Quarks-08.
April 23, 2009PS638 Tom Gaisser 1 Neutrinos from AGN & GRB Expectations for a km 3 detector.
Correlation of the UHECR with AGN using the new statistical test methods and the updated data from Pierre Auger Observatory Hang Bae Kim (Hanyang Univ.)
1 NATURE OF KNEES AND ANKLE V.S. Berezinsky INFN, Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso.
MARCH 11YPM 2015  ray from Galactic Center Tanmoy Mondal SRF PRL Dark Matter ?
Anisotropies in the gamma-ray sky Fiorenza Donato Torino University & INFN, Italy Workshop on High-Energy Messengers: connecting the non-thermal Extragalctic.
Diffuse Emission and Unidentified Sources
52° Congresso SAIt 2008 Raffaella Bonino* for the Pierre Auger Collaboration ( * ) IFSI – INFN – Università di Torino.
Propagation of CR electrons and the interpretation of diffuse  rays Andy Strong MPE, Garching GLAST Workshop, Rome, 17 Sept 2003 with Igor Moskalenko.
November 1 - 3, nd East Asia Numerical Astrophysics Meeting KASI, Korea Shock Waves and Cosmic Rays in the Large Scale Structure of the Universe.
Propagation and Composition of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays
Sources emitting gamma-rays observed in the MAGIC field of view Jelena-Kristina Željeznjak , Zagreb.
A.Z. Gazizov LNGS, Italy Based on works with V. Berezinsky and R. Aloisio UHECR-08.
March 22, 2005Icecube Collaboration Meeting, LBL How guaranteed are GZK ’s ? How guaranteed are GZK ’s ? Carlos Pena Garay IAS, Princeton ~
Astrophysics of the Highest Energy Cosmic Rays Paul Sommers Cracow, Poland January 10, 2004.
COSMIC RAYS. At the Earth’ Surface We see cascades from CR primaries interacting with the atmosphere. Need to correct for that to understand their astronomical.
Astroparticle Physics (3/3)
L. CazónHadron-Hadron & Cosmic-Rays interactions at multi-TeV energies. Trento,2-Dez Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory L. Cazon, for the.
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays: The disappointing model Askhat Gazizov LNGS, INFN, Italy in collaboration with Roberto Aloisio and Veniamin Berezinsky April.
UHE Cosmic Rays from Local GRBs Armen Atoyan (U.Montreal) collaboration: Charles Dermer (NRL) Stuart Wick (NRL, SMU) Physics at the End of Galactic Cosmic.
Evidence for a dark matter particle Yukio Tomozawa University of Michigan March 2016.
A Search for Blazars among the Unidentified EGRET Gamma-Ray Sources.
Topics on Dark Matter Annihilation
On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration
Solar gamma-ray and neutron registration capabilities of the GRIS instrument onboard the International Space Station Yu. A. Trofimov, Yu. D. Kotov, V.
Gamma Rays from the Radio Galaxy M87
EVOLUTION OF LUMINOSITY-LINEAR SIZE RELATION
Recent Results of Point Source Searches with the IceCube Neutrino Telescope Lake Louise Winter Institute 2009 Erik Strahler University of Wisconsin-Madison.
15 sec Takahiro Sudoh (UTokyo) Tomonori Totani (UTokyo)
Theoretical status of high energy cosmic rays and neutrinos
Signatures of Protons in UHECR Transition from Galactic to
Pierre Auger Observatory Present and Future
Cosmogenic Neutrinos challenge the Proton Dip Model
Astrophysical ZeV acceleration in the jets from an accreting blackhole
Haoning He(RIKEN/UCLA/PMO)
The Search for Gamma-Rays From Galaxy Clusters
X-ray and Radio Connections
High Energy emission from the Galactic Center
Neutrinos as probes of ultra-high energy astrophysical phenomena
Particle Acceleration in the Universe
Cosmic rays, γ and ν in star-forming galaxies
Predictions of Ultra - High Energy Neutrino fluxes
Shigeru Yoshida and Aya Ishihara
Presentation transcript:

A. Uryson Lebedev Physical Institute RAS, Moscow Ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) from supermassive black holes (SMBHs) A. Uryson   Lebedev Physical Institute RAS, Moscow

COSMIC RAYS Cosmic rays (CRs) are emission that comes to the Earth from the space. The most part of cosmic rays is particles (protons). The CR energy range is wide: ~10 MeV - ~3×1020 eV. The interval of energies E>4×1019 eV is called ultra-high energies (UHE).

