Undulator Cavity BPM Status

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cavity BPM for Spectromety: progress and plans A. Lyapin.
Advertisements

1 KEK Cavity BPM Hitoshi Hayano Development of Cavity BPM for Q-magnet attachment, Aiming; compact design, 0.2µm resolution, BPM center error (between.
Test of LLRF at SPARC Marco Bellaveglia INFN – LNF Reporting for:
Preliminary Results from HOM Measurements at the Tesla Test Facility (SLAC) Josef Frisch, Kirsten Hacker, Linda Hendrickson, Justin May, Douglas McCormick,
LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 BPM Signal Processing T. Straumann, M. Cecere, E. Medvedko, P. Krejcik SLAC.
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – Cavity BPM October 12, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Status.
Ron Johnson Beam Position October 29-31, Beam Position Monitors FAC Review October 29-31, 2007 Stripline BPM.
Bob Lill FAC meeting Cavity October 30, 2007 LCLS Cavity BPM Status and Testing.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
Bob Lill LCLS FAC June 16-18, 2008 RF BPM Status and Production Test Results.
E. Bong, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Overview E. Bong LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
RF Synchronisation Issues
Hamid Shoaee LCLS FAC Review – October Control System Overview Hamid Shoaee Controls System Manager Injector control system commissioning & Support.
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – BPM April 20, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Status and Plans.
Bob Lill Undulator Cavity BPM System April 16, 2007 Undulator Cavity BPM Status.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
Status of ATF2 Cavity BPM Project Sep 29, 2005 Project Scope: Instrument both couplers ATF2 cavity BPM’s (35) Produce prototype for December cavity test.
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – BPM January 31, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Design and Status.
Experience on design, prototyping and testing of cavity BPM for the European-XFEL > Motivation > Introduction > Principle of CBPMs > Mechanical properties.
Status of the Fermilab Cold BPM R&D Manfred Wendt Fermilab 10/1/20091LCWA09 Main Linac WG.
1 C. Simon CLIC Instrumentation workshop BPM C. Simon on behalf of the Saclay’s group CLIC Instrumentation workshop 2 nd - 3 rd June.
The Cavity Beam Position Monitor (BPM) Massimo Dal Forno Paolo Craievich, Raffaele De Monte, Thomas Borden, Andrea Borga, Mauro Predonzani, Mario Ferianis,
IP-BPM status Siwon Jang KNU. Contents The electronics repair status –Repair work status –Electronics RF test (by using Oscilloscope) –Electronics shipment.
1 ATF2 Q BPM electronics Specification (Y. Honda, ) Design System –Hardware layout –Software –Calibration Testing Production schedule ATF2 electronics.
The beam-based alignment and feedback systems, essential operations of the future colliders, use high resolution Beam Position Monitors (BPM). In the framework.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
High resolution cavity BPMs in the context of the European XFEL
LCLS LLRF System October 10-13, 2005 LLRF05 B. Hong, R. Akre, A. Hill, D. Kotturi, H. Schwarz SLAC, Stanford, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA Work supported.
Beam Test status and Plans of the ILC Main LINAC BPM
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
Low-Q IP BPM Y. I. Kim *, A. Heo, E-S. Kim (KNU) S. T. Boogert (JAI) D. M. McCormick, J. May, J. Nelson, T. Smith, G. R. White (SLAC) Y. Honda, N. Terunuma,
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
PXIE Beam Instrumentation Status Update – Preparing for MEBT 1.1 Beam Vic Scarpine Feb. 9, 2016.
RF low level control & synchronization A. Gallo, M. Bellaveglia, L. Cacciotti SPARC review committee – ENEA Frascati – 16/11/2005.
1CEA/ Saclay/ SACM CARE/SRF/WP11 Development of a new Beam Position Monitor for FLASH, XFEL and ILC Cryomodules Claire Simon, Michel Luong, Stéphane Chel,
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
Communication 40 GHz Anurag Nigam.
Re-entrant BPM R&D for ILC Main Linac
XFEL beamline loads and HOM coupler for CW
Wakefield & Cavity based Monitors: Fermilab BPM Development Plans
An X-band system for phase space linearisation on CLARA
CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM
12.4: SRF HOM Diagnostics: Experimental Results and Future Plans
Timing and synchronization at SPARC
RF Synchronisation Issues
DC Injector and Space Charge Simulation Status
Controls CBETA controls will extend existing EPICS control system
ATF nanoBPM system - nanoGrid ATF2 Movers TTF HOM – dipole / monopole
Paul Scherrer Institut
LCLS Linac Update Brief Overview L1 & BC1 Progress LTU & E-Dump Status Continuing Resolution Impact.
Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date
Low Level RF Status Outline LLRF controls system overview
Electron Source Configuration
Low Level RF Status Outline LLRF controls system overview
Compact linear accelerator FLUTE: status update
High Precision SC Cavity Alignment Diagnostics with HOM Measurements
Report on ATF2 Third Project Meeting ATF2 Magnet Movers ATF2 Q-BPM Electronics Is SLAC ILC Instrumentation Group a good name?
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) LLRF Preliminary Design Review LLRF Monitor and Control System September 26, 2005 Ron Akre.
Undulator System Components Status Dean Walters
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Overview Beam Position Monitoring Wire Scanners / Cherenkov Detectors
Undulator Cavity BPM System Status
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Low Level RF Status Outline Overview showing hardware instances
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Beam Position & Charge Monitors LCLS Lehman Review July 11, 2007
Presentation transcript:

