Basic starting point New tracker layers on the timescale of the first 5 years of running are a sensible first step Contained in the volume from pixel layer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHC-LUMI05 31/8-3/ ArcidossoFabrizio Palla INFN Pisa1 CMS Upgrade for Super-LHC Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa.
Advertisements

Status & Goals of LHC 1 1pb-1 of delivered and recorded luminosities reached! As of this morning: Delivered: 1420 nb-1 Recorded: 1245 nb-1 New record Inst.
LHC Experiments at Liverpool E2V Visit – Nov 2005 Introduction Si Technology Upgrade/Maintenance Summary.
Sept. 18, 2008SLUO 2008 Annual Meeting ATLAS Detector Upgrade Opportunities M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Doug Michael Jan. 12, First goal is to be ready to select an optimal technology in ~one year. –Demonstrate that fundamental technologies are ready.
ATLAS detector upgrades ATLAS off to a good start – the detector is performing very well. This talk is about the changes needed in ATLAS during the next.
D. Lissauer, BNL. 1 ATLAS ID Upgrade Scope R&D Plans for ATLAS Tracker First thoughts on Schedule and Cost.
U.S. ATLAS Executive Meeting Upgrade R&D August 3, 2005Toronto, Canada A. Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Upgrade Introduction January 2008.
Workshop 24 Jun 11 AB Workshop on GEMs for CMS high  Last September’s workshop showed that MPGD technology is now mature. Stable operation of large area.
SLHC SG: ATLAS Pixel G. Darbo - INFN / Genova SLHC SG, July 2004 ATLAS Pixel at SLHC G. Darbo - INFN / Genova Talk overview: A table with different High.
The Bigbite second GEM tracker. SBS GEM Trackers Front Tracker Geometry x6 18 modules In Italy  50 cm x 40 cm Modules are assembled to form larger chambers.
Guido_Tonelli / CMS_TSC / 5 February Time stability of ST sensors The problem The sensors re-measuring campaign Failure analysis Conclusions.
Power Distribution Existing Systems Power in the trackers Power in the calorimeters Need for changes.
THE ATTRACT INITIATIVE Marzio Nessi, Markus Nordberg CERN.
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
A Silicon vertex tracker prototype for CBM Material for the FP6 Design application.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
SiD R&D tasks for the LOI - Subsystem R&D tasks - Summary of SiD R&D - Prioritization of R&D tasks -> Document for DoE/NSF ~Feb 2009 (Mainly based on Marty’s.
Communications G. Darbo – INFN / Genova IBL MB#15, 5 October 2009 o Bump Bonding Selex / INFN Roma, October, 30 th 2009 G. Darbo - INFN / Genova.
PHASE-1B ACTIVITIES L. Demaria – INFN Torino. Introduction  The inner layer of the Phase 1 Pixel detector is exposed to very high level of irradiation.
Structure Update Installation & Building Update Revisions Outlined Costs Revisited (since given to Gina) Jeff Nelson Fermilab.
UK Activities on pixels. Adrian Bevan 1, Jamie Crooks 2, Andrew Lintern 2, Andy Nichols 2, Marcel Stanitzki 2, Renato Turchetta 2, Fergus Wilson 2. 1 Queen.
UCSC August 12, 2008 U.S. Upgrade R&D Meeting: Strip Detector  Seiden.
SCIPP Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics
C. Kiesling, 1st Open Meeting of the SuperKEKB Collaboration, KEK, Dec , The DEPFET-Project: European Collaboration for a Pixel SuperBelle.
Overview of a Plan for Simulating a Tracking Trigger (Fermilab) Overview of a Plan for Simulating a Tracking Trigger Harry Cheung (Fermilab)
ATLAS Trigger Development
CMS pixel telescope at MTEST 1 A. Kumar, S. Kwan, A. Prosser, R. Rivera, M. Turqueti, L. Uplegger.
Local Supports to IDR Discussion ATLAS Upgrade Week November 2014.
9/17/2008TWEPP 2008, R. Stringer - UC Riverside 1 CMS Tracker Services: present status and potential for upgrade Robert Stringer University of California,
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
1. Efficient trigger for many B decay topologies Muon System CALORIMETERS PRS + ECAL+ HCAL RICH1 VERTEX LOCATOR Efficient PID Good decay time resolution.
Ideas for Super LHC tracking upgrades 3/11/04 Marc Weber We have been thinking and meeting to discuss SLHC tracking R&D for a while… Agenda  Introduction:
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
Fabiola Gianotti, 14/10/20031  s = 28 TeV upgrade L = upgrade “SLHC = Super-LHC” vs Question : do we want to consider also the energy upgrade option.
Leonardo Rossi INFN Genova - UTOPIA #12 0 What we have learned from UTOPIA so far? Defined a set of gauge histos to compare layouts Exercised on barrel-part.
ACES Mar 2007Geoff Hall1 System level requirements for upgraded tracker.
PH Theme 3 R&D Meeting with WP leaders 3/7/2008. Overview of WP’s.
M. Gilchriese 1 Pixel R&D The useful lifetime of the innermost pixel layer is expected to be limited to a few years at design luminosity. However, there.
MUX-2010 DISCUSSION : W HAT DO WE NEED NEXT IN HEP.
RD program on hybrids & Interconnects Background & motivation At sLHC the luminosity will increase by a factor 10 The physics requirement on the tracker.
Geoff HallLECC LHC detector upgrades Introductory comments on electronic issues Organisation of this short session.
RD42 Status Report W. Trischuk for the RD42 Collaboration LHCC Meeting – June 12, 2013 Development of CVD Diamond Tracking Detectors for Experiments at.
Upgrade plans for ATLAS. Nigel Hessey (Nikhef) is overall ATLAS upgrade coordinator.
Tracking Upgrade R&D Meeting. Columbia University A. Seiden September 22, 2003.
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
CMS Phase 2 Tracker R&D R. Lipton 2/27/2014
SVT – SuperB Workshop – Annecy March 2010
Detector building Notes of our discussion
 Silicon Vertex Detector Upgrade for the Belle II Experiment
Some input to the discussion for the design requirements of the GridPixel Tracker and L1thack trigger. Here are some thoughts about possible detector layout.
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Strawman A Status Report
CERN R&D plans and Infrastructures
Upgrade Tracker Simulation Studies
WLCG: TDR for HL-LHC Ian Bird LHCC Referees’ meting CERN, 9th May 2017.
WP microelectronics and interconnections
TK Upgrade report.
SVT Issues for the TDR What decisions must be taken before the TDR can be written? What is the mechanism for reaching those decisions How can missing information.
Why Micromegas? Muon Upgrade Workshop, 27/01/2012 Jörg Wotschack.
Valerio Re (INFN-Pavia) on behalf of the RD53 collaboratios
FNAL Production Experience
Silicon tracker and sensor R&D for sPHENIX
SVT detector electronics
SVT detector electronics
SVT – SuperB Workshop – Frascati Sept. 2010
Tracking in SuperLHC 1. Radiation damage
SHLC INFN Road Map Working Group 11/01/2006
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Presentation transcript:

