Preliminary Detailed Design Review: P18001

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P10511: Miniaturization of Xerography Derek Meinke (ME, PM) Matthew Liff (ME) Tony Zhang (EE) Zaw Htoo (ISE)
Advertisements

Christian Seemayer Rob Proetti Tim DeBellis Tim Giguere Will Kelly.
1. P09203 – 1kg Robotic Motor Module Gen 2 Platform This project is Sponsored by the Kate Gleason Foundation.  Team Members:  Lauren Farnsworth → Team.
EDGE™ MAV Control System - P Management Review (MSD I) Erik Bellandi – Project Manager Ben Wager – Lead Engineer Garrett Argenna – Mechanical Engineering.
Typical phases of a project: 1.Schematic Design 2.Design Development 3.Construction Documents 4.Construction Administration.
EDGE™ Final Project Presentation P09141 – Satellite Thermal Heater Controller Anthony Berwin (Mechanical Engineer)
Design Reviews.1 KGCOE Multidisciplinary Sr. Design Borkholder 2007 R I T Design Reviews Objectives of the Design Review Participants for a successful.
Design Reviews.1 KGCOE Multidisciplinary Sr. Design Borkholder 2006 R I T Design Reviews Objectives of the Design Review Participants for a successful.
Low Cost Fundus Camera P15590 December 11th, 2014
Actively Stabilized Hand Held Laser Pointer May 8, 2014 Kaitlin Peranski Spencer Wasilewski Kyle Lasher Kyle Jensen Chris Caporale Jeremy Berke.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Power Generation for the Better Water Maker: Subsystems Design Review October 29, 2013.
Week 9 Subsystem Design Review MSD P /29/13 Emily Courtney, JR Daley, Alex Hebert, Greg Roeth & Martha Vargas.
Automatic Shift Controls for ATV Sponsored by: Joel Notaro Polaris Industries Advised by : Professor George Slack Project Family: Modular, Scalable, Open.
LSU 01/17/2006Spring LaACES Schedule For the semester and the next few weeks.
Detailed Design & Component Selection. Detailed Design Phase Portion of the engineering design process where the engineering team can completely describe.
Preliminary Detailed Design Review P15080 Flow Culture System November 13, 2014.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Stevens Institute of Technology 2/13/2012.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fourth Edition
Request for Proposal (RFP)
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
EE400D DOCUMENTATION INSTRUCTIONAL SERIES CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW.
Page 1 JUSTIFY define and validate REQUIRE- MENTS define initial management DOCUMENTS define INFRA- STRUCTURE allocated maintenance changes management.
1 Introduction to Engineering Team Design Project Agenda Team project description Introduction to design process. Brainstorming.
Electric Toothbrush Redesign Hank Lin Jesse Shaffer Kuralay M. Yaqi Yang 09/30/2011.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Preliminary Detailed Design Review November 13, 2015.
P Magnetically Levitated Propeller Group Members: Eli, Zach, Mike, Joe, & Bernie.
P16453 Subsystem Design Loading, Measurement, Control, and Test of a Journal Bearing Test Platform Kris Kidder | John Dolan | Shay Stanistreet | Anthony.
Subsystem Design Review P16203 Andre Pelletreau, Kerry Oliviera, Jeremy Willman, Vincent Stowbunenko, Kai Maslanka.
P /24/14 Meeting. What we did well ●Depth and thoroughness of work ●Documentation of work ●Team Work ●Others?
Subsystem Design Review Bernie Garcia, Zach Louison, Mike Purcell, Joe Bernardini, Elijah Sensenig.
E-NABLE Hand Test Rig P16061 David Schwartz, Tia Parks, Shannon Barry, Samantha Mason, Charles Rumfola.
P16452: Active Reciprocating Compressor Valve Assembly Week 9: Subsystem Design Review.
P16680: AATech Universal Oil and Bag System Subsystem Design Review 10/20/15.
Preliminary Detailed Design Review Group P16228: Mike, Zach, Joe, Elijah & Bernie.
Project Management Requirements Prof. Ralph Locurcio, PE Dr. Troy Nguyen, PE.
SYSTEM LEVEL DESIGN REVIEW P16318 Gaseous Mass Flow Rate Controller Luke McKean, Lianna Dicke, Selden Porter, Schuyler Witschi ?
Detailed Design Review Group P16228: Mike, Zach, Joe, Elijah & Bernie.
SPX Data Acquisition PRELIMINARY DETAILED DESIGN REVIEW John Dong David Haller Adam Johnson Thomas Klaben Luke Kranz.
What has been accomplished at the end of MSD 1 & 2?
Motor Assisted Wheelchair Design Review 10/01/15.
Request for Proposal (RFP) In response to the RFP – the first step is to prepare a proposal 1. Review Customer Requirements and come up with candidate.
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
P07307: Controls for Dynamic Suspension
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
Chapter 6: Database Project Management
Systems Analysis and Design
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Preliminary Detailed Design
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Detailed Design
Request for Proposal (RFP)
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Build and Test Review
Team We Ate 9 No Glove, No Love.
Tigerbot VI Final Detailed Design Review
Kris Kidder | John Dolan | Shay Stanistreet | Anthony Miuccio
Systems Design Review : Heart Pump and Circulatory System
Low-Cost Fundus Camera
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
P17452 Dresser-Rand System Health Monitor System Level Design Review
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Build and Test Prep
P Nano-ink Deposition System Detail Design Review
Team P16228: Magnetically Levitated Propeller
Project Management Unit #2
P18325: Automated Breast Pump Cleaning System (Team ABC’s)
Detailed Design Presentation
P18044 – Tremor Mitigation Device 2
Detailed Design Review Solar Thermal Water Heater
Detailed Design Review: P18001
P18325: Automated Breast Pump Cleaning System (Team ABC’s)
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Detailed Design Review: P18001 11-14-17

