Construction Project Delivery Methods

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presenters Scott Gaudineer, Program Executive Caldwell Flores Winters
Advertisements

CM/CG Contracting Tom Ravn, Mn/DOT Director, Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting.
Benefits of Construction Management
Construction Project Coordination Presented by: Philip H
Organization of Primary Entities
Special Recognition Cheryl Wilson, State Auditor and Inspectors Office Presented by Ann Embree and Sherri Schieffer County Training Program and Oklahoma.
Potential Second Access Currently we are working on approval access to 2 nd Avenue under CP tracks as shown in top left photo. Our entrance would be across.
Building and Financing Options For Public - Private Projects Thomas Kuffel Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney King County Prosecuting Attorney Office December.
Your Presenters Lisa Dal Gallo Dave Kirn Regional Executive/Justice Market Leader Partner, LEED AP
Facilities Excellence Project Delivery Methods Board of Trustees April 12, 2005.
Airport Owner’s Guide to Project Delivery Systems Prepared by: The Joint Committee of ACI-NA, ACC and AGC.
4 th ANNUAL JOINT CSU/UC PSSOA CONFERENCE March 25-26, 2003 “Emerging Construction Methodologies in CSU – What Public Works Contract Specialists Should.
1. A project delivery method describes the process of how a project will be designed and constructed. A project delivery method can be characterized in.
A Match made in Heaven? Connecting you with a builder.
Your Deliver Method... …Pick it Early
Alternative Project Delivery
Facilities Institute July , 2012 Houston, Texas Click to edit Master title style
Measure L Program Implementation Management Considerations Report to the Board of Trustees San Joaquin Delta Community College District July 13, 2004.
Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build. Extensive master planning preceded this phase 2003 – Dagit Saylor Master Plan Hanbury Evans Update.
Delivery Methods  The Players from Handbook of Architectural Practice, Chapter 9.1 by Phillip Bernstein FAIA  Variables from Handbook of Architectural.
THE PROJECT TEAM TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PROJECT TEAM TRADITIONAL TEAM ORGANIZATION AND VARIATIONS THE OWNER’S TEAM THE DESIGN.
Prof Awad S. Hanna C HANGING P ROJECT D ELIVERY S YSTEMS by Awad S. Hanna, Ph. D., P. E. The University of Wisconsin, Madison Department of Civil and Environmental.
The Importance of the Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) Process
Public Works Contracting Marsha Reilly Office of Program Research House of Representatives recommended.
PM/CAM Training H. Jeff Moore May 11, AGENDA Overview CM at Risk Design (Completion) / Build Lunch Break / Discussion – 11:30 AM – 12:30 PM CM Agency.
Procurement and Construction Management and Oversight What Board Members Need to Know Jerry Smiley, AICP 24 July 2013.
Project Delivery Options in the California Construction Market CSI Fresno Chapter - February 16, 2010 PROJECT DELIVERY OPTIONS in the CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION.
Investment Reform Lenders’ Interests November 2009.
January 24, …a delivery method which entails a commitment by the Construction Manager to deliver the project within a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP).
Contract Signing Authority Delegation of Signature Authority by the Board of Trustees The Board of Trustees of Barnard College has authorized.
CE 366 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS Robert G. Batson, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Construction Engineering The University of Alabama
Agency Construction Management :CM NOT AT-RISK
LEASE-LEASEBACK PROJECT DELIVERY: The Patient is Critical; Can She Be Saved? Timothy M. Truax L AW O FFICES OF T IMOTHY M. T RUAX PC AGC of California.
Project Delivery Methods Part I. What is A Project Delivery Method? The owner’s selection of the organizational structure of the project. Three popular.
By: Diego Miranda.  When an individual owns and operates there own business. There is very little government regulations, but there are great risk for.
You passed the Bond or secured some funds What do we do now? 2014.
Project Delivery Methods CM CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Kevin A. Delorey 11 Feb 2010.
FAC11 - CONSTRUCTION 101: WHERE THE RUBBER MEETS THE ROAD APRIL 3-6, 2013, LONG BEACH, CA These materials have been prepared by the CASBO Facilities Professional.
LACCD Building the Future THOMAS HALL Director Facilities Planning and Development.
The Design / Build Advantage
© 2011 Orbach Huff & Suarez 1 Lease Leaseback Project Delivery Method Kimble Cook Orbach, Huff & Suarez.
BCN 4708 Fall 2008 Chapter 1 The Construction Industry.
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AT RISK Prepared by: Nancy Fouad Carey Attorney AGC Alabama Birmingham Section Meeting November 5, 2012.
CHANGING PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
Nepal administrative staff college
One East Broward Blvd., Suite 1800
by Awad S. Hanna, Ph. D., P. E. The University of Wisconsin, Madison
2016 SAME Small Business Conference - Atlanta
What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Introduction to Project Delivery Methods © Copyright 2017 NASBP.
Lease-Leaseback Project Delivery Method
Design – BIM – Build – Operate
Profession Practices (ECIV-5105)
Class #1 Contract Delivery Systems
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
A Guide for Government Contractors
CM at Risk v. Design-Bid-Build
Ohio Capital Finance Corporation
CHANGING PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
Project Delivery Systems
Nepal administrative staff college
Northwest Hospital Childbirth Center Pre-submittal Meeting
Architectural Services RFQ
Design-Bid-Build (Ch. 149) vs. Construction Manager at Risk (Ch. 149A)
PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS
HFC Public-Private Partnership Basics
#BIM TOP BENEFITS OF IMPRESSIVE BIM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FIRMS & BIM PRECONSTRUCTION SERVICES #BUILDINGINFORMATIONMODELING BIM Engineering U.S.,L.L.C.
Chapter 2 – Review ‘construction management’
Construction Management Services April 16, 2018
Right of Way Certification
What is MnCCC?.
Presentation transcript:

Construction Project Delivery Methods Calistoga Joint Unified School District

Presenters Scott Gaudineer, Program Executive Caldwell Flores Winters Kurt Evans, Vice President Lusardi Construction Juan Barroso, Vice President Blach Construction

Facilities Mission Calistoga School facilities shall support diverse, innovative, interactive learning experiences, promote academic excellence, and instill a passion for life-long learning. The facilities shall be safe, clean, and accommodate the present and future needs of the entire community.

What is Lease/Leaseback? Lease/Leaseback refers to a legal contract where: A School District leases a building or a whole school site to a General Contractor or Construction Manager giving them rights to build out the Architect’s design The General Contractor/Construction Manager then sub-leases the building and site back to the District to allow them to continue school operations

Lease/Leaseback Definition The L/LB Method is a project delivery method that enables a school district to act like a private entity. It is defined and approved under the Education Code Section 17406(a) and reads: “The governing board of a school district, without advertising for bids, may let, for a minimum rental of one dollar ($1) per year, to any person, firm or corporation any real property that belongs to the district if the instrument by which such property is let requires the lessee therein to construct on the demised premises, or provide for the construction thereon, a building or buildings for the use of the school district during the term thereof, and provides that title to that building shall vest in the school district at the expiration of that term…”.

How is Lease-Leaseback Different? The District can hand select a financially sound, qualified, reputable Contractor The Contractor is part of the Team from project start The Contractor is utilized for pre-construction services One Team, One Direction!

Methods of Project Delivery Design/Bid/Build (traditional public bid) Lease/Leaseback Design Assist Lease/Leaseback Design Build CM Multi-prime

Design/Bid/Build (traditional public bid) The Design/Bid/Build process is one in which the District and the Architect work together to define project scope. The Architect (with the design team) complete the project plans which are sent out to General Contractors for public bid. The low bid General Contractor is selected.

Design/Bid/Build (traditional public bid) Pros: Competitive bid process Defined project prior to bid Cons: No design input prior to bid, design is not budget based Largest exposure for change orders Adversarial relationship Time and cost overruns Stuck with low bid

Lease/Leaseback Design Assist The L/LB Design Assist process is one in which the District hires an Architect and General Contractor separately to work together to define project scope with a target budget. The Architect, District, and GC collaborate on design. The GC updates the project budget as plans progress.

Lease/Leaseback Design Assist Pros: The District can choose their Contractor & Architect The Contractor is part of the design process Project is designed to a budget District, Architect, Contractor work as a Team! Cons: There is not single source responsibility

Lease/Leaseback Design Build The L/LB Design Build process is similar to the L/LB Design Assist except that in a Design Build, the Architect works for the General Contractor. The General Contractor becomes the single source responsibility to the District.

Lease/Leaseback Design Build Pros: The District can choose their Contractor & Architect The Contractor is part of the design process Project is designed to a budget There is single source responsibility District, Architect, Contractor work as a Team! Cons: District has less control over design & quality Architect works for Contractor, not District There can be perception of no 3rd party representation

CM Multi-prime The CM Multi-prime process is one in which the District hires an Architect and Construction Manager separately. The CM acts as the District’s agent in all pre-construction and construction activities. The CM bids out the project on behalf of the District to the various trades (carpenters, electricians, etc). The District contracts with all of the trade contractors separately and has liability for these contractors. CM manages schedule and subs.

CM Multi-Prime Pros: Cons: The District can choose their CM Public competitive bid process is used for subs The CM is involved with pre-construction and construction General Contractor mark-up is saved Cons: The District is most at risk (holds all low bid contracts) Creates the most administrative difficulty

Advantages of Having the GC Involved Early Team collaborates to identify District goals & budget Contractor assists designers to help maximize value Contractor assists with construction means and methods, sustainability, & long term durability Project is kept on track with updated budgets and schedules Contractor accountability due to design involvement Proper planning minimizes surprises and changes