Joint session – Beta-beams

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mats Lindroos Will we ever do a beta-beam design study beyond the present CERN-Frejus baseline? Mats Lindroos.
Advertisements

RAL 27 April 2006The beta-beam task, EURISOL1 Status of the beta-beam study Mats Lindroos on behalf of the EURISOL beta-beam task.
ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #8.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
Nufact 2008The Beta Beam WP1 Beta beam R&D status Elena Wildner, CERN on behalf of the Beta Beam Study Group EURISOL/Euronu.
Beta Beams Safety issues and WBS E. Benedetto and E. Wildner EUROnu Safety Workshop 9-10 June 2011, CERN Outline Introduction: the Beta Beams Tentative.
EUROnu Annual Meeting 2-4 June Beta-Beam Costing Exercise Elena Wildner, CERN 03/06/10 1 EUROnu Annual Meeting, 2-4 June 2010.
LINAC4 STATUS Alessandra M. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 1.Motivation and goals 2.Status of Linac4 2 years after official start of the project ( )
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
Loss problems associated with the acceleration of radioactive beams and what we can do about it A.Jansson f fermilab Loss issues (and ideas for solutions)
Moriond 2003M. Benedikt, S. Hancock Injection and Accumulation in a High Energy Ion Storage Ring Michael Benedikt, Steven Hancock AB Division, CERN.
NuFact'06, Aug. 2006A. Fabich, CERNRadioactive Ion Beams, 1 Radioactive Ion Beams A. Fabich, CERN on behalf of the Beta-beam Study Group
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
1 Linac4 Overview M. Vretenar, SLHC Meeting, Motivations 2.Layout 3.Main parameters 4.Schedule 5.Status.
GDR NEUTRINO - SESSION April, LPNHE Neutrinos options at CERN R. Garoby – 27/04/2009.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
June 23, 2005R. Garoby Introduction SPL+PDAC example Elements of comparison Linacs / Synchrotrons LINAC-BASED PROTON DRIVER.
NUFACT05 1 A BASELINE BETA-BEAM Mats Lindroos AB Department, CERN on behalf of the EURISOL Beta-beam task
05/02/08 EUROnu, Elena Wildner, CERN, 05/02/ EURO Beta Beams Kick-off meeting  Elena Wildner, CERN.
R.G. 7/09/20101 Options for neutrinos. R.G. 7/09/20102 Conventional beam from the SPS (1/3) Neutrinos using the SPS Nominal CNGS 732 km baseline from.
Mats Lindroos Future R&D: beta-beam Mats Lindroos.
Fermilab Proton Driver and Muons David Johnson Fermilab Neutrino Factory Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 14, 2006.
Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004 Possible beta beam scenario(s) in the US Andreas Jansson Fermilab.
NuFact'06 WG3, Aug. 2006A. Fabich, CERNBeta-beam Ion Losses, 1 The EURISOL Beta-beam Acceleration Scenario: Ion Losses A. Fabich, CERN NuFact’06, UCIrvine.
CERN, 15/03/05EURISOL - Beta Beam Task1 EURISOL and the Beta-Beam Task Status and Planning Michael Benedikt Mats Lindroos AB-Department, CERN.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Optics considerations for PS2 October 4 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli, B. Goddard, S. Hancock, J.M. Jowett, A. Koschik,
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring February 11 th, 2008 LIS Section Meeting Y. Papaphilippou.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
Research progress and plan CERN-KEK Committee, 2nd meeting 07/Dec/07 Masamitsu AIBA CERN-Japan fellow, AB/BI.
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Introduction Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab,
Status of the magnet studies in the ARCS (FLUKA)
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
The beta-beam Mats Lindroos CERN GSI, 17 January 2005 Mats Lindroos.
A BASELINE BETA-BEAM Mats Lindroos AB Department, CERN
Beta-beams M. Benedikt, A. Fabich and M. Lindroos, CERN
b-beams: R&D Challenges in FP7
Status of the beta-beam study
Elena Wildner, CERN EUROnu meeting Paris June
Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik
Future R&D: beta-beam Mats Lindroos Mats Lindroos.
Accelerator R&D for Future Neutrino Projects
1- Short pulse neutron source
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS
Status of the beta-beam study
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
PS2 design status Y. Papaphilippou LIS section meeting
Beta beam R&D status Elena Wildner, CERN on behalf of
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS/i-RCS
Plans for new LHC injectors R. Garoby
Collimation for beta-beams
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
potential CERN facilities to study proton-driven plasma acceleration
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Status of the BETA-BEAM Task within the EURISOL Design Study
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring
Generation of Higher Brightness Beams for LHC
SLHC-PP kick-off meeting, CERN 9 April 2008
Beta-beams M. Benedikt, A. Fabich and M. Lindroos, CERN
MEIC New Baseline: Part 10
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
LHC Machine Advisory Committee, CERN 12th June 2008
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
Concepts and R&D for beta beam facilities
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
Presentation transcript:

Joint session – Beta-beams Mats Lindroos

Questions Beta-beam concept Can we achieve g=350 with LHC upgrades ? What storage ring for g=350, taking into account relaxed duty cycle ? Activation of PS, SPS, storage ring ? Production of ions: status of Rubbia’s proposal, Li/B vs He/Ne What is harder: increase production or gamma? The beta-beam team

LHC injector upgrades (PAF-RG-May08) Proton flux / Beam power Linac2 Linac4 50 MeV 160 MeV PSB (LP)SPL 1.4 GeV 4 GeV (LP)SPL: (Low Power) Superconducting Proton Linac (4-5 GeV) PS2: High Energy PS (~ 5 to 50 GeV – 0.3 Hz) SPS+: Superconducting SPS (50 to1000 GeV) SLHC: “Superluminosity” LHC (up to 1035 cm-2s-1) DLHC: “Double energy” LHC (1 to ~14 TeV) PS 26 GeV PS2 50 GeV Output energy SPS 450 GeV SPS+ 1 TeV LHC / SLHC DLHC 7 TeV ~ 14 TeV 20 July 2007

Benefits for physics 1 2 3 4 Linac4 PSB PS SPS PS2 or PS2+ (& PS) SPL STAGE 1 2 3 4 DESCRIPTION (new accelerator) Linac4 PSB PS SPS PS2 or PS2+ (& PS) SPL SPS+ Performance of LHC injectors (SLHC) + Ultimate beam from PS ++ Ultimate beam from SPS Maximum SPS performance +++ Highest performance LHC injector Higher energy LHC - b beam ++ (g ~150 6He) ++ (g ~350 6He) n Factory +++ (~5 GeV prod. beam) k, m ~150 kW beam at 50 GeV ~400 kW beam at EURISOL

High energy storage rings Requires high energy injectors or a sew-saw acceleration/deceleration cycle in the decay ring SPS+ Loss of intensity due to “longer half life” Increased space charge problems as the “longer half life” has to be compensated Compromise between magnetic field in dipoles (R&D) and length of decay ring (civil engineering cost)

Higher gamma and longer life time Padova University March 2008 The beta-beam team

Gamma and decay-ring size, 6He Rigidity [Tm] Ring length T=5 T f=0.36 Dipole Field rho=300 m Length=6885m 100 935 4197 3.1 150 1403 6296 4.7 200 1870 8395 6.2 350 3273 14691 10.9 500 4676 20987 15.6 New SPS Civil engineering Magnet R&D

Open midplane Dipoles Design for SLHC by the US LARP team (Gupta et al.,MT-18, Morioka, Jp) Aperture: H 135 mm, V 20 mm Field: 15 T (13.5 T operation) Warm targets to intercept lost ions, 40 W/m

Low duty cycle, from dc to very short bunches… …or how to make meatballs out of sausages! Radioactive ions are usually produced as a “dc” beam but synchrotrons can only accelerate bunched beams. For high energies, linacs are long and expensive, synchrotrons are cheaper and more efficient. The beta-beam team

Accumulation with Barrier buckets (no duty cycle) RF voltages (Barriers) Beam current Aachen, 2007 Beta-beam team

Activation We can probably live with it Pushing for higher intensities, it seems as an objective of 1019 neutrinos per year at the end of one straight section could be reachable considering activation issues. Studies of shielding and activation in the injectors in progress Studies confirm that the EURISOL objectives of 1018 neutrinos per year at the end of the straight section is OK

Radiation protection issues Radiation safety for staff making interventions and maintenance at the target, bunching stage, accelerators and decay ring 88% of 18Ne and 75% of 6He ions are lost between source and injection into the Decay ring Safe collimation of “lost” ions during stacking ~1 MJ beam energy/cycle injected, equivalent ion number to be removed, ~25 W/m average Magnet protection Dynamic vacuum First study (Magistris and Silari, 2002) shows that Tritium and Sodium production in the ground water around the decay ring should not be forgotten The beta-beam team

Production of beta-beam isotopes The Isotope Separation On-Line (ISOL) method at medium energy EURISOL type production, uses typically 0.1-2 GeV protons with up to 100-200 kW beam power through spallation, fission and fragmentation Direct production Uses low energy but high intensity ion beams on solid or gas targets. Production through compound nuclei which forms with high cross section at low energies Direct production enhanced with a storage ring Enhancing the efficiency of the direct production through re-circulation and re-acceleration of primary ions which doesn’t react in the first passage through the target. Possible thanks to ionization cooling! The beta-beam team

Intensities at source ISOL method at 1-2 GeV (200 kW) >1 1013 6He per second <8 1011 18Ne per second 8Li and 8B not studied Studied within EURISOL Direct production >1 1013 (?) 6He per second 1 1013 18Ne per second Studied at LLN, Soreq, WI and GANIL Production ring 1014 (?) 8Li >1013 (?) 8B 6He and 18Ne not studied Will be studied in EURONU DS 1 GeV p p n 2 3 8 U 1 F r + spallation L i X fragmentation 4 C s Y fission The beta-beam team

Direct production: 16O(3He,n)18Ne at LLN Production of 1012 18Ne in a MgO target: At 13 MeV, 17 mA of 3He At 14.8 MeV, 13 mA of 3He Producing 1013 18Ne could be possible with a beam power (at low energy) of 1 MW (or some 130 mA 3He beam). To keep the power density similar to LLN (today) the target has to be 60 cm in diameter. To be studied: Extraction efficiency Optimum energy Cooling of target unit High intensity and low energy ion linac High intensity ion source Thinn MgO target Water cooled target holder and beam dump Ion beam The beta-beam team

IFMIF

Particle turnover ~1 MJ beam energy/cycle injected  equivalent ion number to be removed ~25 W/m average Momentum collimation: ~5*1012 6He ions to be collimated per cycle Decay: ~5*1012 6Li ions to be removed per cycle per meter LHC project report 773 bb p-collimation merging decay losses injection Straight section Arc Momentum collimation The beta-beam team

Summary Target values for beta-beams? 6He as an example: Gamma=350 (SPS+, Br ≈ 3300) Requires in the order of 5 x1013/second out of source 1019 decays per year at the end of the straight section 75 W/m in decay losses In DR (3 times EURISOL) 40 W/m can be managed in LARP dipole 1/2 have to be collected between dipoles or/and better LARP collection system 0.1 in duty factor ≈A/Q: 6He=3, 18Ne=1.8, 8Li=2.7, 8B=1.6