Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
What’s new in the accreditation standards for TSPC programs.
PREPARING FOR NCATE May 19, 2008 Teacher Education Retreat.
Purdue Electronic Portfolio School of Education Purdue University and P 3 T 3 : Purdue Program for Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers to use Technology.
Expected Visit Date Spring  Pam Campbell  Patti Chance  Kathi Ducasse  Sandra Odell  Tom Pierce  LeAnn Putney  Nancy Sileo  Shannon Smith.
Preparing for NCATE October 22-26, 2005 Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works Kathe Rasch, Maryville University Donna M. Gollnick, NCATE October 2005.
NCATE 2000 Update July 2000 Donna M. Gollnick
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
The Program Review Process: NCATE and the State of Indiana Richard Frisbie and T. J. Oakes March 8, 2007 (source:NCATE, February 2007)
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
NCATE Institutional Orientation Session on PROGRAM REVIEW Moving Away from Input- based Programs Toward Performance-based Programs Emerson J. Elliott,
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
1 NCATE Standards. 2  Candidate Performance  Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions  Assessment System and Unit Evaluation  Unit Capacity Field.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Assessing Candidates’ Impact on Student Learning The Don of the Georgia Teacher Preparation Family.
NCATE Standards 1 & 2 January 2002 Donna M. Gollnick & Antoinette Mitchell.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
NCATE’s Transformation Initiative Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE September 16, 2009 Web Seminar will begin at 2:00 (eastern time). Please.
Streamlined NCATE Visits Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE 2008 AACTE Annual Meeting.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
NCSS/NCATE SPA Review Process. New Program Review Process The report Web-based form Limited pages by section Will be able to access drafts.
March 24, :00 pm to 3:00 pm Exhibition Lounge, Corey Union TEC Agenda and Notes.
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
The Role of the NCATE Coordinator Kate M. Steffens St. Cloud State University NCATE Institutional Orientation September, 2002.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Assessing Candidates’ Impact on Student Learning The Don of the Georgia Educator Preparation Family.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Exhibit 3.11 Data Report to Unit Assessment Committee Spring 2008.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Preparing Your ELCC Assessments for NCATE Accreditation Missouri Professors of Educational Administration Conference October 10, 2008.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review Antoinette Mitchell Vice President, Unit Accreditation.
NCATE Program Review Process Margaret D. Crutchfield, Ph.D. September 2006
Candidate Learning Outcomes. REPORTING AGENCIES STATE BOARD FOR EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION (SBEC) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCTION.
Performance-Based Accreditation
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Feedback on BOE Report Writing
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Office of Field and Clinical Partnerships and Outreach: Updates
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
What It Is and How It Works
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
COE Assessment The “Then” and “Now”.
Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review
Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE April 2008
EDCI Retreat; Aug TJ Oakes Phillip VanFossen
NCATE 2000 Unit Standards Overview.
MCAS-Alt “Grade-level” and “Competency” Portfolios
Creating Your Portfolio
Assessment Committee Meeting December 15, 2010
Writing the Institutional Report
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Follow-Up Surveys of Graduates and Employers Preparation in the Content Area
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
ISU Teacher Education Quality Assurance System
Presentation transcript:

Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair NCATE Standard 1 Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair

Candidates preparing to work in schools as teachers or other school professionals know and demonstrate the Content knowledge Pedagogical content knowledge and skills Professional knowledge and skills Professional dispositions Necessary to help all students learn. Assessments Indicate that candidates meet professional, state, and institutional standards.

AFIs – Areas for Improvement Initial and Advanced Programs The unit does not clearly articulate the professional dispositions of the candidates. Limited evidence exists to show that candidates are familiar with or can demonstrate professional dispositions.

Exhibits State program review documents and findings Title II reports submitted to the state for the previous 3 years. Key assessments and scoring guides including standards and proficiencies identified in the Conceptual Framework (CF). Data summaries and results on key assessments, disaggregated by program

Exhibits Key assessments and scoring guides used for assessing professional dispositions. Data and summaries of results on key assessments of professional dispositions, disaggregated by program. Examples of candidates’ assessment and analysis of P-12 student learning. Samples of candidates’ work (e.g. portfolios)

Exhibits Follow-up studies of graduates and summaries of results. Employer feedback on graduates and summaries of results. Data collected by state and/or national agencies on performance of educator preparation programs and the effectiveness of their graduates in classrooms and schools, including student achievement data, when available.

Committee Plans Only 25% completed at this point. New data must be collected on all programs during the academic year and analyzed. Dispositions must be implemented in initial and advanced programs, using plan from Disposition Committee. This data must also be collected and analyzed. By May, we should have the fall 2011 data completed and be working on the spring 2012.