The main problem is: what are UHECR sources? GZK-effect Propagating in the extragalactic space, a cosmic particle interacts with relic (and radio) background, and the particle energy decreases. Due to this particles which start at energies E>4×1019 eV reach the Earth at lower energies, if particle sources are located at distances greater than ~50 Mpc. Greisen 1966; Zatsepin and Kuzmin 1966 (GZK-effect). The main problem is: what are UHECR sources?

CR data Data on UHECRs are obtained at giant ground-based arrays: the Pierre Auger Observatory and the Telescope Array CR arrival directions, composition, anisotropy, the energy spectrum. The energy spectrum due to GZK-effect its shape differs from that of an injection spectrum. It is possible to estimate distances to sources analyzing CR energy spectra measured.

Obviously CRs at ultra-high energies E>4×1019 eV are accelerated in extragalactic point-like sources (but still they are not revealed). CR arrival directions can be used to identify sources if CRs propagate in straight lines. Source identification by particle arrival directions was not effective mainly due to two reasons: errors in CR arrivals of ~ 10 that are too large to select a source among astrophysical objects falling in the error-box around arrival direction, and to CR deflection in extragalactic magnetic fields which are studied insufficiently at present.

extragalactic electromagnetic cascades Another manifestation of GZK-effect: extragalactic electromagnetic cascades In space, UHECRs interact with cosmic microwave background and extragalactic background light: p+γb p+π0, p+γb n+π+. π0  γ +γ, π+μ+ +νµ , μ+ e+ +νe+ν ̅µ γ+γb e+ + e- e+ γb e'+ γ' . As a result electromagnetic cascades are initiated by UHECRs in extragalactic space. Consequently UHECRs contribute to the isotropic gamma-ray background and to the astrophysical neutrino flux.

Isotropic gamma-ray background (IGRB) is measured by the Fermi LAT (the gamma-ray telescope LAT onboard the space observatory Fermi). Fermi LAT data are used for UHECR study as follows. 1) Different classes of objects which are possible UHECR sources are considered; UHECR spectra at the Earth are calculated to fit the measured spectrum. 2) Gamma-ray emission I cascade g generated by UHECRs in extragalactic space is calculated. 3) The calculated gamma-ray intensity is compared with the Fermi LAT IGRB, and models of UHECR sources in which I cascade g > Fermi LAT IGRB are excluded. See e.g. Giachinti et al. 2015; Gavish, Eichler 2016; Berezinsky, Gazizov, Kalashev 2016, where possible UHECR sources are active galactic nuclei (AGN); to fit spectra measured injection spectra are exponential: index a≥2.2, or around 2.6 depending on cosmological evolution of AGN.

Neutrino fluxes are generated during UHECR propagation. The neutrino intensity is obtained: 1) at the neutrino observatory IceCube in the energy range of about (100 – 3×106) GeV, 2) at the PAO in the range of (2×108 – 2×1010) GeV.

Thus two conditions on CR models arises: in addition to Icascade γ < Fermi LAT IGRB (gamma-ray test) cascade neutrino intensity Icascade υ should be less than the intensity of astrophysics neutrino measured I υ measured, Icascade υ< I υ measured (neutrino test)

THE MODEL CR sources are pointlike. (They are SMBHs THE MODEL CR sources are pointlike. (They are SMBHs. ) UHECRs are protons. Other assumptions concern three points: 1) CR sources – injection spectra and evolution 2) Extragalactic background emission 3) Extragalactic magnetic fields

The injection spectra in sources assumed to be exponential, ∝E-α, with the spectral index equals to a=2.2, 1.8, 1, 0.5, 0 where 0 corresponds to equiprobable generation of particles at any UHE. The spectra are harder than those discussed previously in literature due to another acceleration mechanism: here electric fields accelerate CRs (see e.g. [Haswell, Tajima, Sakai, ApJ. 1992]) rather than shock fronts.

