Arroyo Valley High School August 19, 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Advertisements

Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
What Does Rigor Look Like?
Little Red Riding Hood & Cognitive Rigor Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy
Please print the three Cognitive Rigor Matrices full page. Thanks!
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
Karin K. Hess, Ed.D. Tools for Supporting Increased Rigor & High-Quality Assessment and Instruction Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
Writing a Usable and Working Curriculum Background with Step-by- Step Guidance.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Verona Public Schools Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
TEACHING INFORMATIVE WRITING FROM SOURCES Chapter 6 Best Practices in Writing Instruction George E Newell Jennifer VanDerHeide Melissa Wilson.
OF THE COGNITIVE DOMAIN
Standards Academy Grades 3 and 4 Day 1. Objectives Understand the Critical Areas of our grade levels. Examine the importance of vertical alignment across.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Preparing to Cultivate 21 st Century Skills. Development of instruction and assessment that is rigorous and relevant. Measure progress in adding rigor.
The Common Core: Next Steps
THE C OMMON C ORE, & C OGNITIVE R IGOR Language Arts Council Meetings Fall 2012 Portions adapted from Karin K. Hess materials.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Teachers Helping Teachers with Rigor/Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Presented by NHCS Gifted Education Specialists.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Teachers Helping Teachers Align Units with the Common Core/ Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy September 24, 2012 Presented by Elin Reuben Karma.
Writing Student-Centered Learning Objectives Please see Reference Document for references used in this presentation.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Does this learning goal focus on what the student will do? Objective: Conservation of energy A.Yes B.No C.Depends on context.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY OF THE COGNITIVE DOMAIN. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Benjamin Bloom (et al.) created this taxonomy for categorizing levels of abstraction of questions.
Higher Order Thinking Skills
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
From Infusing Rigor & Research into Instruction and Assessment presentation USOE, Salt Lake City, UT February 25-26, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D. Center for.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Dr. Middlebrooks. Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
THE C OMMON C ORE, & C OGNITIVE R IGOR Language Arts Council Meetings Fall 2012 Adapted from Karin K. Hess materials.
Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” What do rigorous academic environments look and sound like?
And PARCC
Technology: A Tool for Digging Deeper Into Content Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D. West Baton Rouge Parish Schools Region 2 Mini-LACUE.
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
Are your students thinking more deeply or just working harder
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
Rigor/Relevance For All Students Common CORE January, 2013
Definitions & Examples
A classification of learning objectives within education
Depth of knowledge (dok)
85. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY “Bloom’s Taxonomy is a guide to educational learning objectives. It is the primary focus of most traditional education.”
A guide to reading, writing, thinking and understanding
About This Document The Cognitive Rigor (CR) Matrix (created by Karin Hess by combining Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) is the primary.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان إعداد
Effective Questioning
When It Rains Rigor The puddles are deeper!
Preplanning Presentation
Writing Learning Outcomes
Higher Order Thinking Skills
Norman L Webb.
Assessment and Higher-Order Thinking
Classifying Questions
Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix
Presentation transcript:

Arroyo Valley High School August 19, 2013 Depth of Knowledge Arroyo Valley High School August 19, 2013

Goals and Objectives Determine why states opted to choose the CCSS Articulate the characteristics of Webb’s Depths of Knowledge Levels and use the Cognitive Rigor Matrix to identify the DOK and Bloom’s level for various skills Ali

Prior Knowledge Questions 1) What do you already know about Common Core State Standards? Ali

3-Minute Common Core Video

Discuss with Groups: With a partner, discuss your reactions to the video. Why did most states choose to adopt the common core state standards? Ali

What Does Rigor Look Like? Connect the Dots: Implementing & Assessing the Common Core Standards Lauryn Taken from the work of Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.

Before we begin… Take a minute to discuss your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” as it relates to instruction, learning, and/or assessment Lauryn

Now let’s apply your rigor definition… Your class has just read some version of Little Red Riding Hood. What is a basic comprehension question you might ask? What is a more rigorous question you might ask? Lauryn

Developing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix Different states/schools/teachers use different models to describe cognitive rigor. Each addresses something different.  Bloom’s: What type of thinking (verbs) is needed to complete a task? Webb’s DOK: How deeply do you have to understand the content to successfully interact with it? How complex is the content? Lauryn

Bloom’s Taxonomy [1956 ] & Bloom’s Cognitive Process Dimensions [2005] Knowledge—Define, duplicate, label, list, name, order, recognize, relate, recall Remember—Retrieve knowledge from long-term memory, recognize, recall, locate, identify Comprehension—Classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate recognize, report, review, select, translate Understand—Construct meaning, clarify, paraphrase, represent, translate, illustrate, give examples, classify, categorize, summarize, generalize, predict… Application—Apply, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret, practice, write Apply—Carry out or use a procedure in a given situation; carry out or use/apply to an unfamiliar task Analysis—Analyze, appraise, explain, calculate, categorize, compare, criticize discriminate, examine Analyze—Break into constituent parts, determine how parts relate Synthesis—Rearrange, assemble, collect, compose, create, design, develop, formulate, manage, write Evaluate—Make judgments based on criteria, check, detect inconsistencies/fallacies, critique Evaluation—Appraise, argue, assess, choose, compare, defend, estimate, explain, judge, predict, rate, core, select, support, value Create—Put elements together to form a coherent whole, reorganize elements into new patterns/structures Lauryn

Webb’s Depth-of-Knowledge Levels DOK-1 – Recall & Reproduction - Recall of a fact, term, principle, concept, or perform a routine procedure DOK-2 - Basic Application of Skills/Concepts - Use of information, conceptual knowledge, select appropriate procedures for a task, two or more steps with decision points along the way, routine problems, organize/display data, interpret/use simple graphs DOK-3 - Strategic Thinking - Requires reasoning, developing a plan or sequence of steps to approach problem; requires some decision making and justification; abstract, complex, or non- routine; often more than one possible answer DOK-4 - Extended Thinking - An investigation or application to real world; requires time to research, problem solve, and process multiple conditions of the problem or task; non-routine manipulations, across disciplines/content areas/multiple sources Lauryn

Video Application What are the main differences among the DOK levels according to the video? DOK Video Ali

Reflection What are the main differences between a DOK 2 and a DOK 3 question or task? Ali

Bloom’s and DOK First, locate what Bloom’s Level a task or question is: Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create Ali

Bloom’s and DOK Then, determine which DOK level the question or task is: Ali DOK 1 DOK 2 DOK 3 DOK 4 Recall and Reproduction Basic Application of Skills and Concepts Strategic Thinking Extended Thinking

DOK is about complexity— not difficulty! The intended student learning outcome determines the DOK level. What mental processing must occur?   While verbs may appear to point to a DOK level, it is what comes after the verb that is the best indicator of the rigor/DOK level. Describe the physical features of a plant. Describe the properties of integer exponents. Describe how the two political parties are alike and different. Describe the most significant effect of WWII on the nations of Europe. Lauryn

Identifying Bloom’s and DOK “Describe”: What new Bloom’s Level is this skill? Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create

Identifying Bloom’s and DOK What DOK Level are these tasks? Describe the physical features of a plant. Describe the properties of integer exponents. Describe how the two political parties are alike and different. Describe the most significant effect of WWII on the nations of Europe. Lauryn DOK 1 DOK 2 DOK 3 DOK 4 Recall and Reproduction Basic Application of Skills and Concepts Strategic Thinking Extended Thinking

Identifying Bloom’s and DOK Describe the physical features of a plant. Remember, DOK 1 Describe the properties of integer exponents. Understand, DOK 1 Describe how the two political parties are alike and different. Understand, DOK 2 Describe the most significant effect of WWII on the nations of Europe. Understand, DOK 3

The Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix: Depth + thinking Level 1 Recall & Reproduction Level 2 Skills & Concepts Level 3 Strategic Thinking/ Reasoning Level 4 Extended Thinking Remember -Recall, locate basic facts, details, events Not appropriate at this level Understand -Select appropriate words to use when intended meaning is clearly evident -Specify or explain relationships -summarize -identify central idea -Explain, generalize, or connect ideas using supporting evidence (quote, example…) -Explain how concepts or ideas specifically relate to other content domains or concepts Apply -Use language structure (pre/suffix) or word relationships (synonym/antonym) to determine meaning -Use context to identify meaning of word -Obtain and interpret information using text features -Use concepts to solve non-routine problems -Devise an approach among many alternatives to research a novel problem Analyze -Identify whether information is contained in a graph, table, etc. -Compare literary elements, terms, facts, events -analyze format, organization, & text structures -Analyze or interpret author’s craft (literary devices, viewpoint, or potential bias) to critique a text -Analyze multiple sources -Analyze complex/abstract themes Evaluate -Cite evidence and develop a logical argument for conjectures -Evaluate relevancy, accuracy, & completeness of information Create -Brainstorm ideas about a topic -Generate conjectures based on observations or prior knowledge -Synthesize information within one source or text -Synthesize information across multiple sources or texts Lauryn

Identifying Bloom’s & DOK Levels For each task listed below, identify where it would fall on the Cognitive Rigor and Relevance Matrix: Identify transitional words and phrases and helped you know the sequence of events in the story. Are all wolves (in literature) like the wolf in this story? Support your response using evidence from other texts. Retell or summarize the story in your own words What is your opinion about the intelligence of the wolf? Justify using details and evidence from the story. Write a telephone conversation between little Red Riding hood and her mother that explains the wolf incident. Who was the main character? What was the story’s setting? Ali

Reflection and Share-Out: How does DOK build upon your knowledge of Bloom’s? How will this impact how teachers design class assignments or performance tasks? Ali

Defining DOK In small groups, use the resources provided to create your own user-friendly definitions for each DOK level on the chart paper provided Ali

Group Share Out! Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4

Wrap Up and Reflection Take the low and high level questions that you receive, and now place them on the NEW Bloom’s and DOK matrix in order to determine their rigor level How has your definition of rigor changed, and how will this affect how you create assessment tasks and questions? Ali

Objective Reflection Determine why states opted to choose the CCSS Articulate the characteristics of Webb’s Depths of Knowledge Levels and use the Cognitive Rigor Matrix to identify the DOK and Bloom’s level for various skills Ali