Social Aspect Of Interlanguage

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHAPTER 2 THE NATURE OF LEARNER LANGUAGE
Advertisements

LG 637 WEEK 5 INTERLANGUAGE.
Hartono, S.S., M.Pd. COLASULA
Second Language Acquisition
Social, Discourse, and psycholinguistic Aspect Of Interlanguage
Chapter 4 Key Concepts.
Interlanguage Rod Ellies 2003 Chapter 3 Second Language Acquicition pp Winda Putri S
The Nature of Learner Language
1. Introduction Which rules to describe Form and Function Type versus Token 2 Discourse Grammar Appreciation.
Second language acquisition
Education of English Conversation
The French Language: identity, diversity and changing environments. Lecture 1 Michaelmas term 2012 Introduction to Language and Identity.
Explaining second language learning
Social Aspects of Interlanguage Second Language Acquisition SLA1 此簡報可能會牽涉到聽眾的討論 活動,也就是所謂的執行項目。 因此在進行簡報時﹐可充份利用 PowerPoint 來記錄這些執行項 目: 於投影片放映狀態按下滑鼠右鍵 選取〔會議記錄簿〕
Ellis 2003, chapter 1 pp By Aida W. Wardhananti
Psycholinguistic Theory
Chapter 1 Rod Ellis, 2003 Page: The Elements  What Is ‘Second Language Acquisitio’?  The Goals Of Sla  Two Case Studies  Methodological Issue.
LANGUAGE TRANSFER SRI SURYANTI WORD ORDER STUDIES OF TRANSFER ODLIN (1989;1990) UNIVERSAL POSITION WHAT EXTENT WORD ORDER IN INTERLANGUAGE IS.
Psycholinguistic aspects of interlanguage
Input and Interaction Ellis (1985), interaction, as the discourse jointly constructed by the learner and his interlocutors and input is the result of.
DISCOURSE ASPECTS OF INTERLANGUAGE Ellis 2003, Chapter 5 pp. 43 – 50 Bastian Surya Adinegara ( ) Fatimah( ) Lilik Suryani ( )
LANGUAGE TRANSFER IN LANGUAGE LEARNING AND LANGUAGE CONTACT (ARABSKI, 2006) Emrah GÜLTEKİN Fethiye ERBİL Elif MET Burcu ÜVER H. Esra ŞİMŞEK.
INTRODUCTION : DESCRIBING AND EXPLAINING L2 ACQUISITION Ellis 2003, Chapter 1 PP By. Annisa Rizqi Handayani.
CHAPTER 1 Description and Explaining L2 Acquisition Source: Rod Ellis 2003 Second Language Acquisition Name: Sekar Katon Wijayanti NIM :
Fita Ariyana Rombel 7 (Thursday 9 am).
Unit 2 The Nature of Learner Language 1. Errors and errors analysis 2. Developmental patterns 3. Variability in learner language.
Second Language Reading. Mechanisms of L2 Reading What linguistic knowledge is important in decoding? – Orthographic knowledge is important for decoding.
Chapter 2 The Nature of Learner Language By : Annisa Mustikanthi.
The Linguistic Environment (Ch. 4)
Introduction : describing and explaining L2 acquisition Ellis, R Second Language Acquisition (3 – 14)
Methodology MSc in TESOL Muna Morris-Adams. Outline 1.Introduction 2.ELT methodology 3.Trends and influences 4.The MET module 5.Action Research 6.Assessment.
Madeline Schroeder G/T Intern Mentor Program
Variability in Interlanguage Session 6. Variability Variability refers to cases where a second language learner uses two or more linguistic variants to.
How Languages Are Learned
Interlanguage L. Selinker 2007 년 2 학기 담당교수 : 홍우평 이중언어커뮤니케이 션.
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND INSTRUCTION IN L2. Input Overuse Developmental pattern Variability in learner language Form-function mapping Revision: some.
Chapter 11 Linguistics and Foreign Language Teaching Lecturer: Rui Liu.
Glottodidactics Lesson 7.
Second Language Acquisition
Instruction and L2 acquisition
Principle Of Learning and Education Course NUR 315
Chapter 3 Interlanguage.
Cognitive Processes in SLL and Bilinguals:
Second Language Acquisition
2nd Language Learning Chapter 2 Lecture 4.
Explaining Second Language Learning
STYLE SHIFTING, CODE-SWITCHING Joan Swann
Theories of Language Development
Social Aspects of Interlanguage
MUHAMMAD JONA LUMINTU Semarang State University
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND INSTRUCTION IN L2
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN L2 ACQUISITION Ellis 2003, Chapter 8 PP
THE NATURE of LEARNER LANGUAGE
Social aspects of interlanguage
Chapter 5.
Affectivity in TESOL Week 8 NJ Kang.
Psycholinguistic aspects of interlanguage
Introduction to Linguistics
Content-based Instruction
The Nature of Learner Language
The Nature of Learner Language (Chapter 2 Rod Ellis, 1997) Page 15
Branches of Applied Linguistics
Chapter 8 Communicative competence
Chapter 4.
The Nature Of Learner Language
Linguistic aspects of interlanguage
Constructivism Constructivism — particularly in its "social" forms — suggests that the learner is much more actively involved in a joint enterprise with.
Chapter 3 Interlanguage.
Social aspects of interlanguage
The Nature of learner language
Presentation transcript:

Social Aspect Of Interlanguage Chapter 2 Rod Ellis, 2003 PP 37-42 By: Fresi yuliana rahma yusita

The Elements Interlanguage as a stylistic continuum The aculturation model of l2 acquisition Social identity and investment in l2 learning

Social Aspects Of Interlanguage The prevaling persepective on interlanguage is psycholinguistic, as reflected in the metaphor of the computer. That is, researchers have been primarily concerned with identifying the internal mechanisms that are responsible for interlanguage devolopment.

Three rather different approaches to incorporating a social angel on the study of L2 acquisition can be identified: First, views interlanguages as consisting of different ‘styles’ which learners call upon under different conditions of language use. Second, concern how social factors determine the input that learners use to construct their interlanguage. Third, considers how the social identities that learners negotiate in their interactions with native speakers shape their opprtunities to speak and, thereby, to learn an L2.

Interlanguage As A Stylistic Continuum Elaine Tarone has proposed that interlanguage involves a stylistic continuum. She argues that learners develop a capability for using the L2 and that this underlies ‘all regular language behaviour’. This capability, which constitutes ‘an abstract linguistic system’, is comprised of a number of different ‘style’ which learner access in accordance with a variety of factors.

Elaine Tarone The careful style, evident when learners are conciously attending to their choice of linguistic forms, as when they feel need to be ‘correct’. Vernacular style, evident when learners are making spontaneous choices of linguistic form, as is likely in free conversation.

Elaine Tarone Tarone’s idea of interlanguage as a stylistic continuum is attractive in a number of ways. It explains why learner language is variable. It suggests that an interlanguage grammar, although different from a native speaker’s grammar, is constructed according to the same priciples, for native speakers have been shown to posses a similar range of styles. It relates language use to language learning.

Tarone has acknowledged, the model also has a number of problems: First, later research has shown that learners are not always most accurate in their careful style and least accurate in their vernacular style. Second, is that the role of social factors remains unclear

Howard Giles Another theory is howard giles’s accomodation theory. This seeks to explain how A learner’s social group influences of the course of L2 acquisition. For giles the key idea is that of ‘social accomodation’. He suggests that when people interact with each other they either try to make their speech similar to that of their addressee in order to emphasize social cohesiveness or to make it different in order to emphasize their social distinctiveness. According to the giles’s theory, then, social factors influence interlanguage development via the impact they have on the attitudes that determine the kind of language use learners engage in. Accomodation theory suggests that social factors, mediated through the interactions that learners take part in, influence both how quickly they learn and tha ctual route that they follow.

The Acculturation Model Of L2 Acquisition A Similar Perspective On The Role Of Social Factors In L2 Acquisition Can Be Found In John Schumann’s Acculturation Model. Schumann Investigated A Thirty Three Years Old, Costa Rican, Named Alberto, Who Was Acquiring English In The United States. Alberto Used A ‘Reduced And Simplified Form Of English’ Throughout.

The Problems he did not progress beyond the forst stage in the development of negatives he continued to use declarative word order rather than inversion in question he acquired vortually no aixilary verbs and he failed to mark regular verbs for past tense or nouns for possession.

John Schumann The main reason for learners failing to acculturate is social distance. A learner’s social distance is determined by a number of factors. Schumsnn also recognizes that social distance is sometimes indeterminate. As presented by Schumann, social factors determine the amount of contact with the L2 individual learners experience and thereby how successful they are in learning.

Two Problems With Such A Model First, it fails to acknowledge that factors like ‘integration pattern’ and ‘attitude’ are not fixed and static but, potetially, variable and dynami, fluctuating in accordance with the learne’s changing social experiences. Second, It fails to acknowledge that learners are not just subject to social conditions but can also become tha subject of them; they can help to construct the social context of their own learning.

Social Identity And Investment In L2 Learning Eva, an adult immigrant learner of English in Canada. Eva felt humiliated in this conversation because she found herself positioned as a’strange woman’, someone who did not know who Bart Simpson was. She was subject to a discourse which assumed an identity she did not have.

Social Identity And Investment In L2 Learning The notion of social identity is central to the theory Pierce advances. She argues that language learners have complex social identities that can only be understood in term of the power relations that shape social structures. A learner’s social identity is, according to Pierce, ‘multiple and cintradictory’. Pierce’s social theory of L2 acquisition affords a different set of metaphor. L2 acquisition involves a ‘struggle’ and ‘investment’. Learners are not computers who process input data but combatants who battle to assert themeselves and investor who expect a good return on their effort.

Conclusion Social cultural models of L2 acquisition, such as those of Giles, Schumann and Pierce, are intended to account for learner’s relative success or failure in learning an L2. That is, they seek to explain the speed of learning and the ultimate level of proficiency of different groups of learners.

THANK YOU