DEFICIENCY POINT METHOD FOR EXISTING BRIDGE EVALUATION J. Vičan, P. Koteš a J. Slavík University of Žilina Faculty of Civil Engineering Department of Structures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seismic Design of Buried Structures
Advertisements

State Aid Programs An Introduction to: Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement.
State Aid Programs Legislative Issues - Bonding Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement Township Sign Replacement Program.
Agenda – Day 1 8:00 am – 8:15 am Introductions and House Keeping
LOAD RATING TRAINING Hand Calculations Tim Keller, PE Amjad Waheed, PE
Executive Summary Introduction In 1988, by virtue of State Statute , the Nebraska State Legislature first assigned the Nebraska Department.
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridge.
RFP AND CONTRACT PHASE Jeff Wassenaar, P.E., HQ Project Development Benjamin Acimovic, P.E., Region 1.
Investigating a Flood with EXCEL Feb 14, 2014 APEC Lesson Study Conference Hee-chan Lew & Chan-hee An Korea National University of Education.
QoS-Aware Resource Allocation for Slowly Time-Varying Channels InfoCom Department - University of Rome La Sapienza
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Screening.
1 McGill University Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
TRACECA PROJECT EVALUATION. PROJECT Rehabilitation and Reconstruction of the Key Transit Highways Connecting the Centre of the Republic of Armenia to.
Canadian Truck Size & Weight Harmonization New Brunswick Department of Transportation Subcommittee on Highway Transport Portland, Maine June 6-9, 2010.
PASSABILITY CRITERIA FOR UNPAVED ROADS (The experience of an operational road engineer guided by research findings) PRESENTATION BY MARTIN HMENSA DEPARTMENT.
Forest Hydrology: Lect. 18
Analytical derivations of merge capacity: a multilane approach Ludovic Leclercq 1,2, Florian Marczak 1, Victor L. Knoop 2, Serge P. Hoogendoorn 2 1 Université.
Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine (former Ministry of Transport and Communications) State Enterprise «State Road Transport Research Institute» (SE.
ARISTOTELION UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF RURAL AND SURVEYING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING.
LRFD-Steel Design 1.
Reliability of Existing Bridge Structures
1 Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management.
M+P – consulting engineers Müller-BBM group Acoustics Noise and vibration control Air quality Air Quality alongside motorways Air Quality alongside.
The Diversity of Transport Accessibility in Polish Regions Monika Musiał – Malago’ University of Economics, Cracow, Poland
I. Truss Bridge Gussets Background
Application of the Direct Optimized Probabilistic Calculation Martin Krejsa Department of Structural Mechanics Faculty of Civil Engineering VSB - Technical.
Energy-Aware Scheduling with Quality of Surveillance Guarantee in Wireless Sensor Networks Jaehoon Jeong, Sarah Sharafkandi and David H.C. Du Dept. of.
Evaluation of Level of Service at Airport Passenger Terminals: Individual Components and Overall Perspectives Anderson Correia Department of Civil Engineering.
VUJE, a. s., Okružná 5, Trnava Strengthening the European Union Energy Security Prepared by Peter Líška (Slovak proposal) Brussels, 14th September.
Content Based MPEG Video Traffic Modeling Ali M. Dawood and Mohammed Ghanbari, senior member, IEEE Presented by Premchander Reddy & Lakshmi deepthi Pasupuleti.
META-LEARNING FOR AUTOMATIC SELECTION OF ALGORITHMS FOR TEXT CLASSIFICATION Karol Furdík, Ján Paralič, Gabriel Tutoky {Jan.Paralic,
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Comparison of different European databases with respect to road category and time periods (on peak, off peak, weekend)
Long run impacts assessment of planned R52/A5 expressway as one of two core road connection between Austria and Czech Republic Milan Viturka, Vilém Pařil,
Segmentation of Vehicles in Traffic Video Tun-Yu Chiang Wilson Lau.
THE VIEWS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE 5-YEAR WORK PROGRAM ON ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE The In-Session Workshop, 22 nd Session of SBSTA Bonn, 21.
Danbro Selected Data For Maps Prioritizing / Ranking Arne Henriksen NVF Annual Bridge Conference 2015.
A Marketing Approach to Bridge Longevity All about being specifically wrong … while being generally right Presented by: Heinrich O. Bonstedt Executive.
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN THE PORT OF BAR AND CITY OF BAR CORRELATIONS BETWEEN THE PORT OF BAR AND CITY OF BAR - some aspects of analysis - Presenter: Deda.
The National Strategy of Slovak Republic
The National Strategy of Slovak Republic Ing. Iveta Kubasáková, PhD.- Ing. Ivana Šimková University of Zilina, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport.
U of Minnesota DIWANS'061 Energy-Aware Scheduling with Quality of Surveillance Guarantee in Wireless Sensor Networks Jaehoon Jeong, Sarah Sharafkandi and.
LOADS 1.
1 ICP PPP Methods Regional Course on Price Statistics and ICP Male, Maldives September 2005 TIMOTHY LO Statistician, International Comparison Program.
SBRA method as a tool for reliability analysis of structural members exposed to multi-component load effects David Pustka VŠB – Technical University of.
Project methodology – for TER By the External Consultant D. Tsamboulas.
Jiangbi Hu, Transportation Research Center, Department of Civil Engineering,Beijing University of Technology, China A QUANTITATIVE MODEL OF ROAD-SURFACE.
NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS SCHOOL OF MINING AND METALLURGY KARST SPRINGS OF GREECE MAPPING AND EVALUATION USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM.
Design Project #1 Replacement of Vehicle Bridge over Spring Creek Centre County, PA Introduction to Engineering Design EDGSN 100 Section 002 G4 Design.
Maria Stavrou ENG 160 Department of Civil Engineering CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY.
DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIGHTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES dr inż. Ryszard Walentyński Faculty of Civil Engineering Silesian University of Technology Gliwice,
Port of Black Sea Regional Conference 31 st October 2007 CONSTANTIN MATEI GENERAL MANAGER National Company “Maritime Ports Administration”
Adapting transport infrastructure to climate change The role of standardization Adapting transport infrastructure to climate change The role of standardization.
土木工程概论 Introduction to Civil Engineering 第五、六、七章 交通、桥梁与港口工程 Chapter 5 Transportation, Bridge and harbor Engineering.
1 ROAD & BRIDGE RESEARCH INSTITUTE WARSAW Juliusz Cieśla ASSESSSMENT OF PRESTRESSING FORCE IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BRIDGE SPANS.
Highway Engineering BE 5th Semester, Civil Engineering
INTRODUCTION TO TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. of roads, streets and highways, their networks and terminals, abutting lands, and relationships with other modes.
DETECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY PROBLEMS WITHIN ROAD TRANSPORT DECISION MAKING Prof. Dr. Nikolay Georgiev eng. Violina Velyova ‘Todor Kableshkov’ University.
1 EUROCODES A tool for building safety and reliability enhancement Introduction to EN 1990 – Section 6 Workshop on Eurocodes: Training the trainers Moscow.
Consumer Markets and Consumer Buyer Behavior
BRIDGE LOADING AND RATING
SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF THE DEGRADATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Agriculture University in Kraków Department of Water Engineering
The influence of wind load on a suspended fiber optic cable
Replacement of Vechicle Bridge over Spring Creek Centre County, PA
Consumer Markets and Consumer Buyer Behavior
Design Criteria CTC 440.
Highway Engineering Civil Engineering Department
BRIDGE LOADING AND RATING
Task Force on the measurement of road traffic volumes in VKm
Regional accessibility indicators: developments and perspectives
Presentation transcript:

