IBI’s: An Introduction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benthic Assessments One benthic ecologists concerns and suggestions Fred Nichols USGS, retired.
Advertisements

Background Texas Instream Flow Program Determine fish species composition and abundances in Big, Little and Black Cypress creeks Determine if changes through.
Marylands Approach to Success Stories Presented to the Region III States Meeting May 12, 2009 Presented by Jim George.
Strengthening the State- Tribal-Federal Partnership to Assess the Condition of Nations Waters.
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Mountaintop Mining/Valley Fills in Appalachia. Background Mountaintop coal mining is a surface mining practice used in the Appalachian states involving.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Summary of Biological Assessment Programs and Biocriteria Development for States, Tribes, Territories, and Interstate Commissions: Streams and Wadeable.
Bioassessment and biomonitoring: some general principles.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
Comparable Biological Assessments from Different Methods and Analyses David B. Herbst 1 and Erik L. Silldorff 2 1 Sierra Nevada Aquatic Research Laboratory,
Benthic Organisms As Water Quality Indicators Mr. Christensen.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Biotic indices and Indicator species. Remember about canaries in coal mines? Indicator species – Use of a living organism that is sensitive to certain.
Community Attributes Kenneth M. Klemow, Ph.D. Wilkes University Kenneth M. Klemow, Ph.D. Wilkes University.
ORD’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) Sound Science for Measuring Ecological Condition
California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands Interpreting CRAM Scores.
Ecoregion typing Ecological classification or typing will allow the grouping of rivers according to similarities based on a top-down nested hierarchical.
REDUCING OUR FOOTPRINT Unit 3-1b How To Measure Water Quality
CRITICAL TECHNICAL ELEMENTS FOR A BIOASSESSMENT PROGRAM Michael T. Barbour, Tetra Tech Chris O. Yoder, MBI.
ARROW: system for the evaluation of the status of waters in the Czech Republic Jiří Jarkovský 1) Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University,
Alexander J. Smith, Barry P. Baldigo, Mike R. McHale New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Development and validation of models to assess the threat to freshwater fishes from environmental change and invasive species PIs: Craig Paukert Joanna.
NC Division of Water Quality Water Quality Assessments and Local Watershed Plans.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
Benthic Community Assessment Tool Development Ananda Ranasinghe (Ana) Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) Sediment.
Goals of CRAM program –Roles of Teams –Need and Intended Uses Summary of Science of Rapid Assessment Conceptual Model Development Process and Schedule.
Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Aquatic Macroinvertebrates
Assessments 2: What the biota can tell us about watershed condition K.E. Limburg lecture notes 26 March, 2002.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
ORSANCO Biological Programs Extra-curricular Updates EMAP-GRE ORBFHP NRSA.
Environmental Assessment and Sustainability CIV913 BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT of River Water Quality Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters : Wright,
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Module 11 Biological Criteria
Molles: Ecology 2 nd Ed. Lakes Most of world’s freshwater resides in a few large lakes:  Great Lakes contain 20% of freshwater in world.
Recommendations for Applying the Critical Elements Methodology.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
Lower Truckee River Bioassessment Symposium Kathy Sertic Bureau of Water Quality Planning Nevada Division of Environmental Protection January 5, 2009.
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
Lab: Benthic Bugs and Bioassessment
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
1 Collaboration on EMAP Stream Condition Assessments in EPA Region 8 Thomas R. Johnson and Karl A. Hermann EPA Region 8.
Invertebrate Standards and Lakes Paul Logan. Existing CEN standards relating to the ecological assessment of freshwaters - TG1 - invertebrates Quality.
The Arizona Rivers Project Southwestern Academy June 2009 Fun with Macroinvertebrates.
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
Record notes in your notebook  Record at least 5 facts/ideas in your notebook.  Write down and answer the following questions:  What are“benthic macroinvertebrates”?
USE OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES TO ASSESS WATER QUALITY IN BOLIN CREEK David Lenat Lenat Consulting Services.
COMPARING BIOINDICATORS TO MEASURE THE EFFICACY OF RESTORATION IN MIDDLE FORK JOHN DAY RIVER, OR Robin M. Henderson & James R. Pratt.
EVALUATING STREAM COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE: Overcoming the Data Deficit Through Standardized Study Design Kenton L. Sena (EPA VSFS Intern), Joe Morgan,
Tools for Tracking Healthy Watersheds
Mountaintop Mining/Valley Fills in Appalachia
Watershed Health Indicators
Aquatic, Watershed, and Earth Resources
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
AIM-NAMF Project Evolution
Fun with Macroinvertebrates
Assessing PA’s Lake Erie Tributaries
WATER QUALITY Vol 3: Biological Characteristics
Biological Assessment of Pond Health
Lotic Communities What is a community? A) The Dictionary B) The Ideal
Using Bugs and GIS to Assess and Manage Watershed Health
Combinations (= multimetrics)
The Index of Biotic Integrity (the BI or IBI)
IBI’s: How It’s Done.
Todd Petty, PhD Basic Stream Ecology
Presentation transcript:

IBI’s: An Introduction

Concept of IBI Multimetric index based on biotic communities that compares the condition of a waterbody to regional reference conditions Uses a variety of metrics to best capture biological integrity Metrics are adjustable depending upon region, objectives, etc.

Management Implications / Uses of Bioassessment Data Identification and understanding of important stressors Identification of impaired stream reaches and watersheds Trend assessment Uses all types of biological data; adapted to coldwater, estuaries, lakes, large rivers, wetlands, and caves

Advantages of IBI’s Provides a standardized protocol for stream sampling Inexpensive and quick Integrates physical, chemical, and biological properties Ability to detect a variety of impairments Elastic Scores are easily comparable

Disadvantages of IBI’s Loss of information Reference condition (?????????) Biotic communities are highly variable Fails to account for temporal / spatial variation Elastic / arbitrary Typically do not account for biomass Rare species often over emphasized

Components of IBI’s Water Chemistry Habitat Assessments Biological Assessments Periphyton Macroinvertebrates Fish

Fish as Environmental Indicators

Positive Attributes of Fish Communities Accurate environmental assessment of health Structure often constant during summer season Persistent and resilient Assess both regional and microhabitat condition Long life span (3-10yrs) Assimilate biological conditions predictably (Simon, 1991)

Positive Attributes of Fish Communities Visibility Highly visible component of aquatic community Aquatic life uses and regulation often characterized in terms of fish (Simon, 1991)

Positive Attributes of Fish Communities Ease of use and interpretation Reduced effort for trend assessment Reduced processing time Distribution, life history, and tolerances for most fishes well documented (Simon, 1991)

Fish IBI Metric Categories Species Richness and Composition Metric Indicator Species Metric Trophic Function Metric Reproductive Function Metric Fish Abundance and Condition Metric