2013 NSSE Results.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
Advertisements

Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
Response rateFirst-year Senior GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 2013 GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE %15%23%21% 22%21%29%26% Representativeness.
NSSE 2014: Accolades and Action Items Faculty Senate Nov. 20, 2014 Patrick Barlow, Ph.D., Assessment Coordinator.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
 Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
NSSE 2005: Student Perceptions of Enriching Educational Experiences Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 18, 2006.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
NC State Office of Institutional Research & Planning September, 2014.
Academic Staff Senate Presentation March 17, 2014.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
Drake Curriculum Assessment Wabash Memo NSSE 2013 Results + Senior Focus Groups Report to Faculty Senate February 19, 2014 Kevin Saunders Stephanie Majeran.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
NSSE 2013 Results Report to Faculty Senate February 19, 2014.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
Diversity at Stetson: Perspectives of Students and Faculty John Tichenor Associate Professor of Decision and Information Science.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Experiences with Faculty
Center for Teaching and Learning
Director of Institutional Accreditation and Assessment
The University of Texas-Pan American
NSSE Data Conversations
Irish Survey of Student Engagement (ISSE) Results 2016
Dissertation Findings
NSSE Data Conversations
NSSE Results for Faculty
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
National Survey of Student Engagement
The University of Texas-Pan American
2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Your Institutional Report Step by Step
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
AUB NSSE 2018 Report K. El Hassan, PhD. OIRA, AUB.
NC State Office of Institutional Research & Planning September, 2017
Predicting Student Retention Based on NSSE Results*
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
GGC and Student Engagement
SENSE: Survey of New Student Engagement
Faculty In-Service Week
Presentation transcript:

2013 NSSE Results

Participation: Rates and Representativeness  Response rate First-year   Senior GGC Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2013 9% 15% 23% 21% 22% 29% 26% Representativeness First-year   Senior Respondent % Population % Female 64 52 67 57 Full-time 78 75 71 68 First-time, first-year 44 46 N/A Race/ethnicitya Am. Indian or Alaska Native 1 Asian 13 7 10 Black or African American 24 36 20 21 Hispanic or Latino 18 15 6 Native Hawaiian/Other Pac. Isl. White 38 35 58 55 Other Foreign or nonresident alien Two or more races/ethicities 4 3 Unknown

Changes to Indicators 2012 and Prior 2013 Benchmarks Theme Engagement Indicator Level of Academic Challenge Academic Challenge Higher-Order Learning Reflective and Integrative Learning Learning Strategies Quantitative Reasoning Active & Collaborative Learning Learning with Peers Collaborative Learning Discussions with Diverse Others Student Faculty Interaction Experiences with Faculty Student-Faculty Interaction Effective Teaching Practices Enriching Educational Experiences Campus Environment Quality of Interactions Supportive Environment Supportive Campus Environment

Engagement Indicators: First-Year   GGC Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE Top 50% Top 10% Academic Challenge Higher-Order Learning 39.0 39.1 38.4 40.9 42.7 Reflective and Integrative Learning 35.4 35.2 35.7 37.6 39.4 Learning Strategies 41.4 40.4 39.7 39.8 41.8 ✓ 44.3 Quantitative Reasoning 28.5 28.0 26.7 27.3 28.8 30.5 Learning with Peers Collaborative Learning 29.9 32.1 30.7 31.5 34.5 37.1 Discussions with Diverse Others 40.1 41.5 39.2 40.8 43.2 45.7 Experiences with Faculty Student-Faculty Interaction 18.9 19.9 20.9 20.0 23.4 Effective Teaching Practices 42.2 40.6 42.8 44.7 Campus Environment Quality of Interactions 41.0 41.7 46.3 Supportive Environment 38.1 36.1 37.2 39.5

Engagement Indicators: Seniors   GGC Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE Top 50% Top 10% Academic Challenge Higher-Order Learning 41.3 41.2 41.4 43.5 45.3 Reflective and Integrative Learning 38.2 38.3 38.8 38.9 41.1 43.1 Learning Strategies 42.7 41.6 40.7 43.2 ✓ 45.4 Quantitative Reasoning 32.2 30.3 29.2 29.7 31.1 32.5 Learning with Peers Collaborative Learning 32.8 33.0 31.6 31.7 35.0 37.5 Discussions with Diverse Others 47.6 42.9 41.0 41.8 44.1 45.8 Experiences with Faculty Student-Faculty Interaction 25.0 24.4 25.1 23.2 34.6 Effective Teaching Practices 41.5 43.3 Campus Environment Quality of Interactions 40.8 42.4 42.8 Supportive Environment 34.5 33.1 36.2 39.1

