MSFC Partnerships Office Function, Organization, and Operation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning Collaborative Spaces in Libraries
Advertisements

Quality Assurance of ICT in Education NAACE is the professional association for those who are concerned with advancing education through the appropriate.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
BATTELLE CROSS-SECTOR INITIATIVE: Technology Transfer & Commercialization Task Force Report to the Board of Regents Master Plan Research Advisory Committee.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
NASA Commercial Crew Program COMSTAC May 2011 Page 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration COMMERCIAL CREW PROGRAM COMSTAC May 2011 E. Mango Commercial.
DRAFT Strategic Planning U.S. Department of Energy Rebuild America Business Partners and Deanna Braunlin GAVIN Consulting, Inc. John Deakin Energy Program.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration 1 GRC All-Hands Meeting 1 May 2006.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew Initiative Overview and Status to the COMSTAC Philip McAlister NASA Exploration Systems Mission.
Centers for IBM e-Business Innovation :: Chicago © 2005 IBM Corporation IBM Project October 2005.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
NASA Real Property Program August 20, 2014 Scott Robinson Director, Facilities Engineering Division Acting Director, Integrated Asset Management Division.
PMSS Final SOW May 22 nd, Statement of Work 2 GLENN RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PMSS) The Contractor shall provide expert.
NGAC Interagency Data Sharing and Collaboration Spotlight Session: Best Practices and Lessons Learned Robert F. Austin, PhD, GISP Washington, DC March.
Working With Federal Laboratories Tim Wittig Principal Technology Management Group SAIC 202/
Implementation and Execution of Successful Research Projects with Industry Partners Keith R. Davis, Ph.D. Director.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
THOMAS J. TAUER ASSOCIATE PROVOST AND DEAN OF UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, EAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CHINCOTEAGUE BAY FIELD STATION LIAISON TO.
Module 2.1 Finance and Administration Cabinet Organizational Changes and Agency Impact March
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
NSF Workshop “Building Partnerships and Pathways to Address Engineering Grand Challenges” at U.T. El Paso, Texas Kamlesh Lulla, Ph.D.; Ph.D. Deputy Director,
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
Partnering in Federal Procurement Presented by: Joe Grabenstein September 21, 2012 MBDA Federal Procurement Center Operated by the Metropolitan Economic.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Concept of Operations for Commercial.
Federal Transit Administration Transit Bus Safety and Security Program Primer for State Departments of Transportation.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
The Life of a Policy Council Member
Advancing Cooperative Conservation. 4C’s Team An interagency effort established in early 2003 by Department of the Interior Secretary Gale Norton Advance.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy ITS America May 2010 Technology Transfer Follows Many Pathways: “It’s a Contact Sport” Work for.
Research Services Research Services Presentation to Department of Paediatrics Gill Rowe Head, Research Services, Medical Sciences 23 September 2015.
Rebecca Nickleson, MS, CRA Assistant Director Office of Research & Sponsored Programs.
ARC New Business Office (NBO) 1) NBO Introduction Wendy Dolci, Chief of NBO 2) Update on NSPIRES and External Funding Sources Ken Galal, NBO 3) Ames Instrumentation.
Carl G. Ray Program Executive Small Business Innovation Research Small Business Technology Transfer SBIRSBIR To increase small business participation.
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)
March 2004 At A Glance NASA’s GSFC GMSEC architecture provides a scalable, extensible ground and flight system approach for future missions. Benefits Simplifies.
How To: A Process for Successful Partnerships. Partnership Definition A partnership IS: A written agreement between the parties. Mutual interest in, mutual.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transitioning Toward the Future of Commercial Human Spaceflight COMMERCIAL CREW PROGRAM AIAA Spring Dinner.
DGS Recommendations to the Governor’s Task Force on Contracting & Procurement Review Report Overview August 12, 2002.
Research at UMR Serving the needs of Missouri and our Nation Wayne Huebner Interim Vice Provost for Research University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, MO
1 Olga King Jet Propulsion Laboratory Office Of Export Compliance April 27, 2011.
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 COE CST Overview May 11, 2011 Introduction to the FAA Center of Excellence for Commercial Space Transportation May 11,
1 Physical and Social Sciences Research Task Team: Final Report Alexander E. MacDonald NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory July 25, 2006 A Presentation.
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
Government and Industry IT: one vision, one community Vice Chairs April Meeting Agenda Welcome and Introductions GAPs welcome meeting with ACT Board (John.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
Safety & Health Considerations in Accommodating Commercial Activties David Loyd, JSC Safety & Test Operations 2013 NASA Safety Directors & Occupational.
0 Software Quality Assurance Implementation Plan Briefing to the Board June 20, 2003.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program February 25, 2003 USDA Presidential Initiatives Meeting Chris Niedermayer, USDA eGovernment Executive.
Small Business Programs Tatia Evelyn-Bellamy Director Small Business Division Small Business Center February 2016.
National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic Service Collaboratives ( HRSA – ) Joan A. Scott, MS CGC, Chief, Genetics Services Branch Division.
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
1 Federal Emergency Management Agency Charlie Hoffman Disaster Operations Directorate Chief, DEC Programs Disaster Emergency Communications National Public.
©© 2013 SAP AG. All rights reserved. Product Development Scenario Overview Open Legend Project Manager Scenario Description The following business roles.
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
Shared Services and Third Party Assurance: Panel May 19, 2016.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
CDRH 2010 Strategic Priorities
Partnering Opportunities ERDC actively engages in research and development with government, academic, and industrial entities:   Potential Partners Agreement.
What does the State GIS Coordinator do?
SCD Grants & Contracts Policy & Procedure 670.
Product Development Scenario Overview
Systems Engineering Management
By Jeff Burklo, Director
What is the Fusion Industry Association?
Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes
Jeff Dutton/NASA COR August 26, 2019
Presentation transcript:

