Overview of the new CMS ECAL electronics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
Advertisements

Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
TileCal Electronics A Status Report J. Pilcher 17-Sept-1998.
28 February 2003Paul Dauncey - HCAL Readout1 HCAL Readout and DAQ using the ECAL Readout Boards Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK.
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
DSP online algorithms for the ATLAS TileCal Read Out Drivers Cristobal Cuenca Almenar IFIC (University of Valencia-CSIC)
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
Gunther Haller SiD LOI Meeting March 2, LOI Content: Electronics and DAQ Gunther Haller Research Engineering Group.
U N C L A S S I F I E D FVTX Detector Readout Concept S. Butsyk For LANL P-25 group.
M. Lo Vetere 1,2, S. Minutoli 1, E. Robutti 1 1 I.N.F.N Genova, via Dodecaneso, GENOVA (Italy); 2 University of GENOVA (Italy) The TOTEM T1.
Technical Part Laura Sartori. - System Overview - Hardware Configuration : description of the main tasks - L2 Decision CPU: algorithm timing analysis.
June 29th 2005Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau1 Plans for a new TCC for the endcaps Characteristics: reminder Preliminary list of tasks and.
11th March 2008AIDA FEE Report1 AIDA Front end electronics Report February 2008.
1 VeLo L1 Read Out Guido Haefeli VeLo Comprehensive Review 27/28 January 2003.
CMS ECAL DAQ Fiber data block format Magnus Hansen
ATLAS Trigger / current L1Calo Uli Schäfer 1 Jet/Energy module calo µ CTP L1.
Motivation General rule for muon triggers: Never neglect a possible backup reduction factor. It will always come back to you. Even if RPC trigger works.
CMS ECAL A new readout system architecture for the CMS ECAL Magnus Hansen
1 Level 1 Pre Processor and Interface L1PPI Guido Haefeli L1 Review 14. June 2002.
11 October 2002Paul Dauncey - CDR Introduction1 CDR Introduction and Overview Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Paolo Rumerio, CERN On behalf of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Group CALOR 2006 Chicago, June 5 th – 9 th, 2006 Commissioning of the CMS Electromagnetic.
CLAS12 Central Detector Meeting, Saclay, 3 Dec MVT Read-Out Architecture & MVT / SVT Integration Issues Irakli MANDJAVIDZE.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory September 1999Fifth Workshop on Electronics for LHC Presented by S. Quinton.
FPGA based signal processing for the LHCb Vertex detector and Silicon Tracker Guido Haefeli EPFL, Lausanne Vertex 2005 November 7-11, 2005 Chuzenji Lake,
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
29/05/09A. Salamon – TDAQ WG - CERN1 LKr calorimeter L0 trigger V. Bonaiuto, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, A. Salamon, G. Salina, F. Sargeni.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
Eric Hazen1 Ethernet Readout With: E. Kearns, J. Raaf, S.X. Wu, others... Eric Hazen Boston University.
DHCAL Acquisition with HaRDROC VFE Vincent Boudry LLR – École polytechnique.
E. Hazen1 Fermilab CMS Upgrade Workshop November 19-20, 2008 A summary of off-detector calorimeter TriDAS electronics issues Eric Hazen, Boston.
Some thoughs about trigger/DAQ … Dominique Breton (C.Beigbeder, G.Dubois-Felsmann, S.Luitz) SuperB meeting – La Biodola – June 2008.
Work on Muon System TDR - in progress Word -> Latex ?
ETD meeting Architecture and costing On behalf of PID group
ATLAS calorimeter and topological trigger upgrades for Phase 1
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
DCH FEE 28 chs DCH prototype FEE &
TELL1 A common data acquisition board for LHCb
L0 processor for NA62 Marian Krivda 1) , Cristina Lazzeroni 1) , Roman Lietava 1)2) 1) University of Birmingham, UK 2) Comenius University, Bratislava,
CMS EMU TRIGGER ELECTRONICS
ATLAS L1Calo Phase2 Upgrade
TCC-48 project status report
CMS SLHC Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade,
Vertex 2005 November 7-11, 2005 Chuzenji Lake, Nikko, Japan
EMC Electronics and Trigger Review and Trigger Plan
ECAL OD Electronic Workshop 7-8/04/2005
Calorimeter Trigger Synchronization in CMS,
Irakli MANDJAVIDZE DAPNIA, CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
TTC system and test synchronization
HCAL Configuration Issues
VELO readout On detector electronics Off detector electronics to DAQ
LHCb calorimeter main features
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
BESIII EMC electronics
John Harvey CERN EP/LBC July 24, 2001
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
The LHCb L0 Calorimeter Trigger
Front-end Electronics for the LHCb Preshower Rémi CORNAT, Gérard BOHNER, Olivier DESCHAMPS, Jacques LECOQ, Pascal PERRET LPC Clermont-Ferrand.
New DCM, FEMDCM DCM jobs DCM upgrade path
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
August 19th 2013 Alexandre Camsonne
SVT detector electronics
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Data Concentrator Card and Test System for the CMS ECAL Readout
TELL1 A common data acquisition board for LHCb
U. Marconi, D. Breton, S. Luitz
HCAL DAQ Interface Eric Hazen Jim Rohlf Shouxiang Wu Boston University
LIP and the CMS Trigger Upgrade On behalf of the LIP CMS Group
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the new CMS ECAL electronics Outline The “TDR era” - The new architecture - Front-End Electronics Off-Detector Electronics Summary Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau The “TDR era” Each crystal is equipped with : a photo-transducer (APD or VPT) a floating point preamplifier (FPPA) ie 1 preampli,4 amplis, logic to select online the gain (1.,5.,9.,33.) a 12-bit sampling ADC (40 Msamples/s) a bit-serialiser and optical link @ 800 Mbits/s Digital data are taken out to the counting room housing the Upper Level Readout (ULR) Benefits : high level of flexibility, minimal amount of radiation hard electronics Drawbacks: high volume of data transfer and storage, high volume of ULR electronics (more than 1000 boards into 60 crates) Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau Glossary in the barrel the trigger towers are 5 X 5 crystals (ie 0.087 X 0.087 in eta X phi). They are formed by 5 strips. Each of these strips is 1(eta) X 5(phi) crystals. in the endcap the crystals are grouped by 5 X 5. Each of these group is a supercrystal. The trigger towers geometry (eta/phi) do not follow the supercrystal geometry (x/y). A trigger tower (ie ~ 0.087 X 0.087 in eta X phi) is made of pseudo-strips (groups of 5 crystals with any shape). A trigger tower can be made of 1,2,3,4,5 pseudo-strips Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

The “TDR era” architecture transmit all data at 40 MHz single digitization for both readout and trigger Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

The new architecture: on and off detector principle of a single digitization for readout and trigger is kept -transmit trigger data @ 40 MHz -transmit readout data @ LV1 rate Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

The new architecture: block diagram Glossary VFE identical ie (APD/VPT, FPPA, sampling ADC) (On-Detector) FE : Front-End (On-Detector) CCS : Clock&Control System (Off-Detector) DCC : Data Concentrator Card (Off-Detector) SRP : Selective Readout Processor (Off-Detector) TCC : Trigger Concentrator Card (Off-Detector) Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau Front-End: function receives the digital signals from the Very Front-End ie 12 bits from sampling ADC and 2 bits for coding the gain@ 40 MHz stores the data during the LV1 latency performs the Trigger Primitives Generation(TPG) formats and sends the data to the DCC upon a LV1 accept sends the TPG to the TCC @ 40 MHz Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Front-End board: barrel GOL for trigger path 0.8 Gbits/s GOL for data path 0.8 Gbits/s FENIX in Trigger Cell Processor mode (25 crystals) FENIX in Strip mode (5 crystals) FENIX in DAQ mode (25 crystals) Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

FENIX chip: characteristics inputs : 5 X 16 bits outputs : 16-bit TRIGGER bus, 16-bit DAQ bus 4 operation modes: STRIP : creating filtered strips (barrel)/pseudo-strips (endcap) sums for the Trigger Cell Processor(TCP) TCP : finalizing the Trigger Primitive Generation(TPG) for one trigger tower in the barrel DAQ : trigger tower (barrel)/supercrystal(endcap) readout state machine, event encapsulation MEMs: reading out the laser monitoring system ASIC in 0.25 um CMOS technology FPGA demonstrator Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

