MILK YIELD AND COMPOSITION VARIATIONS OF LATVIAN BREED GOATS DEPENDING ON THE LENGTH OF THE KIDS SUCKLING PERIOD Kristīne Piliena, Daina Jonkus Latvia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nordisk Avlsværdivurdering Joint Nordic Test Day Model: Evaluation Model M. Lidauer 1, J. Pedersen 2, J. Pösö 3, E. A. Mäntysaari 1, I. Strandén.
Advertisements

ABSTRACT The objective of this research was to derive factors to predict daily milk yield when milk is sampled once per d for cows milked three times (3x)
Relationship of somatic cell score with fertility measures Poster 1390 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis R. H. Miller 1, J. S. Clay 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal.
Hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) resistance to pre-harvest sprouting: diversity and development of method for testing of breeding material L.Legzdiņa,
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
Timed. Transects Statistics indicate that overall species Richness varies only as a function of method and that there is no difference between sites.
2.3. Measures of Dispersion (Variation):
As with averages, researchers need to transform data into a form conducive to interpretation, comparisons, and statistical analysis measures of dispersion.
1 EXPLORING PSYCHOLOGY (7th Edition) David Myers PowerPoint Slides Aneeq Ahmad Henderson State University Worth Publishers, © 2008.
Quantitative Genetics
Derivation of Factors to Estimate Daily Fat, Protein, and Somatic Cell Score from One Milking of Cows Milked Three Times Daily M. M. Schutz* 1 and H. D.
Walloon Agricultural Research Center Walloon Agricultural Research Center, Quality Department Chaussée de Namur, 24 – 5030 GEMBLOUX - Tél :++ 32 (0) 81.
What is in Milk? Fat Protein Lactose Minerals Vitamins, etc. Water.
To inspire people to a career in the primary sector To make our graduates work ready and highly employable in all facets of the agricultural sector.
Understanding Numerical Data
Abstract: This study was conducted to determine the effects of reducing rumen degradable protein (RDP) with constant rumen undegradable protein in mid-lactation.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
2003 G.R. Wiggans,* P.M. VanRaden, and J.L. Edwards Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Acknowledgements This study was performed with financial support of EEA grant EEZ08AP-27 and European Social Fund co-financed project 2009/0218/1DP/ /09/APIA/VIAA/099.
Descriptive Statistics1 LSSG Green Belt Training Descriptive Statistics.
2008 ADSA-ASAS Joint Annual Meeting Indianapolis, July 7-11 Genetic Parameters of Saturated and Monounsaturated Fatty Acids Estimated by Test-Day Model.
1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1.
Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.
Effects of dam’s dry period length on calf M. T. Kuhn,* J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Interbull Meeting – Dublin 2007 Genetic Parameters of Butter Hardness Estimated by Test-Day Model Hélène Soyeurt 1,2, F. Dehareng 3, C. Bertozzi 4 & N.
Factors that affect abortion frequency in dairy herds in the United States R.H. Miller,* M.T. Kuhn, H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Best prediction.
Statistics Division Beijing, China 25 October, 2007 EC-FAO Food Security Information for Action Programme Side Event Food Security Statistics and Information.
J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, and C. M. B. Dematawewa 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
WiggansARS Big Data Computing Workshop (1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Principles and Practises
 Milk fat composition varies with the season (summer vs. winter) but also with the milking time (AM vs. PM).  These observations could allow the diversification.
ADSA 2002 (RHM-P1) 2002 R.H. Miller, ,1 H.D. Norman, 1 and J.S. Clay 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Ashley H. Sanders and H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
CHAPTER 2: Basic Summary Statistics
The population in a statistical study is the entire group of individuals about which we want information The population is the group we want to study.
Characteristics of milk ELISA results for Johne’s disease in US dairy cows Byrem, T. M. 1 *, H. D. Norman 2 and J. R. Wright 2 1 Antel BioSystems, Lansing,
Lactation Number Effects on the Genetic Variability of the Stearoyl Coenzyme-A Desaturase 9 Activity Estimated by Test-Day Model V. M.-R. Arnould 1, N.
The maturity stage of the grass affects milk fatty acids of cows grazing a mountain grassland Gabriele Tornambé 1, Bruno Martin 2, Philippe Pradel 3, Antonino.
Walloon Agricultural Research Center Genetic Variability of Lactoferrin Content Predicted by MIR Spectrometry : MIR Spectrometry + Quantitative Models.
Dairy Cattle Production (95314)
2006 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (1) Trait Selection When Culling U.S. Holsteins H.D. Norman, J.L. Hutchison, J.R. Wright,
3. Milk production and composition
Steinshamn, H.1, Inglingstad, R. Aa.2, Nymo, M.3 and Jørgensen, M.4
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
Loss in milk yield and related composition changes resulting from different levels of somatic cell count in Valle del Belice dairy sheep A. M. Sutera,
Dairy vs. Beef Management
Heard-health-parameters Dairy Herds Calculating Workability
Linear Regression Prof. Andy Field.
C. Maroteau, I. Palhière, H. Larroque, V. Clément,
Lifetime Performance of Dairy Cows in Northern Ireland
Quantitative Data Analysis P6 M4
DATA ANALYSIS - PRACTICAL
Theme 4 Describing Variables Numerically
WP Leader: SRUC (Georgios Banos) INIA, AUTH, UNIVPM, CSIC, AHDB
Milk production of indigenous and crossbred dairy cattle in Senegal
THE ROYAL GUERNSEY AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
Production cycle of cattle
5th Lyceum Zinets Anastasiia
Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity
Abstr. M65 Test-day milk loss associated with elevated test-day somatic cell score R.H. Miller, H.D. Norman, G.R. Wiggans, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement.
Ms. Saint-Paul A.P. Psychology
Domestic vs. imported AI semen for Holstein graziers in the US
CHAPTER 2: Basic Summary Statistics
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Reproductive trends of dairy herds in the United States
2.3. Measures of Dispersion (Variation):
Multiplicative Factors
Assessment of Goat Colostrum Quality and Passive Transfer Status
Presentation transcript:

