Gina Wisker University of Brighton

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teaching Creativity and Teaching for Creativity
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Entrepreneurial Learning in Europe
The PTSM: Curriculum Level STAGE I: Advanced content + short term creative and critical thinking activities STAGE II: Challenging activities that develop.
Being explicit about learning Focusing feedback on improvement Gathering evidence of learning Handing on responsibility for learning Participation Dialogue.
Year Two Year Three Year One Research methods teaching in the social sciences: An integrated approach to inquiry- based learning.
Why do we need enterprise in the curriculum? September 2009.
Research Informed Teaching – a summary Dr Susan Hill and Assoc Prof Tony Fetherston.
Middle Years Programme
CB330005S Review and Planning UND: April 2007.
Quality Enhancement and Communications The development and delivery of a research active curriculum will be promoted as a core and high quality activity.
Research as inquiry Models, approaches and conceptions Vicky Davies 1Based on a presentation by L Norton March 2013.
Making Sense of Assessments in HE Modules (Demystifying Module Specification) Jan Anderson University Teaching Fellow L&T Coordinator SSSL
Technologie dell’informazione e Profili e Curricula le biblioteche Parma Ottobre 2005 IT Competences and Curricula Issues: A University Perspective.
Research Related Teaching
Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in.
A big picture for Outstanding Citizenship. Three key questions 3 How well are we achieving our aims? 1 What are we trying to achieve? 2 How do we organise.
The Areas of Interaction are…
Aims of Workshop Introduce more effective school/University partnerships for the initial training of teachers through developing mentorship training Encourage.
Developing critical and reflective graduates through a research-based learning project Dr. Agnieszka Rydzik and Year 3 BA International Tourism Management.
College of Science and Engineering Learning and Teaching Strategy Planning Meeting Initial Reflections Nick Hulton.
Pedagogy for the 21 st Century LSS Retreat, November, 2010.
Masters Level Modules Ros Ollin School of Education and Professional Development University of Huddersfield.
Linking research and teaching Associate Professor Angela Brew The University of Sydney.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
CEDAR INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Middle Years Programme CEDAR INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL.
Ulster.ac.uk Learning at Ulster Student Learning Experience Principles.
FYITS – Students Mktg Briefing Nov 2010 BSc (Hons) Engineering Management Nature of Course The course seeks to equip students with management knowledge.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
Developing Teaching Strategies To Incorporate and Create Online Resources Maurice Cummins Education Consultant The Association of Independent Schools.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Teaching with Data Cathy Manduca Iowa State University, 2005.
Middle Years Programme The unique benefits of the MYP.
Gina Wisker 1. The session When we plan curriculum and individual courses we consider such issues as the needs of our society, of the discipline, and.
Inquiry into an inquiry model What is inquiry learning? Inquiry implies a need to want to know premise. Inquiry implies a need to want to know premise.
1 Enhancing the Research-Teaching Nexus to Engage and Develop Students R. Wu Faculty of Engineering and Science University of Greenwich.
8/23/ th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA POGIL as a model for general education in chemistry Scott E. Van Bramer Widener University.
Task! Introducing the session … Sit in groups of 2-3
21st Centruy Approaches to Teaching Physics
Module 3: Classroom Course
Inquiry and IBL pedagogies
Get Ahead in your first year
Teaching Creativity and Teaching for Creativity
Rich Tasks.
My research questions What are academics’ perceptions of the influences on their curriculum decisions? What are the drivers that support and inhibit.
CoESP launch, Guelph University, 2016
Graduate Attributes in Syllabus design for EAP
Team Teaching Action Research
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Performance Development and Review:
Albanian Qualification Framework Warsaw – September 2016
The Teaching-Research Nexus
Teaching for conceptual understanding through Inquiry
Teaching All Children: Planning and Assessment
Strategies and Techniques
Enhancing undergraduate learning through the development of research-teaching linkages: Managing the process across different levels within a programme.
TOP 10 INNOVATIVE PEDAGOGIES
What we talk about when we talk about research into teaching
Target Setting for Student Progress
Introduction to the Global Learning Programme for England
Quality assurance and curriculum development
Employability: A review of the literature 2012 – 2016
The Heart of Student Success
Types of educational/instructional methods September 2016
Agenda Post QAA HER, HEA SWS Action Plan Action Planning NTF and Project round HEAR Co Curricula – Graduate Compass Prevent White / Green paper TEF.
EBL – Why do it? Centre for Excellence in Enquiry-Based Learning.
Workshop Overview 1. Why assess process?
The National Approach to Professional Learning
Presentation transcript:

Gina Wisker University of Brighton ‘Why do undergraduates need to develop as researchers and co-constructors of knowledge? And how do we enable them to do so?’ Gina Wisker University of Brighton

‘Research and Writing Skills for Dissertations and Projects: An Introduction’ Some thoughts underpinning our programme

Developing students as researchers ‘Involving students in inquiry-in research-is a way of improving their learning, motivating them more.’(Brew, in Jenkins et al 2003) Identifying ways in which we work with our students to create, help seize and support learning opportunities to develop a range of generic and subject specific research orientations and skills. Developing and providing the activities, materials, resources underpinned by expectations, recognition and reward.

