Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Advertisements

Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
+ What Should I Expect to See During Mathematics Instruction? Helping Secondary Principals Recognize and Support Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Preparing for your HIPPY Accreditation visit Accreditation 101.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
MENTORING NEW TEACHERS Heidi Daniels and Jane Meyer Canton City School District ABLE.
PLC Year 2 Day 2 Inquiry Cycle
Spelling and beyond – Curriculum
Sample evidences for Teacher Evaluation Robyn White
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Overview of Student Growth and T-TESS
Literacy Across Learning
Focused Conversation for TTA
Problem Solving Process.
Lesson 7: How Documentation Can Extend the Learning
TAIS Overview for Districts
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
What are the impact of changes to lesson observation and feedback processes on teachers’ attitudes and practice? Why this? The new process. What did we.
Grading
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Cycle of Continuous Improvement for
Demonstration of Increased or Improved Services for Unduplicated Students (DIISUP) Workshop Tuesday February 27, 2018 Hosted by:
Facilitation guide for Building Team EQ skills.
Learning Forward Annual Conference Session F28
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
INTRODUCTION TO LESSON STUDY
The Objectives of Today’s Workshop
WCSD SLO Process Updates
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Creating a vision for continuous improvement
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
M.A.T.C.H. Professional Series: Module 11
General Notes Presentation length - 10 – 15 MINUTES
Designed for internal training use:
Introducing the Ideas One of Six Traits:
SIR Observation Preparation and Report Examples
INTRODUCTION TO LESSON STUDY
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Implementation, Monitoring, and NM DASH
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Let’s Talk Data: Making Data Conversations Engaging and Productive
Module 2 Nuts and Bolts of Peer Coaching Peer Coach Training.
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Performance-Based monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS) Training
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Critical Element: PBIS Team
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Creating a Vision for a Caring School Community
Bulloch Information Session
Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS)
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Unfilled Positions FWEA Meeting March 18, 2019.
Created by Teri Thomsen 2014; Revised 2015
Feedback from Teacher Superintendent Council & Next Steps
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Guided Root Cause Analysis © 2018 by the Texas Education Agency updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Introduction ESC staff adds introduction and training logistics/norms here. Say (1 min): In the next 2 hours, we are going to learn how to identify the root cause for our areas of low performance (the problem statements). updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Context Setting In your note-taking guide, answer (2 minutes): Why do we take the time to analyze root causes? Individually, take 2 minutes to answer the first question in your note-taking guide (show Slide 3): Why do we take the time to analyze root causes? [Potential responses: so we know where to focus our improvement efforts, so we can prevent the problems from coming up again] updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Key Idea Say (1 min): (show slide 4) Identifying the root cause of low performance allows us to remove the condition that is causing (and will continue to cause) low performance. Key Idea: We analyze root causes so we can identify the real reason we are underperforming and select a strategy that creates sustainable gains in student achievement. We analyze root causes so we can identify the real reason we are underperforming and select a strategy that creates sustainable gains in student achievement. updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Objectives Say (5 mins): (show slide 5) At the end of this session, you will be able to: Engage in guided dialogue with stakeholder groups to brainstorm possible root causes Validate and prioritize root causes   We will look at a couple of case studies to determine why these actions are important for planning, and then we will practice have a guided discussion to conduct a root cause analysis. When you return to your campus, you will be able to implement these tools for your own root cause analysis. Engage in guided dialogue with stakeholder groups to brainstorm possible root causes Validate and prioritize root causes updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Identifying Key Actions for Root Cause Analysis: Case Study A Say (1 min): (show slide 6) We are going to look at two case studies. Pull Case Study A from your packet. Individually, read the case study and answer the two questions in your note taking guide. Take 10 minutes for this. How did this campus get from a surface cause to a root cause? [Potential answers: they identified an area of highest need through specific questioning; they included multiple stakeholder groups which helped reveal more issues, they tie the root cause back to data] What impact will this have on their plan development? [Potential answers: the campus now knows what really caused their low performance in math, they will select a better strategy, because they included various groups, they have a deeper understanding of campus issues] Say (1 min): Turn and talk to your table group and discuss your answers. Take 3 minutes for this. (Facilitators monitor table talk to make sure discussions are on track with the answers above) Say (5 min): Let’s do a whole group share out. (Ask for 3-4 volunteers to share their responses) Read the case study. In your note-taking guide, answer (10 minutes): How did this campus get from a surface cause to a root cause? What impact will this have on their plan development? updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Key Idea Say (3 min): (show Slide 7) Key idea: what we see from this case study is that we set ourselves up for successful planning when we invite a variety of stakeholders to the table to have a guided discussion and prioritize root causes. . We set ourselves up for successful planning when we invite a variety of stakeholders to the table to have a guided discussion and prioritize root causes. updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Improving Practices: Case Study B Say (1 min): (show Slide 8) Let’s look at another campus. This campus missed the same accountability targets and has the same problem statement, but they took a different approach to their root cause analysis. Individually, read the case study and answer the two questions in your note taking guide. Take 7 minutes for this. Why did this campus arrive at a surface cause and not a root cause? [Potential answers: didn’t tie the work to data, no guided discussion, only a couple pf people at the table, one with limited knowledge of the campus] What might happen if the campus bases its improvement strategy on a surface-level cause? [Potential answers: the campus doesn’t know what really caused low performance, so they are more likely to select a strategy that won’t actually help them] Say (1 min): Turn and talk to your table group and discuss your answers. Take 3 minutes for this. (Facilitators monitor table talk to make sure discussions are on track with the answers above) Say (5 min): Let’s do a whole group share out. (Ask for 3-4 volunteers to share their responses) Read the case study. In your note-taking guide, answer (7 minutes): Why did this campus arrive at a surface cause and not a root cause? What might happen if the campus bases its improvement strategy on a surface-level cause updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Key Idea Say (2 min): (show Slide 9) Key idea: Campuses that engage in a more inclusive, deliberate root cause analysis will be able to select better strategies and see more sustainable gains because they know what they need to fix first. Campuses that engage in a more inclusive, deliberate root cause analysis will be able to select better strategies and see more sustainable gains because they know what they need to fix first. updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Practice: Guided Discussion for Root Cause Analysis Say (3 mins): (show Slide 10) Now we are going to practice conducting a root cause analysis with a guided discussion. We are going to use the same problem statement you saw in the case studies, but we are going to apply our own experience to the discussion. To do this, we are going to work with our own campus groups. updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 How to Use the Guided Discussion Take the Guided Discussion worksheet from your packet. You are going to use this document for your conversation. (Show slide 11) (Facilitator explains how to use worksheet and where to record answers) Since you don’t have all your campus data/artifacts with you today, we will just answer the questions based on your campus experience. (Remember this is practice!) Take 10 minutes to work through the questions and record in your note guide. (Facilitator walks around to see at what level participants are stopping.) Under each topic: Start with the first element and GO IN ORDER. Determine if your campus does that element consistently and with fidelity. If yes, provide evidence or artifacts to validate (you will do this back at your campus). Continue to the next element. If your answer is no, write the question in your note taking guide, and then move to the next topic. Repeat for each topic. Take 10 minutes with your table group! updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 The Guided 5 Whys Say (6 mins): (show slide 12) Now that we have identified missing systems or processes, we are going to use a more traditional root cause analysis tool, the 5 whys, to identify some of the reasons we did not implement the system or process from the guided discussion. First, let’s go back to our case studies and look at the 5 whys processes our sample campuses used. Individually, answer the three questions in your note taking guide. Take 5 minutes for this. What did Campus A identify when they asked the 5 whys about the system they did not implement? [Potential answers: that parents believe teacher quality is inconsistent, that teachers do not feel administrators are trained to give feedback on instruction] What did Campus B identify when they asked 5 whys about the problem statement? [Potential answers: that educator preparation programs are not preparing teachers] Why might Campus A’s 5 whys process yield a better improvement plan? [Potential answers: Campus A is focused on the system that is in within their control to implement; they are identifying the potential barriers to putting this system in place] Say (3 min): Turn and talk to your table group and discuss your answers. Take 3 minutes for this. (Facilitators monitor table talk to make sure discussions are on track with the answers above) Say (5 min): Let’s do a whole group share out. (Ask for 3-4 volunteers to share their responses) In your note taking guide, answer the questions about the 5 whys processes that Campuses A and B used (5 mins): What did Campus A identify when they asked the 5 whys about the system they did not implement? What did Campus B identify when they asked 5 whys about the problem