Voltage-gated ion channels

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
X-ray structure of a voltage –dependent K + channel NATURE | VOL 423 | 1 MAY 2003 Youxing Jiang*, Alice Lee, Jiayun Chen, Vanessa Ruta, Martine Chait &
Advertisements

Voltage-Dependent Hydration and Conduction Properties of the Hydrophobic Pore of the Mechanosensitive Channel of Small Conductance  Steven A. Spronk,
Interaction between Extracellular Hanatoxin and the Resting Conformation of the Voltage-Sensor Paddle in Kv Channels  Hwa C Lee, Julia M Wang, Kenton.
The Pore Structure of the Closed RyR1 Channel
Functional Interactions at the Interface between Voltage-Sensing and Pore Domains in the Shaker Kv Channel  Gilberto J. Soler-Llavina, Tsg-Hui Chang,
Vishwanath Jogini, Benoît Roux  Biophysical Journal 
Conformational Change in an MFS Protein: MD Simulations of LacY
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Closing In on the Resting State of the Shaker K+ Channel
Sudha Chakrapani, Luis G. Cuello, D. Marien Cortes, Eduardo Perozo 
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 102, Issue 8, Pages (April 2012)
Common Principles of Voltage-Dependent Gating for Hv and Kv Channels
Dissecting the Actinoporin Pore-Forming Mechanism
Neurobiology: The acid test for resting potassium channels
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages (October 2008)
How Far Will You Go to Sense Voltage?
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Molecular biology of K+ channels and their role in cardiac arrhythmias1  Martin Tristani-Firouzi, MD, Jun Chen, MD, John S Mitcheson, PhD, Michael C Sanguinetti,
From Ionic Currents to Molecular Mechanisms
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Functional Interactions at the Interface between Voltage-Sensing and Pore Domains in the Shaker Kv Channel  Gilberto J. Soler-Llavina, Tsg-Hui Chang,
The Pore Structure of the Closed RyR1 Channel
Calcium channel structure and ligand binding sites.
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
How Does a Voltage Sensor Interact with a Lipid Bilayer
Sanguk Kim, Aaron K. Chamberlain, James U. Bowie  Biophysical Journal 
Closing In on the Resting State of the Shaker K+ Channel
Crystal Structures of a Ligand-free MthK Gating Ring: Insights into the Ligand Gating Mechanism of K+ Channels  Sheng Ye, Yang Li, Liping Chen, Youxing.
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (July 2010)
Common Principles of Voltage-Dependent Gating for Hv and Kv Channels
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 7-10 (May 1999)
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages L07-L09 (January 2007)
Marcos Sotomayor, Klaus Schulten  Biophysical Journal 
Zara A. Sands, Alessandro Grottesi, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Reconstructing Voltage Sensor–Pore Interaction from a Fluorescence Scan of a Voltage-Gated K+ Channel  Chris S Gandhi, Eli Loots, Ehud Y Isacoff  Neuron 
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Quickening the Pace Neuron
Energetics of Pore Opening in a Voltage-Gated K+ Channel
A Twist on Potassium Channel Gating
Coupled Motions between Pore and Voltage-Sensor Domains: A Model for Shaker B, a Voltage-Gated Potassium Channel  Werner Treptow, Bernard Maigret, Christophe.
Open-State Models of a Potassium Channel
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Crystal Structures of Human GlyRα3 Bound to Ivermectin
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Membrane Insertion of a Voltage Sensor Helix
Structural Biology: Piezo Senses Tension through Curvature
Symmetry, Selectivity, and the 2003 Nobel Prize
Calibrated Measurement of Gating-Charge Arginine Displacement in the KvAP Voltage- Dependent K+ Channel  Vanessa Ruta, Jiayun Chen, Roderick MacKinnon 
Interaction between Extracellular Hanatoxin and the Resting Conformation of the Voltage-Sensor Paddle in Kv Channels  Hwa C Lee, Julia M Wang, Kenton.
Sebastian Fritsch, Ivaylo Ivanov, Hailong Wang, Xiaolin Cheng 
Extent of Voltage Sensor Movement during Gating of Shaker K+ Channels
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Yinon Shafrir, Stewart R. Durell, H. Robert Guy  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
The NorM MATE Transporter from N
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Voltage-gated ion channels Zara Sands, Alessandro Grottesi, Mark S.P. Sansom  Current Biology  Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages R44-R47 (January 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.050

Figure 1 (A) The transmembrane topology of a Kv channel subunit, showing the voltage sensor and pore domains. The intact channel is made up of four such subunits. The intracellular (IC) and extracellular (EC) faces of the membrane are labeled. (B) Structure of the voltage sensor domain of the bacterial voltage-gated channel KvAP (PDB code 1ORS), with the S4 helix in deep blue, and helices S1 to S3 in pale blue. (C) Structure of the pore domain from KvAP (PDB code 1ORQ), with the P helix and filter in cyan, and the S6 helix in green. Current Biology 2005 15, R44-R47DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.050)

Figure 2 (A) Models of the Shaker Kv pore domain, the closed conformation model being based on the structure of KcsA, and the open conformation based on KvAP. In both cases, for clarity only two subunits of the core pore-forming domain (S5–P–S6) are shown. The surface lining the pore is shown, and the region of the hydrophobic cytoplasmic gate is indicated for the closed state model. (B) Comparison of the pore-lining helices from the X-ray structures of KcsA (blue, M2 helix, pore closed), KirBac1.1 (cyan, M2 helix, pore closed), MthK (red , M2 helix, pore open), and KvAP (purple, S6 helix, pore open). (C) Comparison of structures of the S6 helix taken from the start (blue) and end (red) of a molecular dynamics simulation of the Shaker Kv channel [11]. In both B and C, the amino-terminal halves – before the molecular hinge – of the helices are used for their superimposition, and the approximate locations of the molecular hinges are indicated by arrows. Current Biology 2005 15, R44-R47DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.050)

Figure 3 Crystal structure of the KvAP voltage sensor (PDB code 1ORS). Helices S1 to S3 are shown in pale blue, and helix S4 is shown in deep blue, with the putative hinge region [7] in red. The sidechains of the positively charged arginine residues of S4 that sense the change in voltage are shown in dark blue stick format. Current Biology 2005 15, R44-R47DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.050)

Figure 4 Three models of the organization of the voltage sensor domain (blue) relative to the pore domain (green) in Kv channels. The S4 helix is shown in deep blue, and for clarity only two of the four subunits are shown. In the canonical model (top), the S4 helix is sandwiched between the pore domain and the S1–S3 helices of the voltage sensor domain. Thus the S4 helix is not exposed to the surrounding lipid bilayer (gray). Upon activation of the channel the S4 helix is thought to twist and translate relative to the remainder of the protein, as indicated by the arrows. In the paddle model (middle), the S4 helix is on the exterior surface of the channel, fully exposed to the lipid bilayer. The arrow shows the presumed direction of movement of the voltage sensor domain upon channel activation. In the twisted S4 model (bottom), the S4 helix is on the surface of the protein. However, the hinge region in the middle of S4 allows the two helical segments to be twisted relative to one another so that the arginine sidechains are not exposed to the surrounding lipid bilayer. Current Biology 2005 15, R44-R47DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.050)