1. Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages 404-411 (February 2010)
Ion Conduction in Ligand-Gated Ion Channels: Brownian Dynamics Studies of Four Recent Crystal Structures 
Chen Song, Ben Corry 
Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
DOI: /j.bpj
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
Side (a) and top (b) views of the crystal structure of GLIC2. Protein subunits are individually colored, and the transmembrane (TM) and extracellular (EC) domains are noted.
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
Pore radius for each crystal structure as a function of position along the channel axis.
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
The α2 helices forming the pore of the TM-domain for (a) ELIC, (b) GLIC1, (c) GLIC1M, and (d) GLIC2. The front subunit is removed for clarity. The protein is colored according to the residue type: nonpolar in white, polar in green (online) or gray (print), basic in blue (online) or dark (print), and acidic in red (online) or dark (print). The constricted regions of the pore are marked with a dashed ellipse.
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 4
I/V curves of the four crystal structures in 300 mM NaCl solution: (circles) for ELIC, (dotted line with squares) for GLIC1, (dashed line with diamond) for GLIC1M, and (solid line with triangles) for GLIC2. The error bars are smaller than the size of the symbols, and therefore not shown here.
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

6. Figure 5
Na+ (solid blue) and Cl− (dashed red) distribution in the (a) ELIC, (b) GLIC1, (c) GLIC1M, and (d) GLIC2 channel interior. The location of Cl− in the EC domain of GLIC2 is highlighted by the arrow.
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

7. Figure 6
I/V curves for GLIC2 in 140 mM NaCl solution (solid line with circles), and for TM-domain alone for GLIC2 in 300 mM NaCl solution (dashed line with squares). The I/V curve for GLIC2 in 300 mM NaCl solution is also shown with the dotted line for comparison.
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

8. Figure 7
The effect of E221 charge on the channel conductance and selectivity. (circles) Conductance of GLIC2 under 295 mV potential in 300 mM NaCl solution (right-hand axis). (squares) Conductance of GLIC2 under −295 mV potential. (Left-hand axis, triangles) Ratio of the numbers of Cl− and Na+ that conducted through the channel.
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

9. Figure 8
(a) A typical snapshot of ion distribution in GLIC2. The front subunit is removed for clarity. Na+ is shown with yellow spheres, Cl− is shown with pink spheres, and the protein is colored according to the residue types as in Fig. 3. (b) The z coordinates of all the Na+ residing from z = −60 to z = 10 Å at simulation time between 11 ns and 13 ns, drawn with black circles. The motions of the three ions that involved in the conduction event are marked with colored lines, in red, green, and blue, respectively.
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions