Prostate cancer patient with I-125 seed implants Cremated at a funeral home Resulted in contamination of retort, processing equipment and surrounding.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is “Appalachian Compact”?
Advertisements

IV Administration – Dosage Calculation
1 Isolation and Quarantine Protocol Public Health Seattle and King County 2004.
Unit B: Safety in Agricultural Mechanics
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
Compliance Dates The final rule was published on January 25, 1995,
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
THE EXTERNAL HAZARD.
C1 Sequences and series. Write down the first 4 terms of the sequence u n+1 =u n +6, u 1 =6 6, 12, 18, 24.
Radiation Safety Training Rights and Regulations. Washington State University Radiation Safety Office.
Underground Storage Tanks at Duke Duke Medical Center –8 permitted USTs located on medical campus –Range in size from 2,000 gallons to 30,000 gallons Proper.
1 Construction and Renovation Activities in Healthcare Facilities What construction crews should know, but were afraid to ask!
Site Safety Plans PFN ME 35B.
Module 3: Developing Plans
Good Loading Practices Carrier Transicold and PLM Trailer Leasing.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 Transitioning to Version 8 Building Data Entry Issues in NEAT/MHEA and Oak Ridge National.
Radioisotope Laboratory Techniques Day 2 Environmental Health & Safety Radiation Control & Radiological Services UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RADIATION SAFETY.
IN-PLACE PROTECTION. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Explain the objective of In Place Protection Identify the means of warning List the criteria in choosing room.
EMERGENCY MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF RADIATION CAUSALTIES IN HOSPITAL Module XVII.
BLR’s Safety Training Presentations
Section 3A Uses and Abuses of Percentages Reprise
Radiation Safety Training Lab Survey Program Washington State University Radiation Safety Office.
Radiation Can Be Fun….!!!! But R.E.S.P.E.C.T. it
1 BASIC COAL FIRED BOILER ATTENDANCE TRAINING COURSE.
1 Shop & Tool Safety Training: Part VII Cartridge Operated Tools.
Med Phys 3A03/3AB2 Practical Health & Medical Physics Communications D.R. Chettle, with D.F. Moscu TA: Helen Moise.
Generation of Radioactive Waste Radioactive Waste Management and Disposal NUCP
1 Preparing for Smallpox: Post-event Smallpox Response.
EG1003: Introduction to Engineering and Design
Resident Duty Hours UB Office of Graduate Medical Education Donna M. Cummiskey Director, GME Resource Management May 20, 2008.
Chapter 2 Energy and Matter
Instruments & Radiopharmaceutical Production
There are three types of emergencies:  Internal  External  Natural disasters.
R Ch 34 Electric Current pg 1
Partial Products. Category 1 1 x 3-digit problems.
Hydronic Balancing Balancing Valves
Web Time Entry Hours Entry in ESS 04/26/12 1 Banner.
Iodine-131 Therapy and the Dialysis Patient M.J. Bohan and R.L. Richardson Yale-New Haven Hospital Radiation Safety Office.
1 Chapter 2Energy and Matter 2.6 Changes of State Copyright © 2005 by Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Benjamin Cummings.
PHILOTECHNICS Decommissioning Radiological Laboratories in California CCRSO Conference October 5, 2007 Presented by: Jon Dillon, M.S.
32 P Module Objectives  To understand the physical nature of 32 P.  To understand the 32 P is both and internal and external radiation hazard.  To understand.
Iodine 125.
Radiation Safety Training Module 2 – Safety and Radiation
PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SAFE USE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL Indiana University - Bloomington.
Ivan P. Salati de Almeida Director of Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Brazilian Nuclear Energy National Commission- CNEN September 2012 Small Scale.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Regulations Part II: Basic Concepts and Definitions Day 8 – Lecture 5(2)
2008 RADIATION SAFETY REFRESHER TRAINING. RESPONDING TO A RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL INCIDENT IN THE LAB It can happen to the best of us.
Major Street Pet Services. Current Cremation Trends National Cremation Rates National Cremation Rates 26.2% (2000) 26.2% (2000) 34.9% (2007) 34.9% (2007)
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Hg System Decommissioning Activities V.B. Graves NFMCC Friday Meeting Feb 29, 2008.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Authorization for the Decommissioning of the Facility.
Radiation Safety Training Module 3 – UGA Site Specific Procedures.
Radioactive Materials Awareness Radiation Safety Training.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” RADIATION PROTECTION SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
Government of Western Australia Department of Mines and Petroleum Please read this before using presentation This presentation is based on content presented.
Prepared By : Miss. Sana’a AL-Sulami Teacher Assistant.
Is Cremation Right For You?
RADIATION SAFETY Mrs. Brinston. Introduction As a healthcare worker, you know that radiation is an important tool for detecting and treating diseases.
PET/CT Workshop Presented at VCUHS by Jennifer Love and Mark Crosthwaite by Jennifer Love and Mark Crosthwaite.
Application of Calibrated Instruments in Medical Facilities MAJ H. Mike Stewart, Jr., MS, CHP April 17, 2009.
Part 5: Meeting the Challenge of the “EC Tracers” Healthcare Engineering Consultants How Should I Prepare for the “EC Tracer” Part of the Survey?
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections Gerald A. Schlapper, PhD, PE, CHP Health Physicist Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Region I.
Radiation Safety Refresher Training for PET Imaging For Record of Attendance or Interoffice Mail Test to: Stephen David,
Radiological Safety for Experiment T-489 Irradiation Experiment in Endstation A Spring 2007 ITEMS: Experimental Setup Long-Term Radiation inside ESA Short-Term.
Waste and Contamination
Instructions for Wipe Testing for Radioactive Material Contamination
Presented at VCUHS by Jennifer Love and Mark Crosthwaite
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Presentation transcript:

Prostate cancer patient with I-125 seed implants Cremated at a funeral home Resulted in contamination of retort, processing equipment and surrounding rooms Agreement State required decontamination to very restrictive limits

Part 1 – implants 63 sources (seeds) mCi /seed Total: 15.8 mCi Written discharge instructions The Radiation Safety Officer should be notified if the patient is hospitalized, or if death should occur. Part 2 – external beam treatments

Temperature: F Duration: 2-3 hours Combustion Air Flow: 2000 – 2500 cfm Cooling Period: 1 hour at cfm Remains: 3-9 lbs (bone fragments) Soft tissue vaporized Bone fragments normally pulverized after cremation. Source: Cremation Association of North America

Activity 35 mCi I-125 Dose Rates meter from patient 1.6 mR/hr on contact patients abdomen Source - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Two instances in NRC jurisdiction 9.8 mCi – cremated with NRC permission 2 mR/hr on contact w/ plastic bag of remains Bkg after placing bag in metal urn 12 mCi – cremated with NRC permission No data regarding dose rates

Day (-14): Seeds implanted Day (-3): Patient died Day 0: Clinic notified of death, patient cremated, initial characterization, clinic RSO helps funeral home complete cremation procedures Day 1: State regulator notified, remains transferred, facility characterized Day 2: State inspection and survey Day 6: Follow up surveys – State inspector and clinic RSO Day 7: Chase notified and provides decommissioning proposal and prepares to mobilize

Day 6 – Day 73: Funeral Home and State negotiate course of action. Options: Shutdown and decay Decommission – refractory was scheduled for relining regardless of incident Day 73: Funeral Home decides to proceed with decommissioning Day 73 – Day 103: State decides release criteria Day 103 – Day 107: On-site work Day 110: Final Status Report submitted to State Day 131: State confirmatory surveys complete Day 133: Facility released for unrestricted use

Therapy Clinic RSO responds Conditions Implant patient ashes in pulverizer 2 nd cremated body (ashes) inside retort 3 rd body in refrigerator ready to cremate Dose Rates w/GM detector 100 mr/hr inside retort 10 mr/hr external to pulverizer 1 mr/hr at retort door

Patient remains in plastic bag and plastic transport box – 10 mr/hr contact Remains buried Remains of 2 nd person in plastic bag and plastic transport box – 0.1 mr/hr contact Remains returned to family Activity homogenously dispersed in ashes

Some items taken to Clinic for DIS Broom head, brushes, whisk broom, dust pan, leather gloves Clinic makes a commitment to accept all waste from remediation for DIS State approves DIS at clinic

Clinic RSO performed dose assessment External dose to operator estimated by dose rate measurements and time-motion study Measurements corrected for energy differences between Cs-137 (cal source) and I-125 Thyroid scan conducted at local hospital – dont know results Total dose was 12 mrem to hand and 0.6 mrem TEDE

Retort and Exhaust Retort (3 x 8) No filters or pollution control equipment Crematory Room (8 x 29) Processing Room (9 x 10) (a walled-off section of the Crematory Room) Office (15 x 15)

State regulations are 25 mrem/yr w/ALARA State would not consider dose modeling or application of NRC default screening values NRC DSV for I-125 is 690,000 dpm/100cm 2 Site-Specific Criteria 20 dpm/100cm 2 removable based on RG 1.86 State not really concerned with total contamination or dose rates Chase implemented criteria of detectability (~1000 dpm/100cm 2 ) as a goal for identifying areas for remediation to mitigate risk of exceeding removable contamination limits

Direct Measurements Field Instrument for Detection of Low Energy Radiation (FIDLER) Bicron G5 and LMI 2221 Thin Nal(TI) Scintillation Crystal (5 Dia x thick) Thin Window: Beryllium, (0.010 thick) Energy window set at kev to capture I-125 emission for survey – AND - to capture I-129 emissions for calibration and efficiency determination (~22% efficiency, ~ 700 cpm bkg) Removable Measurements Packard Tri-carb 2800 liquid scintillation counter Single channel 0-80 kev, 78% efficiency

Location Total Activity (dpm/100cm 2 ) Removable Activity (dpm/100cm 2 ) Remediation Method Office Floor 5K0.8K Wet Wipe Prep Table 13K1.4K Wet Wipe Process Room Floor 312K5.6K Scabble, Vacuum Process Room Pulverizer 265K10K Vacuum, Scrubbed, scoured and wiped Retort Room Floor 1.4M60K Vacuum, Scrubbed, scoured and wiped Inside Retort Off Scale 1 mR/hr 24K Vacuumed, dose rate reduced dramatically Hammered Removed 2.5 to 5 of floor liner Process Room Exhaust Duct 3.5K112 Wet Wipe

All smears (except one) < 20 dpm/100cm 2, Direct Measurements up to 1400 dpm/100cm 2 NORM in refractory materials 112 dpm/100cm 2 inside exhaust duct – performed dose assessment to leave in place Not accessible for occupancy <<<<<< DSV Short half-life Ridiculous to even think about remediating State accepted

State regulator - conservative release criteria No signs of the SS seed capsules Radioactivity attached to ashes – where there was no ash, there was no radioactivity Significant mixing of ashes between cremations If you get cremated, you will have company for eternity Two cases in NRC jurisdiction – NRC does not view as a concern

Questions?