MSFC Partnerships Office Function, Organization, and Operation Stacy Counts/Manager, MSFC Partnerships Office February 21, 2012

Why do we have a Partnerships Office? Created to provide beginning-to-end institutional capability for Partnerships. Serves organizations across the Center as a central hub for Partnerships assistance. The Office works closely with Center Strategic Development, Sciences, Engineering, Chief Technologist and the external community to form agreements that leverage Marshall’s capabilities, facilities, and expertise. The Office focuses on business practices and collaborative forums that facilitate Partnerships. Emphasis is on External Partner Needs

Flight Programs and Partnerships Office Robert Lightfoot/MSFC Center Director FP01 / Flight Programs and Partnerships Office FP02 / Planning & Control Office Safety & Mission Assurance Teresa Vanhooser, Manager Alan Clark Rhega Gordon, Manager Paul Gilbert, Deputy Manager Doug Riser, Assistant Manager Lisa Messer, Administrative Officer Shelia Woods (DC), ESA Chief Engineer Lisa Watson - Morgan, Manager Ken Welzyn , Deputy Manager Procurement Mark Stiles FP10 / ISS Office FP20 / Robotic Mission Programs Office FP30 / Human Exploration Development Office FP40 / Partnerships Office Annette Sledd, Manager Dennon Clardy, Manager Chris Cianciola, Manager Stacy Counts, Manager Gregg McDaniel, Deputy Manager Sandra Nixon, MSA Vacant, Deputy Whitney Young, Coord ./Data Mgr. Sheri Bedwell (DC) , MSA Angie Williams, MSA Vacant, MSA Rickey Cissom, Staff Thomas Erdman, Staff CCDEV COTS Commercial Space Commercial Industry Federal Government Academia/International Partners For more information, contact: Stacy Counts, Manager, Partnerships Office, (256) 544-6004 Chip Jones, Partnership Manager for Commercial Space, (256) 544-2701 Charles Nola, Partnership Manager for Federal Government, (256) 544-6367

MSFC Partnerships Office FP40/Partnerships Office Partnerships Office (FP40) Stacy Counts, Manager Whitney Young, Technical Coordinator MSA, Vacant Commercial Space Partnership Mgr Chip Jones Commercial Industry Federal Government Partnership Manager Charlie Nola International & Academic

“One Stop Shop” Systems Engineering Skills Operations NASA Standards Requirements Definition Design Manufacture Test Verification and Validation Transportation/ Logistics Systems Engineering Skills NASA Standards Certification Space Environments DDT&E Skills Payload Design Launch Vehicle Systems Thermal Protection GN&C S&MA Stennis Space Center Engine Test KSC Launch MAF Advanced Manufacturing (MSFC and MAF) Composites Propulsion Structural

MSFC Capabilities of Interest to Commercial Partners Propulsion Systems Research, Technology, & Development Unique Facilities(MAF & MSFC) Large-Scale Manufacturing (MAF & MSFC) Space Environments & Testing Structural Testing Propulsion Testing Avionics/Electrical Systems and Software Payload Systems Technology, Development, & Integration Vehicle Development and Integration Damage Tolerance & Fracture Mechanics Guidance, Navigation, and Control Thermal Systems Design Program/Project Management Fluid Dynamics Systems Engineering, Analysis, and Integration Mechanical, Propellants, Pressurants, and Calibration Safety and Mission Assurance Mission Operations   ECLSS Design and Development To support those core areas, we have many capabilities we’ve built up over 50 years. I’d define a capability as a discipline where we have a workforce with the knowledge and experience and/or special facilities to support that work – all of which should be of interest to commercial partners, regardless of their interest – propulsion, structures, materials, life support, etc. and where they are in their development cycle. If it goes to or through space, we’ve got capabilities there.

