Fig. 2. —Phylogenetic relationships and motif compositions of some representative MORC genes in plants and animals. ... Fig. 2. —Phylogenetic relationships.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Fig. 1. Genomic structure of the csd gene in A

Advertisements

Fig. 8 The two cases for the terminal edge e<sub>0</sub>

FIG. 2.— Phylogenetic tree and divergence time estimates for mtDNA sequences of Przewalski's and domestic horses. The results of analysis carried out in.

Fig. 1. — The life cycle of S. papillosus. (A) The life cycle of S

From: Is ftsH the Key to Plastid Longevity in Sacoglossan Slugs?

Fig. 1 Nodes in a conceptual knowledge graph

FIG. 1.— Correlation of RPKM between (A) 1,509 TE families estimated from B73–104 and the in silico data with 5 outliers indicated in gray; (B) 1,514 TE.

Figure 1 The branches of NJ phylogenies calculated from the main genomic ORFs of (A) 240 isolates of PVY and (B) 103 of the isolates that showed no significant.

Fig. 2. —The 26 models implemented in this study

Figure 1. The flow chart illustrates the construction process of anti-CRISPRdb, and the information that users can obtain from anti-CRISPRdb. From: Anti-CRISPRdb:

Figure 1: Necrobiosis lipoidica: Yellow-brown skin lesions with indurated borders located on both lower legs. Figure 1: Necrobiosis lipoidica: Yellow-brown.

Figure 1. Circular taxonomy tree based on the species that were sequenced in our study. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1. An example of a thioviridamide-like molecule, thioalbamide, and inset, a proposed biochemical route to ... Figure 1. An example of a thioviridamide-like.

ADAb: anti-drug antibody.

FIGURE 1 Kidney biopsies of Patients 1 and 2

Figure 1: Axial T2 W images of penis showed a well-defined septated area of 2 cm in the posterior aspect of ... Figure 1: Axial T2 W images.

FIGURE 1 Histological diagnoses divided into 8-year time frames (n = 1208). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.

FIGURE 1 The effect of daprodustat on hemoglobin (Hgb) levels

FIGURE 2 Responses to the question: regarding vasoactive drugs, does your centre use the following frequently, rarely ... FIGURE 2 Responses to the question:

FIGURE 1 Maternal (A) urinary aldosterone; (B) plasma active renin; (C) urinary AGT concentrations; and (D) plasma AGT ... FIGURE 1 Maternal (A) urinary.

FIGURE 1 Flow chart of patient enrollment and exclusion

Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected numbers of exon boundaries aligning to boundaries of domain and disorder ... Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected.

Figure 1. autoMLST workflow depicting placement and de novo mode

Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot of cumulative incidence of cancer onset following dermatomyositis diagnosis stratified ... Anti-TIF1-Ab: anti-transcriptional.

Figure 1 Flortaucipir PET MUBADA/PERSI SUVr at baseline, 9 and 18 months for individual subjects. Each subject is ... Figure 1 Flortaucipir PET MUBADA/PERSI.

Fig. 1 Mean change from baseline in ANC ± s. e

Point estimates with ... Point estimates with 95% CI. HR: hip replacement; KR: knee replacement. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.

FIGURE 1 Participant flow diagram. Exercise Counseling Clinic (ECC).

Graph 1. The number of homicide cases per year discussing neuro-evidence. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.

Figure 1. Analysis of human TRIM5α protein with Blast-Search and PhyML+SMS ‘One click’ workflow. (A) NGPhylogeny.fr ... Figure 1. Analysis of human TRIM5α.

Figure 2. Natural history of chlamydia transmission, with arrows showing the transitions between health states. Figure 2. Natural history of chlamydia.

Figure 1 Nelson-Aalen estimates of the cumulative incidence rates for patients on versus off IST. ON = optic neuritis; ... Figure 1 Nelson-Aalen estimates.

FIGURE 1 Study consort diagram

Fig. 2 Case 2. Levels of serum creatinine and anti-GBM antibodies before and during treatment with cyclophosphamide, ... Fig. 2 Case 2. Levels of serum.

Figure 1. Illustration of DGR systems and their prediction using myDGR

FIGURE 1 Food groups consumed (mean, g/d) among US infants and young children by age group and tertile of mean ... FIGURE 1 Food groups consumed (mean,

Figure 1. Prediction result for birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 (PDB: 1bv1), as obtained by comparison to the cherry ... Figure 1. Prediction result for.

