Dr. Phyllis Underwood REL Southeast

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Gifted Education and Response to Intervention Update on Gifted Education Workshop August 2013 Toddie Adams, Marshall County Schools.
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.
Individual Career and Academic Plans. What are ICAPs? An individualized plan, developed by the student and the student’s parent or legal guardian, in.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
Healthy North Carolina 2020 and EBS/EBI 101 Joanne Rinker MS, RD, CDE, LDN Center for Healthy North Carolina Director of Training and Technical Assistance.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
ILP Intervention Plans Tutorial. Intervention Plans in the ILP The Intervention Plan module was added to the ILP in May 2009 to meet requirements of SB.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Florida Center for Reading Research: Mission & Projects Dr. Marcia L. Grek Council of Language Arts Supervisors, May 2003.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Washington, DC July 21, 2008 Tools for Bridging the Research to Practice Gap Mary Wagner, Ph.D. SRI International.
Hammarskjold Middle School Supporting Students Interventions.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Welcome To Implementation Science 8 Part Webinar Series Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin Chaparro, Ph.D University of Oregon.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Lead Agency Viability Assessment Consistent with OPPAGA Report 04-65, DCF contracted with FMHI to assist in the design and implementation of a centralized.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Pathways to Acceleration: Signposts for the Evaluation Committee Gifted Education Services ODE Office for Exceptional Children.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
Use PowerPoint deck to share with your staff details about:
Getting Started with i-Ready®
Evaluation of Priority Gender Equality
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Planning Team: Improving Quality of Life for Individuals Across the Lifespan Julia LePage and Terri Rodgers Missouri DDD.
Measuring Project Performance: Tips and Tools to Showcase Your Results
RTI Workshop: Report-Out Activity Jim Wright www. interventioncentral
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
Acknowledgement and disclaimer
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Response to Intervention = RTI
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Grantee Guide to Project Performance Measurement
Tennessee’s STEM School Designation
Introduction Introduction
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
CLAS/RSF Meeting Dr. Barbara Foorman, Mr. Kevin Smith and Ms. Laurie Lee Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Southeast at Florida State University.
February 21-22, 2018.
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
The Why Good morning! My name is Shannon Miller and I am the director of Curriculum and Instruction at United Township High School District #30. I was.
Summerour Middle Planning Meeting
Making Middle Grades Work
Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Phyllis Underwood REL Southeast Training on REL Southeast Literacy Tools: Leveling up K-12 Literacy Interventions through the use of Self-Study Guides Dr. Phyllis Underwood REL Southeast

This information is being provided as part of a Research to Practice Workshop administered by the Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast. Information and materials mentioned or shown during this presentation are provided as resources and examples for the viewer's convenience. Their inclusion is not intended as an endorsement by the Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast or its funding source, the Institute of Education Sciences (Contract ED-IES-17-C-0011). In addition, the instructional practices and assessments discussed or shown in these presentations are not intended to mandate, direct, or control a State’s, local educational agency’s, or school’s specific instructional content, academic achievement system and assessments, curriculum, or program of instruction. States and local programs are free to use any instructional content, achievement system and assessments, curriculum, or program instruction they wish, insofar as they support the goals and objectives of their state and local education agencies.

REL-SE at Florida State University

REL-SE at Florida State University REL Program Overview Establish priority areas within each region Provide access to high quality, scientifically valid education research through applied research developmental projects studies technical assistance

IES Practice Guides Practice guides, published by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), are developed by panels of nationally recognized experts. They offer actionable recommendations, strategies for overcoming potential roadblocks, and an indication of the strength of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Ask A REL Free reference desk service Provides references and summaries of research tailored to your specific questions For more information and to submit a question visit http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/askarel/index.asp?REL=southeast

REL Southeast Literacy Roadmap https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/infographics/pdf/REL_SE_Implementing_evidencebased_literacy_practices_roadmap.pdf

Purpose and use of the self-study guides The purposes of the Intervention Self-Study Guides for Implementation are to help districts, and schools: Gather baseline information to use in developing an implementation plan for literacy/academic interventions. Prioritize their needs as they develop their implementation plan for literacy/academic interventions. Gather progress-monitoring information for continuous improvement of literacy/academic interventions. Evaluate the implementation of literacy/academic interventions.

