New Faculty Orientation Non-tenure-track Faculty Appointments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Renee L. Wallace Associate Vice President Academic Personnel Services August 9, 2013.
Advertisements

1 Reappointment, Promotion & Continuous Appointment (Tenure) Process and Issues.
Retention Reviews Patricia Linton Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences.
Proposed Revisions to Section 5 (Review & Evaluation of Faculty Performance) of the Faculty Handbook Spring, T&P Oversight Committee Office.
 UAFT *Collective Bargaining Agreement – Article 5  UNAC * Collective Bargaining Agreement – Article 9 Can access through Faculty Services website at:
Faculty of Medicine Learning Collaborative Unionization of Research Personnel and Contract Academic Staff Regulations April 28, 2011.
Workload Agreements New Faculty Orientation Patricia Linton Professor of English Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences.
New Web-Based Course Evaluation Services Available to Schools and Departments Presentation to Faculty Council November 6, 2009.
Faculty Affairs presents:.  Conditions of Appointment  Lecturer Evaluation Process  Reappointment  Entitlements  Order of Assignment  Salary  New.
Workload Agreements New Faculty Orientation Patricia Linton Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences.
Workload Agreements New Faculty Orientation Patricia Linton Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences.
Douglas O. Smith Office of General Counsel February 15, 2013.
Preparation for Faculty Evaluation Patricia Linton Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences March 27, 2015.
MSCHE Expectations for Governance Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education Annual Conference December 12, 2011.
EMPOWERING LOCAL SENATES Kevin Bontenbal, South Representative Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative.
Workload Fulfillment New Faculty Orientation Patricia Linton Senior Associate Dean College of Arts & Sciences.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
ARTICLE X, DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION PROCEDURES GOVERNING TENURE, PROMOTION, AND CONTRACT RENEWAL contract, unchanged for
Wrestling with Workload: Valpo’s Faculty Workload Task Force Kraig Olejniczak, Dean, College of Engineering Mike Owens, Assistant Provost for Faculty Affairs.
Reimbursed Release Time (RRT) and FAC Additional Pay Office of Research & Sponsored Programs 1.
Faculty Governance Jane Dillehay Faculty Chair Jan Hafer AAUP Chair 12 August 2011.
SCC Tenure Process November 13, Goal: Ensure Faculty Excellence  Faculty excellence supports Shoreline’s vision of being a world-class institution.
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, HAYWARD Academic Affairs MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 1995 T0: Department Chairs FROM: Frank Martino Provost & Vice President,
Hamlet on Submission Deadlines: To Enforce Them or not to Enforce Them Presented by Darlene Allen, MBA, CRA Director, Pre-Award Administration Morehead.
Patricia Linton, Ph.D. Professor of English Senior Associate Dean for Academics College of Arts and Sciences Faculty Evaluation.
Fall 2006 Faculty Evaluation and Tenure Review Process Tenure Review Process Riverside Community College District.
Canadian Business Ethics Research Network – PhD Cluster Professional Development Workshop Pursuing a Successful Academic Career Sheila A. Brown PhD, May.
CHAIRS AND DIRECTORS ORIENTATION August 16, 2016.
University p&t forum Introductions April 24, 2017.
Tenure and Promotion at University of Toledo
Support of Scholarly Activities (SOSA)
Workload Fulfillment Term Faculty Appointments Patricia Linton
NTTF Rights and Responsibilities
PAc-17 Sabbatical Leave of Absence
The Departmental Performance Review Committee
Remarks on the Tenure and Promotion Process
New and Improved Annual Reviews
Faculty Workload Model
Training for Reviewers Fall 2017
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Faculty Evaluation Faculty Workshop on Retention April 2, 2010
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
Topics How are things?  Concerns, questions, comments?
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
The UIS Faculty Personnel Process
What you need to know now to be promoted later!
Achieving Tenure and Promotion
Janet Kistner VP Faculty Development & Advancement April 2018
Faculty Performance Reviews at MSU
Chapter 340: Employee Absences Faculty Leave
The Departmental Performance Review (PR)
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Office of Sponsored Programs & Research
Overview of Sabbatical Leave Policies and Procedures
Preparing for Promotion and Annual Review August 22, 2018
Promotion on the Clinician Educator and Clinical Practice Tracks
Maximizing Your Chances for Promotion and Tenure
The Departmental Performance Review Committee
Multi-year Contract Amendment
New Faculty Orientation
Your Senate & Curriculum Issues
PAc-28 Educational Leave of Absence
Training for Reviewers Fall 2018
After the Dossier is Submitted
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
Promotion & Tenure workshop
Training for Faculty Reviewers
Sabbatical and Difference-in-Pay Leaves Office of Faculty Advancement
Preparation for Faculty Evaluation
Tenure and Promotion: Crossing the Finish Line
Presentation transcript:

New Faculty Orientation Non-tenure-track Faculty Appointments Workload Fulfillment New Faculty Orientation Non-tenure-track Faculty Appointments

Workload Agreement Document that establishes expectations of the faculty member across the academic year (Fall & Spring). Basis of faculty evaluation.

Role of the Workload Agreement in Evaluation Faculty are evaluated annually by the dean or dean’s designee based upon an Annual Activity Report (AAR) submitted by the faculty member. The AAR consists of a current CV plus the Annual Activity Report form, which includes a brief narrative self- evaluation. The AAR follows the basic outline of the Workload Agreement. Evaluations are based upon fulfillment of the workload assignment and professional responsibilities.

Constraints affecting Non-tenure-track Appointments Not a Continuing Appointment – each NTT appointment is based upon defined needs and resources. NTT appointments are expected to end. Evaluation and reappointment are separate decisions. Successful fulfillment of the workload is critical, but not the only basis for a new appointment. Each NTT appointment fulfills a specific need defined by the workload.

Development of NTT Workload Agreement Workload proposal initiated by department chair or program administrator Approved by Dean & Provost Faculty member may or may not have input in the development of the workload

Development of Workload Agreement All components of a non-tenure-track workload are contingent upon need. Workload components may vary from semester to semester and from one contract period to another. Components that may be included, as needed: Teaching (most NTT appointments are teaching- intensive Service (as applicable) Research/Creative activity (as applicable)

Development of Workload Agreement The standard faculty Workload Agreement establishes faculty responsibilities during a 9-month contract period, typically Fall and Spring semesters. If a Summer Additional Assignment or Contract Extension is assigned and accepted, it should be documented either on a separate summer workload, or as “plus one, two, or three months” on the base workload, depending on the nature of the work. (The University is not obligated to offer an additional assignment outside the 9-month contract, and the faculty member is not obligated to accept it.) Workload agreements for summer assignments are often developed later than the standard Workload Agreement.

Teaching Assignments According to the UNAC Collective Bargaining Agreement, teaching encompasses, among other things: Delivery of instruction (whatever the format) Preparation of course materials Development or revision of curriculum General advising of students “Other activities benefitting students’ academic development.”

Service No standard template for workload assignments In many units, there is ongoing evaluation of essential service in light of fiscal constraints. Service components of workloads (if applicable) have become narrower and more specific. Requests / invitations for service often come after submission of the original workload proposal. Do not take on significant additional service activities unless assigned by the Dean. Stay within the specified service proportion of the workload.

Midyear Revision of Workload Proposed changes in the actual workload require revision of the workload document and formal approval by the chair or program administrator and the Dean or Dean’s designee. Change in teaching – common for specific courses to change, but workload agreement should be corrected. Requests for changes or additions to the workload should be discussed with the department Chair and approved by the Dean before commitment.

Reminders Any increase or overload in the scope of work must be authorized by the Dean or Dean’s designee. Faculty should not independently accept expanded assignments on the assumption that compensation will be available. Many NTT appointments are renewed. However, successful past performance does not guarantee a new appointment. Needs and resources must be documented for each NTT appointment, each time. Every term of hire is a discrete contract.