DEFICIENCY POINT METHOD FOR EXISTING BRIDGE EVALUATION J. Vičan, P. Koteš a J. Slavík University of Žilina Faculty of Civil Engineering Department of Structures and Bridges

INTRODUCTION At present, there are railway bridges and road bridges (without motorway bridges) in Slovakia, from which more than 20 % have not satisfactory loading capacities and about 2,5 % of all bridges are in critical technical condition. From the viewpoint of aforesaid and in accordance with experience of the most developed European countries, there is a need to apply complex system approach and create the computer - aided Bridge management system based on the more sophisticated bridge evaluation.

RELIABILITY-BASED EVALUATION OF EXISTING BRIDGES – Primary parameters: Bridge loading capacity (LLRF) respecting actual technical bridge condition, Bridge spatial arrangement (on bridge and under bridge structure), Bridge age or its remaining lifetime. –Secondary parameters: Parameter of road traffic intensity replacing bridge categorization according to road classification Parameter of the bridge length underlining bridge significance from the building and economical viewpoint.

BRIDGE EVALUATION USING DEFICIENCY POINTS METHOD Proposed method of Deficiency points respects following basic effects: Actual bridge loading capacity (B LC ), Actual bridge technical condition (B TC ), Actual bridge deck width (B W ), Actual vertical bridge clearance over and under the observed bridge (B H ), Actual bridge age and its planned remaining lifetime (B A ).

Secondary parameters: Parameter of the road traffic intensity Parameter of the bridge length taking into account bridge significance from the building and economical viewpoint

Global number of deficiency points should be determined according following equation: DP = W LC B LC + W TC B TC + W W B W + W H B H + W A B A while DP Є 0,100 Influence of particular parameters is taken into account by weight factors: W LC +W TC + W W +W H +W A = 100, where B LC is the number of deficiency points due to actual bridge loading capacity, B TC is the number of deficiency points taking actual technical condition into account, B W is the number of deficiency points allowing for actual bridge deck width, B H is the number of deficiency points allowing for actual bridge vertical clearance over and under the bridge observed, B A is the number of deficiency points from the bridge age viewpoint, Wj are the weighting factors of individual evaluation parameters from the viewpoint of their influence on the complex bridge evaluation.

Influence of bridge loading capacity While B LC > 0 and LLRF max is the maximum characteristic value of the bridge loading capacity, LLRF is the actual value of the bridge loading capacity, W T is the weight factor of transport intensity influence, W L is the weight factor of bridge length influence, n 1 is the exponent allowing for category of communication.

Loading capacity is the basic evaluation parameter of the existing bridge reliability. The loading capacity can be characterized as the relative member design resistance expressed in the design load effects of the standard load model (1) where R d is the design resistance of the bridge loading capacity limiting member E Sd are the design load effects of the standard load model o are design values of the other load effects affecting the bridge in combination with traffic load.

W T + W L = 1,0 K T is the factor taking into account influence of transport intensity ADI is average daily transport intensity on the bridge, ADTI is average daily intensity of truck transport on the observed bridge, max ADI is the maximum daily transport intensity in frame of evaluated region, n 1, n 2 are factors allowing for influence of automobile or truck transport 0 < n 1 < 1,0 a 0< n 2 < 1,0.

K L is the coefficient allowing for bridge length effect where B L is the bridge length, B L,max is the maximum bridge length in frame of evaluated region.

Influence of bridge technical condition whileB TC 0 and TC is the actual evaluation of existing bridge technical condition. The given formulae is valid for road bridges, whose technical condition is classified into 7 classes.

Influence of bridge spatial arrangement Effect of bridge deck width while B W > 0 and SW is the standard value of bridge deck width, W is the actual value of bridge deck width.

Influence of bridge vertical clearance can be taken into account by following formulae: while B H > 0 and H O is an influence of bridge vertical overclearence on the observed bridge, H U is an influence of bridge vertical underclearence of the observed bridge.

Influence of bridge vertical overclearence of the observed bridge while H O > 0 and SH O is the standard value of the vertical overclearence on the observed bridge, H O is the actual value of this parameter on the observed bridge. SH O = 6.0 m for railway communication, SH O = 4.80 m for roads of I. and II. category, SH O = 4.50 m for roads of III. category, SH O = 4.20 for local communications.

Influence of vertical underclearence of the observed bridge while H U > 0 and SH U is the standard value of the bridge vertical underclearence of the observed bridge, H U is the actual value of this parameter SH U = 6.0 m over railway communication, SH U = 4.80 m over roads of I. and II. category, SH U = 4.50 m over roads of III. category, SH U = 4.20 over local communications, SH U = 0.50 over rivers.

Influence of bridge age while B A > 0 and T D is the design bridge lifetime in years, T D = 100 years, RC is year of bridge construction or reconstruction, RE is year of the bridge evaluation.

Váhové faktory - Vplyv zaťažiteľnosti W LC = 30 - Vplyv technického stavu W TC = 45 - Vplyv šírkového usporiadania na moste W W = 10 - Vplyv výškového usporiadania na moste a pod mostom W H = 5 - Vplyv veku mosta W A = 10 - Vplyv intenzity dopravy W T = 0,8 - Vplyv dĺžky premostenia W L = 0,2 - Koeficient vplyvu intenzity dopravy n 1 = 0,5 - Koeficient vplyvu nákladnej cestnej dopravy n 2 = 1,0 - Koeficient vplyvu osobnej cestnej dopravy n 3 = 1,0

Thanks for your attention