Attendance Boundary Development & Revisions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to the Mountain Road Corridor Redistricting Meeting October 13, 2008 Pasadena Elementary.
Advertisements

Welcome to the Mountain Road Corridor Redistricting Meeting October 6, 2008 Marley Elementary.
1 School “H” Sardinia Avenue and Big Leaf Street Located south of I-75 and east of North Salford Boulevard.
Comprehensive Elementary School Redistricting INFORMATIONAL MEETING December 10, 11, 2008.
St. Joseph’s (Thamesford) Accommodation Review Committee Public Meeting St. Joseph’s Catholic Elementary School April 30, 2013.
Elementary School #33. Board approval in 2006 Funding 2002 Bond 2005 Bond Location Camino A Lago Meadows.
Attendance Boundary Realignment FONTANA UNIFIEDSCHOOL DISTRICT November 19, 2008.
WALLED LAKE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT Redistricting Plan for the school year.
UNIT 5 REDISTRICTING COMMUNITY FORUM mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Agenda Crofton Area Redistricting Meeting October 2, :00 p.m. Welcome and Introductions Sign In! Redistricting Process Review Material Requested.
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REDISTRICTING PROCESS & SCENARIOS BOARD OF EDUCATION MARCH 23, 2012.
Elk Island Public Schools
Objectives and Timelines Mark P. Mondanaro SCHOOL CLOSING AND CONSOLIDATION FEASIBILITY.
Analysis of Salvador and El Centro School Boundaries SEPTEMBER 16, 2015.
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 1 Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program.
Iredell-Statesville Attendance Line Review Spring Area Advisory Meetings.
11 School Board Monitoring Report: Capacity Update Arlington Public Schools April 29, 2010.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HARFORD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REDISTRICTING INITIATIVE FOCUS GROUP PRESENTATION PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE.
SUPERINTENDENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS Capacity Utilization Arlington Public Schools December 17, 2009.
Amending the Regional Agreement Presentationby Massachusetts Association of Regional Schools 1.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Anglophone West School District Education Council Sustainability Study – Bath Elementary and Middle Schools Executive Summary April 23, 2015.
Planning Update Prepared by Anthony A. Athens III Director of Planning September 10, 2007.
Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) September 10, 2007.
OCTOBER 15, 2015 SCHOOL CONSOLIDATION & REDISTRICTING Dr. Karen M. Couch, Superintendent Ron Kauffman, RK Educational Planning, LLC.
Elementary/Middle School Boundary Presentation.
Working Together to Help Our Schools What is CPC?.
Attendance Zone Realignment Process Fall 2014 Approved by TISD Board of Trustees 12/09/
YCJUSD District Boundary Committee Final Recommendations Ted Alejandre – Committee Chair Assistant Superintendent, Business Services April 24, 2007.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education August 4, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Services.
School District Reorganization Elverado CUSD 196 Elverado High School Michelle Heninger / Illinois State Board of Education.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education Update August 28,
Clay County School Concurrency Program January 18, 2007.
Hillsborough County Public School Siting MPO SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP
Program and Accommodation Review Burlington Secondary Schools Director’s Preliminary Report October 5, 2016.
Session objectives After completing this session you will:
Harrisonburg City Public Schools November 01, 2016
District Program Design Update
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
School Board Learning Session
Zoning Ordinance Update Study
Dalton Public Schools Special Project Team
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
School Advisory Committees
Moore County Schools Guiding Principles in Student Assignment Planning
Elementary Rebalance.
Parent/Community Meeting March 13, 2018 Presented by:
Public Information Meeting Milton #10 Public School
MPO School Transportation Working Group
Boundary Analysis for “ANATOLIA 2” ELEMENTARY sCHOOL
Student Transportation Services
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Student Assignment Advisory Committee
Aspiring School Leaders Information Session
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
Boundary Realignment Analysis
School Concurrency Requirement that public school facilities necessary to maintain the adopted level of service are in place prior to or concurrent with.
March 19, 2018 CCPTA.
DRAFT Buffer Zone Policy
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
BARBOUR COUNTY SCHOOLS SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET HEARING October 8th, 2018
Fall 2018 Elementary School Boundary Process: Superintendent’s Recommendation (To take effect September 2019) November 8, 2018.
Preview of Moore County Board of Education
East Windsor – Forest Glade Area
Presentation transcript:

Attendance Boundary Development & Revisions Effective for SY 2007-2008

Redistricting Process STEP 1: Staff analyzes existing attendance boundaries. This analysis is to include, but not necessarily limited to, the following criteria: Historic enrollment trends, projected enrollment trends, school size and capacity, specific area population demographics, proximity, neighborhood concept, school bus transportation, walking distance, safety, stability and equity of distribution. STEP 2: From data developed in the Step 1 analysis, options are to be developed. These options are to be unranked and are to represent the best alternatives in meeting the criteria of Step 1. STEP 3: A meeting is scheduled to include the Assistant Superintendent of Support Services, Director of Facility Planning and Construction, the Coordinator of Planning and Intergovernmental Relations, the Director of Transportation, the appropriate Director of Elementary or Secondary Education, the Director of Exceptional Education (as necessary) and each affected School Principal. The purpose of the meeting is to rank the alternatives. STEP 4: The Assistant Superintendent of Support Services will agenda the ranked redistricting alternatives during a Superintendent’s staff meeting for general staff questions and discussions. The purpose is to encourage staff input to the Superintendent in order for the Superintendent to formulate his/her recommendation. Once the Superintendent’s recommendation is formulated, the recommendation will be posted in each affected school. The Coordinator of Planning and Intergovernmental Relations will correspond with each affected school’s School Advisory Committee for input, identification of timelines and process. STEP 5: The Superintendent presents his/her recommendation to the School Board at an advertised School Board meeting. The Superintendent will request authorization to advertise the recommended school attendance boundaries in a local newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement will be for three (3) consecutive weeks. The recommendation will continue to be posted in each affected school and placed in the school newsletter if at all possible. The public will be allowed to address the recommendation if requested. STEP 6: The Superintendent, after having advertised his/her recommendation, and after due consideration of additional input from staff and/or citizens, will agenda at the next School Board meeting approval of the original recommendation or revised recommendation for school attendance boundaries. A Public Hearing will be conducted by the School Board to seek public input at the meeting. Upon concluding the Public Hearing, the Superintendent’s recommendation will be opened for discussion by the Board and ultimately acted upon either as the Superintendent’s original or revised recommendation, as revised by the Board or tabled to a time certain for additional time of consideration. STEP 7: Upon the School Board acting upon a new or revised school attendance boundary, the District’s Facility Planning and Construction Department will update and post new or revised attendance boundary descriptions and maps, communicate same to each affected school, communicate same to the Board of Realtors and to any large development within the attendance boundary being affected.

Redistricting Process Current Step STEP 5: The Superintendent presents his/her recommendation to the School Board at an advertised School Board meeting. The Superintendent will request authorization to advertise the recommended school attendance boundaries in a local newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement will be for three (3) consecutive weeks. The recommendation will continue to be posted in each affected school and placed in the school newsletter if at all possible. The public will be allowed to address the recommendation if requested.

Redistricting Process Next Step STEP 6: The Superintendent, after having advertised his/her recommendation, and after due consideration of additional input from staff and/or citizens, will agenda at the next School Board meeting approval of the original recommendation or revised recommendation for school attendance boundaries. A Public Hearing will be conducted by the School Board to seek public input at the meeting. Upon concluding the Public Hearing, the Superintendent’s recommendation will be opened for discussion by the Board and ultimately acted upon either as the Superintendent’s original or revised recommendation, as revised by the Board or tabled to a time certain for additional time of consideration. November 21, 2006 at 7:00 PM

Timeline September, 2006 STEP 1: Background Date Developed STEP 2: Options Developed October 11, 2006 STEP 3: Staff and School Principals Meet to Review the Recommendation STEP 4: Finalize Recommendation October 19, 2006 STEP 5: Present Recommendation to School Board Request Authorization to Advertise Advertisements and Communications Processed November 21, 2006 STEP 6: School Board Public Hearing is Conducted Board Discussion and Approval of Attendance Boundaries November/December, 2006 STEP 7: Attendance Boundary Map Updates Provided Communications Processed

Considerations/Criteria SAFETY ANALYSIS OF EXISTING ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES SCHOOL CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE

Considerations/Criteria GEOGRAPHIC AREA CHARACTERISTICS (MATURE VS. GROWING) PROJECTED ENROLLMENT TRENDS SCHOOL BOARD FACILITY LIST SHORT RANGE AND LONG RANGE ENROLLMENT FORECASTS

Considerations/Criteria NEIGHBORHOOD CONCEPT PROXIMITY FOR STUDENT ATTENDANCE (IF NOT NEIGHBORHOOD, THEN AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE) MINIMUM SIZE OF SCHOOL BALANCED STUDENT DISTRIBUTION

Considerations/Criteria TRANSPORTATION PARENT/STUDENT PERSONAL TRANSPORTATION WALKING DISTANCE/PATHS SCHOOL BUS TRANSPORTATION

Enrollment, Capacity & Projections

Coppergate Elementary New Elementary School From RideOut Elementary Pop Region 34 - 695 students SY 2007-08 Projections Enrollment – 774 students LOS – 90%

Coppergate Elementary

Coppergate Elementary Proposed Boundary

RideOut Elementary Improve Student Distribution From Lake Asbury Elementary Pop Region 11 – 74 students From Tynes Elementary Pop Region 33 – 109 students SY 2007-08 Projections Enrollment – 568 students LOS – 66%

RideOut Elementary

RideOut Elementary Proposed Boundary

Ridgeview Elementary School Improve Student Distribution From Tynes Elementary Pop Region 35 – 95 students SY 2007-08 Projections Enrollment – 859 students LOS – 111% Some students will need to be relocated to maintain LOS.

Ridgeview Elementary

Ridgeview Elementary Proposed Boundary

Lakeside Elementary Improve Student Distribution From Doctors Inlet Elementary Pop Region 39 – 219 students Pop Region 40 – 54 students SY 2007-08 Projections Enrollment – 895 students LOS – 104%

Lakeside Elementary School

Lakeside Elementary School Proposed Boundary

McRae Elementary Improve Student Distribution From Keystone Heights Elementary Pop Region 47 – 71 students Pop Region 49 – 24 students SY 2007-08 Projections Enrollment – 666 students LOS – 77%

McRae Elementary School

McRae Elementary School Proposed Boundary