statement? Why might Campus A’s 5 whys process yield a better improvement plan? updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Key Idea Say (2 min): (show Slide 13) Key idea: The 5 whys help us identify the barriers that prevent us from implementing systems and processes. The 5 whys help us identify the barriers that prevent us from implementing systems and processes. updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 The Guided 5 Whys Say (3 mins): (show slide 14) Now we are going to use a traditional root cause analysis tool, the 5 whys, to uncover the root cause that kept us from taking this step. But our 5 whys are also a bit more guided. For this practice, we will just use the question you stopped at in teaching and learning. (Facilitator reads over example in slide 14) Take 10 minutes with your group to do this. In your note-taking guide, ask and answer “why” 5 times for the T&L question you stopped at. The first 2 why questions are set for you! Example: Under teaching and learning, our first NO answer was to “Campus instructional leaders have consistent, documented expectations for maximizing instructional time and delivering effective instruction.” Why wasn’t this system/process implemented? Because we want teachers to work with their own style of instruction. Why didn’t we achieve success when we let teachers work with their own style of instruction? Because our teachers were inconsistent with the quality and rigor of instruction. Why were teachers inconsistent? Because we didn’t monitor quality and rigor consistently. Why didn’t we monitor consistently? Because we didn’t establish a system for observations and feedback that worked with our schedule. Why didn’t we create this system? Because we did not prioritize it. updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Guided 5 Whys Reflection Say (3 min): (show slide 15) You have identified some of barriers or threats that may have prevented you from implementing this system or process. You’ll want to keep these in mind when you write (and implement!) your plan. In your note taking guide, answer the following questions to focus your ideas for planning (take 2 minutes): Of the barriers we identified in the because statements: Which are due to mindsets? Which are due to action (or inaction)? Which are due to resources? In your note taking guide, answer (2 mins): Of the barriers we identified in the because statements: Which are due to mindsets? Which are due to action (or inaction)? Which are due to resources? updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Key Idea Say (2 min): (show Slide 16) Key idea: Removing barriers and ensuring that the conditions exist for campus improvement is one of the key responsibilities of the District Coordinator of School Improvement. Removing barriers and ensuring that the conditions exist for campus improvement is one of the key responsibilities of the District Coordinator of School Improvement. updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Writing a Root Cause Statement Say (6 mins): (show Slide 17) Our last step in this section is to write the root cause statement that would go in our plan. With your table team, develop your root cause statement. The root cause statement should: identify the system or process that was missing that led to low performance identify one or more key barriers that kept that system or process from being implemented The example we worked with earlier is written as a root cause statement on the slide. The system that was lacking is highlighted in yellow; the key barrier is highlighted in green. Take 5 minutes to do this. (Facilitator walks around to answer questions and help team identify biggest barrier(s).) The root cause statement should: identify the system or process that was missing that led to low performance identify one or more key barriers that kept that system or process from being implemented Example: Campus instructional leaders did not create consistent, documented expectations for delivering effective instruction because we prioritized teacher autonomy over student outcomes. updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Tips for Conducting Root Cause Analysis at your campus Say (3 min): (show slide 18) Before we movie into our final reflection, we wanted to share a couple of tips for when you return to your campus to do this work. First, we want to acknowledge that doing a root cause analysis can lead to some difficult conversations. If you have attended any professional development around communicating with stakeholders (like Courageous Principals), now is the time to employ those strategies! And remember: focus on the specific process (or lack of a process), not the specific people, that led to low performance. Second, we want to reiterate the importance of conducting the root cause analysis with multiple stakeholder groups. You may want to consider giving the Guided Discussion Worksheet to these different groups BEFORE everyone comes together to see if you are calibrated on what systems are lacking at the campus. Difficult conversations ahead: use your communication toolkit and focus on processes Give the guided discussion worksheet to stakeholders prior to the meeting; calibrate in the meeting updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Final Reflection (show slide 19) We have practiced using guided discussion to identify and validate a prioritized root cause. Before we leave, in your note taking guide, take a minute to reflect on the last question: What are the key actions I need to keep in mind when I do this work at my campus? In your note-taking guide, answer: What are the key actions I need to keep in mind when I do this work at my campus? updated 8/13/18

Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI 06/28/18 Facilitator enters follow up/contact information here updated 8/13/18