High Impact Practices GGC Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE First Year Learning community 8 15 11 Service-learning 46 50 59 52 Research with faculty 6 5 Participated in at least one 57 61 58 Participated in two or more 9 12 Seniors   22 24 64 67 60 28 23 Internship or field exp. 38 48 Study abroad 13 Culminating senior exp. 42 45 82 84 86

Academic Challenge

Academic Challenge: Mean Comparisons GGC First-year students compared with Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2013 Engagement Indicator Mean Effect size   Higher-Order Learning 39.0 39.1 -.01 38.4 .04 Reflective & Integrative Learning 35.4 35.2 .02 35.7 -.02 Learning Strategies 41.4 40.4 .07 39.7 * .12 39.8 Quantitative Reasoning 28.5 28.0 .03 26.7 .11 27.3 .08 GGC Senior students compared with Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2013 Engagement Indicator Mean Effect size   Higher-Order Learning 41.3 41.2 .01 41.4 -.01 .00 Reflective & Integrative Learning 38.2 38.3 38.8 -.05 38.9 -.06 Learning Strategies 42.7 41.6 .08 41.1 .11 40.7 * .14 Quantitative Reasoning 32.2 30.3 .10 29.2 ** .17 29.7

AC: Higher-Order Learning Details First Year Senior Percentage responding "Very much" or "Quite a bit" about how much coursework emphasized… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 4b. Applying facts, theories, or methods to practical problems or new situations 72 75 71 74 79 80 4c. Analyzing an idea, experience, or line of reasoning in depth by examining its parts 70 73 77 78 4d. Evaluating a point of view, decision, or information source 69 4e. Forming a new idea or understanding from various pieces of information 68

AC: Reflective & Integrative Learning Details First Year Senior Percentage of students who responded that they "Very often" or "Often"… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2a. Combined ideas from different courses when completing assignments 56 54 71 70 2b. Connected your learning to societal problems or issues 53 51 64 62 65 2c. Included diverse perspectives (political, religious, racial/ethnic, gender, etc.) in course discussions or assignments 52 49 50 57 2d. Examined the strengths and weaknesses of your own views on a topic or issue 63 67 2e. Tried to better understand someone else's views by imagining how an issue looks from his or her perspective 66 68 69 2f. Learned something that changed the way you understand an issue or concept 2g. Connected ideas from your courses to your prior experiences and knowledge 73 76 78 81 83 84

AC: Learning Strategies Details First Year Senior Percentage of students who responded that they "Very often" or "Often"… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 9a. Identified key information from reading assignments 82 81 85 84 9b. Reviewed your notes after class 70 68 67 66 65 9c. Summarized what you learned in class or from course materials 73 64 69

AC: Quantitative Reasoning Details First Year Senior Percentage of students who responded that they "Very often" or "Often"… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 6a. Reached conclusions based on your own analysis of numerical information (numbers, graphs, statistics, etc.) 55 54 50 51 64 56 53 6b. Used numerical information to examine a real-world problem or issue (unemployment, climate change, public health, etc.) 41 39 37 38 45 44 6c. Evaluated what others have concluded from numerical information 40 36 48 42

Learning With Peers

Learning with Peers: Mean Comparisons GGC First-year students compared with Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2013 Engagement Indicator Mean Effect size   Collaborative Learning 29.9 32.1 ** -.16 30.7 -.06 31.5 * -.11 Discussions with Diverse Others 40.1 41.5 -.08 39.2 .06 40.8 -.04 GGC Seniors compared with Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2013 Engagement Indicator Mean Effect size   Collaborative Learning 32.8 33.0 -.01 31.6 .09 31.7 .08 Discussions with Diverse Others 47.6 42.9 *** .29 41.0 .41 41.8 .36

LWP: Collaborative Learning Details Percentage of students who responded that they "Very often" or "Often"… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 1e. Asked another student to help you understand course material 37 49 45 48 31 41 38 1f. Explained course material to one or more students 57 58 54 56 59 60 1g. Prepared for exams by discussing or working through course material with other students 50 46 44 1h. Worked with other students on course projects or assignments 52 73 63