MILK YIELD AND COMPOSITION VARIATIONS OF LATVIAN BREED GOATS DEPENDING ON THE LENGTH OF THE KIDS SUCKLING PERIOD Kristīne Piliena, Daina Jonkus Latvia University of Agriculture, Agrobiotechnology institute, Lielā 2, Jelgava, LV 3001, Latvia

The aim The aim of the study is the assessment of milk yield variability and milk composition for goats with different kid suckling period within 7 days after kid weaning, as well as the influence of a suckling period on productivity in lactation

Materials and Methods The place of the research: the milk Latvian local goat herds of milk During the research were analysed: the results of 60 dairy goat A1 group weaned first day, milk samples the - 6th, 7th, 8th, 11th and 13th day of lactation; A30 group weaned 30 th day, milk samples the - 31st, 32nd, 33rd 36th, 38th day of lactation; A60 group weaned 60 th day, milk samples the - 61st, 62nd, 63rd, 66th. and 68th day of lactation

Materials and Methods Analyzed goat milk productivity traits: Milk yield, kg; Fat content (%); Protein content, (%); The research data were processed using the programmes SPSS version 14.0 and MS EXCEL2010; We used the describing statistics indicators – the mean and the standard error of the mean to analyse the data We used the coefficient of variation (CV %) to describe the fluidity

RESULTS The average milking days, milk yield, milk composition and daily milk yield in closed lactation of the research goats. Trait Research group A1 A30 A60 Milking days 297.2 ± 58.25 a 294.2 ± 62.67 a 279.3 ± 82.45 b Milk yield (kg) 455.7 ± 4.18 a 439.3 ± 4.87 a 407.3 ± 10.64 b Fat (%) 4.45 ± 0.12 4.57 ± 0.09 4.39 ± 0.10 Protein (%) 3.23 ± 0.03 3.21 ± 0.04 3.19 ± 0.03 Milk fat + protein (kg) 35.5 ± 0.61 a 34.2 ± 0.53 a 30.8 ± 0.86 b Daily milk yield (kg) 1.53 1.49 1.46 a;b – P<0.05

Conclusions The significantly highest milk yield 455.7 kg, and the sum total of milk fat and protein content 35.5 kg, was obtained from goats when kids were weaned post partum (A1), the lowest milk yield 407.3 kg and milk fat and protein amount 30.8 kg was obtained from goats suckling kids for 60 days (P < 0.05). The variability of milk yield of the research herd after kid weaning in 5 successive recordings we observed that the variability of the milk yield ranged from 2.8 to 19.6%. Higher variability of the milk composition components presented fat content (from 1.7 to 31.8%). The variability of protein content for all the groups was similar.