Partnerships Office Functions Facilitate the development of new agreements, or update existing agreements Provide clear direction on how the process works Connect appropriate technical personnel inside MSFC with partners Coordinate with the parties to ensure the right information is included in the agreement Coordinate with Chief Financial Office on pricing policies and consistency Coordinate with Legal to ensure MSFC Uniqueness statement is adequate Maintain relationships with external partners to ensure that each is getting the facilities and capabilities requested and to respond to issues as soon as possible Support various Industry events to raise awareness of NASA capabilities Maintain a Website for community access to: news releases collaboration events partnerships material organizational contacts hot links to engineering sites, other NASA Partnership Office sites

Space Act Agreements – What You Should Know Most of the agreements we use for partnerships are Space Act Agreements. Nonreimbursable SAA; no funding involved but MSFC must have an internal charge code to cover labor Reimbursable SAA; funding flows from partner to MSFC What is the difference between an “umbrella SAA” and an “Annex” Umbrella Agreement Annex Standalone Agreement How long does an SAA take to establish? How quickly can MSFC begin work on an agreement? Legal flexibilities within the SAA Pull Out clause Nonexclusivity What are key areas that cause an SAA to get “hung up”? Potential Competition with Commercial Providers (MSFC Uniqueness) Potential Conflict of Interest with SLS NRAs Who determines which agreements are accepted and which are not? Partnership Working Group Strategic Planning Council (Center Director and Direct Reports) What are considerations factored in the approval decision? Resource availability Can other NASA Centers add an annex to a MSFC umbrella and vice versa?

Agreement Steps Identify Opportunity Verify Center Alignment Partnerships Office engages with partner on possible opportunities; requests technical POCs from ED. Identify Opportunity Verify Center Alignment Develop Agreement Agreement Review and Approval Agreement Execution Partnerships Working Group Partnerships Office drafts initial agreement and brings technical POCs in for discussion on tasks. Partnerships Office maintains communication with partner and helps to work any issues.

Summary NASA is transforming its conventional thinking on partnerships to put more emphasis on long-term relationship management, and on external stakeholder needs. MSFC’s Center Director demonstrated his support to NASA’s partnerships initiative by instituting a Center re-organization with established offices for Partnerships and Center Strategic Development.

Back Up SAA Checklist for External Partners Examples of Proposed Umbrella Scope, MSFC Uniqueness Statements

SAA Checklist Type of SAA Reimbursable Non-Reimbursable Name of company, and division if desired, with address to send SAA hardcopy Title of proposed work Purpose/summary of proposed work NASA Mission supported by this work (HEOMD, etc) and how the work supports that mission Responsibilities of the partner/Responsibilities of NASA (usually discussed and developed by NASA/Partner together) Milestones/schedule for proposed tasks Milestone for each deliverable or significant event Payment information (incremental or one lump sum) NASA facilities to be used NASA-owned equipment/property to be loaned to the partner

SAA Checklist (continued) Proprietary data to be shared “Background data” – existing company proprietary data (i.e. engine performance data) provided by partner and needed for the agreement Proprietary data of partner (to include software) Proprietary data of government (to include software) Proprietary data for third parties The method of disposal of data desired by the partner Patent Rights Patents pending on any task/data involved? Existing patent on NASA or Partner side? Length of agreement (1 – 5 years) Partner Management POC Partner Technical POC (if desired) Partner Signatory (usually partner’s contracts personnel)

SAA Checklist (continued) Statement of NASA/MSFC Uniqueness Any related patented inventions that can be used to support NASA’s uniqueness? Any unique expertise of proposed NASA participating employees? Any unique equipment or facility owned by NASA? Any unique analysis techniques and/or associated tools? Has partner tried to obtain proposed work outside NASA resources and found unavailable?

Examples of Umbrella Purpose This Umbrella Agreement shall be for the purpose of providing a mechanism for MSFC and Partner to collaborate on current and future Launch Vehicle Technologies to include shared facilities, hardware, capabilities, and technical expertise at the respective organizations. This Umbrella Agreement shall be for establishing the legal framework within which Partner and MSFC may collaborate for the purpose of exchanging engineering expertise and support in the areas of safety, design, development, and systems integration of space flight hardware to include use of facilities as needed. This Umbrella Agreement shall be for the purpose of providing reimbursable support to Partner in their efforts to design, develop, test, and operate launch vehicles and space systems, including but not limited to: launch vehicle structural design and fabrication; liquid rocket engine design and test; launch abort systems and cargo and payload processing and integration.

Examples of MSFC Uniqueness Partner wants to work with NASA MSFC because there are no commercial entities with this technology development capability that would not be a competitor to Partner for future applications of the technology. MSFC has been involved in every civilian development effort to mature the technology since NASA’s formation and has extensive expertise and capability. Assess: Unique NASA facilities that can’t be found in industry? Unique NASA resources/expertise that can’t be found in industry? Integrated testing that combines several individual test scenarios? Combination of design, manufacture and test needed at one location? Only other providers of the needed resources/facilities/capabilities are competitors?