Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparing for Cycle III School and District Accountability Ratings and AYP Determinations Information Sessions August 26 & 27, 2004 Juliane Dow, Associate.
Advertisements

No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2008.
Testing Overview 2012, 2013, 2014 Presenter – Guyla Ness.
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 17 &
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
WBCSD District Strategic Goals Update August 10, 2015.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
The Many Meanings of “Multiple Measures” Susan Brookhart Volume 2009, Volume 67:3 ASCD, November 2009, pp
ESEA Waiver and Accountability Status School Committee Presentation September 24, 2013.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Pittsfield Public Schools September 23, 2009.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
TVAAS Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Annual Student Performance Report September
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.
HAWLEMONT REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2012 STATE OF THE DISTRICT ADDRESS Presented by: Michael A. Buoniconti Superintendent of Schools Hawlemont Regional.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
STUDENT GROWTH GOALS PART 2- “HOW MUCH GROWTH”. LAST WEEK Who: 8.1- the 9 th grade team 6.1- the 9 th grade class 3.1 –the Special Eduction/ELL/LAP students.
Webster Public Schools September 17, MCAS Results  Progress at every grade in every subject  Too slow to keep pace  With NCLB targets 
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Braintree Public Schools Spring 2007 MCAS Tests Braintree High School.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS and PARCC Results Spring 2015 Joyce Edwards Assistant Superintendent for Teaching and Learning December 8, 2015.
What is AYP? AYP stands for Adequate Yearly Progress
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
2012 Accountability Determinations
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Release of PARCC Student Results
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
New Statewide Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL 2010 MCAS Presentation October 26, 2010.
NANTUCKET PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School
Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?
Presentation transcript:

Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day Webster Public Schools September 16, 2011 Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day

AYP in every subject, at every grade level, and for every subgroup. Goal for 2010-2011 AYP in every subject, at every grade level, and for every subgroup.

Adequate Yearly Progress What is AYP? Adequate Yearly Progress

MCAS Participation Rate How AYP is Calculated: A + (B or C) + D = Affirmative AYP Determination A MCAS Participation Rate 95% or grater participation rate in MCAS and MCAS-Alt tests B MCAS Performance 95.1 or greater Composite Performance Index (CPI) in ELA; 92.2 or greater CPI in mathematics C MCAS Improvement Meet or exceed 2011 improvement target (specific to schools, districts, and student groups) or by reducing the percentage of non-proficient students by 10% from 2010 to 2011 (“Safe harbor”) D Additional Indicator For schools serving grades 1-11, attendance rate; for schools ending in grade 12, cohort graduation rate + + OR 4

2011 MCAS Results Due to be released next week Headline Slow, Steady Progress in Most Grades Some Real Progress in Some Grades

AYP Results Areas for possible AYP Aggregate 3 schools X 2 subjects = 6 Made AYP in 4 Subgroups 3 schools X 2 subjects = 6 Made AYP in 1

But AYP is becoming ever harder to reach, so…CPI Results In 14 tests given in ELA and Math CPI Improvement in 9

Percentage of Students Scoring Advanced or Proficient For the 17 tests given last spring, the percentage of students scoring Advance or Proficient increased in 13 On 3 of those test, the increase was more than 10 percentage points E.g. From 34% scoring A or P up to 46%

Student Growth Percentile Measures growth of student in a year compared to a similar cohort based on testing history Below 40 is slow 40-60 is “normal” Above 60 is fast

Student Growth Percentiles Of the 14 test for which a SGP could be calculated Slow growth in 5 Normal Growth in 4 Fast Growth in 5

We are doing the right things… Last year, we said We are doing the right things… Not often enough Not widespread enough

Best Practices 90 90 90 Schools A focus on academic achievement • Clear curriculum choices • Frequent assessment of student progress and multiple opportunities for improvement • An emphasis on nonfiction writing • Collaborative scoring of student work

This year - A tentative summary We have figured our what to do Implementation is starting to show real, measurable improvement Implementation is still uneven Headwinds at the many of the same grades as in past years We have a plan to spread best practices to every classroom We have more to do to reach every student

Plan to Spread Best Practices Professional Pride MCAS NCLB Curriculum Mapping Common Planning RTTT ESW Best Practices In Every Classroom Every Day ISGs Inst Coaches Data Analysis Unit Design Common Assessments Common Core Educator Evaluation School Choice

What teachers do in the classroom, day to day and minute to minute What Matters Most What teachers do in the classroom, day to day and minute to minute Jon Saphier

What’s new? The end of “private practice” The continuation of public accountability The beginning of professional accountability The challenges and rewards of working closely with others

We’ve got our work cut out for us and we know what to do EVERY CLASSROOM EVERY STUDENT EVERY DAY

And so… Next week, MCAS results will show real, measurable progress Not yet fast enough Not yet in every classroom Not yet reaching subgroups We are on the right track We need all hands on deck Let’s get to work… Dr. Kelley has some details and the outline for the rest of the day