FENIX chip: the trigger path linearization from 12+2 to 18 used in barrel & endcap used in barrel only total ET strip or pseudo strip signal Fine Grain Veto Bit Fine Grain Veto Bit time VHDL description : verification is in progress implementation in a XC2V1000-4FG256 takes 9 clock cycles (40 MHz) to generate the TPG (barrel). The target is to run the TPG (barrel) algorithm in 8 clock cycles in the ASIC version BCID FIR filter + Peak Finder Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau Optical links ~ 3100 Data links (FE to DCC) at 0.8 Gbits/s ~ 4500 Trigger links (FE to TCC) at 0.8 Gbits/s ~ 3000 Clock and Control links (FE from/to CCS) at 0.8 Gbits/s instead of ~ 80000 in the TDR approach same technology as the tracker data links 12-fiber ribbons, packed in cables of 8 ribbons packing greatly impacts on the DCC and TCC architectures Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Off-Detector electronics: layout 4 TTC/TTS partitions: 2X 1/2 Barrel + 2 Endcaps Barrel = 2 X 18 supermodules; Endcap = 2 X 4 quadrants Supermodule = 68 trigger towers; Quadrant = 78 supercrystals Barrel: 1 DCC + 1 TCC (double width) + 1 CCS per supermodule 1 crate = 5 supermodules Barrel (ie 1584 trigger towers) electronics fit in 8 crates Endcap: 2 DCC + 10 TCC (simple width) + 1 CCS per quadrant Endcap (ie 624 supercrystals) electronics fit in 8 crates SRP = 1 crate Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau CCS: function interface to Trigger Control System (TCS) and Trigger Throttling System (TTS) distribution of clock and control signals DCC and TCC and front-end system fan-in the TTS signals from the DCC, TCC and SRP and transmission to TTS configuration of the Front-End system Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau CCS: block diagram OD FE Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau DCC: function receives formatted digital data from the Front-End boards and TCC verifies integrity of the input event fragments reduces the data volume performing the zero suppression using the Selective Readout information provided by the SRP formats events transmits events to the global DAQ transmits monitoring and spying events to the local DAQ Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

DCC: data volumes and data rates 38.1 kBytes for input crystal event (10 time samples) 156 Bytes (barrel) or 300 Bytes (endcap) TCC event 2 kBytes average output event size data reduction factor 21 in average 200 Mbytes/s average output data rate 528 Mbytes/s maximum output data rate 32 events stored (maximum) Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau DCC: block diagram moves iFIFOs to oFIFOs 68 inputs 2 inputs (monitoring) Receiver Block 2 channels each to the DAQ Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau DCC: input block From Selective Readout Processor demultiplexer 1 to 16 Zero suppression 10-tap FIR filter Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau TCC: function receives and deserializes the digital data from the Front-End boards performs the geometrical mapping between the supercrystals and the trigger towers in the endcap finalizes the TPG computations for the endcap encodes the TPG using a non-linear scale for the total transverse energy sends the encoded and time aligned TPG to the Regional Trigger via a dedicated daughter board (Synchro and Link Board) classifies the trigger towers into high, medium or low interest for the SRP stores the encoded TPG during the L1 latency transmits the stored TPG to the DCC for each L1 event Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

TCC: block diagram (barrel) optical to electrical converters (12 channels) Synchro&Link Board to the Regional Trigger (8 channels) demultiplexer 1 to 16 (12 channels) to the Selective Readout Processor processing & storage unit (12 channels) Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

TCC: block diagram (endcap) single routing for any position in the endcap different programs for building the trigger towers Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau SLB: block diagram 4 channels 2 Gbits/s ie 8 trigger towers to the Regional Trigger - build online histogram for survey of the LHC bunch crossings structure - align the channels BC0 40.08 to 120.24 MHz Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

TCC: preliminary implementation (barrel) double width module to fit the connectors 6 FPGAs for processing & data storage I/Os Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Selective Readout Processor: function selects dynamically (L1 rate) the meaningful ECAL information which is spread in ~1.5 Mbytes (ie number of crystals X 10 samples X 2 bytes) performs suppression in order to reduce the ECAL data volume (ie crystals and trigger towers data) to ~100 kBytes/event (average) Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Selective Readout Processor: principles organizes the readout using “readout towers” of 25 crystals (barrel: trigger towers,endcap: supercrystals) classifies the readout towers in term of total transverse energy (high, medium or low interest) establishes correspondence between classification and “readout state” (no reading, full reading, reading with Zero Suppression) Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Selective Readout Processor: 2 possible implementations TCC produces the classification @ 40 MHz, SRP produces the readout states during the L1 latency requiring a very high (80 GBytes/s) transfer rate between TCC and SRP. TCC produces the classification @ L1 rate (100kHz), SRP produces the readout states after the L1 accept signal requiring extra buffering in TCC and DCC for data storage Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau

Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau Summary New ECAL electronics architecture has been presented Major reduction (~40%) of the total cost of the system with exactly the same functionality as described in the TDR Design of a new radiation hard ASIC (FENIX chip) in 0.25um is already started Reduced number of data links between the On and Off Detector electronics using the same technology as the tracker (re)Design of the less costly Off-Detector electronics has recently started Colmar, September 12, 2002 Ph. BUSSON LLR Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau