TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair Water Quality Division

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why Lab. Certification? Laboratory certification tries to insure that the laboratory is qualified and capable of analyzing the sample and obtaining quality.
Advertisements

©Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C. Presented by: LAUREN KALISEK (512) Congress Avenue Suite 1900 Austin, Texas.
Mentoring Session Technical Assistance Committee Method Modifications.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Looking Ahead.
DOW Laboratory Certification Program Update – 2015 Presentation to: KWWOA April 15, 2015 Department for Environmental Protection Energy & Environment Cabinet.
Status of the WET Program William Telliard Director, Analytical Methods USEPA Office of Science & Technology Office of Water.
PA Department of Environmental Protection Continuous Source Monitoring Manual (Manual, Revision 8)
Implementation Procedures (IPs) Brittany Lee Standards Implementation Team
Wastewater Laboratory Certification Presented at: KWWOA April17,
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
Adem.alabama.gov Revisions to the Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) AWWA Alabama-Mississippi Section ADEM Regulation Update February 26, 2014 George Cox (334)
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Streamlining Rules for Pretreatment Regulation Requested changes to Chapters 922 & 923 of the City of Zanesville Codified Ordinances Presentation to City.
The Clean Water Act (1977, 1981, 1987) By: Jonas Szajowitz.
Revisions to: The Procedures to Implement the Surface Water Quality Standards Mrs. Brittany M. Lee Standards Implementation Team Phone:
 40 CFR § (d)(1)(v) “(W)hen the permitting authority determines, using the procedures in paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section, toxicity testing.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
Overview CWA Methods Update Rule Method 608.3
The Method Update Rule Does this affect me? HOW?
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS AND GOALS
Clean Water Act Methods Overview of EPA’s CWA Method Activities
Department of Environmental Quality
Stormwater Construction General Permit (CGP) TXR150000
NetDMR.
Submittal And Review Of New And Revised Water Quality Standards
Simple Mathematics and How It Impacts You
Method Modifications & ATP 40 CFR part and 136.5
Water Quality Division Updates
Water Quality Standards Submittal & Review Process
Environmental Protection Agency
EPA Method A Summary of the Changes in the Newly Promulgated GC/MS Method for Volatile Organics in Wastewater Harry McCarty and Kevin Roberts CSRA,
EPA Method Equivalency
July 13, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
NC DPPEA Compliance Assistance - Water
Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards Proposed Rulemaking
September 8, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
Rules for Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
Public Comment Webinars January 14, 2015 and January 15, 2015
Have Instrument, make method; How new methods are made and validated
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) CAFO Rule and the Proposed Idaho NPDES CAFO General.
Clean Water Act Methods Overview of EPA’s CWA Method Activities
EPA Method Equivalency
EPA Region 10 Alternate Test Procedures and Method Update Rule
2018 Stormwater Construction General Permit (CGP) Renewal TXR150000
RPA and the DEQ Drive for Lower Detection Limits
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Report of Proceedings Surface Water Quality Standards Triennial Review Environmental Management Commission November 13, 2014 Steve Tedder – EMC Hearing.
The Clean Water Acts of 1977, 1981, & 1987
SDWA Collaborative Efforts Overview
National Environmental Monitoring Conference
NetDMR.
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Wastewater Permitting Updates
Peter Schaefer Standards Implementation Team
Update on Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
TCEQ Laboratory Accreditation Program (LAP) Update
Update on Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Water Quality
Water Quality What is water quality?
Clean Water Act/NPDES Regulatory Updates
2019 AWOP National Meeting Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water
Kasy Stinson Water Supply Division
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
EPA/OAQPS Pollutant Emissions Measurement Update 2019
Wastewater Permitting Updates
Presentation transcript:

TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair Water Quality Division Final Rule: 2017 Clean Water Act Methods Update Rule for Analysis of Effluent TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair May 16, 2018 Rebecca L. Villalba Water Quality Division

Clean Water Act Methods Update Rule for the Analysis of Effluent (2017 Methods Update Rule) The final rule amended 40 CFR Part 136 - laboratory testing procedures approved for analysis and sampling under the Clean Water Act Rule proposed: February 19, 2015 Final Rule signed: December 15, 2016 Final Rule published: August 28, 2017 (See Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 165) Effective date: September 27, 2017

2017 Methods Update Rule Who and what is affected? NPDES permit applicants – industries and municipalities, Sampling or other reports required under NPDES, Other requests for quantitative or qualitative effluent data under NPDES regulations, State CWA 401 certifications, Sludge sampling and testing (§136.1), and Sampling and testing under EPA’s pretreatment regulations for existing and new sources of pollution by categorical industries (§403.12(b)(5)(v)) Refer to applicability language in §122.1, §136.1 and §403.1 On July 30, 2013, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the proposed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination system (NPDES) Electronic Reporting Rule (e-Reporting) in the Federal Register. The rule proposes to replace certain paper based NPDES permitting and compliance monitoring reporting requirements with mandatory electronic reporting. The 135-day public comment period for the proposed rule closed on December 12, 2013. EPA received 170 public comment submissions from a variety of stakeholder groups, which together totaled to 850 comment pages. The largest number of public comments (by comment pages) came from government agencies (50%) with industrial stakeholders contributing most of the remaining comments (42%).