Figure 1. PaintOmics 3 workflow diagram

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of solar energy and coal-fired power generation system. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1. Uncertainty reduction, value creation, and appropriation in two case studies. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1 Ratio of the geometric mean concentration of hsTnT (A) and sST2 (B) at baseline (BL) and each subsequent ... Figure 1 Ratio of the geometric mean.

Figure 1. Time to clinical stability (a) and time to defervescence (b) in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. ... Figure 1. Time to clinical stability.

Figure 1. MERMAID web server interface (Start page, Parameter page): MERMAID provides two ways to submit a protein ... Figure 1. MERMAID web server interface.

Figure 1. Yvis platform overview

Figure 1. The framework of NetGO with seven steps

Figure 1. Workflow of the HawkDock server that is divided into three major steps: (i) input of unbound or bound protein ... Figure 1. Workflow of the HawkDock.

Figure 1 Patient disposition

Figure 1 BM community in the normozoospermic and iNOA human testis parenchyma. Quantification of the 16 S copies/ng in ... Figure 1 BM community in the.

Fig. 1. —Synteny analysis of melon chromosome 1 (brown) and cucumber chromosome 7 (green) based on melon-cucumber ... Fig. 1. —Synteny analysis of melon.

Figure 1 Design of trials included in individual patient data meta-analysis. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.

Figure 1. Scheme of a phosphorothioated-terminal hairpin formation and self-priming extension (PS-THSP) for selection ... Figure 1. Scheme of a phosphorothioated-terminal.

Figure 1. The proportion of CSBM responders over the 2-week treatment period (A), the proportion of SBM responders by ... Figure 1. The proportion of CSBM.

Figure 1 Genetic results. No case had more than one diagnostic result

Figure 1. (A) Baseline contrast-enhanced CT scan of melanoma patient presenting with metastases in the liver and lymph ... Figure 1. (A) Baseline contrast-enhanced.

Figure 1. Prevalence of parasitic infection and anemia among the children. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.

Figure 1. The overlap between Ensembl/GENCODE, RefSeq and UniProtKB genes. The number of genes classified as coding in ... Figure 1. The overlap between.

Fig. 1. —OR gene tree including 2,973 genes from seven ants, honeybee, and jewel wasp. The tree was reconstructed ... Fig. 1. —OR gene tree including 2,973.

Figure 1. DNA-guided RNA cleavage activity

Figure 1. Illustration of aggregation functions on the local network of 1-decene. 1-decene is marked as target. ... Figure 1. Illustration of aggregation.

Figure 1 The workflow of CAR development from a hybridoma

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the replicons of the family Burkholderiaceae. An unrooted RAxML maximum ... Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the.

Source:Zimnisky (2014). Source:Zimnisky (2014).

Figure 1 Mechanisms of mitral regurgitation.

Fig. 1. —GO categories enriched in gene families showing high or low omega (dN/dS) values for Pneumocystis jirovecii. ... Fig. 1. —GO categories enriched.

Figure 2. Model adequacy results for the two empirical data sets, West African Ebola, and 2009 H1N1 influenza. The ... Figure 2. Model adequacy results.

Fig. 2. Genetic differentiation among populations and individuals

Figure 1. Unrooted phylogenetic trees for UL73 and UL74 based on amino acid sequences derived from 243 genome ... Figure 1. Unrooted phylogenetic trees.

Figure 1. (A) Overview of ENPD including data source, data processing and features. Transcriptomes from TSA, genomes ... Figure 1. (A) Overview of ENPD.

Figure 1. Hepatitis C screening and diagnostic algorithm at the MSF clinic, Karachi, Pakistan, March 2016–September ... Figure 1. Hepatitis C screening.

Fig. 1. A graphical representation of the GGDNA workflow used to identify each single expressed TE transcript from ... Fig. 1. A graphical representation.