Linking research and teaching Information transfer / teacher focused approach Conceptual change / student focused approach Prosser and Trigwell (1999) 4

Ways of perceiving ‘reality’, identity and knowledge (ontology and epistemology)are challenged & changed (Barnett 2006) Like the Tardis in Dr Who, engagement in research offers more than it seems to –it fundamentally questions established ways of perceiving reality, treatment of ‘knowledge’(seen as an ongoing construction to which students contribute).

Engaging in research discussions Undertaking research and inquiry STUDENTS ARE PARTICIPANTS Research-tutored Research-based Engaging in research discussions Undertaking research and inquiry EMPHASIS ON RESEARCH PROCESSES AND PROBLEMS EMPHASIS ON RESEARCH CONTENT Learning about current research in the discipline Developing research and inquiry skills and techniques Research-led Research-oriented STUDENTS FREQUENTLY ARE AN AUDIENCE Curriculum design and the research-teaching nexus (based on Healey, 2005, 70) 7

(information-active) Authoring (discovery-active) STUDENT-LED Pursuing (information-active) Authoring (discovery-active) EXPLORING AND ACQUIRING EXISTING KNOWLEDGE PARTICIPATING IN BUILDING KNOWLEDGE Identifying (information-responsive) Producing (discovery-responsive) STAFF-LED Inquiry-based learning: a conceptual framework (Based on Levy, 2009)

Developing students’ research learning A research active curriculum Teaching learning and assessment which encourage research based practices, understandings and creations Resources used interactively

A ‘research active curriculum’ (after Healey and Jenkins) All undergraduate students in all higher education institutions should experience learning through, and about, research and inquiry. Through a research-active curriculum. structured interventions at course team, departmental, institutional and national levels. Embedding of research oriented learning and teaching activities, and assessments. Through focused support – developmental opportunities, models and materials accessible to staff and to students when wanted and needed.

Research as learning-stages and elements Problem identification Autonomy and group work Problem solving Information identification Information acquisition and management Project design and management Ideas—action—completer finisher skills Writing and presenting Sharing, and acting on the work.

Involves Curriculum development to embed research/enquiry and critical thinking from the start- opportunities and support in teaching learning and assessment - Thinking skills -creative problematising & problem solving, ideas generation, Information identification, finding, gathering, processing, managing, using, making, sharing.

Reflective awareness of and building on generic and subject specific research skills Developing communication in a variety of forms including presentations, essays, projects, dissertations, Opportunities for evidencing growth, reflective learning, and independent learning, carrying students forward beyond degree study –employability, further study, life.

Skills and learning behaviour development lead to Time, space, constraints, values constructions of versions of knowledge the world and self all problematised Skills and learning behaviour development lead to new firmly based confidence contributions to knowledge , ownership of that knowledge and the processes, communication of that knowledge and those processes

Why develop students as researchers? and co-researchers? What are the skills and outcomes ? What the benefits? What is the transferability and sustainability Of research and enquiry skills ? Do you help develop your students as researchers? and if so where? How?

Research learning - Attitudes – Enquiring, creating , sharing. Understandings- Critical thinking, problematising given arguments, interpretations. Threshold concepts (Meyer Land Cousins 2003)- different disciplines see the world and construct knowledge differently-understanding and mobilising that understanding is a key to research learning. Skills - focusing on issues and problems, questioning , knowing where to look, how to look, how to find, and what to do with what you find, selecting and focusing, theorising, conceptualising, interpreting, managing, seeing the patterns and themes, finding and making something new. Communicating -being able to organise and communicate it to others.

Characteristics of critical thinking Problem identification Problem solving Flexibility Using research reading and evidence base to identify difficulties and address problems Group working Autonomy and independence Sustainability of skills Analysis Reflection Decision making Deductive and inductive Accepting others views/arguments Knowledge creating Accountability Organisation Selectivity of knowledge creativity

Strategies for building the relationship between teaching and research “Emphasize the construction of knowledge by students rather than the imparting of knowledge by instructors…. Ensure that students experience the process of artistic and scientific productivity.” (Hattie and Marsh, 1996: 533).

Strategies for Linking Teaching and Research Develop student understanding of the role of research in their discipline Develop students’ abilities to carry out research in their discipline Manage student experience of staff research. (Jenkins, 2001)

How do we encourage students to become researchers? Research oriented activities early in studies- seeking information, asking questions, creating new knowledge, underpinning work with theories and reading building claims on evidence Devising own questions &proposals Annotated bibliographies Critical evaluation of models of research eg in essays , reports

Active membership in a community of scholars Encourage students to feel part of the wider community of scholars - and not passive recipients of ‘knowledge’. Encourage and assist students to develop, present and publish their work. Present the resulting papers to current and prospective students as evidence of the active contributions that can potentially be made to the field.

A synergistic system: Students as active participants, not passive recipients Inquiry, investigation, and discovery are the heart of the enterprise, whether in funded research projects or in undergraduate classrooms … The teaching responsibility of the university is to make all its students participants in this shared mission. (Boyd Commission, 2000)

Learning and teaching practices to underpin students developing as researchers Interactive lectures- short interactions – and tasks- handouts- break up the lecture Online learning with variety of materials, interactions reflections resources Group tasks and interactions in large and small groups- encourage discussion engagement critical thinking, debates – argument using evidence Students as researcher assessment formats including projects and dissertations – encourage problem identification, shared practices, problem solving, finding out and making knowledge-in the real world context. Encourage management of enquiry, structure, data, argument, expression