Agenda Team Vision Feasibility Risk assessment Drawings Concept with pressure sensor Concept with relays Budgeting Prototyping Tre’s prototype Detailed electrical drawings Design flowchart Testing Feasibility Sensor testing plans (relate to risk management) Any sensor test results Simulation for strain gauges BOM Plans for next phase

Team vision What we intended to do: What we accomplished: Investigate concepts from Pugh Diagram Begin ordering sensors and parts for testing Design and build a Proof-of-Concept prototype Determine sensors to proceed with Review and update Risk Management chart Consult Subject Matter Experts Create a BOM What we accomplished: Ordered material for glove portion of prototype Ordered strain gauges Identified and ordered another feasible sensor Integrated functionality for 9 axis accelerometer Made Electrical system diagrams and schematics Updated the Risk Management chart Consulted a Subject Matter Expert regarding sensor feasibility Drafted a BOM Designed and built a Proof-of Concept prototype Natasha

Risk Management - High Risk Items Full document in pre-read Corey

Risk Management - High Risk Items Full document in pre-read Corey

Drawings - Proposed Design of Electrical Subsystem 2D Overall Subsystem Design 3D Overall Subsystem Design Zach?

Drawings - Proposed Design Case to cover internal components zach?

Drawings - Proposed Design Mini watch bands to adjust to a range of finger circumference sizes zach?

Drawings - Proposed Design Thorough Sketch of Hand Strap to secure controller Silicone base of the Hand Strap zach?

Budgeting Chris

Prototyping - Tre’s Prototype

Detailed Electrical Drawings Chris

Design Flow Chart Tre

Testing Buttons

Testing Accelerometer ADXL335

Testing RBG

Feasibility - Strain Gauge Simulation Epoxy for strain Gauge Silicone Layer Modelled as linear stretching instead of bending Zach Calculate using equivalent springs in place of materials

Feasibility - Strain Gauge Simulation Zach

Feasibility - Sensor Testing Adrita

BOM Chris

Plans for Next Phase Test switch/relay replacements Review Test Plan results Determine final design based on test results Decide which sensor, MCU, bluetooth to use Design mechanical implementation of sensor Research alternate materials for silicone to use for glove Research manufacturing processes needed for “glove” Design PCB to reduce size Adrita: For the next three weeks, the main focus is on carrying out the test plans, so that we can obtain the proper details for the detailed review.