Presentation transcript:

Fig. 2. —Phylogenetic relationships and motif compositions of some representative MORC genes in plants and animals. ... Fig. 2. —Phylogenetic relationships and motif compositions of some representative MORC genes in plants and animals. The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using some representative species based on the ML method implemented in RaxML-HPC2 through the online CIPRES Science Gateway website. For major nodes, ML bootstrap values >70% are labeled based on 1,000 replications. Motifs conserved across MORC proteins were identified through a MEME analysis and each motif composition is presented in supplementary figure S3, Supplementary Material online. Based on their highly conserved motif composition, we proposed a characteristic MORC domain that was marked in red box on the right. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Genome Biol Evol, Volume 10, Issue 7, 02 July 2018, Pages 1730–1744, https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy136 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Fig. 1. —Phylogenetic classification of MORC genes in plant and animal lineages. Phylogenetic tree was constructed ... Fig. 1. —Phylogenetic classification of MORC genes in plant and animal lineages. Phylogenetic tree was constructed using the ML method implemented in RaxML-HPC2 through the online CIPRES Science Gateway website. The topology of ML tree showed that MORC genes in plants and animals can be clearly classified into two major groups, respectively, which is designed as Plants-Group I, Plants-Group II and Animals-Group I, Animals-Group II. The green algae were located in the base of these two plant groups. Seven and four canonical MORC genes in Arabidopsis and human were labeled with red triangle and circle. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Genome Biol Evol, Volume 10, Issue 7, 02 July 2018, Pages 1730–1744, https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy136 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Fig. 3. —Homologous modeling of MORC1 protein and MORC domain in several representative species. The 3D structure of ... Fig. 3. —Homologous modeling of MORC1 protein and MORC domain in several representative species. The 3D structure of MORC1 protein and MORC domain in Arabidopsis and human were predicted based on the Swiss-model database according to mice MORC3 protein crystal structure (A). Sequence logo of MORC domain was generated on the Weblogo website using all aligned MORC domain sequences (B). Some conserved secondary structures in MORC domain were labeled (on the logo bottom) according to human MORC1 domain modeling result (on the logo top). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Genome Biol Evol, Volume 10, Issue 7, 02 July 2018, Pages 1730–1744, https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy136 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Fig. 4. —Phylogenetic relationships of MORC gene family in major groups of green lineage. The phylogenetic tree was ... Fig. 4. —Phylogenetic relationships of MORC gene family in major groups of green lineage. The phylogenetic tree was built using the ML method implemented in RaxML-HPC2 through the online CIPRES Science Gateway and the Chlorophyta was rooted as outgroup. Two major groups (Group I-1 and 2 and Group II) and two major gene duplication events (D1 and D2) are recognized. Numbers above each branch indicates bootstrap support percentage values based on 1,000 replications and values >50% are shown. Gene lineages composed of angiosperms, gymnosperms, monilophytes, lycophytes, bryophytes, charophyta, and chlorophyta are labeled on the right. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Genome Biol Evol, Volume 10, Issue 7, 02 July 2018, Pages 1730–1744, https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy136 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Fig. 5. —Maximum likelihood tree of detailed phylogenetic relationships among each group in representative angiosperm ... Fig. 5. —Maximum likelihood tree of detailed phylogenetic relationships among each group in representative angiosperm MORC genes. Phylogenetic trees of the Group II (A), Group I-2 (B), and Group I-1 (C) from representative angiosperms were reconstructed by ML method using in RaxML-HPC2 program through the online CIPRES Science Gateway with default parameters. For each clade, numbers above branches indicate bootstrap support percentage values based on 1,000 replications. The red asterisks indicate the family-specific gene duplication event and other different color asterisks represent several ancient whole genome duplication (WGD) events. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Genome Biol Evol, Volume 10, Issue 7, 02 July 2018, Pages 1730–1744, https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy136 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Fig. 6. —A proposed model for the evolution of MORC genes in plants and animals. Based on sequence similarity, ... Fig. 6. —A proposed model for the evolution of MORC genes in plants and animals. Based on sequence similarity, exon–intron organization and MORC domain, MORC genes in plants and animals can be divided into two major groups, respectively. The MORC gene is present in both plants and animals and its origin can be traced back to the common ancestor before the divergence of plants and animals. Animal MORCs underwent a gene duplication during the evolution of vertebrates in each subgroups and thus produced multiple gene copies in vertebrate lineages. Plant MORCs encountered several rounds of gene duplication events in the long-term evolutionary courses, eventually generating large-scale expansion in most species. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Genome Biol Evol, Volume 10, Issue 7, 02 July 2018, Pages 1730–1744, https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy136 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.