LWP: Discussions with Diverse Others Details Percentage of students who responded that they "Very often" or "Often" had discussions with… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 8a. People from a race or ethnicity other than your own 76 72 68 70 85 75 8b. People from an economic background other than your own 74 71 73 86 77 8c. People with religious beliefs other than your own 69 63 82 66 8d. People with political views other than your own 65 80

Experiences with Faculty

Experiences with Faculty: Mean Comparisons GGC First-year students compared with Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2013 Engagement Indicator Mean Effect size   Student-Faculty Interaction 18.9 19.9 -.07 20.9 * -.13 20.0 Effective Teaching Practices 42.2 40.1 ** .16 40.6 .11 40.4 .13 GGC Seniors compared with Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2013 Engagement Indicator Mean Effect size   Student-Faculty Interaction 25.0 24.4 .04 25.1 -.01 23.2 .11 Effective Teaching Practices 43.1 41.5 41.3 .12 41.1 * .14

EWF: Student-Faculty Interaction Details First Year Senior Percentage of students who responded that they "Very often" or "Often"… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 3a. Talked about career plans with a faculty member 26 32 34 45 44 46 42 3b. Worked w/faculty on activities other than coursework (committees, student groups, etc.) 17 18 19 25 27 28 3c. Discussed course topics, ideas, or concepts with a faculty member outside of class 23 24 35 36 3d. Discussed your academic performance with a faculty member 31 40 37

EWF: Effective Teaching Practices Details First Year Senior Percentage responding "Very much" or "Quite a bit" about how much instructors have… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 5a. Clearly explained course goals and requirements 81 80 82 86 83 5b. Taught course sessions in an organized way 76 79 5c. Used examples or illustrations to explain difficult points 78 77 5d. Provided feedback on a draft or work in progress 73 63 68 65 66 62 64 5e. Provided prompt and detailed feedback on tests or completed assignments 69 61 70

Campus Environment

Campus Environment: Mean Comparisons GGC First-year students compared with Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2013 Engagement Indicator Mean Effect size   Quality of Interactions 39.2 41.0 * -.15 41.7 ** -.20 Supportive Environment 35.7 38.1 -.17 36.1 -.03 37.2 -.11 GGC Seniors compared with Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2013 Engagement Indicator Mean Effect size   Quality of Interactions 40.8 42.4 -.13 43.3 ** -.21 42.8 * -.17 Supportive Environment 34.6 34.5 .01 33.1 .11

CE: Quality of Interactions Details First Year Senior Percentage rating a 6 or 7 on a scale from 1="Poor" to 7="Excellent" their interactions with… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 13a. Students 53 59 60 62 66 65 13b. Academic advisors 47 46 50 49 56 52 58 13c. Faculty 48 51 61 64 13d. Student services staff (career services, student activities, housing, etc.) 38 43 44 41 42 13e. Other administrative staff and offices (registrar, financial aid, etc.) 37 40 35

CE: Supportive Environment Details First Year Senior Percentage responding "Very much" or "Quite a bit" about how much the institution emphasized… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie Class NSSE 14b. Providing support to help students succeed academically 79 78 75 73 72 14c. Using learning support services (tutoring services, writing center, etc.) 76 70 68 69 67 14d. Encouraging contact among students from diff. backgrounds (soc., racial/eth., relig., etc.) 60 57 58 59 52 14e. Providing opportunities to be involved socially 64 74 65 14f. Providing support for your overall well-being (recreation, health care, counseling, etc.) 66 62 14g. Helping you manage your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) 40 44 26 33 32 14h. Attending campus activities and events (performing arts, athletic events, etc.) 56 14i. Attending events that address important social, economic, or political issues 50 55 51 53 45 49 46

High Impact Practices

Learning Communities: First-Year and Senior Participate in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together First Year Senior

Service Learning: First-Year and Senior About how many of your courses at this institution have included a community-based project (service learning)? First Year Senior

Research with a Faculty Member: First-Year and Senior Work with a faculty member on a research project First Year Senior

Internship or Field Experience: Senior Only Participate in an internship, co-op, field experience, student teaching, or clinical placement.

Study Abroad: Senior Only Participate in a study abroad program

Culminating Senior Experience: Senior Only Complete a culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project or thesis, comprehensive exam, portfolio, etc.)