Focus Group Discussion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exploratory Research and Qualitative Analysis
Advertisements

Conducting Interviews
An Introduction to Focus Groups Peter Harper. Focus Groups are Group Interviews Focus group interviews are characterised by: having a clear focus involving.
Dr. Geri Cochran Director, Institutional Research, Assessment and Planning.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT Coach as Facilitator The purpose of this module is to present key concepts of facilitation and provide an opportunity for participants.
Session 8 Early Risk Communication Campaign Planning Session 8 Slide Deck Slide 8-1.
Qualitative Research Methodologies Keys to Exploratory Research.
Week 8: Research Methods: Qualitative Research 1.
Copyright © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited EXPLORATORY RESEARCH AND QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS Chapter 5 Part 2 Designing Research Studies.
Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer / Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation Semi structured.
Facilitate Group Learning
Interviews.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Improving Transparency, Consultation and Communication of RIAs March 2009.
Chapter 9* Managing Meetings. Chapter 10/Managing Meetings Hilgert & Leonard © Explain why meetings, committees, and being able to lead meetings.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Nominal Group Process (NGP) A well researched technique (Delbecq et al., 1986) that is effective in facilitating a group to come to the best combined judgements.
1 Oregon Department of Human Services Senior and People with Disabilities State Unit on Aging-ADRC In partnership with  Portland State University School.
THE SOUND OF SILENCE: AN EVALUATION OF CDC’S PODCAST INITIATIVE Quynh-Chau, M., Myers, Bradford A. (2013). The Sound of Silence: an evaluation of CDC's.
HCS 465 OUTLET Experience Tradition /hcs465outlet.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Community Score Card as a social accountability Approach Methodology and Applications March 2015.
In-depth interviews The in-depth interview is a qualitative research technique that conducts intensive individual interviews with a small number of respondents.
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Community Benefit Programs
Title of presentation Copyright IDS and MeTA 2010
Session VII: Formulation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Focus Groups A Tool to Enhance CCRs
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Case Study Ethnographic Research
Interviews & focus groups
DATA COLLECTION METHODS IN NURSING RESEARCH
Part Two.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
NEEDS ANALYSIS.
Sundar Barman Deptt. of Extension Education AAU, Jorhat
SP_ IRS : Research in Inclusive and Special Education
CLP’s Experience Measuring Women’s Empowerment: Lessons Learnt and Results Welcome: Thank you to gender-working group for allowing us to come and present.
CHAPTER 5 Qualitative Research
RESEARCH METHODS LECTURE 42
Augmentative and Alternative Communication Assessment and Intervention
Aaker, Kumar, Day Ninth Edition Instructor’s Presentation Slides
10.2 Qualitative research: Interviews
Part 2: Planning and Strategy Chapter 6
Developing a Methodology
Paediatric Disability Information & Advice Services in Rural Malawi
Designing a Housing Microfinance Loan Product
Chapter 3 Performance Management and Strategic Planning
RAPID EVALUATION METHOD
Interviews & focus groups
Understanding Attrition in the Free and Reduced School Lunch Program
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research
The Community as a Client: Assessment and Diagnosis
Introduction to Social Anthropology November 2018
Introduction to Interviewing
Chapter 6 Discuss the types of strategic research
Overview to qualitative research Introduction to tools
Teaching & Inquiry I: Fundamentals of Teaching Through Inquiry
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Criteria for prioritizing health-related problems for research
Session 1.4. The EFSA Analysis Plan
Interviews & focus groups
Team Check-Up Orientation Briefing
Participatory Rural Appraisal.
semi-structured, focus groups and narrative interviews.
Media communication Richard Trombly Contact :
Mid Term Review.
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Mid Term Review.
Interviews & focus groups
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Case Study Ethnographic Research
Chapter 13: Project Stakeholder Management
Case studies: interviews
Presentation transcript:

Focus Group Discussion

Focus Group Discussion FGD is a rapid assessment, semi‐structured data gathering method in which a purposively selected set of participants gather to discuss issues and concerns based on a list of key themes drawn up by the researcher/facilitator (Kumar 1987). This qualitative research technique was originally developed to give marketing researchers a better understanding of the data from quantitative consumer surveys.

Purpose of FGD To gain knowledge about a particular topic or need by interviewing a group of people directly affected by the issue. To understand local perceptions about the issues To identify and understand constraints To identify and strategise coping mechnisms FGD is used to conduct a needs assessment or evaluating a program.

Methods Semi-structured group interview Ranking Matrix

familiarity with the discussion topic ability to speak the language spoken of the area cultural sensitivity, genuine interest in people sensitivity to men and women politeness empathy respect for participants Facilitator – he is moderator of FGD

How to conduct FGD After a brief introduction, the purpose and scope of the discussion are explained. Participants are asked to give their names and short background information about themselves. The discussion is structured around the key themes using the probe questions prepared in advance. During the discussion, all participants are given the opportunity to participate.

Encourage shy participants to speak. Use a variety of moderating tactics to facilitate the group Stimulate the participants to talk to each other, not necessarily to the moderator. Encourage shy participants to speak. Pay close attention to what is said in order to encourage that behavior in other participants. Use in‐depth probing

Discourage dominant participants Call on other participants Politely intervene by saying, “Maybe we can discuss that in another occasion...” Look in another direction Take advantage of a pause and suggest that the subject can be discussed in detail in another session Discourage dominant participants

Rice Planthopper Outbreaks Sample FGD Guide Rice Planthopper Outbreaks How are outbreaks reported? What is the flow of outbreak information from the field upwards? And usually how long will this take to reach Agril.directors? How do Agril. directors act on reports of outbreaks? Are reports of outbreaks from the field communicated upwards to the central offices or contained within the province? What is AD’s management procedure for dealing with a pest outbreak? What about the People’s Committee?

During the outbreak last season, what do you think was expected of you as an extension official? As a People’s Committee vice chairman? What steps did AD take to manage the problem last season? What about the People’s Committee in the area? What management options were preferred and recommended by PPD? (Chemical, escape strategy, etc.) Why was that option chosen? What were your worries about the outbreak? What were your worries about the disease/pest management option you have chosen and recommended to farmers?

How much was the budget allocation for disease control How much was the budget allocation for disease control? How was this amount determined? What was the basis for the budget allocation? How was the budget allocation decided in PPD? Who decides the budget allocation for pest outbreaks? What extension mechanisms were used to communicate to farmers about virus disease/pest control?

Multi-disciplinary team of KVK ld by Home Scientist on area of health and nutritional issues What are the major problems that members community have? Who was affected by what illness?(rank problems in order of importance, indicate nutrition related problems) In your view, what are the reasons for these problems and what I commonly done to resolve the problems?(Draw a matrix with these problems, causes, actions taken by community and households; Probe deep enough to understand the underlying problem and causes) How do the families address the problems?

Multi-disciplinary team of KVK ld by Home Scientist on area of health and nutritional issues How are decisions me in the household with regard to health or in response to health problems? Who makes specific decisions? how are household resources allocated in case of ill health? What resources are needed by the community, households and individuals to become more successful at preventing health and utrition problems from recurring

Information gathered: Nutritional related problems, their intensity and importance Causes of these problems Actions initiated by the target group for solving these problems Resources allocated at family level for addressing these problems Community level actions Determining interventions

Thank you…