Undulator Cavity BPM Status May 27, 2019 Undulator Cavity BPM Status

Design Review Outline BPM System Design Overview Cavity Design Electronics and ADC Current status for phase I prototype testing Planning phase II prototype test First article and production

LTU and Undulator BPM System Specification Parameter Specification Limit Condition Resolution < 1m 0.2 – 1.0 nC +/- 1 mm range Offset Stability < +/- 1m 1 hour 20.0 +/- 0.56 Celsius < +/- 3m 24 hours +/- 1 mm range Gain Error < +/- 10 % Dynamic Range, Position +/- 1 mm 10 mm diameter vacuum chamber Dynamic Range, Intensity > 14 dB PC Gun

BPM System Overview Block Diagram

X-Band Cavity BPM Design Each BPM has position cavity and reference cavity SLAC selective coupling design utilized to reduce monopole mode Iris couplers are precisely EDM into Solid Copper Body Waveguide transition brazed to body

Cold Test Prototype Non-vacuum cold test prototype Accelerated design verification and cold test development Removable end caps Presently used to verify tuning effects and test fixture development

Before and After Brazing (ITS Prototype)

Prototype Cold Test (Dipole cavity 500 micron offset) Parameter (500 µm offset) Predicted Measured Prototype # 1 bolted end caps Measured Prototype # 2 brazed end caps Frequency TM010 8.262 GHz 8.271 GHz 8.243 GHz Coupling TM010 -53 dB -69 dB -62 dB Frequency TM110 11.364 GHz 11.344 GHz 11.357 GHz Coupling TM110 -32 dB -28 dB -24 dB Q (loaded) TM110 2704 2086 2391 X/Y Isolation TM110 -26 dB -33 dB -23 dB Dipole to Monopole cavity Isolation <-80 dB <-85 dB <-89 dB Frequency TM020 15.825 GHz 15.767 GHz 15.785 GHz Coupling TM020 -78 dB -64 dB -50 dB

Baseline Design for Phase I Prototype Miteq X-Band Low Noise Receiver Existing product line WR 75 Waveguide Interface Low Noise Figure (2.7 dB) Budgetary price for (3 channels) $6500.00

Prototype Receiver Specification Parameter Specification Limit Condition RF Frequency 11.364 GHz 20.0 +/- 0.56 Celsius Dx, Dy, Intensity Input Peak Power 50 watts peak No damage (limiter protection) LO Frequency 11.424 GHz (2856 MHz*4) 1nC, 1mm offset, 200fs BL LO Power Range +10 dBm Max. Provide LO for 3 down converters IF Frequency 60 MHz Min. Noise Figure Dx and DY 2.7 dB Max. Noise Figure Intensity (reference) 4.0 dB Max. LO to RF Isolation 40 dB Min. LO to IF Isolation 45 dB Min. Output Power +14 dBm 1 dB compression Conversion Gain 25 dB typical

In-Tunnel Receiver Block Diagram

Prototype X-Band Low Noise Receivers Conversion gain 28 dB Over 60 dB dynamic range Noise Figure 2.5 dB IF bandwidth 40-80 MHz Receiver noise floor -88 dBm assuming 20 MHz IF bandwidth Cavity BPM Sensitivity: -54 dBm/0.2nC/1m

BPM System Test Approach Phase I Injector Test Stand ITS Install single X-Band Cavity and modified off-the-shelf down converter receiver Mount BPM on two-axis translation stage Phase II LEUTL test with PC gun Install three X-Band Cavities BPMs Mount all 3 BPMs together on a two-axis translation stage

Injector Test Stand (ITS) Beam Parameters Charge- 1 nC single-bunch Bunch length- ~ 3 - 4 ps FWHM for ps laser Spot size on final screen at 5.5 MeV ~ 0.75 mm rms, ps laser

(Phase I) ITS BPM Test Results BPM setup on X/Y translation stage Aligned BPM Pitch and Yaw to < 25 m Initial beam spot size 2-3 mm rms at low charge (0.05 nC) at faraday cup before adding new focusing magnets to reduce to 200 um rms Beam stability limited to 50 m rms. Laser improvements ongoing

ITS Data Processing Development Cavity BPM and electronics tested using ITS beam line First raw cavity voltage outputs captured on scope 6/9/06 Mover system calibration Testing is on-going following Aug/Sep shut-down Hor. Ref. Vert.