2017 Methods Update Rule: Summary of Changes Revisions: Provide increased flexibility to the regulated community Improve data quality Update methods to keep current with technology advances Address laboratory contamination issues related to the Minimum Detection Limit (MDL) and better account for intra-laboratory variability.

2017 Methods Update Rule: Summary of Changes Changes include: Revised methods published by EPA and voluntary consensus standard bodies, such as ASTM International and the Standard Methods (SM) Committee. Added certain methods reviewed under the alternate test procedures (ATP) program to 40 CFR Part 136 and clarified the procedures for EPA approval of nationwide and limited use ATPs Revised the procedure for determination of the MDL.

2017 Methods Update Rule: Summary of Changes The changes include: New SM and ASTM methods for Inorganics metals, ammonia, cyanide, arsenic, color, turbidity, conductivity, alkalinity, hardness, etc. The final rule amends 40 CFR Part 136 and is applicable to NPDES wastewater permitting including approved pretreatment programs.

2017 Methods Update Rule: Summary of Changes Revised three EPA Methods that replace 608 (Pesticides and PCBs), 624 and 625 (volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds) 608.3: Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs by GC/HSD replaces Method 608 624.1: Purgeables by GC/MS replaces Method 624 625.1: Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS replaces Method 625

2017 Methods Update Rule: Summary of Changes Revised microbiological methods for E. coli and fecal coliforms, Clarified and corrected chemical, radiochemical, and whole effluent toxicity (WET) methods Methods reviewed under the ATP program

2017 Methods Update Rule: Summary of Changes Clarified the procedures for EPA approval of nationwide and limited use ATPs Clarified that only EPA can approve alternative test procedures (no state approval) Six new ATPs: for Coliform/E. coli, nitrate-nitrogen, inorganic ammonia, total kjedldahl nitrogen (TKN), nitrate in water & wastewater, and total phosphorus A laboratory may modify certain types of approved 40 CFR Part 136 methods if the modification is documented as described at 40 CFR 136.6. The laboratory will no longer receive or require a letter from EPA. The permittee must notify the state of its intent to use a modified method.

2017 Methods Update Rule: Summary of Changes Amended procedure for the determination of MDLs to address laboratory contamination and to better account for intra-laboratory variability. The MDL procedure now uses method blanks to calculate an MDL, in addition to the spiked samples that have always been used. The MDL is the higher of the two values (either the MDLs calculated using spiked samples or the MDLb calculated using method blanks). Requires that the samples used to calculate the MDL are representative of laboratory performance throughout the year, rather than on a single date. A laboratory has the option to pool data from multiple instruments to calculate one MDL that represents multiple instruments.

2017 Methods Update Rule: Summary of Changes The final rule includes Minimum Levels (MLs) and MDLs for some analytical methods.  Instead of using the term Minimum Analytical Levels (MALs), a term used in Texas, the final rule uses the term ML. Some MLs and MDLs in the rule are lower than those in TCEQ’s Implementation Procedures for the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (IPs), June 2010, RG-194, Some MLs and MDLs in the rule are higher than those in the IPs. The rule includes different MLs for the same pollutant depending on the method used.

2017 Methods Update Rule: Summary of Changes The final rule added a “multiplier” to the definition of ML.  MLs may be obtained in several ways: published in a method; may be based on the lowest acceptable calibration point used by a laboratory; or may be calculated by multiplying the MDL in a method, or the MDL determined by a laboratory, by a factor of 3 (adding the multiplier factor is new in the 2017 MUR). Historically, 40 CFR Part 136 typically included only MDLs for the specified analytes in the listed methods (MLs were not typically listed).

2017 Methods Update Rule: Summary of Changes For the purposes of NPDES compliance monitoring, EPA considers the following terms to be synonymous: ‘‘quantitation limit,’’ ‘‘reporting limit,’’ and ‘‘minimum level.’’ The rule revision introduces MLs to the following methods: Method 608.3; Method 624.1; and Method 625.1.

2017 Methods Update Rule: EPA Resources https://www.epa.gov/cwa-methods/methods-update-rule-2017

2017 Methods Update Rule (MUR): Next Steps for Implementation in Texas NELAC accreditation for new analytical methods in final rule: 608.3, 624.1 and 625.1 TCEQ internal MUR workgroup formed to develop implementation plan and timeline to: Revise the 2010 Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards to update analytical levels (MALs, MLs, and MDLs) Revise TPDES permit applications Revise TPDES permit language provisions Develop policy for TPDES compliance monitoring for permittees and pretreatment programs

2017 Methods Update Rule (MUR): Next Steps for Implementation in Texas Internal MUR workgroup will present proposed implementation plan and timeline to management TCEQ will seek comments on proposed implementation plan and timeline from external MUR workgroup Need participants for external workgroup: permittees and laboratories Send e-mail to: Outeach@tceq.texas.gov Include External MUR Workgroup in subject line TCEQ will submit implementation plan to EPA Region 6 for approval

Questions?