Self-study Guides for Literacy/Academic Interventions

Self-study Guide for Implementing Early Literacy Interventions The Self-study Guide for Implementing Early Literacy Interventions was developed to help district- and school-based practitioners conduct self-studies for planning and implementing early literacy interventions. It is intended to promote reflection about current strengths and challenges in planning for implementation of early literacy interventions, spark conversations among staff, and identify areas for improvement. This guide provides a template for data collection and guiding questions for discussion that may improve the implementation of early literacy interventions and decrease the number of students failing to meet grade-level literacy expectations by the time they enter grade 3.

Self-study Guide for Implementing Literacy Interventions in Grades 3-8 The Self-study Guide for Implementing Literacy Interventions in Grades 3-8 was developed to help state, district, and school-based practitioners and stakeholders conduct self-studies of planning and implementation for literacy intervention. While literacy interventions can be implemented in any grade, focusing on interventions in grades 3-8 is critical because it is often the best chance for students identified with earlier reading deficiencies to become ready for the literacy demands of postsecondary education and careers.

Self-study Guide for Implementing High School Academic Interventions The Self-study Guide for Implementing High School Academic Interventions was developed to help state, district, and school-based practitioners and stakeholders conduct self-studies of planning and implementation for high school academic intervention. While academic intervention can be implemented at any grade level, focusing on interventions in high school is critical because this is often a student’s last chance to become ready for the academic demands of post-secondary education and careers.

Self-study process Self-study is a process of using a guide with predetermined focus areas and questions to collect, share, and discuss data with stakeholders. The self-study process includes the discussion of guiding questions and potential sources of evidence to support the review of state, district, and school-based planning and implementation of academic interventions. The process should be tied to district and school actions and assess the current status of implementation.

Self-study process The self-study process is designed to promote reflection about current strengths and challenges in planning or implementation, spark conversations among staff, and identify areas for improvement. The process can include teachers, instructional coaches, guidance counselors, school-based administrators, district administrators, and chief academic officers knowledgeable in literacy/academic interventions.

Self-study process The self-study process works best if a dedicated facilitator leads the process for members of the self-study team. This facilitator should be knowledgeable in best literacy/academic intervention practices from research as well as in intervention policies, procedures, and implementation and should review the process in detail before the self-study begins. The facilitator should also collect relevant data and possible sources of evidence before convening a meeting. The facilitator should be a careful listener and able to lead and structure discussions around collected evidence and decision-making processes.

Self-study process: Preparing for self-study Facilitator collects relevant data and sources of evidence School schedule(s) RTI plans/guidelines Assessment results Pupil progression plan Relevant meeting notes Teacher/student surveys Identify self-study team Classroom/intervention teachers Instructional coaches Guidance counselors School and/or district admin. Chief academic officers Identify a facilitator who is knowledgeable in: Academic intervention best practices Intervention policies, procedures, and implementation Self-study process Leading a team

Components of self-study guides Scoring Guide: Includes guiding questions and potential sources of evidence to support states and districts in reviewing state, district, and school-based planning and implementation. Tied to district and school actions and uses a four-point scale to assess the current status of implementation. Based on eight areas which research shows as being associated with strong implementation.

Components of self-study guides Consensus Rating Form After the Scoring Guide is completed by individual team members, a facilitator will guide the self-study team through a consensus rating process. The team will use the Consensus Rating Form to reach agreement on the current status of implementation in the district or school and on planning the next steps.

Components of self-study guides Planning Next Steps Form Prioritize the areas based on the strength of evidence and importance for success as described in the literature. Review the consensus scores showing a need to develop or improve. Identify two or three top priorities from the eight areas  for action planning and record the priority areas. Complete a detailed plan for next steps and activities and note any potential challenges on the Planning Next Steps Form.  

Each of the Scoring Guide Areas provides possible sources of evidence and guiding questions.

Each guide contains an appendix which provides support for each of the scoring guide areas, including an annotated bibliography.

Questions. Phyllis Underwood punderwood@fcrr. org http://rel-se. fcrr