We suppose that UHECR sources are located at distances z≥0.05. Source evolution We suppose that UHECR sources are located at distances z≥0.05. Source evolution influences on the CR spectrum measured (e.g. Uryson 1998, 2018; Berezinsky et al. 2016; Gavish, Eichler 2016). In the model we use a scenario of BL Lac evolution (Di Mauro et al., 2014; Kalashev, Kido 2015).

Extragalactic background emission Cosmic microwave background: Planck distribution, <εr> =6.7∙10-4 eV, <nr >=400 сm-3. Extragalactic background light: Inoue et al. 2013. Extragalactic radio background: Protheroe, Biermann 1996.

Extragalactic magnetic fields seem to be inhomogeneous: 1∙10−17Gs < B <3∙10−6 Gs (Kronberg 2005; Essey, Ando and Kusenko 2011; Dzhatdoev et al. 2017). Fields of B<≈10-9 –10-8 Gs do not break cascades. Fields of B∼10−6 Gs disturb cascades due to electron synchrotron emission. We suppose that regions where extragalactic fields are of∼10−6 Gs occupy a small part of extragalactic space and neglect them. We assume that extragalactic fields do not break cascades.

the public available code TransportCR (Kalashev, Kido 2015) COMPUTING the public available code TransportCR (Kalashev, Kido 2015) for CR propagation in the extragalactic space

Model spectra are several orders lower than the PAO and TA spectra and differ strongly in shape. So CR sources with hard injection spectra contribute negligibly to the CR flux detected by ground arrays. What is the UHECR contribution to the diffuse gamma-ray emission?

Fermi LAT IGRB = unresolved sources + extragalactic diffuse emission Contribution of unresolved sources at E>50 GeV: 86 (+16, -14) % (Di Mauro 2016) Fermi LAT IGRB (E>50 GeV)=1.325·10-9 (cm-2 s-1 sr-1) Deducting contribution of unresolved sources of 86% IGRB without blazars (E>50 GeV) =1.855∙10-10 (cm-2 s-1 sr -1). (1)

IGRB without blazars (E>50 GeV) =1.855×10-10 (cm-2 s-1 sr-1). (1) In the model for the set of spectral index values a=2.2, 1.8, 1, 0.5, 0 the cascade integral gamma-ray intensity is: Icascade γ(E>50 GeV)≈ (1.1 -1.6) ×10-10 (cm-2 s-1 sr-1). (2) The model cascade gamma-ray emission Icascade γ(E>50 GeV) is less than the value (1) in all cases of spectral indices considered. Thus the model under consideration satisfies the gamma-ray test.

We do not discuss cascade gamma-ray spectra because they depend negligibly on CR injection spectra (Berezinsky, Kalashev 2016; Dzhatdoev et al. 2017).

Neutrino fluxes are also generated during UHECR propagation, whereupon the neutrino test on CR models arises. Astrophysics neutrino fluxes measured are: E2dΦ/dE = (1.84×10-4 – 1.44×10-8) GeV sr-1 s-1 cm-2 at E=(125.89-3.16×106) GeV [PAO], E2dΦ/dE < 1.3×10-7 GeV sr-1 s-1 cm-2 at (2×1017 – 2×1019)eV [IceCube].

At energies E >1019 eV neutrino spectra depends on injection spectra.

All calculated spectra of cascade neutrinos are lower than those measured. So the model satisfies the neutrino test.

CONCLUSION Here particle injection spectra are assumed to be harder than those discussed previously in cosmic-ray literature. 1. In this case particle flux on the Earth is too low for detection. 2. But particles produce in the space a noticeable flux of diffuse gamma-ray emission via electromagnetic cascades. 3. It should be accounted for analyzing other source models and dark matter models. 4. Neutrinos are produced in cascades, and at energies E >1019 eV neutrino spectra depends on injection spectra. 5. So data on gamma-ray and neutrino emission can be used to study the model.

Remarks In the study presented it is important that injection spectra are hard. It is no matter where they are formed. The idea about hard injection particle spectra in sources arises from (Haswell, Tajima and Sakai, Astrophys. J. 1992) where particle acceleration by electric fields in accretion discs around SMBHs is analyzed. Another approach to the Universe structure (without SMBHs) exist (e.g. V. Olyeynik, this conference). 2. The first attempt to study extragalactic EM-cascades using CR data: Uryson JETP 1998.

Thank you!