ITS Data Processing Development

Waveforms acquired with sampling scope and processed via Epics

Normalized waveforms 0.05 nC charge

Dipole Cavity Preliminary Test Data Parameter Predicted Value Cold Test Data ITS Test Data Frequency (TM110) 11.364 GHz 11.357 GHz 11.359 GHz Q (loaded) (TM110) 2704 2391 2500 Isolation X/Y (TM110) -26 dB -23 dB < -20 dB Voltage Output 2.3 mV/um/nC 1.22 mV/um/nC

(Phase II) 3 BPM Test Schedule Milestones Refine design and develop First Article Cavity BPM and support hardware August 06 Start 3 BPMs October 06 First unit with accelerated delivery Install 3 cavity BPMs into APS LEUTL and Test December 06

Prototype Phase II Cavity BPM Specification Parameter Specification Limit (change) Condition TM110 Frequency Dipole Cavity 11.364 GHz (11.384 GHz) 20.0 +/- 0.56 Celsius Loaded Q factor 3000 +/- 200 (3500 +/- 200) Power Output TM110 -10 dBm 1nC, 1mm offset, 200fs BL X/Y Cross Talk < -20 dB (<-26 dB) +/- 1 mm range TM010 Frequency Monopole Cavity (11.374 GHz) 3000+/- 200 Power Output TM010 1nC, +/-1mm offset range, 200fs BL

Dipole Cavity Design Beam pipe radius = 5 mm Cavity radius = 14.937 mm (14.888 mm) Cavity gap = 3 mm Distance beam axis to bottom of wg = 9.5 mm (10.5 mm) Waveguide= 19.05 x 3 mm

Monopole Cavity Design Beam pipe radius = 5 mm Cavity radius = 11.738 mm (11.477 mm) Cavity gap = 2 mm (3 mm) Coupling Slot = 2 x 4 mm (2.5 x 4 mm) Tangent to surface of cavity opening to bottom of waveguide=1.734 mm (3.75 mm) Waveguide= 19.05 x 3 mm

Tuning Pins Feature Added Tuning pins prototyped and tested in lab Tuning pin simulations verify lab measurements Tuning pins will improve performance and production yield Tuning Pins

Design Development First Article Design ITS Test Unit Cold Test Unit

Receiver Design Changes Packaged 3 channel receiver High/Low gain feature (28/0dB) to extend dynamic range. Add a simple CW tone self-test feature

Receiver Packaging Design Receiver enclosure 12.5 wide by 11 deep by 2.5 thick (inches) with radiation shield cover Houses input filters local oscillator and down-converter 3-WR75 Inputs, 3-type “N” outputs, LO ref. input Type “N”, power and control cable

SLAC ADC Development The PAD (Phase and Amplitude Detector) being considered for Cavity BPM ADC Linear Technologies LTC2208 16 bit digitizer chip specified to run up to 130MHz

Phase II Data Acquisition Design Approach Instrument three BPMs with SLAC Built 16-bit, 130 MSPS digitizers (PAD) Epics driver available Synchronize ADC clock with 119 MHz Digitize horizontal, vertical position and Intensity 0 to 1 volt range Digital down convert 40 MHz IF decaying exponentials

Phase II Testing Objectives 3 BPM Test Test three BPM separated by fixed distance to determine single-shot Evaluate First Article Prototypes Complete test matrix to prove compliance to specification

System Layout and Planning Beam X-band receiver LRU

Production Phase Production of 2 BPMs for LTU 04/07 Production of 6 BPMs for undulator 04/07 Production of 9 BPMs for undulator 06/07 Production of 9 BPMs for undulator 08/07 Production of 10 BPMs for undulator 10/07 Spares 12/07

X-Band Cavity BPM development ongoing Summary X-Band Cavity BPM development ongoing Bolt-together prototype (non-vacuum) complete ITS prototype testing ongoing 3 BPM test prototype design enhancements ongoing Receiver Prototype Development First Prototype installed in ITS with good results 3 BPM test prototype design incorporates high/low gain, self-test and final packaging Data Acquisition and Test Collaborating with SLAC to use the same ADC as SLAC LINAC BPM upgrade