Basic starting point New tracker layers on the timescale of the first 5 years of running are a sensible first step Contained in the volume from pixel layer 0 to 4 Need to use/reuse service space for pixels Questions for R&D Single layers or a complete replacement? New sensor geometry and/or technology? Small strips? What features in the electronics to make first steps towards using these layers in L1? Seeding vs correlation Be on the road maps at the right levels and at timescales To assist, already agreed CMS peer-review scheme Main lines identified so far Tracker & Trigger Microelectronics and Power Optoelectronics & data architectures Merge at early stage into system(s) SLHC Meeting - Frascati 24 Nov 2005 Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa

Cost & Power estimate for new Tracker Pix Sys #1 : 3 layers 330 mW/cm2 High f pix 400 SFr/cm2 Pix Sys #2 : 2 layers 130 mW/cm2 Large pix 100 SFr/cm2 Pix Sys #3 : 3 layers 45 mW/cm2 Macro pix 40 SFr/cm2 Eta =1.4  Area = 18.3 m2 Mechanics etc. not in costs! Strip detector ~25 mW/cm2 SLHC Meeting - Frascati 24 Nov 2005 Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa

Longer term R&D Power requires major effort & new ideas Chip voltages reduce with technology evolution, currents may (??), but number of channels will not Need to bring increased total currents through volumes which can’t expand Material budget should not increase R&D and qualification time is underestimated Reduce the number of module types Increase automation of assembly Large systems are hard to build Qualification must be taken seriously True industrial production is likely to be required Sensors are one of many issues Any new material technology must be large-scale commercial within ~5 years Electronic technology evolution will bring benefits and also more complexity and much difficult work SLHC Meeting - Frascati 24 Nov 2005 Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa

Strategy Is the right strategy R&D followed by request for complete new tracker? Alternative could be upgrade… ..by installation of modest protoype system at tp = to + 5y Less cost and lower risk Less substantial case for support needed More chance of resources, on short time scale Allows trial of components or devices, which may still evolve Technology investigations less popular with funding agencies than physics experiments Human time-scale Might be possible to react to LHC conditions, either machine, experiment or even discoveries or to convince reviewers & funders… May be complete pixel system replacement ??? SLHC Meeting - Frascati 24 Nov 2005 Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa