Seasonal common scores plots

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1ECMWF forecast User Meeting -- Reading, June 2006 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Advertisements

Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 9° General MeetingAthens September Working package/Task on “standardization” The “core” Continuous parameters: T2m,
COSMO General Meeting – Roma Sept 2011 Some results from operational verification in Italy Angela Celozzi – Giovanni Favicchio Elena Oberto – Adriano.
3.01 Investigate the water cycle including the processes of: Evaporation. Condensation. Precipitation. Run-off.
 Weather Maps often use symbols to represent conditions  A common one is known as a Wind Barb.
Verification of DWD Ulrich Damrath & Ulrich Pflüger.
Unit 4: Weather. KWHL “Looking for Trends” Weather Data Collection Project Everyday during the unit, you will write down weather data at the beginning.
Weather Observation What is the weather in different places?
COSMO General Meeting Zurich, 2005 Institute of Meteorology and Water Management Warsaw, Poland- 1 - Verification of the LM at IMGW Katarzyna Starosta,
Long-term trends of the quality of COSMO-EU forecast expressed as the universal score COSI and others scores for temperature 2 m and wind 10 m - related.
On the impact of the SSO scheme in the COSMO model into the development of a deep cyclone in the Tirrenian sea Case study: April Antonella Morgillo.
COSMO General Meeting – Moscow Sept 2010 Some results from operational verification in Italy Angela Celozzi - Federico Grazzini Massimo Milelli -
9° General Meeting Adriano Raspanti - WG5. 9° General MeetingAthens September Future plans CV-VerSUS project future plans COSI “The Score” new package.
SEASONAL COMMON PLOT SCORES A DRIANO R ASPANTI P ERFORMANCE DIAGRAM BY M.S T ESINI Sibiu - Cosmo General Meeting 2-5 September 2013.
We carried out the QPF verification of the three model versions (COSMO-I7, COSMO-7, COSMO-EU) with the following specifications: From January 2006 till.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Conditional verification of all COSMO countries: first.
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
Seasonal forecasting from DEMETER to ENSEMBLES21 July 2009 Seasonal Forecasting From DEMETER to ENSEMBLES Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes ECMWF.
The latest results of verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta Joanna Linkowska COSMO General Meeting, Cracow September 2008 Institute of Meteorology.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Fuzzy and standard verification for COSMO-EU and COSMO-DE Ulrich Damrath (with contributions by Ulrich Pflüger) COSMO GM Rome 2011.
Quiz Do Quiz on worksheet page ________ –Use the map given to answer the following questions. –Use your ESRT! –Hand in when done.
U. Damrath, COSMO GM, Athens 2007 Verification of numerical QPF in DWD using radar data - and some traditional verification results for surface weather.
31 August 2015 Map Discussion Asheville, North Carolina Douglas Miller.
Langen, September 2003 COSMO-LEPS objective verification Chiara Marsigli, Francesco Boccanera, Andrea Montani, Fabrizio Nerozzi, Tiziana Paccagnella.
Climate-Weather Presentation For Climate Modeling 11 September 2015.
Short Range Ensemble Prediction System Verification over Greece Petroula Louka, Flora Gofa Hellenic National Meteorological Service.
General Meeting Moscow, 6-10 September 2010 High-Resolution verification for Temperature ( in northern Italy) Maria Stefania Tesini COSMO General Meeting.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Tuning the horizontal diffusion in the COSMO model.
16 November 2015 Map Discussion Asheville, North Carolina Douglas Miller.
10 November 2014 Map Discussion Asheville, North Carolina Douglas Miller.
Operational verification system Rodica Dumitrache National Metorogical Administration ROMANIA.
Overview of WG5 activities and Conditional Verification Project Adriano Raspanti - WG5 Bucharest, September 2006.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 2 Outlook Some focus on Temperature with common plots and Conditional Verification Some Fuzzy verification Long trends.
10th COSMO General Meeting, Cracow, Poland Verification of COSMOGR Over Greece 10 th COSMO General Meeting Cracow, Poland.
Latest results in the precipitation verification over Northern Italy Elena Oberto, Marco Turco, Paolo Bertolotto (*) ARPA Piemonte, Torino, Italy.
Verification methods - towards a user oriented verification The verification group.
Dmitry Alferov, Elena Astakhova, Gdaly Rivin, Inna Rozinkina Hydrometcenter of Russia 13-th COSMO General Meeting, Rome, 5-9 September 2011.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 2 Outlook The COSMO-Index COSI at DWD Time series of the index and its DWD 2003.
WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Rome 2011 Authors: ALL Presented by Adriano Raspanti.
New results in COSMO about fuzzy verification activities and preliminary results with VERSUS Conditional Verification 31th EWGLAM &16th SRNWP meeting,
Weather Station Model.
Operational Verification at HNMS
Station Models.
COSMO-RU operational verification in Russia using VERSUS2
Current verification results for COSMO-EU and COSMO-DE at DWD
André Walser MeteoSwiss, Zurich
aLMo from GME and IFS boundary conditions: A comparison
Tuning the horizontal diffusion in the COSMO model
NMME Update High Frequency Data Online – and Growing
COSMO Priority Project ”Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts”
WEATHER STATION MODEL Wind Speed Cloud Cover Temperature Wind
18 November 2013 Map Discussion
Country Presentation SASCOF September 2016 Maldives
COSMO General Meeting 2009 WG5 Parallel Session 7 September 2009
Verification Overview
Conditional verification of all COSMO countries: first results
Preliminary evaluations of COSMO RO using VERSUS
Christoph Gebhardt, Zied Ben Bouallègue, Michael Buchhold
T. Ose, T. Yasuda (MRI/JMA), Y. Takaya, S. Maeda, C. Kobayashi
SRNWP-PEPS COSMO General Meeting September 2005
Some Verification Highlights and Issues in Precipitation Verification
Verification Overview
Ulrich Pflüger & Ulrich Damrath
Latest Results on Variational Soil Moisture Initialisation
Weather Station Models
Short Range Ensemble Prediction System Verification over Greece
26 November 2018 Map Discussion
Verification using VERSUS at RHM
Presentation transcript:

Seasonal common scores plots 13 th COSMO General Meeting, Rome, 5th-9th September 2011

Period: SON 2010, DJF2010/2011, MAM 2011, JJA 2011 Run: 00 UTC run Continuous parameters - T2m, Td2m, Mslp, Wspeed, TCC (optional) Scores : ME, RMSE Forecasts Step: every 3 hours Dichotomic parameters - Precipitation: Scores: FBI, ETS Cumulating: 6h, 12h and 24h Thresholds: 0.2, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0 for mm/6h and mm/12h Thresholds: 0.2, 2.0, 10.0, 20.0 mm/24h

TEMPERATURE AT 2 M - SON 2010 - JJA 2011

DEW POINT TEMPERATURE - SON 2010 - JJA 2011

MEAN SEA LEVEL PRESSURE - SON 2010 – JJA 2011

WIND SPEED AT 10 M - SON 2010 - JJA 2011

TOTAL CLOUD COVER - SON 2010 - JJA 2011

PRECIPITATION 6 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0,10.0 mm, FBI - SON 2010

PRECIPITATION 6 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0,10.0 mm ETS - SON 2010

PRECIPITATION 12 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0,10.0 mm, FBI - SON 2010

PRECIPITATION 12H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0,10.0 mm ETS - SON 2010

PRECIPITATION 24H, 0.2, 2.0, 10.0, 20.0 mm FBI - SON 2010

PRECIPITATION 24H, 0.2, 2.0,10.0, 20.0 mm ETS - SON 2010

PRECIPITATION 6 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0 mm, FBI - DJF 2011

PRECIPITATION 6 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0,10.0 mm, ETS - DJF 2011

PRECIPITATION 12 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0,10.0 mm, FBI - DJF 2011

PRECIPITATION 12 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0,10.0 mm, ETS - DJF 2010

PRECIPITATION 24 H, 0.2, 2.0, 10.0, 20.0 mm, FBI - DJF 2010

PRECIPITATION 24 H, 0.2, 2.0,10.0, 20.0 mm, ETS - DJF 2010

PRECIPITATION 6 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0 mm, FBI – MAM 2010

PRECIPITATION 6 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0,10.0 mm, ETS - MAM 2010

PRECIPITATION 12 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0 mm, FBI – MAM 2010

PRECIPITATION 12 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0 mm, ETS – MAM 2010

PRECIPITATION 24 H, 0.2, 2.0, 10.0, 20.0 mm, FBI – MAM 2011

PRECIPITATION 24 H, 0.2, 2.0,10.0, 20 mm, ETS – MAM 2010

PRECIPITATION 6 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0 mm, FBI – JJA 2011

PRECIPITATION 6 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0 mm, ETS – JJA 2011

PRECIPITATION 12 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0 mm, FBI – JJA 2011

PRECIPITATION 12 H, 0.2, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0 mm, ETS – JJA 2011

PRECIPITATION 24 H, 0.2, 2.0, 10.0, 20.0 mm, FBI – JJA 2011

PRECIPITATION 24 H, 0.2, 2.0, 10.0, 20.0 mm, ETS – JJA 2011